2021, Volume 7, Issue 4
Engineering >> 2021, Volume 7, Issue 4 doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2020.11.007
Integrated Network Design and Demand Forecast for On-Demand Urban Air Mobility
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA
Next Previous
Abstract
Urban air mobility (UAM) is an emerging concept proposed in recent years that uses electric vertical take-off and landing vehicles (eVTOLs). UAM is expected to offer an alternative way of transporting passengers and goods in urban areas with significantly improved mobility by making use of low-altitude airspace. In addition to other essential elements, ground infrastructure of vertiports is needed to transition UAM from concept to operation. This study examines the network design of UAM on-demand service, with a particular focus on the use of integer programming and a solution algorithm to determine the optimal locations of vertiports, user allocation to vertiports, and vertiport access- and egress-mode choices while considering the interactions between vertiport locations and potential UAM travel demand. A case study based on simulated disaggregate travel demand data of the Tampa Bay area in Florida, USA was conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed model. Candidate vertiport locations were obtained by analyzing a three-dimensional (3D) geographic information system (GIS) map developed from lidar data of Florida and physical and regulation constraints of eVTOL operations at vertiports. Optimal locations of vertiports were determined to achieve the minimal total generalized cost; however, the modeling structure allows each user to select a better mode between ground transportation and UAM in terms of generalized cost. The outcomes of the case study reveal that although the percentage of trips that switched from ground mode to multimodal UAM was small, users choosing the UAM service benefited from significant time saving. In addition, the impact of different parameter settings on the demand for UAM service was explored from the supply side, and different pricing strategies were tested that might influence potential demand and revenue generation for UAM operators. The combined effects of the number of vertiports and pricing strategies were also analyzed. The findings from this study offer in-depth planning and managerial insights for municipal decision-makers and UAM operators. The conclusion of this paper discusses caveats to the study, ongoing efforts by the authors, and future directions in UAM research.
Keywords
Advanced air mobility ; Skyport ; Travel mode choice ; Low-altitude airspace ; Unmanned systems
Figures
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
References
[ 1 ] Reed T, Kidd T. Global traffic scorecard. Technical Report. Altrincham: INRIX Research; 2019.
[ 2 ] Concepts studies for future intracity air transportation systems. Report. Cambridge: Flight Transportation Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 1970. Report No.: R70-2.
[ 3 ] Vascik PD. Systems-level analysis of on demand mobility for aviation [dissertation]. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 2017.
[ 4 ] Holden J, Goel N. Fast-forwarding to a future of on-demand urban air transportation [Internet]. San Francisco: Uber Elevate; 2016 Oct 27 [cited 2020 Jul 12]. Available from: https://www.uber.com/elevate.pdf. link1
[ 5 ] Xu E. The future of transportation: white paper on urban air mobility systems [Internet]. Guangzhou: Ehang; 2020 Jan 15 [cited 2020 Jul 12]. Available from: https://www.ehang.com/app/en/EHang%20White%20Paper%20on%20Urban% 20Air%20Mobility%20Systems.pdf. link1
[ 6 ] Gipson L. NASA embraces urban air mobility, calls for market study [Internet]. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration; 2017 Nov 8 [cited 2020 Jul 12]. Available from: https://www.nasa.gov/aero/nasaembraces-urban-air-mobility. link1
[ 7 ] Antcliff KR, Moore MD, Goodrich KH. Silicon Valley as an early adopter for ondemand civil VTOL operations. In: 16th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference; 2016 Jun 13–17; Washington, DC, USA. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics; 2016.
[ 8 ] Urban air mobility (UAM) market study [Internet]. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration; 2018 Nov [cited 2020 Jul 12]. Available from: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0fz0x1s2. link1
[ 9 ] Zee aero z-p2 [Internet]. Alexandria: Electric VTOL News; 2018 Mar 12 [cited 2020 Jul 12]. Available from: http://evtol.news/aircraft/zee-aero/.
