[ 1 ] Imbens GW, Rubin DB. Causal inference for statistics, social, and biomedical sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2015. 链接1

[ 2 ] Bang H, Robins JM. Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models. Biometrics 2005;61(4):962–73. 链接1

[ 3 ] Kuang K, Cui P, Li B, Jiang M, Yang S, Wang F. Treatment effect estimation with data-driven variable decomposition. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence; 2017 Feb 4–9; San Francisco, CA, USA; 2017. 链接1

[ 4 ] Athey S, Imbens GW, Wager S. Approximate residual balancing: debiased inference of average treatment effects in high dimensions. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Stat Methodol) 2018;80(4):597–623. 链接1

[ 5 ] Kuang K, Cui P, Li B, Jiang M, Yang S. Estimating treatment effect in the wild via differentiated confounder balancing. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining; 2017 Aug 13–17; Halifax, NS, Canada; 2017. p. 265–74.

[ 6 ] Imai K, Van Dyk DA. Causal inference with general treatment regimes: generalizing the propensity score. J Am Stat Assoc 2004;99(467):854–66. 链接1

[ 7 ] Egami N, Imai K. Causal interaction in factorial experiments: application to conjoint analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 2019;114(526):529–40. 链接1

[ 8 ] Louizos C, Shalit U, Mooij JM, Sontag D, Zemel R, Welling M. Causal effect inference with deep latent-variable models. In: Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30; 2017 Dec 4–9; Long Beach, CA, USA; 2017. p. 6446–56. 链接1

[ 9 ] Crump RK, Hotz VJ, Imbens GW, Mitnik OA. Dealing with limited overlap in estimation of average treatment effects. Biometrika 2009;96(1):187–99. 链接1

[10] Li F, Thomas LE, Li F. Addressing extreme propensity scores via the overlap weights. Am J Epidemiol 2019;188(1):250–7. 链接1

[11] Kuang K, Cui P, Athey S, Xiong R, Li B. Stable prediction across unknown environments. In: Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining; 2018 Aug 19–23; London, UK; 2018. p. 1617–26. 链接1

[12] Zhuang Y, Wu F, Chen C, Pan Y. Challenges and opportunities from big data to knowledge in AI 2.0. Front Inf Technol Elec Eng 2017;18(1):3–14. 链接1

[13] Pan Y. 2018 special issue on artificial intelligence 2.0: theories and applications. Front Inf Technol Elec Eng 2018;19(1):1–2. 链接1

[14] Hoerl C, McCormack T, Beck SR, editors. Understanding counterfactuals, understanding causation: issues in philosophy and psychology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011. 链接1

[15] Pearl J, Glymour M, Jewell NP. Causal inference in statistics: a primer. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2016. 链接1

[16] Daniel RM, De Stavola BL, Vansteelandt S. Commentary: the formal approach to quantitative causal inference in epidemiology: misguided or misrepresented? Int J Epidemiol 2016;45(6):1817–29. 链接1

[17] Pearl J. Causal and counterfactual inference. Forthcoming section in the handbook of rationality. Cambridge: MIT press; 2018. 链接1

[18] Goldfeld K. Considering sensitivity to unmeasured confounding: part 1 [Internet]. New York: Keith Golgfeld; 2019 Jan 2 [cited 2019 Jun 1]. Available from: https://www.rdatagen.net/post/what-does-it-mean-if-findings-aresensitive-to-unmeasured-confounding/. 链接1

[19] Yule GU. Notes on the theory of association of attributes in statistics. Biometrika 1903;2(2):121–34. 链接1

[20] Simpson EH. The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables. J R Stat Soc B 1951;13(2):238–41. 链接1

[21] Chen H, Geng Z, Jia J. Criteria for surrogate end points. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 2007;69(5):919–32. 链接1

[22] Geng Z, Liu Y, Liu C, Miao W. Evaluation of causal effects and local structure learning of causal networks. Annu Rev Stat Appl 2019;6(1):103–24. 链接1

[23] Pearl J. Is scientific knowledge useful for policy analysis? A peculiar theorem says: no. J Causal Infer 2014;2(1):109–12. 链接1

[24] Fleming TR, DeMets DL. Surrogate end points in clinical trials: are we being misled? Ann Intern Med 1996;125(7):605–13. 链接1

[25] Xu L, Pearl J. Structuring causal tree models with continuous variables. In: Proceedings of the Third Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. Arlington: AUAI Press; 1987. p. 170–9.

