期刊首页 优先出版 当期阅读 过刊浏览 作者中心 关于期刊 English

《中国工程科学》 >> 2020年 第22卷 第4期 doi: 10.15302/J-SSCAE-2020.04.022

我国设立法医局的必要性及其管理模式

1. 中国政法大学证据科学研究院,北京100088;

2. 河北医科大学法医学院,石家庄050017;

3. 河北省法医学实验室,石家庄050017;

4. 河北省法医分子协同创新中心,石家庄050017

资助项目 :中国工程院咨询项目“法医科学与社会治理法治化战略研究”(2019-XZ-31) 收稿日期: 2020-05-22 修回日期: 2020-06-27 发布日期: 2020-08-11

下一篇 上一篇

摘要

深化司法体制改革,健全统一司法鉴定管理体制是推进全面依法治国的重要组成部分。理顺法医鉴定管理制度是完善统一司法鉴定管理体制的重中之重。本文通过国内外法医鉴定管理制度比较,分析了我国法医鉴定领域管理部门分散、执业环境过度市场化、区域发展失衡、科研力量分散等弊端,探讨了我国成立法医局管理模式的可行性和必要性。研究阐述了法医局的运行和职责定位,认为应充分整合我国现有的各部门法医学资源,发挥现有的法医学专业人才力量,建立统一的、独立于公检法系统的国家级、省级、地市级三级法医局,不断提高法医鉴定权威性和公信力;建议由法医局承担司法鉴定、科学研究、职称评定、人才培养等职责,负责制定法医鉴定技术标准和工作指南。

参考文献

[ 1 ] 霍宪丹. 司法鉴定管理是社会管理与公共服务的统一 [J]. 中国 司法, 2011 (9): 94–96. Huo X D. Forensic identification management is the unity of social management and public services [J]. Justice of China, 2011 (9): 94–96.
Huo X D. Forensic identification management is the unity of social management and public services [J]. Justice of China, 2011 (9): 94–96. Chinese. 链接1

[ 2 ] 常林. 谁是司法鉴定的 “守门人” ? [J]. 证据科学, 2010, 18(5): 618–632 . Chang L. Who is the “gate-keeper” of expert opinions? [J]. Evidence Science, 2010, 18 (5): 618–632.
Chang L. Who is the “gate-keeper” of expert opinions? [J]. Evidence Science, 2010, 18 (5): 618–632. Chinese. 链接1

[ 3 ] 司法部司法鉴定管理局. 两大法系法医鉴定制度的观察与借鉴 [M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2008. Judicial Authenticationl Bureau of the Ministry of Justice. Observation and application of the Judicial Authentication System of the Two Law System [M]. Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press, 2008.
Judicial Authentication Bureau of the Ministry of Justice. Observation and application of the Judicial Authentication System of the Two Law System [M]. Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press, 2008. Chinese.

[ 4 ] 陈如超. 司法鉴定管理体制改革的方向与逻辑 [J]. 法学研究, 2016, 38(1): 187–208. Chen R C. The direction and logic of the reform of the forensic authentication management system [J].Chinese Journal of Law, 2016, 38 (1): 187–208.
Chen R C. The direction and logic of the reform of the forensic authentication management system [J]. Chinese Journal of Law, 2016, 38 (1): 187–208. Chinese. 链接1

[ 5 ] 霍宪丹. 司法鉴定统一管理机制研究 [M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2017. Huo X D. Research on unified management mechanism of forensic authentication [M]. Beijing: Law Press, 2017.
Huo X D. Research on unified management mechanism of forensic authentication [M]. Beijing: Law Press, 2017. Chinese.

[ 6 ] 陈永生. 我国刑事误判问题透视——以20起震惊全国的刑事冤 案为样本的分析 [J]. 中国法学, 2007 (3): 45–61. Chen Y S. Perspective of China’s criminal misjudgment: Analysis based on 20 criminal wrong cases that shocking the Country [J]. China Legal Science, 2007 (3): 45–61.
Chen Y S. Perspective of China’s criminal misjudgment: Analysis based on 20 criminal wrong cases that shocking the Country [J]. China Legal Science, 2007 (3): 45–61. Chinese. 链接1

[ 7 ] 郭华. 健全统一司法鉴定管理体制的实施意见的历程及解读 [J]. 中国法医鉴定, 2017 (5): 1–7. Guo H. History and interpretation of the implementation opinions on perfecting the unified judicial authentication management system [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Science, 2017 (5): 1–7.
Guo H. History and interpretation of the implementation opinions on perfecting the unified judicial authentication management system [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Science, 2017 (5): 1–7. Chinese. 链接1

