期刊首页 优先出版 当期阅读 过刊浏览 作者中心 关于期刊 English

《工程(英文)》 >> 2016年 第2卷 第1期 doi: 10.1016/J.ENG.2016.01.017

HPR1000:具备能动与非能动安全性的先进压水堆

China Nuclear Power Engineering Co., Ltd., Beijing 100840, China

收稿日期: 2015-11-06 修回日期: 2016-03-04 录用日期: 2016-03-07 发布日期: 2016-03-31

下一篇 上一篇

摘要

HPR1000是具有能动与非能动安全性的先进核电站。它是基于现有压水堆核电站成熟技术的渐进式设计,融合了包括采用177组CF3先进燃料组件的堆芯能动与非能动安全系统、全面的严重事故预防与缓解措施、强化的外部事件防护能力和改进的应急响应能力在内的先进设计特征。针对关键的自主创新技术,如非能动系统、堆芯和主设备,研究人员已经开展了充分的试验验证。 HPR1000的设计满足国际上对先进轻水堆的用户要求以及最新的核安全要求,并且考虑了福岛事故的经验反馈。基于其出色的安全性与经济性,HPR1000为国内与国际核电市场提供了卓越可行的解决方案。

图片

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

参考文献

[ 1 ] International Atomic Energy Agency [Internet]. Vienna: 50 years of nuclear energy. [cited 2015Aug13]. Available from: https://www.iaea.org/About/Policy/GC/GC48/Documents/gc48inf-4_ftn3.pdf.

[ 2 ] OECD Nuclear Energy Agency. Nuclear energy today. 2nd ed. Paris: Nuclear Energy Agency of the OECD; 2013.

[ 3 ] World Nuclear Association [Internet]. London: nuclear power in the world today. 2016Jan [cited 2015Aug13]. Available from: http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/Current-and-Future-Generation/Nuclear-Power-in-the-World-Today/.

[ 4 ] International Atomic Energy Agency. Nuclear power reactors in the world (2015 edition). Vienna: IAEA; 2015.

[ 5 ] Goldberg SM, Rosner R. Nuclear reactors: generation to generation. Cambridge: American Academy of Arts and Sciences; 2011.

[ 6 ] Zhang RP, Zhang X, Zhang LQ. Technical evolution of leading nuclear power reactor types in the world. China Nucl Power 2009; 2(1): 85−9; 2(2): 184−9; 2(3): 276−81; 2(4): 371−9. Chinese.

[ 7 ] Electric Power Research Institute. Advanced light water reactor utility requirement document. Palo Alto, CA: EPRI; 1990.

[ 8 ] EUR organization. European utility requirements for LWR nuclear power plants. 2001.

[ 9 ] International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA international fact finding expert mission of the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP accident following the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami. Vienna: IAEA; 2011.

[10] Nuclear Emergency Response Headquarters, Government of Japan. Report of Japanese government to IAEA ministerial conference on nuclear safety−the accident at TEPCO’s Fukushima nuclear power stations. 2011.

[11] Miller C, Cubbage A, Dorman D, Grobe J, Holahan G, Sanfilippo N; US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Recommendations for enhancing reactor safety in the 21st century: the near-term task force review of insights form the Fukushima Dai-ichi accident. New York: Progressive Management; 2011.

[12] HM Chief Inspector of Nuclear Installations. Japanese earthquake and tsunami: implications for the UK Nuclear Industry. 2011.

[13] Wu YX, Song DY, Zhao GH. Post-Fukushima tendency of nuclear power codes and standards. Nucl Sci Eng 2013; 33(3): 329−36. Chinese.

[14] Autorité de Sûreté nucléaire. Complementary safety assessment of the French nuclear power plants (European “stress tests”) −report by the French Nuclear Safety Authority. 2011.

[15] European Commission. Communication from the commission to the council and the European parliament−on the interim report on the comprehensive risk and safety assessments (“stress tests”) of nuclear power plants in the European Union. 2011.

[16] China National Nuclear Safety Administration. General technical requirements for post-Fukushima improvement actions of NPP (tentative). 2012. Chinese.

[17] WENRA Reactor Harmonization Working Group. Report−safety of new NPP designs. 2013.

[18] International Atomic Energy Agency. Safety of nuclear power plants: design. IAEA Safety Standards Series No.: SSR-2/1 (Rev. 1). Vienna: IAEA. Forthcoming2016.

相关研究