航空发动机下一代适航规章制定策略和技术路径

2022年第24卷第4期

摘要

关键词

图片

参考文献

相关研究

回顶部

《中国工程科学》 >> 2022年第24卷第4期 doi: 10.15302/J-SSCAE-2022.04.020

航空发动机下一代适航规章制定策略和技术路径

1. 中国航空发动机集团有限公司，北京 100097；

2. 中国民航大学，天津 300300；

3. 北京航空航天大学航空发动机研究院，北京 100191

资助项目：中国工程院咨询项目“航空发动机自主适航规章的制定策略和技术路径研究”(2019-XY-73), “中国航空发动机自主适航规章的顶层架构和瓶颈技术簇特征研究”(2020-XZ-01) 收稿日期： 2022-04-10 修回日期： 2022-07-05 发布日期： 2022-08-04

HTML209 PDF 164 收藏 0

摘要

适航规章是民用航空产品安全性的核心保障，是民航强国、航空强国的重要标志。完善的适航规章体系是民用航空工业发达国家合理利用国际民航组织规则，保障民用航空产品安全性和最广泛市场占有率的技术与管理手段；随着我国大型飞机、航空发动机和燃气轮机重大科技专项的实施，进一步完善我国适航规章体系建设必要且紧迫。本文深入剖析了航空发动机适航规章的技术内涵，系统梳理了当前国内外航空发动机适航规章存在的突出问题，在此基础上从国际民航组织和我国民用航空工业两个视角，开展了下一代航空发动机适航规章的制定策略和技术路径研究。本文研究结果明确了以“系统安全要求”为统领，以“安全等效、逻辑清晰、国际兼容、本土适用”为原则的航空发动机下一代适航规章制定策略和技术路径；提出了航空发动机适航规章顶层新架构，该架构在充分继承国际上已有经验教训、安全标准不降低的同时，更加适应航空发动机在系统安全性技术方面的进步，且可灵活适应航空发动机新技术发展和创新。最后，针对我国航空发动机适航规章体系建设，提出了持续深化研究、同步扩大应用、行业协同发展的对策建议。

关键词

下一代适航规章 ; 航空发动机 ; 新规章架构 ; 系统安全要求

图片

图1

图2

图3

图4

参考文献

[ 1 ] 中国民用航空局 . 新时代民航强国建设行动纲要 [EBOL]. 2018-11-26 [ 2022-06-20 ]. http:www.caac.gov.cnXXGKXXGKZFGW201812t20181212_193447.html .
Civil Aviation Administration of China. Action plan for building a strong civil aviation country in the new era [EB/OL]. (2018-11-26) [2022-06-20]. Chinese.

[ 2 ] Federal Aviation Administration. FAR part 33 Amendment 33-34 airworthiness standards: Engines [S]. Washington DC: Federal Aviation Administration, 2014.

[ 3 ] European Aviation Safety Agency. CS-E Amendment 6 certification specifications and acceptable means of compliance for engines [S]. Cologne: European Aviation Safety Agency, 2020.

[ 4 ] 中国民用航空局 . CCAR-33R2 航空发动机适航规定 [EBOL]. 2016-05-17 [ 2022-06-20 ]. http: www.caac.gov.cnXXGKXXGKMHGZ201606t20160622_38639.html .
Civil Aviation Administration of China. CCAR-33R2 Aeroengine airworthiness regulations [EB/OL]. (2016-03-17) [2022-06-20]. Chinese.

[ 5 ] Federal Aviation Administration, Aerospace Industries Association. Technical report on propulsion system and Auxiliary Power Unit (APU) related aircraft safety hazards [R]. Washington DC: Federal Aviation Administration, 1999.

[ 6 ] Federal Aviation Administration, Aerospace Industries Association. 2nd technical report on propulsion system and Auxiliary Power Unit (APU) related aircraft safety hazards [R]. Washington DC: Federal Aviation Administration, 2005.

[ 7 ] Federal Aviation Administration, Aerospace Industries Association. 3rd technical report on propulsion system and Auxiliary Power Unit (APU) related aircraft safety hazards [R]. Washington DC: Federal Aviation Administration, 2017.

[ 8 ] Society of Automotive Engineers. SAE ARP4754—2010 guidelines for development of civil aircraft and systems [S]. Washington DC: Society of Automotive Engineers, 2010.

[ 9 ] Society of Automotive Engineers. SAE ARP4761—1996 guidelines and methods for conducting the safety assessment process on civil airborne systems and equipment [S]. Washington DC: Society of Automotive Engineers, 1996.

[10] Federal Aviation Administration. AC 20-115C airborne software assurance [S]. Washington DC: Federal Aviation Administration, 2013.
Federal Aviation Administration. AC 20-115D Airborne software development assurance using EUROCAE ED-12( ) and RTCA DO-178( ) [S]. Washington DC: Federal Aviation Administration, 2017.

[11] Federal Aviation Administration. AC 20-152 RTCA, Inc., RTCA/DO-document254, design assurance guidance for airborne electronic hardware [EB/OL]. (2007-07-05)[2022-06-20]. https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/advisory_circulars/index.‍cfm/go/document.information/documentID/22211.
Federal Aviation Administration. AC 20-152 RTCA, Inc., document RTCA/DO-254, design assurance guidance for airborne electronic hardware [S]. Washington DC: Federal Aviation Administration, 2005. 链接1

[12] Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics. Software considerations in airborne systems and equipment certification: RTCA DO-178C-2011 [S]. Washington DC: Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics, 2011.

[13] Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics. Design assurance guidance for airborne electronic hardware: RTCA DO-254-2000 [S]. Washington DC: Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics, 2000.

[14] Federal Aviation Administration. FAR part 33.75 amendment 33-6 safety analysis [S]. Washington DC: Federal Aviation Administration, 1974.

[15] Federal Aviation Administration. FAR part 33.75 amendment 33-24 safety analysis [S]. Washington DC: Federal Aviation Administration, 2007.