Journal Home Online First Current Issue Archive For Authors Journal Information 中文版

Strategic Study of CAE >> 2020, Volume 22, Issue 1 doi: 10.15302/J-SSCAE-2020.01.018

International Comparative Study on the Setting of Medical Specialty Catalogue and Countermeasures

1. China−Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China;

2. Beijing Hospital, Beijing 100730, China; 

3. Chinese Academy of Engineering, Beijing 100088, China;

4. Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China

Funding project:CAE Advisory Project “Research on the Current Situation, Problems and Development Strategies of Chinese Doctors” (2017-XZ-21) Received: 2019-07-16 Revised: 2019-12-10 Available online: 2020-02-19

Next Previous

Abstract

The medical specialty catalogue is of great significance for promoting the development of the medical discipline and cultivating qualified medical talents; therefore, a comprehensive and scientific medical specialty catalogue becomes even more important in the context of constructing first-class disciplines in colleges and universities. To promote the progressive development of medical disciplines in China, this research sorted out the medical specialty category by literature analysis, and systematically compared the features and category of medical specialty among the U.S. and the U.K. and China. Several major problems are raised as follow: non-uniform medical specialty and sub-specialty category, outdated arrangement of specialties in quantities and content, premature entry into sub-specialty training, inconsistent categories with standardized residential training, etc. To tackle the problems above, this research suggests that the medical specialty category should be in track with global standard, unified with interdisciplinary approach,and standardized admission and exit criteria be set up, which will prepare future qualified health professionals and promote the advancement of medical disciplines.

References

[ 1 ] Chen Y T, Hu W L, Xie P, et al. Study on the problems and countermeasures of the specialty catalogue of medical education [J]. China Higher Medical Education, 2010 (7): 15–16. Chinese. link1

[ 2 ] Frank J R, Mungroo R, Ahmad Y, et al. Toward a definition of competency-based education in medicine: A systematic review of published definitions [J]. Medical Teacher, 2010, 32(8): 631–637. link1

[ 3 ] Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta Z A, et al. Health professionals for a new century: Transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world [J]. The Lancet, 2010, 376 (9756): 1923–1958. link1

[ 4 ] Wu H X, Wang L, Wu H M, et al. Work report on the revision of the discipline category in the field of medicine [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2011, 31(3): 334–337. Chinese.

[ 5 ] National Center for Education Statistics. Classification of instructional programs: 2000 edition. [EB/OL]. (2002-05-08) [2019- 07- 02]. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/2002165.pdf. link1

[ 6 ] Zhang Z F. The feature of the setup for college subjects, majors and curriculums in the United States and the enlightenments [J]. Modern Education Science, 2015 (3): 161–166. Chinese. link1

[ 7 ] Liu D H, Liu J. A comparative study of American and Chinese discipline specialty [J]. Journal of Changchun University of Technology (Higher Education Study Edition), 2008, 29(4): 114–116. Chinese. link1

[ 8 ] Higher Education Statistics Agency. JACS3.0 [EB/OL]. (2013-02-01) [2019-07-02]. https://www.hesa.ac.uk/support/documentation/ jacs. link1

[ 9 ] Han S M, Xu W M , Yi L T. The catalogue of graduate disciplines in UK: Evolution track and enlightenment [J]. Academic Degrees & Graduate Education, 2019 (8): 71–77. Chinese. link1

[10] Zhou J J, Hu W L, Xie P, et al. International adaptability of discipline and specialty directory adjustment in medical field [J]. Northwest Medical Education, 2010, 18(3): 429–431, 441. Chinese. link1

Related Research