2018, Volume 4, Issue 3
Engineering >> 2018, Volume 4, Issue 3 doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2018.05.008
Turning Industrial Residues into Resources: An Environmental Impact Assessment of Goethite Valorization
Department of Materials Engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven 3001, Belgium
Next Previous
Abstract
Goethite is a metals-rich residue that occurs during zinc production. The feasibility of metal recovery from goethite has been demonstrated, but is not economically viable on an industrial scale. Therefore, goethite is landfilled with considerable economic costs and environmental risks. The goal of this study is to evaluate the environmental performance of a new valorization strategy for goethite residues from zinc production, with the aims of: ① recovering the valuable zinc contained in the goethite and ② avoiding the landfilling of goethite by producing a clean byproduct. The presented goethite valorization strategy consists of a sequence of two processes: ① plasma fuming and ② inorganic polymerization of the fumed slag. Plasma fuming recovers the valuable metals by fuming the goethite. The metals-free fumed slag undergoes a process of inorganic polymerization to form inorganic polymers, that can be used as a novel building material, as an alternative to ordinary Portland cement (OPC)-based concrete. Lifecycle assessment (LCA) is used to compare the environmental performance of the inorganic polymer with the environmental performances of equivalent OPC-based concrete. The LCA results show the tradeoff between the environmental burdens of the fuming process and inorganic polymerization versus the environmental benefits of metal recovery, OPC concrete substitution, and the avoidance of goethite landfilling. The goethite-based inorganic polymers production shows better performances in several environmental impact categories, thanks to the avoided landfilling of goethite. However, in other environmental impact categories, such as global warming, the goethite valorization is strongly affected by the high-energy requirements of the plasma-fuming process, which represent the environmental hotspots of the proposed goethite recycling scheme. The key elements toward the sustainability of goethite valorization have been identified, and include the use of a clean electric mix, more effective control of the fumed gas emissions, and a reduced use of fumed slag through increased efficiency of the inorganic polymerization process.
Figures
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
References
[ 1 ] Van Genderen E, Wildnauer M, Santero N, Sidi N. A global life cycle assessment for primary zinc production. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2016;21(11):1580–93. link1
[ 2 ] Ismael MRC, Carvalho JMR. Iron recovery from sulphate leach liquors in zinc hydrometallurgy. Miner Eng 2003;16(1):31–9. link1
[ 3 ] Welham N, Malatt K, Vukcevic S. The stability of iron phases presently used for disposal from metallurgical systems—a review. Miner Eng 2000;13(8):911–31. link1
[ 4 ] Piga L, Stoppa L, Massidda R. Recycling of industrial goethite wastes by thermal treatment. Resour Conserv Recycling 1995;14(1):11–20. link1
[ 5 ] Pelino M, Cantalini C, Abbruzzese C, Plescia P. Treatment and recycling of goethite waste arising from the hydrometallurgy of zinc. Hydrometallurgy 1996;40(1–2):25–35. link1
[ 6 ] Hoang J, Reuter MA, Matusewicz R, Hughes S, Piret N. Top submerged lance direct zinc smelting. Hydrometallurgy 2009;22(9–10):742–51. link1
[ 7 ] Verscheure K, Van Camp M, Blanpain B, Wollants P, Hayes P, Jak E. Continuous fuming of zinc-bearing residues: part II. The submerged-plasma zinc-fuming process. Metall Mater Trans B 2007;38(1):21–33. link1
[ 8 ] Verscheure K, Van Camp M, Blanpain B, Wollants P, Hayes P, Jak E. Continuous fuming of zinc-bearing residues: part I. Model development. Metall Mater Trans B 2007;38(1):13–20. link1
