2016, Volume 2, Issue 1
Engineering >> 2016, Volume 2, Issue 1 doi: 10.1016/J.ENG.2016.01.024
The Traveling Wave Reactor: Design and Development
TerraPower LLC, Bellevue, WA 98005, USA
Next Previous
Abstract
The traveling wave reactor (TWR) is a once-through reactor that uses in situ breeding to greatly reduce the need for enrichment and reprocessing. Breeding converts incoming subcritical reload fuel into new critical fuel, allowing a breed-burn wave to propagate. The concept works on the basis that breed-burn waves and the fuel move relative to one another. Thus either the fuel or the waves may move relative to the stationary observer. The most practical embodiments of the TWR involve moving the fuel while keeping the nuclear reactions in one place−sometimes referred to as the standing wave reactor (SWR). TWRs can operate with uranium reload fuels including totally depleted uranium, natural uranium, and low-enriched fuel (e.g., 5.5% 235U and below), which ordinarily would not be critical in a fast spectrum. Spent light water reactor (LWR) fuel may also serve as TWR reload fuel. In each of these cases, very efficient fuel usage and significant reduction of waste volumes are achieved without the need for reprocessing. The ultimate advantages of the TWR are realized when the reload fuel is depleted uranium, where after the startup period, no enrichment facilities are needed to sustain the first reactor and a chain of successor reactors. TerraPower’s conceptual and engineering design and associated technology development activities have been underway since late 2006, with over 50 institutions working in a highly coordinated effort to place the first unit in operation by 2026. This paper summarizes the TWR technology: its development program, its progress, and an analysis of its social and economic benefits.
Keywords
Nuclear energy ; Electricity generation ; Advanced reactor ; Traveling wave reactor ; Sustainability
Figures
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
References
[ 1 ] Asafu-Adjaya J, Blomqvist L, Brand S, Brook B, DeFries R, Ellis E, An ecomodernist manifesto [Internet]. 2015[cited 2015Oct28]. Available from: http://www.ecomodernism.org/.
[ 2 ] Hejzlar P, Petroski R, Cheatham J, Touran N, Cohen M, Truong B, TerraPower, LLC traveling wave reactor development program overview. Nucl Eng Technol 2013; 45(6): 731−44. link1
[ 3 ] Chen SK, Petroski R, Todreas NE. Numerical implementation of the Cheng and Todreas correlation for wire wrapped bundle friction factors-desirable improvements in the transition flow region. Nucl Eng Des 2013; 263: 406−10. link1
[ 4 ] Mikityuk K. Heat transfer to liquid metal: review of data and correlations for tube bundles. Nucl Eng Des 2009; 239(4): 680−7. link1
[ 5 ] Engel FC, Minushkin B, Atkins RJ, Markley RA. Characterization of heat transfer and temperature distributions in an electrically heated model of an LMFBR blanket assembly. Nucl Eng Des 1980; 62(1−3): 335−47. link1
[ 6 ] Miller SJ, Latta R. Fuel performance modeling of traveling wave reactor fuel elements [poster session]. In: Materials Modeling and Simulation for Nuclear Fuels 2013 Workshop; 2013Oct14−16; Chicago, IL, USA; 2013.
[ 7 ] Cohen M, Werner M, Johns C. Mechanical model of a TerraPower, traveling wave reactor fuel assembly duct. In: 22nd International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology; 2013Aug18−23; San Francisco, CA, USA. Red Hook: Curran Associates, Inc.; 2014.
[ 8 ] Bates E, Truong B, Huddar L. Phase II of the EBR-II SHRT-45R benchmark study−TerraPower’s SAS4A/SASSYS-1 results. In: Proceedings of 2016 Advances in Reactor Physics−Linking Research, Industry, and Education (PHYSOR 2016); 2016May1−5; Sun Valley, ID, USA; Forthcoming 2016.
[ 9 ] Pahl R, Lahm CE, Hayes SL. Performance of HT9 clad metallic fuel at high temperature. J Nucl Mater 1993; 204: 141−7. link1
[10] Yacout AM, Salvatores S, Orechwa Y. Degradation analysis estimates of the time-to-failure distribution of irradiated fuel elements. Nucl Tech 1996; 113(2): 177−89.
[11] Touran N, Cheatham J, Petroski R. Model biases in high-burnup fast reactor simulations [CD-ROM]. In: Proceedings of 2012 Advances in Reactor Physics−Linking Research, Industry, and Education (PHYSOR 2012); 2012Apr15−20; Knoxville, TN, USA. LaGrange Park: American Nuclear Society; 2012.
[12] Cheatham J, Truong B, Touran N, Latta R, Reed M, Petroski R. Fast reactor design using the advanced reactor modeling interface. In: Proceedings of 2013 21st International Conference on Nuclear Engineering: Volume 2; 2013Jul29−Aug2; Chengdu, China. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2013. p. V002T05A072.
[13] Waldo JB, Padilla Jr A, Nguyen DH, Claybrook SW. Application of the GEM shutdown device to the FFTF reactor. Trans Am Nucl Soc 1986; 53: 312−3.
[14] Johnson BC. Preliminary results of the TerraPower-1 probabilistic risk assessment. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference and the Annual European Safety and Reliability Conference 2012; 2012Jun25−29; Helsinki, Finland. Red Hook: Curran Associates, Inc.; 2012. p. 3543−9.
[15] Bickel P, Friedrich R. ExternE: externalities of energy: methodology 2005 update. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2005.
[16] Weaver KD, Gilleland J, Whitmer C, Zimmerman G. High burn-up fuels for fast reactors: Past experience and novel applications. In: Proceedings of 2009 International Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants; 2009May10−14; Tokyo, Japan. Red Hook: Curran Associates, Inc.; 2010. p. 795−802.
[17] Hackett MJ, Povirk G, Vollmer J. Materials development for the traveling wave reactor [presentation]. In: TMS 2012: 141st Annual Meeting and Exhibition; 2012Mar11−15; Orlando, FL, USA; 2012.
[18] Hilton BA, Hejzlar P, McAlees DG, Weaver KD, Maloy SA, Saleh TA, Traveling wave reactor: material requirements and development program. In: Proceedings of New Materials for Innovative Development of Nuclear Power Engineering Conference; 2014Mar24−27; Dimitrovgrad, Russia; 2014.
[19] Charlton WS, LeBouf RF, Gariazzo C, Grant Ford D, Beard C, Landsberger S, Proliferation resistance assessment methodology for nuclear fuel cycles. Nucl Technol 2007; 157(2): 143−56.
[20] Kharecha PA, Hansen JE. Prevented mortality and greenhouse gas emissions from historical and projected nuclear power. Environ Sci Technol 2013; 47(9): 4889−95. link1
京公网安备 11010502051620号
