Journal Home Online First Current Issue Archive For Authors Journal Information 中文版

Engineering >> 2023, Volume 25, Issue 6 doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2022.07.016

Intelligent Monitoring System Based on Spatio–Temporal Data for Underground Space Infrastructure

a State Key Laboratory of Software Development Environment, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
b Department of Geotechnical Engineering, College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
c Institute of Urban Smart Transportation and Safety Maintenance, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China

Received: 2021-12-19 Revised: 2022-07-07 Accepted: 2022-07-10 Available online: 2022-09-13

Next Previous

Abstract

Intelligent sensing, mechanism understanding, and the deterioration forecasting based on spatio–temporal big data not only promote the safety of the infrastructure but also indicate the basic theory and key technology for the infrastructure construction to turn to intelligentization. The advancement of underground space utilization has led to the development of three characteristics (deep, big, and clustered) that help shape a tridimensional urban layout. However, compared to buildings and bridges overground, the diseases and degradation that occur underground are more insidious and difficult to identify. Numerous challenges during the construction and service periods remain. To address this gap, this paper summarizes the existing methods and evaluates their strong points and weak points based on real-world space safety management. The key scientific issues, as well as solutions, are discussed in a unified intelligent monitoring system.

Figures

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

References

[ 1 ] Nadimi S, Shahriar K, Sharifzadeh M, Moarefvand P. Triaxial creep tests and back analysis of time-dependent behavior of siah bisheh cavern by 3-dimensional distinct element method. Tunnel Undergr Space Technol 2011;26(1):155‒62. link1

[ 2 ] Debernardi D, Barla G. New viscoplastic model for design analysis of tunnels in squeezing conditions. Rock Mech Rock Eng 2009;42(2):259‒88. link1

[ 3 ] Jimenez R, Recio D. A linear classifier for probabilistic prediction of squeezing conditions in Himalayan tunnels. Eng Geol 2011;121(3‒4):101‒9.

[ 4 ] Guan Z, Jiang Y, Tanabashi Y. Rheological parameter estimation for the prediction of long-term deformations in conventional tunnelling. Tunnel Undergr Space Technol 2009;24(3):250‒9. link1

[ 5 ] Li J, Hao H, Chen Z. Damage identification and optimal sensor placement for structures under unknown traffic-induced vibrations. J Aerosp Eng 2017;30(2): B4015001. link1

[ 6 ] He J, Guan X, Liu Y. Structural response reconstruction based on empirical mode decomposition in time domain. Mech Syst Signal Process 2012;28:348‒66. link1

[ 7 ] Lu W, Teng J, Li C, Cui Y. Reconstruction to sensor measurements based on a correlation model of monitoring data. Appl Sci 2017;7(3):243. link1

[ 8 ] Zhao X, Jia J, Zheng YM. Strain monitoring data restoring of large-span steel skybridge based on BP neural network. J Archit Civil Eng 2009;26(1):101‒6. Chinese.

[ 9 ] Zhigang F, Katsunori S, Qi W. Sensor fault detection and data recovery based on LS-SVM predictor. Chin J Sci Instrum 2007;28(2):193‒7. Chinese.

[10] Bao Y, Li H, Sun X, Yu Y, Ou J. Compressive sampling-based data loss recovery for wireless sensor networks used in civil structure health monitoring. Struct Health Monit 2013;12(1):78‒95. link1

[11] Huang Y, Wu D, Liu Z, Li J. Lost strain data reconstruction based on least squares support vector machine. Meas Control Tech 2010;29:8‒12. Chinese.

