Strategic Study of Chinese Academy of Engineering >> 2016, Volume 18, Issue 4 doi: 10.15302/J-SSCAE-2016.04.017
Study on Overseas Practice Strategic Emerging Industries
Analysis of Foreign Classical Policy Tools for Strategic Emerging Industries—Government Procurement and Subsidy Policies
1.School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China;
2. School of Public Policy and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, ChinaReceived：2016-05-30 Revised：2016-07-12 Available online：2016-09-21
At present, the strategic emerging industry has become the key to upgrading a country's industrial structure and to winning a priority of economic development. Various countries start to consider the development of emerging industries as a national level strategy and apply a portfolio of policy tools to promote the development of emerging industries. Therefore, research of the important measures adopted by other countries in promoting the development of emerging industries offers important reference for China to carry out relevant policies. This paper mainly analyzes two classical policy tools adopted by developed countries, including government procurement and government subsidiary, so as to provide reference for China to cultivate and develop its strategic emerging industries.
emerging industry ; policy tools ; government procurement ; government subsidiary ; industrial policy analysis
 Guo X H, Li X Y. Energetically develop strategic emerging indus-tries [N]. People’s Daily, 2015-12-31 (7). Chinese.
 Ning S. Study of public policies [M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2011. Chinese. link1
 Rothwell R, Zegveld W. Reindustrialization and technology [M]. New York: M.E. Sharp, Inc, 1985. link1
 Nemet G F. Demand-pull, technology-push, and government-led incentives for non-incremental technical change [J]. Research Pol-icy, 2009, 38 (5): 700–709. link1
 Zhao X Y, Su J. An analysis framework for public S & T policies: the perspective of policy tools [J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2007, 25 (1): 52–56. Chinese. link1
 Stefano G D, Gambardella A, Verona G. Technology push and demand pull perspectives in innovation studies: Current findings and future research directions [J]. Research Policy, 2012, 41 (8): 1283–1295. link1
 Peters M, Schneider M, Griesshaber T, et al. The impact of tech-nology-push and demand-pull policies on technical change-Does the locus of policies matter? [J]. Research Policy, 2012, 41 (8): 1296–1308. link1
 Wei J Y, Hong Z S, Xv G N. Reflections and analysis of strategic emerging industries’ relevant policies during the “12th Five-year Plan”. Report on the development of China’s strategic industries (2015) [M]. Beijing: China Science Publishing & Media Ltd., 2014. Chinese.
 Song H F, Mu R P, Ren Z B. Study on correlation between the government procurement policy and the related implemented rules [J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2011, 29 (2): 291–299. Chinese. link1
 Guo A F, Zhou J Z. Practices adopted by US government to sup-port technological innovations and their reference meanings [J]. Science of Scientific and Management of S&T, 2003, 24 (1): 49–51. Chinese. link1
 Liu J M. Analysis of British government’s procurement system and revelation [J]. Public Finance Research, 2013, (3): 69–74. Chinese. link1
 Georghiou L, Edler J, Uyarra E, et al. Policy instruments for pub-lic procurement of innovation: Choice, design and assessment [J]. Technoloical Forecasting and Social Change, 2014, 86: 1–12. link1
 Uyarra E, Edler J, Garcia-Estevez J, et al. Barriers to innovation through public procurement: A supplier perspective [J]. Technova-tion, 2014, 34 (10): 631–645. link1
 Wang C H. On government procurement promoting self-innovation in China [J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2006, 24 (6): 967–970. Chinese. link1
 Edquist C, Zabala-Iturriagagoitia J M. Pre-commercial procure-ment: a demand or supply policy instrument in relation to innova-tion? [J] R & D Management, 2015, 45 (2): 147–160. link1
 Dufek L. Public Procurement: A panel data approach [J]. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2015, 25: 535–542. link1
 Fan Q, Han M C. The impact of government R&D subsidy on the performance of national and regional independent innovation—an empirical research based on the panel data of 28 provincial regions [J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Manage-ment, 2011, 25 (3): 183–188. Chinese. link1
 Wang S P, Yu M, Yan X F. Main developed countries’ new en-ergy policies and their revelations to China [C]// Wang Z. Low carbon economy and development of energy enterprises: Literary collection of the fourth China’s energy strategy international forum. Beijing: Petroleum industry press, 2009. Chinese.
 Mock P, Yang Z F. Driving electrification: A global comparison of fiscal incentive policy for electric vehicles [R/OL]. (2014-05-06) [2016-04-22].