Journal Home Online First Current Issue Archive For Authors Journal Information 中文版

Engineering >> 2023, Volume 23, Issue 4 doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2022.03.017

Trends, Drivers, and Mitigation of CO2 Emissions in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area

a Key Laboratory of City Cluster Environmental Safety and Green Development, Ministry of Education, School of Ecology, Environment and Resources, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
b The Bartlett School of Construction and Project Management, University College London, London, WC1E 7HB, United Kingdom
c Integrated Research for Energy, Environment and Society (IREES), Energy and Sustainability Research Institute Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, 9747 AG, Netherlands
d Department of Earth System Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100080, China

Received: 2021-07-31 Revised: 2022-02-21 Accepted: 2022-03-02 Available online: 2022-05-25

Next Previous

Abstract

The Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA) is a national initiative aimed at building a world-class city cluster in China and whose trends, socioeconomic drivers of CO2 emissions, and mitigation pathways are of great significance to the high-quality regional economic development. This study compiled the CO2 emission inventories of the GBA from 2000 to 2019 and explored the key drivers of CO2 emissions using the logarithmic mean Divisia index method. The results showed that CO2 emissions in GBA slowed significantly after 2017 and have already been decoupled from gross domestic product (GDP) growth. Economic growth and energy intensity are the major factors driving and inhibiting the increase in GBA’s CO2 emissions, respectively. The energy production and heavy manufacturing sectors have reduced their roles in driving the growth of GBA’s CO2 emissions, with the service sector becoming the main driver. GBA achieved remarkable results in low-carbon development through industrial restructuring and upgrading. Industrial upgrades in Shenzhen and Hong Kong and technological advances in Shenzhen, Guangzhou, and Foshan have significantly curbed the growth in the GBA’s CO2 emissions. The heterogeneity of cities in the GBA greatly increases the complexity of formalizing the allocation of emission reduction tasks and developing a roadmap for regional carbon neutrality. Graded emission reduction strategies and carbon peaking and neutrality policy recommendations for GBA cities are proposed. This study provides a scientific basis for the development of an action program for carbon peaking and neutrality in GBA cities and low-carbon development plans for other cities and regions.

SupplementaryMaterials

Figures

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

References

[ 1 ] Guan D, Liu Z, Geng Y, Lindner S, Hubacek K. The gigatonne gap in China’s carbon dioxide inventories. Nat Clim Chang 2012;2(9):672‒5. link1

[ 2 ] Liu F, Liu C. Regional disparity, spatial spillover effects of urbanisation and carbon emissions in China. J Clean Prod 2019;241:118226. link1

[ 3 ] Li B, Haneklaus N. The role of renewable energy, fossil fuel consumption, urbanization and economic growth on CO2 emissions in China. Energy Rep 2021;7:783‒91. link1

[ 4 ] Liu J, Wang Q, Song Z, Fang F. Bottlenecks and countermeasures of high-penetration renewable energy development in China. Engineering 2020;7(11):1611‒22. link1

[ 5 ] RENEWABLES NOW 2021. Renewables 2021 global status report. Report. Paris: RENEWABLES NOW; 2021. link1

[ 6 ] United Nations General Assembly (UNGA). Address to the general debate of the 75th session of the United Nations general assembly. New York: Seventy-fifth United Nations General Assembly; 2020.

[ 7 ] Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People´s Republic of China (MEE). Guidance on integrating and strengthening efforts related to climate change and ecological protection. Beijing: Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People´s Republic of China; 2021. Chinese.

[ 8 ] The State Coucil of The People´s Republic of China (SC). Outline of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay area development plan. Beijing: The State Coucil of The People´s Republic of China; 2019. Chinese.

[ 9 ] National Bureau of Statistics of China. Guangdong statistical yearbook 2021. Beijing: China Statistical Press; 2021. Chinese.

[10] Project team of study on medium to long term scenario of energy transition in Guangdong. Study on medium to long term scenario of energy transition in Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macau Bay Area. Beijing: Science Press; 2020. Chinese.

