Journal Home Online First Current Issue Archive For Authors Journal Information 中文版

Strategic Study of CAE >> 2004, Volume 6, Issue 12

200 km Per Hour一The Best Choice for Beijing - Shanghai Express Railway

Bohai Shipbuilding Heavy Industry Co. , Ltd, Huludao, Liaoning 125004, China

Received: 2004-03-22 Revised: 2004-09-06 Available online: 2004-12-20

Next Previous

Abstract

This paper, proceeding from China's actual conditions, holds that in the construction of Beijing — Shanghai express railway China should choose “the optimal” instead of “the fastest”. For the long and medium distance the passenger train which “starts at sunset and arrives at daybreak” has the optimal cost performance. The paper maintains that the electrified fast-speed wheel/rail system with a speed of 200 km per hour should be the best choice for China*s railway development. It accords with not only the demands of the development of real socio-economic base of China, which is vast in territory, but also the demands of the future development of China and the world as well. In the time with increasing energy crisis, the maglev train with speed of 400 km per hour and the high-speed rail system with speed of 300 km per hour will lead to the unbearable wastes of socio-economic resources and huge loss in operation.

References

[ 1 ] 严陆光.关于我国高速磁悬浮列车发展战略的思考[J].中国工程科学,2002,4(12):40~46 link1

[ 2 ] 臧其吉,吴玉树,曾树谷,等.高速铁路是运输市场竞争和科学技术进步的产物[J],中国工程科学,2000,2(5):1~7 link1

[ 3 ] 李玉山,石 硕.京沪铁路的第三种声音[N].科学时报,2003-10-15(4)

[ 4 ] 李玉山.京沪高铁:“最优”还是“最高”[J].中国经济周刊,2004,(7):22~23 link1

[ 5 ] 华允璋.京沪高速线的造价分析、建设时机和方案选择[J].科技导报,2003,(6):14 link1

[ 6 ] 金履忠.轮轨技术是京沪高速铁路的必然选择———兼论日、德磁浮系统的现状[J].中国工程科学,2000,2(7):22~27 link1

[ 7 ] 丰 言.磁悬浮列车可能造成巨大噪音污染[N].科学时报,2004-04-16(2)

[ 8 ] 何邦模,黄建苒,戴未央,等.修建京沪高速铁路是正确的战略抉择[J].中国工程科学,2000,2(5):14~20 link1

[ 9 ] [美]米奇欧·卡库.远景———二十一世纪的科技演变[M ].海口:海南出版社,2000 link1

Related Research