[12] Huang YW, Wu DG, Li J. Structural healthy monitoring data recovery based on extreme learning machine. Comput Eng 2011;16:241‒3. link1

[13] Zhang Z, Luo Y. Restoring method for missing data of spatial structural stress monitoring based on correlation. Mech Syst Signal Process 2017;91:266‒77. link1

[14] Chen C, Jiao S, Zhang S, Liu W, Feng L, Wang Y. TripImputor: real-time imputing taxi trip purpose leveraging multi-sourced urban data. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 2018;19(10):3292‒304. link1

[15] Tan X, Sun X, Chen W, Du B, Ye J, Sun L. Investigation on the data augmentation using machine learning algorithms in structural health monitoring information. Struct Health Monit 2021;20(4):2054‒68. link1

[16] Fan G, Li J, Hao H. Lost data recovery for structure health monitoring based on convolutional neural networks. Struct Control Health Monit 2019;26(10): e2433. link1

[17] Jiang H, Wan C, Yang K, Ding Y, Xue S. Continuous missing data imputation with incomplete dataset by generative adversarial networks-based unsupervised learning for long-term bridge health monitoring. Struct Health Monit 2021;21(3):1093‒109. link1

[18] Kammer DC. Estimation of structural response using remote sensor locations. J Guid Control Dyn 1997;20(3):501‒8. link1

[19] Wan Z, Li S, Huang Q, Wang T. Structural response reconstruction based on the modal superposition method in the presence of closely spaced modes. Mech Syst Signal Process 2014;42(1‒2):14‒30.

[20] Iliopoulos A, Shirzadeh R, Weijtjens W, Guillaume P, Van Hemelrijck D, Devriendt C. A modal decomposition and expansion approach for prediction of dynamic responses on a monopile offshore wind turbine using a limited number of vibration sensors. Mech Syst Signal Process 2016;68‒69:84‒104.

[21] Mace B, Halkyard C. Time domain estimation of response and intensity in beams using wave decomposition and reconstruction. J Sound Vib 2000;230(3):561‒89. link1

[22] Li J, Law SS, Ding Y. Damage detection of a substructure based on response reconstruction in frequency domain. Key Eng Mater 2013;569‒570:823‒30.

[23] Li J, Law SS. Substructural response reconstruction in wavelet domain. J Appl Mech 2011;78(4):041010. link1

[24] Li J, Hao H. Substructure damage identification based on wavelet-domain response reconstruction. Struct Health Monit 2014;13(4):389‒405. link1

[25] Lai T, Yi TH, Li HN. Wavelet-galerkin method for reconstruction of structural dynamic responses. Adv Struct Eng 2017;20(8):1174‒84. link1

[26] Zhang X, Wu Z. Dual-type structural response reconstruction based on moving-window Kalman filter with unknown measurement noise. J Aerosp Eng 2019;32(4):04019029. link1

[27] Zhang C, Xu Y. Structural damage identification via response reconstruction under unknown excitation. Struct Control Health Monit 2017;24(8):e1953. link1

[28] Peng Z, Dong K, Yin H. A modal-based Kalman filter approach and OSP method for structural response reconstruction. Shock Vib 2019;5475696:1‒14. link1

[29] Bao Y, Beck JL, Li H. Compressive sampling for accelerometer signals in structure health monitoring. Struct Health Monit 2011;10(3):235‒46. link1

[30] Bao Y, Yu Y, Li H, Mao X, Jiao W, Zou Z, et al. Compressive sensing-based lost data recovery of fast-moving wireless sensing for structure health monitoring. Struct Control Health Monit 2015;22(3):433‒48. link1

[31] Wan HP, Ni YQ. Bayesian multi-task learning methodology for reconstruction of structure health monitoring data. Struct Health Monit 2019;18 (4):1282‒309. link1

[32] Kerschen G, Poncelet F, Golinval JC. Physical interpretation of independent component analysis in structural dynamics. Mech Syst Signal Process 2007;21(4):1561‒75. link1

[33] Hasanov A, Baysal O. Identification of an unknown spatial load distribution in a vibrating cantilevered beam from final overdetermination. J Inverse Ill-Posed Probl 2015;23(1):85‒102. link1

[34] Li Y, Sun L. Structural deformation reconstruction by the Penrose-Moore pseudo-inverse and singular value decomposition-estimated equivalent force. Struct Health Monit 2021;20(5):2412‒29. link1

[35] Shang Z, Sun L, Xia Y, Zhang W. Vibration-based damage detection for bridges by deep convolutional denoising autoencoder. Struct Health Monit 2020;20(4):1880‒903. link1