[11] Wu M, Wu J, Zang C. A comprehensive evaluation of the eco-carrying capacity and green economy in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, China. J Clean Prod 2020;281:124945. link1

[12] Huang R, Lv G, Chen M, Zhu Z. CO2 emissions embodied in trade: evidence for Hong Kong SAR. J Clean Prod 2019;239:117918. link1

[13] Dong D, Duan H, Mao R, Song Q, Zuo J, Zhu J, et al. Towards a low carbon transition of urban public transport in megacities: a case study of Shenzhen, China. Resour Conserv Recycling 2018;134:149‒55. link1

[14] Xu Q, Dong Y, Yang R. Urbanization impact on carbon emissions in the Pearl River Delta region: kuznets curve relationships. J Clean Prod 2018;180:514‒23. link1

[15] Lin B, Li Z. Spatial analysis of mainland cities’ carbon emissions of and around Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Sustain Cities Soc 2020;61:102299. link1

[16] Dou X, Deng Z, Sun T, Ke P, Zhu B, Shan Y, et al. Global and local carbon footprints of city of Hong Kong and Macao from 2000 to 2015. Resour Conserv Recycling 2021;164:105167. link1

[17] Qian Y, Zheng H, Meng J, Shan Y, Zhou Y, Guan D. Large inter-city inequality in consumption-based CO2 emissions for China’s Pearl River Basin cities. Resour Conserv Recycling 2022;176:105923. link1

[18] Liu X, Ou J, Chen Y, Wang S, Li X, Jiao L, et al. Scenario simulation of urban energy-related CO2 emissions by coupling the socioeconomic factors and spatial structures. Appl Energy 2019;238:1163‒78. link1

[19] Xie Z, Gao X, Yuan W, Fang J, Jiang Z. Decomposition and prediction of direct residential carbon emission indicators in Guangdong Province of China. Ecol Indic 2020;115:106344. link1

[20] Xu W, Xie Y, Xia D, Ji L, Huang G. A multi-sectoral decomposition and decoupling analysis of carbon emissions in Guangdong province, China. J Environ Manage 2021;298:113485. link1

[21] Zhang Y, Fu Z, Xie Y, Li Z, Liu Y, Hu Q, et al. Multi-objective programming for energy system based on the decomposition of carbon emission driving forces: a case study of Guangdong, China. J Clean Prod 2021;309:127410. link1

[22] Kennedy C, Ibrahim N, Hoornweg D. Low-carbon infrastructure strategies for cities. Nat Clim Chang 2014;4(5):343‒6. link1

[23] Shan Y, Fang S, Cai B, Zhou Y, Li D, Feng K, et al. Chinese cities exhibit varying degrees of decoupling of economic growth and CO2 emissions between 2005 and 2015. One Earth 2021;4(1):124‒34. link1

[24] Wang S, Liu X. China’s city-level energy-related CO2 emissions: spatiotemporal patterns and driving forces. Appl Energy 2017;200:204‒14. link1

[25] Du M, Zhang X, Xia L, Cao L, Zhang Z, Zhang L, et al. The China Carbon Watch (CCW) system: a rapid accounting of household carbon emissions in China at the provincial level. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2022;155:111825. link1

[26] Shan Y, Guan D, Liu J, Mi Z, Liu Z, Liu J, et al. Methodology and applications of city level CO2 emission accounts in China. J Clean Prod 2017;161:1215‒25. link1

[27] Zhou Y, Shan Y, Liu G, Guan D. Emissions and low-carbon development in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area cities and their surroundings. Appl Energy 2018;228:1683‒92. link1

[28] Liu Z, Guan D, Wei W, Davis SJ, Ciais P, Bai J, et al. Reduced carbon emission estimates from fossil fuel combustion and cement production in China. Nature 2015;524:335‒8. link1

[29] Dong F, Yu B, Hadachin T, Dai Y, Wang Y, Zhang S, et al. Drivers of carbon emission intensity change in China. Resour Conserv Recycling 2018;129:187‒201. link1