[10] Ehang 184 [Internet]. Alexandria: Electric VTOL News; 2020 Aug [cited 2020 Jul 12]. Available from: http://evtol.news/aircraft/ehang/. link1
[11] Vahana, the self-piloted, eVTOL aircraft from A3 by airbus, successfully completes first full-scale test flight [Internet]. Toulouse: Airbus; 2018 Feb 2 [cited 2020 Jul 12]. Available from: https://www.airbus.com/newsroom/pressreleases/en/2018/02/vahana–the-self-piloted–evtol-aircraft-from-a–byairbus–succ.html. link1
[12] Vascik PD, Hansman RJ. Constraint identification in on-demand mobility for aviation through an exploratory case study of Los Angeles. In: 17th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference; 2017 Jun 5– 9; Denver, CO, USA. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics; 2017. link1
[13] Vascik PD, Hansman RJ. Evaluation of key operational constraints affecting ondemand mobility for aviation in the Los Angeles Basin: ground infrastructure, air traffic control and noise. In: 17th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference; 2017 Jun 5–9; Denver, CO, USA. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics; 2017. link1
[14] Hasan S. Urban air mobility (UAM) market study. Report. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration; 2018 Jun. Report No.: HQ-EDAA-TN70296. Contract No.: 80HQTR17F.
[15] Garrett-Glaser B. Uber’s aerial rideshare project ‘entering the next phase’ [Internet]. Rockville: Access Intelligence LLC; 2020 Jan 22 [cited 2020 Jul 12]. Available from: https://www.aviationtoday.com/2020/01/22/ubers-aerialrideshare-project-entering-next-phase/. link1
[16] Binder R, Garrow LA, German B, Mokhtarian P, Daskilewicz M, Douthat TH. If you fly it, will commuters come? A survey to model demand for eVTOL urban air trips. In: 2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference; 2018 Jun 25–29; Atlanta, GA, USA; 2018.
[17] Garrow LA, German B, Ilbeigi M. Conceptual models of demand for electric propulsion aircraft in intra-urban and thin-haul markets. In: Proceedings of the 97th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board; 2018 Jan 7– 11; Washington, DC, USA; 2018.
[18] Garrow LA, German B, Mokhtarian P, Glodek J. A survey to model demand for eVTOL urban air trips and competition with autonomous ground vehicles. In: AIAA Aviation Forum; 2019 Jun 17–21; Dallas, TX, USA. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics; 2019.
[19] Garrow LA, Ilbeigi M, Chen Z. Forecasting demand for on demand mobility. In: 17th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference; 2017 Jun 5–9; Denver, CO, USA. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics; 2017.
[20] Sivak M, Schoettle B. A survey of public opinion about flying cars. Report. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan; 2017 Apr. Report No.: SWT-2017-8.
[21] Eker U, Fountas G, Anastasopoulos PC, Still SE. An exploratory investigation of public perceptions towards key benefits and concerns from the future use of flying cars. Travel Behav Soc 2020;19:54–66. link1
[22] Al Haddad C, Chaniotakis E, Straubinger A, Plötner K, Antoniou C. Factors affecting the adoption and use of urban air mobility. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 2020;132:696–712. link1
[23] Fu M, Rothfeld R, Antoniou C. Exploring preferences for transportation modes in an urban air mobility environment: Munich case study. Transp Res Rec 2019;2673(10):427–42. link1
[24] Straubinger A, Kluge U, Fu M, Al Haddad C, Ploetner KO, Antoniou C. Identifying demand and acceptance drivers for user friendly urban air mobility introduction. In: Müller B, Meyer G, editors. Towards user-centric transport in Europe 2. Cham: Springer; 2020. p. 117–34. link1
[25] Balac´ M, Rothfeld RL, Hörl S. The prospects of on-demand urban air mobility in Zurich, Switzerland. In: 2019 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC); 2019 Oct 27–30; Auckland, New Zealand; 2019.