[26] Xu L. Deep bidirectional intelligence: alphazero, deep IA-search, deep IAinfer, and TPC causal learning. Appl Inf 2018;5(1):5. 链接1

[27] Xu L. Machine learning and causal analyses for modeling financial and economic data. Appl Inf 2018;5(1):11. 链接1

[28] Spirtes P, Glymour C, Scheines R. Causation, prediction, and search. 2nd ed. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2001. 链接1

[29] Pearl J. Causality: models, reasoning, and inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000. 链接1

[30] Spirtes P, Zhang K. Causal discovery and inference: concepts and recent methodological advances. Appl Inform 2016;3(1):3. 链接1

[31] Shimizu S, Hoyer PO, Hyvärinen A, Kerminen A. A linear non-gaussian acyclic model for causal discovery. J Mach Learn Res 2006;7:2003–30. 链接1

[32] Zhang K, Hyvärinen A. On the identifiability of the post-nonlinear causal model. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence; 2009 Jun 18–21; Montreal, QC, Canada. Arlington: AUAI Press; 2019. p. 647–55. 链接1

[33] Hoyer PO, Janzing D, Mooij JM, Peters J, Scholkopf B. Nonlinear causal discovery with additive noise models. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems; 2008 Dec 8–13; Vancouver, BC, Canada; 2008. p. 689–96. 链接1

[34] Zhang K, Hyvärinen A. Causality discovery with additive disturbances: an information-theoretical perspective. In: Buntine W, Grobelnik M, Mladenic´ D, Shawe-Taylor J, editors. Machine learning and knowledge discovery in databases. Berlin: Springer; 2009. p. 570–85. 链接1

[35] Zhang K, Schölkopf B, Muandet K, Wang Z. Domain adaptation under target and conditional shift. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Machine Learning; 2013 Jun 16–21; Atlanta, GA, USA; 2013. p. 819–27. 链接1

[36] Baroni P, Gabbay DM, Giacomin M, Van der Torre L. Handbook of formal argumentation. London: College Publications; 2018. 链接1

[37] Osborne J. Arguing to learn in science: the role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science 2010;328(5977):463–6. 链接1

[38] Shoham Y. Nonmonotonic reasoning and causation. Cogn Sci 1990;14 (2):213–52. 链接1

[39] Liao B, Jin L, Koons RC. Dynamics of argumentation systems: a division-based method. Artif Intell 2011;175(11):1790–814. 链接1

[40] Sklar EI, Azhar MQ. Explanation through argumentation. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human–Agent Interaction; 2018 Dec 15– 18; Southampton, UK; 2018. p. 277–85. 链接1

[41] Fazzinga B, Flesca S, Furfaro F. Complexity of fundamental problems in probabilistic abstract argumentation: beyond independence. Artif Intell 2019;268:1–29. 链接1

[42] Pearl J. On a class of bias-amplifying variables that endanger effect estimates. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence; 2010 Jul 8–11; Catalina Island, CA, USA; 2000. p. 425–32. 链接1

[43] Kempthorne O. The design and analysis of experiments. New York: Wiley; 1952. 链接1

[44] Scheffe H. The analysis of variance. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1959. 链接1

[45] Hinkelmann K, Kempthorne O. Design and analysis of experiments: volume 1: introduction to experimental design. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2007. 链接1

[46] Imbens GW, Rubin DB. Causal inference for statistics, social, and biomedical sciences: an introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2015. 链接1

[47] Splawa-Neyman J. On the application of probability theory to agricultural experiments: essay on principles. Section 9. Stat Sci 1990;5(4):465–72. 链接1

[48] Ding P, Dasgupta T. A randomization-based perspective on analysis of variance: a test statistic robust to treatment effect heterogeneity. Biometrika 2018;105(1):45–56. 链接1

[49] Dasgupta T, Pillai NS, Rubin DB. Causal inference from 2K factorial designs by using potential outcomes. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 2015;77 (4):727–53. 链接1

[50] Wu J, Ding P. Randomization tests for weak null hypotheses. 2018. arXiv:1809.07419.

