期刊首页 优先出版 当期阅读 过刊浏览 作者中心 关于期刊 English

《环境科学与工程前沿(英文)》 >> 2022年 第16卷 第5期 doi: 10.1007/s11783-022-1544-5

Is atmospheric oxidation capacity better in indicating tropospheric O formation?

1. Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China;2. IRDR ICoE on Risk Interconnectivity and Governance on Weather/Climate Extremes Impact and Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China;3. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Particle Pollution and Prevention, Department of Environmental Science & Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China;4. Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, Bremen D-28359, Germany;5. Climate and Atmosphere Research Center (CARE-C), the Cyprus Institute, Nicosia 27456, Cyprus;6. Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg 20146, Germany;7. National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80307, USA;8. State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;9. State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Sources and Control of Air Pollution Complex, Beijing 100084, China;2. IRDR ICoE on Risk Interconnectivity and Governance on Weather/Climate Extremes Impact and Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China;3. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Particle Pollution and Prevention, Department of Environmental Science & Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China;10. Institute of Eco-Chongming (IEC), Shanghai 202162, China

收稿日期: 2022-02-22 录用日期: 2022-05-29 发布日期: 2022-04-10

下一篇 上一篇

摘要

● This study summarizes and evaluates different approaches that indicate O3 formation.

相关研究