[36] Tan X, Wang Y, Du B, Ye J, Chen W, Sun L, et al. Analysis for full face mechanical behaviors through spatial deduction model with real-time monitoring data. Struct Health Monit 2021;21(4):1805‒18. link1

[37] Bani-Hani KA. Vibration control of wind-induced response of tall buildings with an active tuned mass damper using neural networks. Struct Control Health Monit 2007;14(1):83‒108. link1

[38] Ni Y, Li M. Wind pressure data reconstruction using neural network techniques: a comparison between BPNN and GRNN. Measurement 2016;88:468‒76. link1

[39] Oh BK, Glisic B, Kim Y, Park HS. Convolutional neural network-based data recovery method for structure health monitoring. Struct Health Monit 2020;19(6):1821. link1

[40] Zhang Y, Miyamori Y, Mikami S, Saito T. Vibration-based structural state identification by a 1-dimensional convolutional neural network. Comput Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 2019;34(9):822‒39. link1

[41] Jiang K, Han Q, Du X, Ni P. Structural dynamic response reconstruction and virtual sensing using a sequence to sequence modeling with attention mechanism. Autom Constr 2021;131:103895. link1

[42] Bao Y, Tang Z, Li H, Zhang Y. Computer vision and deep learning‒based data anomaly detection method for structure health monitoring. Struct Health Monit 2019;18(2):401‒21. link1

[43] Tang Z, Chen Z, Bao Y, Li H. Convolutional neural network-based data anomaly detection method using multiple information for structure health monitoring. Struct Control Health Monit 2019;26(1):e2296. link1

[44] Chen C, Zhang D, Castro PS, Li N, Sun L, Li S, et al. iBOAT: isolation-based online anomalous trajectory detection. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 2013;14(2):806‒18. link1

[45] Yang WX, Tes PW. Development of an advanced noise reduction method for vibration analysis based on singular value decomposition. NDT E Int 2003;36(6):419‒32. link1

[46] Žvokelj M, Zupan S, Prebil I. Non-linear multivariate and multiscale monitoring and signal denoising strategy using kernel principal component analysis combined with ensemble empirical mode decomposition method. Mech Syst Signal Process 2011;25(7):2631‒53. link1

[47] Calabrese L, Campanella G, Proverbio E. Noise removal by cluster analysis after long time ae corrosion monitoring of steel reinforcement in concrete. Constr Build Mater 2012;34:362‒71. link1

[48] Jiang X, Mahadevan S, Adeli H. Bayesian wavelet packet denoising for structural system identification. Struct Control Health Monit 2007;14(2):333‒56. link1

[49] Katicha SW, Flintsch G, Bryce J, Ferne B. Wavelet denoising of TSD deflection slope measurements for improved pavement structural evaluation. Comput Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 2014;29(6):399‒415. link1

[50] Du B, Sun X, Ye J, Cheng K, Wang J, Sun L. GAN-based anomaly detection for multivariate time series using polluted training set. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 2021:1‒13. link1

[51] Neerukatti RK, Hensberry K, Kovvali N, Chattopadhyay A. A novel probabilistic approach for damage localization and prognosis including temperature compensation. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 2016;27(5):592‒607. link1

[52] Pavlopoulou S, Worden K, Soutis C. Novelty detection and dimension reduction via guided ultrasonic waves: damage monitoring of scarf repairs in composite laminates. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 2016;27(4):549‒66. link1

[53] Yuan L, Fan W, Yang X, Ge S, Xia C, Foong SY, et al. Piezoelectric PAN/BaTiO3 nanofiber membranes sensor for structure health monitoring of real-time damage detection in composite. Compos Commun 2021;25:100680. link1

[54] Castaldo P, Jalayer F, Palazzo B. Probabilistic assessment of groundwater leakage in diaphragm wall joints for deep excavations. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2018;71:531‒43. link1

[55] Liu G, Mao Z, Todd M, Huang Z. Damage assessment with state-space embedding strategy and singular value decomposition under stochastic excitation. Struct Health Monit 2014;13(2):131‒42. link1

[56] Nichols J, Todd M, Wait J. Using state space predictive modeling with chaotic interrogation in detecting joint preload loss in a frame structure experiment. Smart Mater Struct 2003;12(4):580‒601. link1