[51] Miratrix LW, Sekhon JS, Yu B. Adjusting treatment effect estimates by poststratification in randomized experiments. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 2013;75(2):369–96. 链接1

[52] Li X, Ding P, Lin Q, Yang D, Liu JS. Randomization inference for peer effects. J Am Stat Assoc 2019:1–31. 链接1

[53] Li X, Ding P. General forms of finite population central limit theorems with applications to causal inference. J Am Stat Assoc 2017;112(520):1759–69. 链接1

[54] Zhao A, Ding P, Mukerjee R, Dasgupta T. Randomization-based causal inference from split-plot designs. Ann Stat 2018;46(5):1876–903. 链接1

[55] Mukerjee R, Dasgupta T, Rubin DB. Using standard tools from finite population sampling to improve causal inference for complex experiments. J Am Stat Assoc 2018;113(522):868–81. 链接1

[56] Fisher R. Statistical methods for research workers. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd; 1925. 链接1

[57] Freedman DA. On regression adjustments to experimental data. Adv Appl Math 2008;40(2):180–93. 链接1

[58] Lin W. Agnostic notes on regression adjustments to experimental data: reexamining Freedman’s critique. Ann Appl Stat 2013;7(1):295–318. 链接1

[59] Eicker F. Limit theorems for regressions with unequal and dependent errors. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability; 1967 Jun 21–Jul 18; Berkeley, CA, USA. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1967. p. 59–82. 链接1

[60] Huber PJ. The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability; 1967 Jun 21–Jul 18; Berkeley, CA, USA; Berkeley: University of California Press; 1967. p. 221–33. 链接1

[61] White H. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 1980;48(4):817–38. 链接1

[62] Bloniarz A, Liu H, Zhang CH, Sekhon JS, Yu B. Lasso adjustments of treatment effect estimates in randomized experiments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2016;113(27):7383–90. 链接1

[63] Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 1996;58(1):267–88. 链接1

[64] Lei L, Ding P. Regression adjustment in completely randomized experiments with a diverging number of covariates. 2018. arXiv:1806.07585.

[65] Ding P, Feller A, Miratrix L. Decomposing treatment effect variation. J Am Stat Assoc 2019;114(525):304–17. 链接1

[66] Lu J. Covariate adjustment in randomization-based causal inference for 2K factorial designs. Stat Probab Lett 2016;119:11–20. 链接1

[67] Middleton JA. A unified theory of regression adjustment for design-based inference. 2018. arXiv:1803.06011.

[68] Cox DR. Randomization and concomitant variables in the design of experiments. In: Anderson TW, Styan GHP, Kallianpur GG, Krishnaiah PR, Ghosh JK, editors. Statistics and probability: essays in honor of CR Rao. Amsterdam: North-Holland; 1982. p. 197–202. 链接1

[69] Morgan KL, Rubin DB. Rerandomization to improve covariate balance in experiments. Ann Stat 2012;40(2):1263–82. 链接1

[70] Li X, Ding P, Rubin DB. Asymptotic theory of rerandomization in treatmentcontrol experiments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2018;115(37):9157–62. 链接1

[71] Morgan KL, Rubin DB. Rerandomization to balance tiers of covariates. J Am Stat Assoc 2015;110(512):1412–21. 链接1

[72] Branson Z, Dasgupta T, Rubin DB. Improving covariate balance in 2K factorial designs via rerandomization with an application to a New York City department of education high school study. Ann Appl Stat 2016;10 (4):1958–76. 链接1

[73] Li X, Ding P, Rubin DB. Rerandomization in 2K factorial experiments. 2018. arXiv:1812.10911.

[74] Zhou Q, Ernst PA, Morgan KL, Rubin DB, Zhang A. Sequential rerandomization. Biometrika 2018;105(3):745–52. 链接1

[75] Fisher RA. The design of experiments. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd; 1935. 链接1

[76] Rubin DB. Comment on ‘‘randomization analysis of experimental data: the Fisher randomization test”. J Am Stat Assoc 1980;75(371):591–3. 链接1

[77] Tukey JW. Tightening the clinical trial. Control Clin Trials 1993;14(4):266–85. 链接1

[78] Rosenbaum PR. Covariance adjustment in randomized experiments and observational studies. Stat Sci 2002;17(3):286–327. 链接1

[79] Aronow PM. A general method for detecting interference between units in randomized experiments. Sociol Methods Res 2012;41(1):3–16. 链接1

[80] Athey S, Eckles D, Imbens GW. Exact p-values for network interference. J Am Stat Assoc 2018;113(521):230–40. 链接1

[81] Basse G, Feller A, Toulis P. Exact tests for two-stage randomized designs in the presence of interference. 2017. arXiv:1709.08036.

