Journal Home Online First Current Issue Archive For Authors Journal Information 中文版

Engineering >> 2022, Volume 14, Issue 7 doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2021.09.004

China’s Energy Transition Pathway in a Carbon Neutral Vision

Institute of Energy, Environment, and Economy, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Received: 2021-05-11 Revised: 2021-08-29 Accepted: 2021-09-20 Available online: 2021-10-27

Next Previous

Abstract

China’s energy system requires a thorough transformation to achieve carbon neutrality. Here, leveraging the highly acclaimed The Integrated MARKAL-EFOM System model of China (China TIMES) that takes energy, the environment, and the economy into consideration, four carbon-neutral scenarios are proposed and compared for different emission peak times and carbon emissions in 2050. The results show that China’s carbon emissions will peak at 10.3–10.4 Gt between 2025 and 2030. In 2050, renewables will account for 60% of total energy consumption (calorific value calculation) and 90% of total electricity generation, and the electrification rate will be close to 60%. The energy transition will bring sustained air quality improvement, with an 85% reduction in local air pollutants in 2050 compared with 2020 levels, and an early emission peak will yield more near-term benefits. Early peak attainment requires the extensive deployment of renewables over the next decade and an accelerated phasing out of coal after 2025. However, it will bring benefits such as obtaining better air quality sooner, reducing cumulative CO2 emissions, and buying more time for other sectors to transition. The pressure for more ambitious emission reductions in 2050 can be transmitted to the near future, affecting renewable energy development, energy service demand, and welfare losses.

Figures

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

Fig. 10

Fig. 11

References

[ 1 ] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Global warming of 1.5 C: an IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; 2018. link1

[ 2 ] UNFCCC. Decision 1/CP.21: Adoption of the Paris Agreement. In: Paris Climate Change Conference; 2015 Nov 30–Dec 11; Paris, France; 2015.

[ 3 ] International Energy Agency. World energy outlook 2020. Report. Paris: International Energy Agency; 2020 Oct. link1

[ 4 ] He G, Lin J, Sifuentes F, Liu X, Abhyankar N, Phadke A. Rapid cost decrease of renewables and storage accelerates the decarbonization of China’s power system. Nat Commun 2020;11(1):2486. link1

[ 5 ] He G, Lin J, Zhang Y, Zhang W, Larangeira G, Zhang C, et al. Enabling a rapid and just transition away from coal in China. One Earth 2020;3(2):187–94. link1

[ 6 ] Wang R, Chang S, Cui X, Li J, Ma L, Kumar A, et al. Retrofitting coal-fired power plants with biomass co-firing and carbon capture and storage for net zero carbon emission: a plant-by-plant assessment framework. Glob Change Biol Bioenergy 2021;13(1):143–60. link1

[ 7 ] Lu X, Cao L, Wang H, Peng W, Xing J, Wang S, et al. Gasification of coal and biomass as a net carbon-negative power source for environment-friendly electricity generation in China. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2019;116(17):8206–13. link1

[ 8 ] Qin Z, Zhuang Q, Cai X, He Y, Huang Y, Jiang D, et al. Biomass and biofuels in China: toward bioenergy resource potentials and their impacts on the environment. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2018;82:2387–400. link1

[ 9 ] Yang Q, Zhou H, Bartocci P, Fantozzi F, Mašek O, Agblevor FA, et al. Prospective contributions of biomass pyrolysis to China’s 2050 carbon reduction and renewable energy goals. Nat Commun 2021;12(1):1698. link1

[10] Kang Y, Yang Q, Bartocci P, Wei H, Liu SS, Wu Z, et al. Bioenergy in China: evaluation of domestic biomass resources and the associated greenhouse gas mitigation potentials. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2020;127:109842. link1

[11] Yang B, Wei YM, Liu LC, Hou YB, Zhang K, Yang L, et al. Life cycle cost assessment of biomass co-firing power plants with CO2 capture and storage considering multiple incentives. Energy Econ 2021;96:105173. link1

[12] Huang X, Chang S, Zheng D, Zhang X. The role of BECCS in deep decarbonization of China’s economy: a computable general equilibrium analysis. Energy Econ 2020;92:104968. link1

[13] Ren L, Zhou S, Peng T, Ou X. A review of CO2 emissions reduction technologies and low-carbon development in the iron and steel industry focusing on China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2021;143:110846. link1

[14] Habert G, Miller SA, John VM, Provis JL, Favier A, Horvath A, et al. Environmental impacts and decarbonization strategies in the cement and concrete industries. Nat Rev Earth Environ 2020;1(11):559–73. link1

[15] Rissman J, Bataille C, Masanet E, Aden N, MorrowWR, Zhou N, et al. Technologies and policies to decarbonize global industry: review and assessment of mitigation drivers through 2070. Appl Energy 2020;266:114848. link1

[16] Wang R, Feng W, Wang L, Lu S. A comprehensive evaluation of zero energy buildings in cold regions: actual performance and key technologies of cases from China, the US, and the European Union. Energy 2021;215:118992. link1

[17] Xing R, Hanaoka T, Masui T. Deep decarbonization pathways in the building sector: China’s NDC and the Paris Agreement. Environ Res Lett 2021;16 (4):044054. link1

[18] Chiaramonti D, Maniatis K. Security of supply, strategic storage and Covid19: which lessons learnt for renewable and recycled carbon fuels, and their future role in decarbonizing transport? Appl Energy 2020;271:115216. link1

[19] Institute of Climate Change and Sustainable Development Tsinghua University. China’s long-term low-carbon development strategies and pathways comprehensive report. Beijing: China Environment Publishing Group; 2021. Chinese.