[ 9 ] Alemán JV, Chadwick AV, He J, Hess M, Horie K, Jones RG, et al. Definitions of terms relating to the structure and processing of sols, gels, networks, and inorganic-organic hybrid materials (IUPAC recommendations 2007). Pure Appl Chem 2009;79(10):1801–29. link1
[10] Van Deventer JSJ, Provis JL, Duxson P, Brice DG. Chemical research and climate change as drivers in the commercial adoption of alkali activated materials. Waste Biomass Valoriz 2010;1(1):145–55. link1
[11] Iacobescu RI, Angelopoulos GN, Jones PT, Blanpain B, Pontikes Y. Ladle metallurgy stainless steel slag as a raw material in ordinary portland cement production: a possibility for industrial symbiosis. J Clean Prod 2016;112(Pt 1):872–81. link1
[12] Oh JE, Monteiro PJM, Jun SS, Choi S, Clark SM. The evolution of strength and crystalline phases for alkali-activated ground blast furnace slag and fly ash- based geopolymers. Cement Concr Res 2010;40(2):189–96. link1
[13] Setién J, Hernández D, González JJ. Characterization of ladle furnace basic slag for use as a construction material. Constr Build Mater 2009;23(5):1788–94. link1
[14] Shi C, Qian J. High performance cementing materials from industrial slags—a review. Resour Conserv Recycling 2000;29(3):195–207. link1
[15] Heijungs R, Guinée JB. Allocation and ‘‘what-if” scenarios in life cycle assessment of waste management systems. Waste Manage 2007;27(8): 997–1005. link1
[16] Rebitzer G, Ekvall T, Frischknecht R, Hunkeler D, Norris G, Rydberg T, et al. Life cycle assessment part 1: framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Environ Int 2004;30(5):701–20. link1
[17] ISO 14040:2006. Environmental management—life cycle assessment— principles and frameworks. ISO standard. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2006.
[18] Doka G. Life cycle inventories of waste treatment services. Dubendorf: Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories; 2009.
[19] Richards GG, Brimacombe JK, Toop GW. Kinetics of the zinc slag-fuming process: part I. Industrial measurements. Metall Trans B 1985;16(3):513–27. link1
[20] Abdel-latif MA. Fundamentals of zinc recovery from metallurgical wastes in the Enviroplas process. Miner Eng 2002;15(11 Suppl 1):945–52. link1
[21] Electricity [Internet]. Oslo: Statistics Norway; c2018 [cited 2017 Jul 17]. link1
[22] Classen M, Althaus HJ, Blaser S, Doka G, Jungbluth N, Tuchschmid M. Life cycle inventories of metals. Dübendorf: Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories; 2009.
[23] Generating facilities [Internet]. New York: Elia; c2018 [cited 2017 Jul 17]. link1
[24] Machiels L, Arnout L, Jones PT, Blanpain B, Pontikes Y. Inorganic polymer cement from Fe-silicate glasses: varying the activating solution to glass ratio. Waste Biomass Valoriz 2014;5(3):411–28. link1
[25] Peys A, Peeters M, Katsiki A, Pontikes Y. Performance and durability of Fe-rich inorganic polymer composites with basalt fibers. In: Proceedings of the 41st International Conference and Expo on Advanced Ceramics and Composites; 2017 Jan 22–27; Daytona Beach, FL, USA; 2017.
[26] Fédération belge Béton Cellulaire. Le Béton Cellulaire: Materiau d’Avenir. Bruxelles: Fédération belge Béton Cellulaire; 2009. French.
[27] Kellenberger D, Althaus HJ, Jungbluth N, Künniger T. Life cycle inventories of building products. Dübendorf: Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories; 2007.
[28] Benetto E, Rousseaux P, Blondin J. Life cycle assessment of coal by-products based electric power production scenarios. Fuel 2004;83(7–8):957–70. link1
[29] Belboom S, Digneffe JM, Renzoni R, Germain A, Léonard A. Comparing technologies for municipal solid waste management using life cycle assessment methodology: a Belgian case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2013;18(8):1513–23. link1
[30] Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M, De Schryver A, Struijs J, Van Zelm R. A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level. The Hague: VROM; 2009. link1
京公网安备 11010502051620号