[57] Sohn H, Allen DW, Worden K, Farrar CR. Statistical damage classification using sequential probability ratio tests. Struct Health Monit 2003;2(1):57‒74. link1

[58] Lynch JP, Sundararajan A, Law KH, Kiremidjian AS, Carryer E. Embedding damage detection algorithms in a wireless sensing unit for operational power efficiency. Smart Mater Struct 2004;13(4):800‒10. link1

[59] Nair KK, Kiremidjian AS, Law KH. Time series-based damage detection and localization algorithm with application to the ASCE benchmark structure. J Sound Vib 2006;291(1‒2):349‒68.

[60] Wu Z, Xu B, Yokoyama K. Decentralized parametric damage detection based on neural networks. Comput Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 2002;17(3):175‒84. link1

[61] Yan L, Elgamal A, Cottrell GW. Substructure vibration NARX neural network approach for statistical damage inference. J Eng Mech 2013;139(6):737‒47. link1

[62] Gul M, Necati CF. Statistical pattern recognition for structure health monitoring using time series modeling: theory and experimental verifications. Mech Syst Signal Process 2009;23(7):2192‒204. link1

[63] Skarlatos D, Karakasis K, Trochidis A. Railway wheel fault diagnosis using a fuzzy-logic method. Appl Acoust 2004;65(10):951‒66. link1

[64] Sohn H, Kim SD, Harries K. Reference-free damage classification based on cluster analysis. Comput Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 2008;23(5):324‒38. link1

[65] Kesavan KN, Kiremidjian AS. A wavelet-based damage diagnosis algorithm using principal component analysis. Struct Control Health Monit 2012;19(8):672‒85. link1

[66] Liu XZ, Ni YQ. Wheel tread defect detection for high-speed trains using FBGbased online monitoring techniques. Smart Struct Syst 2018;21(5):687‒94.

[67] Abdeljaber O, Avci O, Kiranyaz MS, Boashash B, Sodano H, Inman DJ. 1-d CNNs for structural damage detection: verification on a structure health monitoring benchmark data. Neurocomputing 2018;275:1308‒17. link1

[68] Mousavi Z, Varahram S, Ettefagh MM, Sadeghi MH, Razavi SN. Deep neural networks-based damage detection using vibration signals of finite element model and real intact state: an evaluation via a lab-scale offshore jacket structure. Struct Health Monit 2021;20(1):379‒405. link1

[69] Zhao J, Du B, Sun L, Zhuang F, Lv W, Xiong H. Multiple relational attention network for multi-task learning. In: Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining; 2019 Aug 4‒8; Anchorage, AK, USA. New York City: Association for Computing Machinery; 2019. p. 1123‒31. link1

[70] Chen C, Liu Q, Wang X, Liao C, Zhang D. semi-Traj2Graph: identifying finegrained driving style with GPS trajectory data via multi-task learning. IEEE Trans Big Data 2021;8(6):1‒15.

[71] Tran D, Bourdev L, Fergus R, Torresani L, Paluri M. Learning spatiotemporal features with 3D convolutional networks. In: Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV); 2015 Dec 11‍‒‍18; Santiago, Chile. Danvers: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE); 2015. p. 4489‒97. link1

[72] LeCun Y, Kavukcuoglu K, Farabet C. Convolutional networks and applications in vision. In: Proceedings of 2010 IEEEInternational Symposium on Circuits and Systems ISCAS); 2010 May 30‒Jun 2; Paris, France. Paris: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE); 2010. p. 253‒6. link1

[73] Li Y, Yu R, Shahabi C, Liu Y. Diffusion convolutional recurrent neural network: data-driven traffic forecasting. In: Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Learning Representations; 2018 Apr 30‒May 3; Vancouver Convention Center, Vancouver, BC, Canada. OpenReview.net; 2017. p. 1‒16.