[20] Bu C, Cui X, Li R, Li J, Zhang Y, Wang C, et al. Achieving net-zero emissions in China’s passenger transport sector through regionally tailored mitigation strategies. Appl Energy 2021;284:116265. link1

[21] Van Soest HL, den Elzen MGJ, van Vuuren DP. Net-zero emission targets for major emitting countries consistent with the Paris Agreement. Nat Commun 2021;12(1):2140. link1

[22] Cai B, Cao L, Lei Y, Wang C, Zheng L, Zhu J, et al. China’s carbon emission pathway under the carbon neutrality target. China Popul Resour Environ 2021;31(1):7–14. Chinese. link1

[23] Mao X, Zeng A, Xing Y, Gao Y, He F. From concept to action: a review of research on co-benefits and co-control of greenhouse gases and local air pollutants reductions. Clim Change Res 2021;17:255–67. Chinese. link1

[24] Xing J, Lu X, Wang S, Wang T, Ding D, Yu S, et al. The quest for improved air quality may push China to continue its CO2 reduction beyond the Paris Commitment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2020;117(47):29535–42. link1

[25] Yang X, Pang J, Teng F, Gong R, Springer C. The environmental co-benefit and economic impact of China’s low-carbon pathways: evidence from linking bottom-up and top-down models. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2021;136:110438. link1

[26] Li N, Chen W. Energy–water nexus in China’s energy bases: from the Paris Agreement to the Well Below 2 Degrees target. Energy 2019;166:277–86. link1

[27] Global Energy Interconnection Development and Cooperation Organization. A study of China’s carbon neutrality by 2060. Report. Beijing: Global Energy Interconnection Development and Cooperation Organization; 2021 Mar. Chinese. link1

[28] Duan H, Zhou S, Jiang K, Bertram C, Harmsen M, Kriegler E, et al. Assessing China’s efforts to pursue the 1.5 C warming limit. Science 2021;372 (6540):378–85. link1

[29] Energy Foundation China. China’s new growth pathway: from the 14th Five-Year Plan to carbon neutrality. Report. Beijing: Energy Foundation China; 2020 Dec. link1

[30] Rogelj J, Geden O, Cowie A, Reisinger A. Net-zero emissions targets are vague: three ways to fix. Nature 2021;591(7850):365–8. link1

[31] Chen W, Yin X, Zhang H. Towards low carbon development in China: a comparison of national and global models. Clim Change 2016;136(1): 95–108. link1

[32] Wang H, Chen W, Zhang H, Li N. Modeling of power sector decarbonization in China: comparisons of early and delayed mitigation towards 2-degree target. Clim Change 2020;162(4):1843–56. link1

[33] Tang H, Zhang S, Chen W. Assessing representative CCUS layouts for China’s power sector toward carbon neutrality. Environ Sci Technol 2021;55 (16):11225–35. link1

[34] Yin X, Chen W. Trends and development of steel demand in China: a bottomup analysis. Resour Policy 2013;38(4):407–15. link1

[35] Chen W, Yin X, Ma D. A bottom-up analysis of China’s iron and steel industrial energy consumption and CO2 emissions. Appl Energy 2014;136: 1174–83. link1

[36] Ma D, Chen W, Yin X, Wang L. Quantifying the co-benefits of decarbonisation in China’s steel sector: an integrated assessment approach. Appl Energy 2016;162:1225–37. link1

[37] Li N, Ma D, Chen W. Quantifying the impacts of decarbonisation in China’s cement sector: a perspective from an integrated assessment approach. Appl Energy 2017;185:1840–8. link1

[38] Shi J, Chen W, Yin X. Modelling building’s decarbonization with application of China TIMES model. Appl Energy 2016;162:1303–12. link1

[39] Zhang H, Chen W, Huang W. TIMES modelling of transport sector in China and USA: comparisons from a decarbonization perspective. Appl Energy 2016;162:1505–14. link1

[40] Houghton JT, Meira Filho LG, Lim B, Treanton K, Mamaty I, Bonduki Y. Revised 1996 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories: the workbook (volume 2). Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; 1996.

[41] Li N, Chen W, Rafaj P, Kiesewetter G, Schöpp W, Wang H, et al. Air quality improvement co-benefits of low-carbon pathways toward well below the 2 C climate target in China. Environ Sci Technol 2019;53(10):5576–84. link1

Related Research