Journal Home Online First Current Issue Archive For Authors Journal Information 中文版

Engineering >> 2017, Volume 3, Issue 4 doi: 10.1016/J.ENG.2017.04.014

CCS Research Development and Deployment in a Clean Energy Future: Lessons from Australia over the Past Two Decades

CO2CRC Ltd. & Peter Cook Centre for Carbon Capture and Storage Research, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia

Accepted: 2017-05-18 Available online: 2017-08-30

Next Previous

Abstract

There is widespread, though by no means universal, recognition of the importance of carbon capture and storage (CCS) as a carbon mitigation technology. However, the rate of deployment does not match what is required for global temperatures to stay well below 2?°C. Although some consider the hurdles to achieving the widespread application of CCS to be almost insurmountable, a more optimistic view is that a great deal is now known about CCS through research, demonstration, and deployment. We know how to do it; we are confident it can be done safely and effectively; we know what it costs; and we know that costs are decreasing and will continue to do so. We also know that the world will need CCS as long as countries, companies, and communities continue to use fossil fuels for energy and industrial processes. What is lacking are the necessary policy drivers, along with a technology-neutral approach to decrease carbon emissions in a cost-effective and timely manner while retaining the undoubted benefits of ready access to reliable and secure electricity and energy-intensive industrial products. In this paper, Australia is used as an example of what has been undertaken in CCS over the past 20 years, particularly in research and demonstration, but also in international collaboration. Progress in the large-scale deployment of CCS in Australia has been too slow. However, the world’s largest storage project will soon be operational in Australia as part of the Gorgon liquefied natural gas (LNG) project, and investigations are underway into several large-scale CCS Flagship program opportunities. The organization and progress of the Cooperative Research Centre for Greenhouse Gas Technologies (CO2CRC) Otway Project, which is currently Australia’s only operational storage project, is discussed in some detail because of its relevance to the commercial deployment of CCS. The point is made that there is scope for building on this Otway activity to investigate more broadly (through the proposed Otway Stage 3 and Deep Earth Energy and Environment Programme (AusDEEP)) the role of the subsurface in carbon reduction. There are challenges ahead if CCS is to be deployed as widely as bodies such as the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) consider to be necessary. Closer international collaboration in CCS will be essential to meeting that challenge.

Figures

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

References

[ 1 ] International Energy Agency. 20 years of carbon capture and storage: Accelerating future deployment.Paris: International Energy Agency; 2016.

[ 2 ] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Metz B, Davidson O, de Coninck HC, Loos M, Meyer LA, editors. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2005.

[ 3 ] Finkel A, Moses K, Munro C, Effeney T, O’Kane M. Independent review into the future security of the National Electricity Market: Blueprint for the future.Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2017 Jun.

[ 4 ] Bongers G,Byrom S, Constable T. Retrofitting CCS to coal: Enhancing Australia’s energy security.Melbourne: CO2CRC Ltd.; 2017.

[ 5 ] Hooper B. Submissions to the independent review into the future security of the National Electricity Market. 2017. Available from: http://www.environment.gov.au/energy/national-electricity-market-review/submissions.

[ 6 ] Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. Australian power generation technology report.Melbourne: CO2CRC Limited; 2016.

[ 7 ] Chambers M. Gas carbon capture “cheaper” than wind and solar, experts say [Internet].Sydney: The Australian; 2017 Feb 20. Available from: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/mining-energy/gas-carbon-capture-cheaper-than-wind-and-solar-experts-say/news-story/0d1a7971f3dc872192ab28baccacb1f6.

[ 8 ] Cook PJ, Rigg A, Bradshaw J. Putting it back where it came from: Is geological disposal of carbon dioxide an option for Australia? APPEA J 2000;40(1):654–66 link1

[ 9 ] Mac Dowell N, Fennell PS, Shah N, Maitland GC. The role of CO2 capture and utilization in mitigating climate change. Nat Clim Change 2017;7(4):243–9 link1

[10] Pour N, Webley PA, Cook PJ. A sustainability framework for bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) technologies. Energy Procedia 2017. In press link1

[11] Cook PJ, Causebrook R, Gale J, Michel K, Watson M. What have we learned from small-scale injection projects? Energy Procedia 2014;63:6129–40 link1

[12] Jenkins CR, Cook PJ, Ennis-King J, Undershultz J, Boreham C, Dance T, et al.Safe storage and effective monitoring of CO2 in depleted gas fields. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109(2):E35–41 link1

[13] Stalker L, Boreham C, Underschultz J, Freifeld B, Perkins E, Schacht U, et al.Geochemical monitoring at the CO2CRC Otway Project: Tracer injection and reservoir fluid acquisition. Energy Procedia 2009;1(1):2119–25 link1

[14] Underschultz J, Boreham C, Dance T, Stalker L, Freifeld B, Kirste D, et al.CO2 storage in a depleted gas field: An overview of the CO2CRC Otway Project and initial results. Int J Greenh Gas Con 2011;5(4):922–32 link1

[15] Cook PJ, editor. Geologically storing carbon: Learning from the Otway Project experience.Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing; 2014.

[16] Bunch M, Daniel R, Lawrence M, Browne G, Menacherry S, Dance T, et al.Multi-scale characterisation of the Paaratte Formation, Otway Basin, for CO2 injection and storage. APPEA J 2012;52(2):664 link1

[17] Haese RR, LaForce T, Boreham C, Ennis-King J, Freifeld BM, Paterson L, et al.Determining residual CO2 saturation through a dissolution test—Results from the CO2CRC Otway Project. Energy Procedia 2013;37:5379–86 link1

[18] Paterson L, Boreham C, Bunch M, Dance T, Ennis-King J, Freifeld B, et al.Overview of the CO2CRC Otway residual saturation and dissolution test. Energy Procedia 2013;37:6140–8 link1

[19] Paterson L, Boreham C, Bunch M, Dance T, Ennis-King J, Freifeld B, et al.CO2CRC Otway Stage 2B residual saturation and dissolution test. In: Cook PJ, editor Geologically storing carbon: Learning from the Otway Project experience. Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing; 2014. p. 329–60.

[20] Pevzner R, Urosevic M, Caspari E, Galvin RJ, Madadi M, Dance T, et al.Feasibility of time-lapse seismic methodology for monitoring the injection of small quantities of CO2 into a saline formation, CO2CRC Otway Project. Energy Procedia 2013;37:4336–43 link1

[21] Pevzner R, Caspari E, Gurevich B, Dance T, Cinar Y. Feasibility of CO2 plume detection using 4D seismic: CO2CRC Otway Project case study—Part 2: Detectability analysis. Geophysics 2015;80(4):B105–14 link1

[22] Shulakova V, Pevzner R, Dupuis JC, Urosevic M, Tertyshnikov K, Lumley DE, et al.Burying receivers for improved time-lapse seismic repeatability: CO2CRC Otway field experiment. Geophys Prospect 2015;63(1):55–69 link1

[23] Boston A, Bongers G, Byrom S. Balancing flexibility whilst decarbonising electricity on the NEM.Canberra: Australian National Low Emissions Coal Research & Development; 2017.

Related Research