[74] Yu B, Yin H, Zhu Z. Spatio‒temporal graph convolutional networks: a deep learning framework for traffic forecasting. In: JérômeL, editor. Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-18); 2018 Jul 13‒19; Stockholm, Sweden. Palo Alto: AAAI Press; 2017. p. 3634‒40. link1

[75] Chen Y, Ye YQ, Sun BN, Lou W, Yu J. Application of model prediction technology to bridge health monitoring. J Zhejiang Univ Eng Sci 2008;42(1):157‒63.

[76] Yang N, Bai X. Forecasting structural strains from long-term monitoring data of a traditional Tibetan building. Struct Control Health Monit 2019;26(1):e2300. link1

[77] Solhjell IK. Bayesian forecasting and dynamic models applied to strain data from the Göta river bridge [dissertation]. Blindern: University of Oslo; 2009.

[78] Wang Y, Ni Y. Bayesian dynamic forecasting of structural strain response using structure healthmonitoring data. Struct Control HealthMonit 2020;27(8):e2575. link1

[79] Ching J, Chen YC. Transitional Markov chain Monte Carlo method for Bayesian model updating, model class selection, and model averaging. J of Eng Mech 2007;133(7):816‒32. link1

[80] Cheung SH, Beck JL. Calculation of posterior probabilities for Bayesian model class assessment and averaging from posterior samples based on dynamic system data. Comput Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 2010;25(5):304‒21. link1

[81] Fei X, Lu CC, Liu K. A Bayesian dynamic linear model approach for real-time short-term freeway travel time prediction. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 2011;19(6):1306‒18. link1

[82] Fan X, Liu Y. Dynamic extreme stress prediction of bridges based on nonlinear mixed Gaussian particle filtering algorithm and structure health monitoring data. Adv Mech Eng 2016;8(6):1‒10. link1

[83] Dervilis N, Shi H, Worden K, Cross E. Exploring environmental and operational variations in SHM data using heteroscedastic Gaussian processes. Dyna Civil Struct 2016;2:145‒53. link1

[84] Worden K, Cross E. On switching response surface models, with applications to the structure health monitoring of bridges. Mech Syst Signal Process 2018;98:139‒56. link1

[85] Caywood MS, Roberts DM, Colombe JB, Greenwald HS, Weiland MZ. Gaussian process regression for predictive but interpretable machine learning models: an example of predicting mental workload across tasks. Front Hum Neurosci 2017;10:647. link1

[86] Su G, Yu B, Xiao Y, Yan L. Gaussian process machine-learning method for structural reliability analysis. Adv Struct Eng 2014;17(9):1257‒70. link1

[87] Prakash G, Sadhu A, Narasimhan S, Brehe JM. Initial service life data towards structure health monitoring of a concrete arch dam. Struct Control Health Monit 2018;25(1):e2036. link1

[88] Wang X, Yang K, Shen C. Study on MGPA-BP of gravity dam deformation prediction. Math Probl Eng 2017;2586107:1‒18. link1

[89] Kang F, Liu J, Li J, Li S. Concrete dam deformation prediction model for health monitoring based on extreme learning machine. Struct Control Health Monit 2017;24(10):e1997. link1

[90] Deng NW, Qiu FQ, Xu H. Application of BP model to data analysis of earth-rock dams. Eng J Wuhan Univ 2001;34(4):17‒20. Chinese.

[91] Kao CY, Loh CH. Monitoring of long-term static deformation data of Fei-Tsui arch dam using artificial neural network-based approaches. Struct Control Health Monit 2013;20(3):282‒303. link1

[92] Lam HF, Yuen KV, Beck JL. Structure health monitoring via measured ritz vectors utilizing artificial neural networks. Comput Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng 2006;21(4):232‒41. link1

[93] Du B, Li W, Tan X, Ye J, Chen W, Sun L. Development of load-temporal model to predict the further mechanical behaviors of tunnel structure under various boundary conditions. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2021;116:104077. link1

[94] Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J. Long short-term memory. Neural Comput 1997;9(8):1735‒80. link1

[95] Chen C, Zhang D, Wang Y, Huang HY. Enabling smart urban services with GPS trajectory Data. Heidelberg: Springer; 2021. link1

[96] Troisi R, Castaldo P. Technical and organizational challenges in the risk management of road infrastructures. J Risk Res 2022;25(6):791‒806. link1

Related Research