[30] Wang M, Feng C. The impacts of technological gap and scale economy on the low-carbon development of China’s industries: an extended decomposition analysis. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2020;157:120050. link1

[31] Shahbaz M, Loganathan N, Muzaffar AT, Ahmed K, Ali Jabran M. How urbanization affects CO2 emissions in Malaysia? The application of STIRPAT model. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2016;57:83‒93. link1

[32] Balsalobre-Lorente D, Shahbaz M, Roubaud D, Farhani S. How economic growth, renewable electricity and natural resources contribute to CO2 emissions? Energy Policy 2018;113:356‒67. link1

[33] Zhao L, Zhao T, Yuan R. Scenario simulations for the peak of provincial household CO2 emissions in China based on the STIRPAT model. Sci Total Environ 2021;809:151098. link1

[34] Meng F, Su B, Thomson E, Zhou D, Zhou P. Measuring China’s regional energy and carbon emission efficiency with DEA models: a survey. Appl Energy 2016;183:1‒21. link1

[35] Li Z, Qi L. Reflections on econometric modeling methodology. Soc Sci China 2010;182(2):69‒83. Chinese.

[36] Ang BW, Zhang FQ. A survey of index decomposition analysis in energy and environmental studies. Energy 2000;25(12):1149‒76. link1

[37] Wang Q, Hang Y, Su B, Zhou P. Contributions to sector-level carbon intensity change: an integrated decomposition analysis. Energy Econ 2018;70:12‒25. link1

[38] Pasurka Jr CA. Decomposing electric power plant emissions within a joint production framework. Energy Econ 2006;28(1):26‒43. link1

[39] Wang C. Decomposing energy productivity change: a distance function approach. Energy 2007;32(8):1326‒33. link1

[40] Zhou P, Ang BW. Decomposition of aggregate CO2 emissions: a production-theoretical approach. Energy Econ 2008;30(3):1054‒67. link1

[41] Li A, Zhang A, Zhou Y, Yao X. Decomposition analysis of factors affecting carbon dioxide emissions across provinces in China. J Clean Prod 2017;141:1428‒44. link1

[42] Zhang W, Tang X, Yang G, Zha D. Decomposition of CO2 emission intensity in Chinese MIs through a development mode extended LMDI method combined with a production-theoretical approach. Sci Total Environ 2020;702:134787. link1

[43] Zha D, Yang G, Wang Q. Investigating the driving factors of regional CO2 emissions in China using the IDA-PDA-MMI method. Energy Econ 2019;84:104521. link1

[44] Du K, Lin B. Understanding the rapid growth of China’s energy consumption: a comprehensive decomposition framework. Energy 2015;90:570‒7. link1

[45] Leontief WW. Quantitative input and output relations in the economic systems of the United States. Rev Econ Stat 1936;18(3):105‒25. link1

[46] Guan D, Hubacek K, Weber CL, Peters GP, Reiner DM. The drivers of Chinese CO2 emissions from 1980 to 2030. Glob Environ Change 2008;18(4):626‒34. link1

[47] Mi Z, Zheng J, Meng J, Shan Y, Zheng H, Ou J, et al. China’s energy consumption in the New Normal. Earths Futur 2018;6(7):1007‒16. link1

[48] Su B, Ang BW. Structural decomposition analysis applied to energy and emissions: some methodological developments. Energy Econ 2012;34(1):177‒88. link1

[49] Hoekstra R, van den Bergh JCJM. Comparing structural decomposition analysis and index. Energy Econ 2003;25(1):39‒64. link1

[50] Feng K, Davis SJ, Sun L, Hubacek K. Drivers of the US CO2 emissions 1997-2013. Nat Commun 2015;6(1):7714. link1

[51] Choi KH, Ang BW. Attribution of changes in Divisia real energy intensity index—an extension to index decomposition analysis. Energy Econ 2012;34(1):171‒6. link1

