期刊首页 优先出版 当期阅读 过刊浏览 作者中心 关于期刊 English

《工程(英文)》 >> 2017年 第3卷 第4期 doi: 10.1016/J.ENG.2017.04.014

碳捕集和封存技术研究开发及未来清洁能源行业部署—— 澳大利亚在过去20年中的经验教训

CO2CRC Ltd. & Peter Cook Centre for Carbon Capture and Storage Research, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia

录用日期: 2017-05-18 发布日期: 2017-08-30

下一篇 上一篇

摘要

碳捕集和封存(CCS)技术作为一种碳减排手段,虽未得到全方位认可,但其重要性已得到人们的广泛认可。但是,若要将全球温度上升幅度控制在低于2℃,则此技术的推广应用速度并不能满足相关的需求。虽然大规模推广CCS 技术所面临的困难尚无法全部克服,但通过不断的研究、交流和规划,目前CCS 技术已得到了极大丰富。我们知道如何进行相关操作,并自信能安全有效地完成相关操作;我们知道相关的成本情况,也知道目前成本正在不断降低,而且未来会继续降低。同时,我们也知道,只要各个国家、公司、团体继续将化石燃料用作能源及用于各种工业过程,则世界就会一直需要碳捕集和封存技术。我们缺少的是必要的政策驱动和技术上呈中性(不会增加二氧化碳排放)的方法,以达到及时、低成本地降低CO2 排放,并维持稳定的、安全的电力供应以保证能源密集型工业产品的生产和使用。我们以澳大利亚为例来说明过去20 年内人们对碳捕集和封存技术所做的各种努力,尤其是在碳捕集和封存技术研究和示范工程以及国际合作方面所做的各种努力。在澳大利亚国内,碳捕集和封存技术的大规模推广进展非常慢。但全球最大的碳捕集和封存项目将作为Gorgon 液化天然气项目的一部分,很快在澳大利亚国内投入运营,另外还有数个大规模的碳捕集和封存的旗舰级项目正在考察中。CO2CRC Otway 项目是澳大利亚国内目前唯一一个运行中的二氧化碳封存项目。该项目目前正在进行一些细节方面的组织和推进工作。需要指出的是,如果要推广Otway 项目,还需对地下岩石对封存CO2 的影响开展大量研究。如果要在全球范围广泛使用碳捕集和封存技术,国际能源机构和国际气候变化委员会等机构都认为我们面临很大的挑战,还有很多重大问题需要解决。要解决这些问题,全球各方必须紧密协作。

图片

图1

图2

图3

参考文献

[ 1 ] International Energy Agency. 20 years of carbon capture and storage: Accelerating future deployment.Paris: International Energy Agency; 2016.

[ 2 ] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Metz B, Davidson O, de Coninck HC, Loos M, Meyer LA, editors. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2005.

[ 3 ] Finkel A, Moses K, Munro C, Effeney T, O’Kane M. Independent review into the future security of the National Electricity Market: Blueprint for the future.Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2017 Jun.

[ 4 ] Bongers G,Byrom S, Constable T. Retrofitting CCS to coal: Enhancing Australia’s energy security.Melbourne: CO2CRC Ltd.; 2017.

[ 5 ] Hooper B. Submissions to the independent review into the future security of the National Electricity Market. 2017. Available from: http://www.environment.gov.au/energy/national-electricity-market-review/submissions.

[ 6 ] Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. Australian power generation technology report.Melbourne: CO2CRC Limited; 2016.

[ 7 ] Chambers M. Gas carbon capture “cheaper” than wind and solar, experts say [Internet].Sydney: The Australian; 2017 Feb 20. Available from: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/mining-energy/gas-carbon-capture-cheaper-than-wind-and-solar-experts-say/news-story/0d1a7971f3dc872192ab28baccacb1f6.

[ 8 ] Cook PJ, Rigg A, Bradshaw J. Putting it back where it came from: Is geological disposal of carbon dioxide an option for Australia? APPEA J 2000;40(1):654–66 链接1

[ 9 ] Mac Dowell N, Fennell PS, Shah N, Maitland GC. The role of CO2 capture and utilization in mitigating climate change. Nat Clim Change 2017;7(4):243–9 链接1

[10] Pour N, Webley PA, Cook PJ. A sustainability framework for bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) technologies. Energy Procedia 2017. In press 链接1

[11] Cook PJ, Causebrook R, Gale J, Michel K, Watson M. What have we learned from small-scale injection projects? Energy Procedia 2014;63:6129–40 链接1

[12] Jenkins CR, Cook PJ, Ennis-King J, Undershultz J, Boreham C, Dance T, et al.Safe storage and effective monitoring of CO2 in depleted gas fields. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109(2):E35–41 链接1

[13] Stalker L, Boreham C, Underschultz J, Freifeld B, Perkins E, Schacht U, et al.Geochemical monitoring at the CO2CRC Otway Project: Tracer injection and reservoir fluid acquisition. Energy Procedia 2009;1(1):2119–25 链接1

[14] Underschultz J, Boreham C, Dance T, Stalker L, Freifeld B, Kirste D, et al.CO2 storage in a depleted gas field: An overview of the CO2CRC Otway Project and initial results. Int J Greenh Gas Con 2011;5(4):922–32 链接1

[15] Cook PJ, editor. Geologically storing carbon: Learning from the Otway Project experience.Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing; 2014.

[16] Bunch M, Daniel R, Lawrence M, Browne G, Menacherry S, Dance T, et al.Multi-scale characterisation of the Paaratte Formation, Otway Basin, for CO2 injection and storage. APPEA J 2012;52(2):664 链接1

[17] Haese RR, LaForce T, Boreham C, Ennis-King J, Freifeld BM, Paterson L, et al.Determining residual CO2 saturation through a dissolution test—Results from the CO2CRC Otway Project. Energy Procedia 2013;37:5379–86 链接1

[18] Paterson L, Boreham C, Bunch M, Dance T, Ennis-King J, Freifeld B, et al.Overview of the CO2CRC Otway residual saturation and dissolution test. Energy Procedia 2013;37:6140–8 链接1

[19] Paterson L, Boreham C, Bunch M, Dance T, Ennis-King J, Freifeld B, et al.CO2CRC Otway Stage 2B residual saturation and dissolution test. In: Cook PJ, editor Geologically storing carbon: Learning from the Otway Project experience. Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing; 2014. p. 329–60.

[20] Pevzner R, Urosevic M, Caspari E, Galvin RJ, Madadi M, Dance T, et al.Feasibility of time-lapse seismic methodology for monitoring the injection of small quantities of CO2 into a saline formation, CO2CRC Otway Project. Energy Procedia 2013;37:4336–43 链接1

[21] Pevzner R, Caspari E, Gurevich B, Dance T, Cinar Y. Feasibility of CO2 plume detection using 4D seismic: CO2CRC Otway Project case study—Part 2: Detectability analysis. Geophysics 2015;80(4):B105–14 链接1

[22] Shulakova V, Pevzner R, Dupuis JC, Urosevic M, Tertyshnikov K, Lumley DE, et al.Burying receivers for improved time-lapse seismic repeatability: CO2CRC Otway field experiment. Geophys Prospect 2015;63(1):55–69 链接1

[23] Boston A, Bongers G, Byrom S. Balancing flexibility whilst decarbonising electricity on the NEM.Canberra: Australian National Low Emissions Coal Research & Development; 2017.

相关研究