[ 8 ] 司法部司法鉴定管理局. 司法部司鉴局简报 [R]. 北京: 司法部 司法鉴定管理局, 2015. Judicial Authentication Administration of the Ministry of Justice. Brief report about the judicial authentication [R]. Beijing: Judicial Authentication Administration of the Ministry of Justice, 2015.
Judicial Authentication Administration of the Ministry of Justice. Brief report about the judicial authentication [R]. Beijing: Judicial Authentication Administration of the Ministry of Justice, 2015. Chinese.

[ 9 ] 党凌云, 张效礼. 2017年度全国司法鉴定情况统计分析 [J]. 中 国法医鉴定, 2018 (3): 96–100. Dang L Y, Zhang X L. Statistical analysis of national forensicauthentication in 2017 [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Science, 2018 (3): 96–100.
Dang L Y, Zhang X L. Statistical analysis of national forensic authentication in 2017 [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Science, 2018 (3): 96–100. 链接1

[10] 国家自然科学基金委员会. 关于公布2019年度国家自然科学 基金申请项目评审结果的通告 [EB/OL]. (2019-08-16)[2019- 12-21]. http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/publish/portal0/tab442/info76217. htm. National Natural Science Foundation of China. Announcement on the announcement of the evaluation results of the National Natural Science Foundation of China in 2019 [EB/OL]. (2019-08- 16)[2019-12-21]. http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/publish/portal0/tab442/ info76217.htm.
National Natural Science Foundation of China. Announcement on the announcement of the evaluation results of the National Natural Science Foundation of China in 2019 [EB/OL]. (2019-08-16) [2019-12-21]. http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/publish/portal0/tab442/ info76217.htm. Chinese. 链接1

[11] National Institute of Justice. National Institute of Justice’s “2019 National Institute of Justice Funding List”[EB / OL)]. (2019-12-20) [2020-04-15]. https://nij.ojp.gov/funding/awards/list?field_award_ status_value=All&state=All&field_fiscal_year_value=2019&- combine_awards=&awardee=&city=&sort_by=field_fiscal_year_ value&sort_order=DESC. 链接1

[12] 王红健. 对基层公安法医队伍建设的思考 [J]. 法医学杂志, 2015, 31(4): 314–316. Wang H J. Thinking about the construction of grassroots public security forensic team [J]. Journal of Forensic Medicine, 2015, 31 (4): 314–316.
Wang H J. Thinking about the construction of grassroots public security forensic team [J]. Journal of Forensic Medicine, 2015, 31 (4): 314–316. Chinese. 链接1

[13] 李友梅. 中国社会治理转型(1978—2018)[M]. 北京: 社会科 学文献出版社, 2018. Li Y M. Transformation of China’s social governance (1978— 2018) [M]. Beijing: Social Science Academic Press, 2018.
Li Y M. Transformation of China’s social governance (1978—2018) [M]. Beijing: Social Science Academic Press, 2018. Chinese.

[14] 霍宪丹, 盛小列. 让科技为正义说话 [M]. 北京: 中国科学技术 出版社, 2013. Huo X D, Sheng X L. Let science and technology speak for justice [M]. Beijing: Science and Technology of China Press, 2013.
Huo X D, Sheng X L. Let science and technology speak for justice [M]. Beijing: Science and Technology of China Press, 2013. Chinese.

[15] 顾敏. 我省首次集中清理54家司法鉴定机构 [N]. 新华日报, 2019-11-13 (3). Gu M. 54 forensic authentication agencies in our province were cleaned up for the first time [N]. Xinhua Daily, 2019-11-13, (3).
Gu M. 54 forensic authentication agencies in our province were cleaned up for the first time [N]. Xinhua Daily, 2019-11-13, (03). Chinese.

[16] 樊崇义, 阮娜. 北京司法鉴定行业社会调查报告 [J]. 中国司法, 2016 (9): 54–59. Fan C Y, Ruan N. Social investigation report of Beijing forensic authentication industry [J]. Justice of China, 2016 (9): 54–59.
Fan C Y, Ruan N. Social investigation report of Beijing forensic authentication industry [J]. Justice of China, 2016 (9): 54–59. Chinese. 链接1

相关研究