[82] Ding P. A paradox from randomization-based causal inference. Stat Sci 2017;32(3):331–45. 链接1

[83] Rosenbaum PR. Exact confidence intervals for nonconstant effects by inverting the signed rank test. Am Stat 2003;57(2):132–8. 链接1

[84] Rigdon J, Hudgens MG. Randomization inference for treatment effects on a binary outcome. Stat Med 2015;34(6):924–35. 链接1

[85] Li X, Ding P. Exact confidence intervals for the average causal effect on a binary outcome. Stat Med 2016;35(6):957–60. 链接1

[86] Ding P, Li F. Causal inference: a missing data perspective. Stat Sci 2018;33 (2):214–37. 链接1

[87] Greenland S, Robins JM, Pearl J. Confounding and collapsibility in causal inference. Stat. Sci 1999;14:29–46. 链接1

[88] Greenland S, Pearl J. Adjustments and their consequences—collapsibility analysis using graphical models. Int Stat Rev 2011;79(3):401–26. 链接1

[89] Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 1983;70(1):41–55. 链接1

[90] Horvitz DG, Thompson DJ. A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe. J Am Stat Assoc 1952;47(260):663–85. 链接1

[91] Wright PG. Tariff on animal and vegetable oils. New York: Macmillan; 1928. 链接1

[92] Heckman J. Instrumental variables: a study of implicit behavioral assumptions used in making program evaluations. J Hum Resour 1997;32 (3):441–62. 链接1

[93] Manski CF. Nonparametric bounds on treatment effects. Am Econ Rev 1990;80(2):319–23. 链接1

[94] Balke A, Pearl J. Bounds on treatment effects from studies with imperfect compliance. J Am Stat Assoc 1997;92(439):1171–6. 链接1

[95] Goldberger AS. Structural equation methods in the social sciences. Econometrica 1972;40(6):979–1001. 链接1

[96] Robins JM. Correcting for non-compliance in randomized trials using structural nested mean models. Commun Stat Theory Method 1994;23 (8):2379–412. 链接1

[97] Hernán MA, Robins JM. Causal inference. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall; 2011. 链接1

[98] Angrist JD, Imbens GW, Rubin DB. Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. J Am Stat Assoc 1996;91(434):444–55. 链接1

[99] Lin W, Feng R, Li H. Regularization methods for high-dimensional instrumental variables regression with an application to genetical genomics. J Am Stat Assoc 2015;110(509):270–88. 链接1

[100] Kang H, Zhang A, Cai TT, Small DS. Instrumental variables estimation with some invalid instruments and its application to mendelian randomization. J Am Stat Assoc 2016;111(513):132–44. 链接1

[101] Wang L, Robins JM, Richardson TS. On falsification of the binary instrumental variable model. Biometrika 2017;104(1):229–36. 链接1

[102] Manski CF, Pepper JV. Monotone instrumental variables: with an application to the returns to schooling. Econometrica 2000;68(4):997–1010. 链接1

[103] Small DS. Sensitivity analysis for instrumental variables regression with overidentifying restrictions. J Am Stat Assoc 2007;102(479):1049–58. 链接1

[104] Miao W, Geng Z, Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ. Identifying causal effects with proxy variables of an unmeasured confounder. Biometrika 2018;105(4):987–93. 链接1

[105] Miao W, Tchetgen Tchetgen E. Invited commentary: bias attenuation and identification of causal effects with multiple negative controls. Am J Epidemiol 2017;185(10):950–3. 链接1

[106] Miao W, Tchetgen ET. A confounding cridge approach for couble negative control inference on causal effects. 2018. arXiv:1808.04945.

[107] Lipsitch M, Tchetgen Tchetgen E, Cohen T. Negative controls: a tool for detecting confounding and bias in observational studies. Epidemiology 2010;21(3):383–8. 链接1

[108] Smith GD. Negative control exposures in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiology 2012;23(2):350–1. 链接1

[109] Flanders WD, Strickland MJ, Klein M. A new method for partial correction of residual confounding in time-series and other observational studies. Am J Epidemiol 2017;185(10):941–9. 链接1

[110] Rosenbaum PR. The role of known effects in observational studies. Biometrics 1989;45(2):557–69. 链接1

[111] Wang J, Zhao Q, Hastie T, Owen AB. Confounder adjustment in multiple hypothesis testing. Ann Stat 2017;45(5):1863–94. 链接1