[52] Peters GP, Andrew RM, Canadell JG, Fuss S, Jackson RB, Korsbakken JI, et al. Key indicators to track current progress and future ambition of the Paris Agreement. Nat Clim Chang 2017;7:118‒22. link1

[53] Ang BW, Liu N. Handling zero values in the logarithmic mean Divisia index decomposition approach. Energy Policy 2007;35(1):238‒46. link1

[54] Ang BW. LMDI decomposition approach: a guide for implementation. Energy Policy 2015;86:233‒8. link1

[55] Jiang J, Ye B, Xie D, Tang J. Provincial-level carbon emission drivers and emission reduction strategies in China: combining multi-layer LMDI decomposition with hierarchical clustering. J Clean Prod 2017;169:178‒90. link1

[56] Ou JM, Meng J, Shan Y, Zheng H, Mi Z, Guan D. Initial Declines in China’s provincial energy consumption and their drivers. Joule 2019;3(5):1163‒8. link1

[57] Guan D, Meng J, Reiner DM, Zhang N, Shan Y, Mi Z, et al. Structural decline in China’s CO2 emissions through transitions in industry and energy systems. Nat Geosci 2018;11(8):551‒5. link1

[58] The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Report. Hayama, Japan: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies; 2006.

[59] Peters G, Weber C, Liu J. Construction of Chinese energy and emissions inventory. Report. Trondheim, Norway: Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU); 2006. Report No.:4/2006

[60] Li L, Shan Y, Lei Y, Wu S, Yu X, Lin X, et al. Decoupling of economic growth and emissions in China’s cities: a case study of the Central Plains urban agglomeration. Appl Energy 2019;244:36‒45. link1

[61] Li K, Zhou Y, Xiao H, Li Z, Shan Y. Decoupling of economic growth from CO2 emissions in Yangtze River Economic Belt cities. Sci Total Environ 2021;775:145927. link1

[62] Xiao H, Duan Z, Zhou Y, Zhang N, Shan Y, Lin X, et al. CO2 emission patterns in shrinking and growing cities: a case study of Northeast China and the Yangtze River Delta. Appl Energy 2019;251:113384. link1

[63] Mousavi B, Lopez NSA, Biona JBM, Chiu ASF, Blesl M. Driving forces of Iran’s CO2 emissions from energy consumption: an LMDI decomposition approach. Appl Energy 2017;206:804‒14. link1

[64] Le Quéré C, Korsbakken JI, Wilson C, Tosun J, Andrew R, Andres RJ, et al. Drivers of declining CO2 emissions in 18 developed economies. Nat Clim Chang 2019;9(3):213‒7. link1

[65] Long Y, Yoshida Y, Liu Q, Guan D, Zheng H, Li Y, et al. Japanese carbon emissions patterns shifted following the 2008 financial crisis and the 2011 Tohoku earthquake. Communications Earth & Environment 2021;2(1):125. link1

[66] Guan Y, Shan Y, Huang Q, Chen H, Wang D, Hubacek K. Assessment to China’s recent emission pattern shifts. Earths Futur 2021;9(11): e2021EF002241. link1

[67] US Energy Information Administration (EIA). State energy-related CO2 emission data tables. Washington, DC: US Energy Information Administration; 2021.

[68] The State Coucil of The People´s Republic of China. China: 12th five-year plan (2011-2015) for national economic and social development. Beijing: The State Coucil of The People´s Republic of China; 2011.

[69] National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC). The 12th five-year plan for energy development. Beijing: National Development and Reform Commission; 2011. Chinese.

[70] People´s Government of Guangdong Province (PGGD). Notice on issuing the “Outline of the environmental protection plan for the Pearl River Delta (2004-2020). Guangzhou: People´s Government of Guangdong Province; 2005. Chinese.

[71] The State Coucil of The People´s Republic of China. Several opinions on speeding up the shutdown of small thermal power units. Beijing: The State Coucil of The People’s Republic of China; 2007. Chinese. http://www.ceads.net/. †† http://www.ceads.net/. link1

Related Research