[26] Balac M, Vetrella AR, Rothfeld R, Schmid B. Demand estimation for aerial vehicles in urban settings. IEEE Intell Transp Syst Mag 2019;11(3):105–16. link1
[27] Rothfeld R, Balac M, Plötner KO, Antoniou C. Agent-based simulation of urban air mobility. In: 2018 Modeling and simulation technologies conference; 2018 Jun 26–29; Atlanta, GA, USA. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics; 2018. link1
[28] Rothfeld R, Balac M, Plötner KO, Antoniou C. Initial analysis of urban air mobility’s transport performance in Sioux Falls. In: 2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference; 2018 Jun 25–29; Atlanta, GA, USA. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics; 2018.
[29] Lim E, Hwang H. The selection of vertiport location for on-demand mobility and its application to Seoul Metro Area. Int J Aeronaut Space Sci 2019;20 (1):260–72. link1
[30] Fadhil DN. A GIS-based analysis for selecting ground infrastructure locations for urban air mobility [dissertation]. Munich: Technical University of Munich; 2018.
[31] Daskilewicz M, German B, Warren M, Garrow LA, Boddupalli SS, Douthat TH. Progress in vertiport placement and estimating aircraft range requirements for eVTOL daily commuting. In: 2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference; 2018 Jun 25–29; Atlanta, GA, USA. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics; 2018.
[32] Rath S, Chow JY. Air taxi skyport location problem for airport access. 2019. arXiv:1904.01497.
[33] Thompson M. Panel: perspectives on prospective markets. In: Proceedings of the 5th Annual AHS Transformative VTOL Workshop; 2018 Jan 18–19; San Francisco, CA, USA; 2018.
[34] Coast data [Internet]. Washington, DC: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; [cited 2020 Jul 12]. Available from: http:// coastbikeshare.com/data/. link1
[35] Populus [Internet]. San Francisco: Populus; [cited 2020 Jul 12]. Available from: https://www.populus.ai/. link1
[36] Helling B. How much does Uber cost? A comprehensive guide [Internet]. Omaha: Ridester; 2019 Nov 5 [cited 2020 Jul 12]. Available from: https:// www.ridester.com/uber-rates-cost/. link1
[37] Hopr [Internet]. Chicago: CycleHop LLC dba HOPR; [cited 2020 Jul 12]. Available from: https://gohopr.com/tampabay-2/. link1
[38] Shared electric scooter pilot program [Internet]. Tampa: City of Tampa; [cited 2020 Jul 12]. Available from: https://www.tampagov.net/tss-transportation/ programs/shared-electric-scooter-pilot-program. link1
[39] Auchincloss AH, Weinberger R, Aytur S, Namba A, Ricchezza A. Public parking fees and fines: a survey of U.S. cities. Public Works Manag Policy 2015;20 (1):49–59. link1
[40] Data access viewer [Internet]. Charleston: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; [cited 2020 Jul 12]. Available from: https://coast. noaa.gov/dataviewer/. link1
[41] Alumur S, Kara BY. Network hub location problems: the state of the art. Eur J Oper Res 2008;190(1):1–21. link1
[42] Farahani RZ, Hekmatfar M, Arabani AB, Nikbakhsh E. Hub location problems: a review of models, classification, solution techniques, and applications. Comput Ind Eng 2013;64(4):1096–109. link1
[43] Vascik PD, Hansman RJ. Development of vertiport capacity envelopes and analysis of their sensitivity to topological and operational factors. In: AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum; 2019 Jan 7–11; San Diego, CA, USA. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics; 2019.
[44] Ernst AT, Hamacher H, Jiang H, Krishnamoorthy M, Woeginger G. Uncapacitated single and multiple allocation p-hub center problems. Comput Oper Res 2009;36(7):2230–41. link1
[45] Kara BY. Modeling and analysis of issues in hub location problems [dissertation]. Ankara: Bilkent University; 1999.
[46] An Y, Zhang Y, Zeng B. The reliable hub-and-spoke design problem: models and algorithms. Transp Res Part B Methodol 2015;77:103–22. link1
[47] Data USA: Hillsborough County, FL [Internet]. Cambridge: Data USA; [cited 2020 Sep 6]. Available from: https://datausa.io/profile/geo/hillsboroughcounty-fl#income_gender. link1
京公网安备 11010502051620号