[112] Gagnon-Bartsch JA, Speed TP. Using control genes to correct for unwanted variation in microarray data. Biostatistics 2012;13(3):539–52. 链接1

[113] Hong G, Raudenbush SW. Evaluating kindergarten retention policy: a case study of causal inference for multilevel observational data. J Am Stat Assoc 2006;101(475):901–10. 链接1

[114] Sobel ME. What do randomized studies of housing mobility demonstrate? Causal inference in the face of interference. J Am Stat Assoc 2006;101 (476):1398–407. 链接1

[115] Halloran ME, Struchiner CJ. Causal inference in infectious diseases. Epidemiology 1995;6(2):142–51. 链接1

[116] Halloran ME, Struchiner CJ. Study designs for dependent happenings. Epidemiology 1991;2(5):331–8. 链接1

[117] Halloran ME, Hudgens MG. Dependent happenings: a recent methodological review. Curr Epidemiol Rep 2016;3(4):297–305. 链接1

[118] Hudgens MG, Halloran ME. Toward causal inference with interference. J Am Stat Assoc 2008;103(482):832–42. 链接1

[119] Basse G, Feller A. Analyzing two-stage experiments in the presence of interference. J Am Stat Assoc 2018;113(521):41–55. 链接1

[120] Forastiere L, Mealli F, VanderWeele TJ. Identification and estimation of causal mechanisms in clustered encouragement designs: disentangling bed nets using bayesian principal stratification. J Am Stat Assoc 2016;111 (514):510–25. 链接1

[121] Kang H, Imbens G. Peer encouragement designs in causal inference with partial interference and identification of local average network effects. 2016. arXiv:1609.04464.

[122] Rigdon J, Hudgens MG. Exact confidence intervals in the presence of interference. Stat Probab Lett 2015;105:130–5. 链接1

[123] Aronow PM, Samii C. Estimating average causal effects under interference between units. 2018. arXiv:1305.6156v4.

[124] Aronow PM, Samii C. Estimating average causal effects under general interference, with application to a social network experiment. Ann Appl Stat 2017;11(4):1912–47. 链接1

[125] Choi D. Estimation of monotone treatment effects in network experiments. J Am Stat Assoc 2017;112(519):1147–55. 链接1

[126] Forastiere L, Airoldi EM, Mealli F. Identification and estimation of treatment and interference effects in observational studies on networks. 2016. arXiv:1609.06245.

[127] Eckles D, Karrer B, Ugander J. Design and analysis of experiments in networks: reducing bias from interference. J Causal Inference 2017;5(1): 1–23. 链接1

[128] Eckles D, Kizilcec RF, Bakshy E. Estimating peer effects in networks with peer encouragement designs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2016;113(27):7316–22. 链接1

[129] Jagadeesan R, Pillai N, Volfovsky A. Designs for estimating the treatment effect in networks with interference. 2017. arXiv:1705.08524.

[130] Bowers J, Fredrickson MM, Panagopoulos C. Reasoning about interference between units: a general framework. Polit Anal 2013;21(1):97–124. 链接1

[131] Toulis P, Kao E. Estimation of causal peer influence effects. In: Proceedings of 30th International Conference on Machine Learning; 2013 Jun 16–21; Atlanta, GA, USA; 2013. p. 1489–97. 链接1

[132] Basse GW, Feller A, Toulis P. Randomization tests of causal effects under interference. Biometrika 2019;106(2):487–94. 链接1

[133] Sävje F, Aronow PM, Hudgens MG. Average treatment effects in the presence of unknown interference. 2017. arXiv:1711.06399.

[134] Liu L, Hudgens MG. Large sample randomization inference of causal effects in the presence of interference. J Am Stat Assoc 2014;109(505):288–301. 链接1

[135] Imai K, Jiang Z, Malani A. Causal inference with interference and noncompliance in two-stage randomized experiments. Technical report. Princeton: Princeton University; 2018. 链接1

[136] Kang H, Keele L. Spillover effects in cluster randomized trials with noncompliance. 2018. arXiv:1808.06418.

[137] Loh WW, Hudgens MG, Clemens JD, Ali M, Emch ME. Randomization inference with general interference and censoring. 2018. arXiv:1803.02302.

[138] Vanderweele TJ, Hong G, Jones SM, Brown JL. Mediation and spillover effects in group-randomized trials: a case study of the 4Rs educational intervention. J Am Stat Assoc 2013;108(502):469–82. 链接1