2018, Volume 4, Issue 5
Engineering >> 2018, Volume 4, Issue 5 doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2018.08.009
SH-Mode Seismic-Reflection Imaging of Earthfill Dams
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0053, USA
Next Previous
Abstract
Assessing subsurface characteristics and imaging geologic features (e.g., faults, cavities, low-velocity layers, etc.) are typical problems in near-surface geophysics. These questions often have adverse geotechnical engineering implications, and can be especially acute when associated with high-hazard structures such as large earthen flood-control dams. Dam-related issues are becoming more frequent in the United States, because a large part of this major infrastructure was designed and constructed in the early- to mid-twentieth century; these dams are thus passing into the latter stages of their design life, where minute flaws that were overlooked or thought to be insignificant in design/construction are now proving problematic. The high-hydraulic heads associated with these structures can quicken degradation of weak areas and compromise long-term integrity. Addressing dam-related problems solely with traditional invasive drilling techniques is often inadequate (i.e., lack of lateral resolution) and/or economically exorbitant at this scale. However, strategic geotechnical drilling integrated with the broad utility of near-surface geophysics, particularly the horizontally polarized shear-wave (SH-mode) seismic-reflection technique for imaging the internal structural detail and geological foundation conditions of earthfill embankment dams can cost-effectively improve the overall subsurface definition needed for remedial engineering. Demonstrative evidence for this supposition is provided in the form of SH-wave seismic-reflection imaging of in situ and engineered as-built components of flood-control embankment dams at two example sites in the central United States.
Keywords
Geophysics ; Seismic reflection ; Shear-wave ; Near-surface ; Dam safety
Figures
Fig.1
Fig.2
Fig.3
Fig.4
Fig.5
Fig.6
Fig.7
Fig.8
Fig.9
References
[ 1 ] Federal Emergency Management Agency. Federal guidelines for dam safety risk management Report. New York: Federal Emergency Management Agency; 2015.
[ 2 ] Nunnally SW. Construction methods and management. 8th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 2011.
[ 3 ] Woolery EW. SH-wave reflection images of anomalous foundation conditions at the Mississinewa dam, Indiana. J Environ Eng Geophys 2002;7 (4):161–8. link1
[ 4 ] Steeples DW, Knapp RW. Reflections from 25 feet or less [expanded abstract]. In: The 52nd Annual International Meeting and Exposition, Society of Exploration Geophysicists; 1982 Oct 17–21; Dallas, TX, USA; 1982. p. 469–71. link1
[ 5 ] Hunter JA, Pullan SE, Burns RA, Gagne RM, Good RL. Shallow seismic reflection mapping of the overburden-bedrock interface with the engineering seismograph—some simple techniques. Geophysics 1984;49 (8):1381–5. link1
[ 6 ] Pullan SE, Hunter JA. Seismic model studies of the overburden-bedrock reflection. Geophysics 1985;50(11):1684–8. link1
[ 7 ] Knapp RW, Steeples DW. High-resolution common depth point seismic reflection profiling, instrumentation. Geophysics 1986;51(2):276–82. link1
[ 8 ] Knapp RW, Steeples DW. High-resolution common depth point seismic reflection profiling, field acquisition parameter design. Geophysics 1986;51 (2):283–94. link1
[ 9 ] Goforth T, Hayward C. Seismic reflection investigations of a bedrock surface buried under alluvium. Geophysics 1992;57(9):1217–27. link1
[10] Woolery EW, Street RL, Wang Z, Harris JB. Near-surface deformation in the New Madrid seismic zone as imaged by high resolution SH-wave seismic methods. Geophys Res Lett 1993;20(15):1615–8. link1
[11] Woolery EW, Wang Z, Street RL, Harris JB. AP- and SH-wave seismic reflection investigation of the Kentucky Bend scarp in the New Madrid seismic zone. Seismol Res Lett 1996;66(2):67–74. link1
[12] Woolery EW, Street RL, Harris JB, Wang Z, McIntyre J. Neotectonic structure in the central New Madrid seismic zone: evidence from multi-mode seismic- reflection data. Seismol Res Lett 1999;70(5):554–76. link1
[13] Woolery EW, Baldwin J, Kelson K, Hampson S, Givler R, Sundermann S. Site- specific fault assessment in the fluorspar area fault complex western Kentucky. Seismol Res Lett 2009;80(6):1035–44.
[14] Harris JB. Shear-wave splitting in Quaternary sediments: neotectonic implications in the central New Madrid seismic zone. Geophysics 1996;61 (6):1871–82. link1
[15] Deidda GP, Balia R. An ultrashallow SH-wave seismic reflection experiment on a subsurface ground model. Geophysics 2001;66(4):1097–104. link1
[16] Woolery E, Street R. Quaternary fault reactivation in the fluorspar area fault complex of western Kentucky: evidence from shallow SH-wave reflection profiles. Seismol Res Lett 2002;73(5):628–39. link1
[17] Benjumea B, Hunter JA, Aylsworth JM, Pullan SE. Application of high-resolution seismic techniques in the evaluation of earthquake site response, Ottawa Valley, Canada. Tectonophy 2003;368(1–4):193–209. link1
[18] Pugin AJM, Pullan SE, Hunter JA, Oldenborger GA. Hydrogeological prospecting using P- and S-wave landstreamer seismic reflection methods. Near Surf Geophys 2009;7:315–27. link1
[19] Sheriff RE, Geldart LP. Exploration seismology [dissertation]. New York: Cambridge University; 1995.
[20] Woolery EW, Almayahi A. Shear-wave birefringence measurements in faulted near-surface sediment. Bull Seismol Soc Am 2014;104(3):1540–9. link1
[21] Steeples DW, Miller RD. Seismic-reflection methods applied to engineering, environmental, and ground-water problems. In: Proceedings of the 1st Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems; 1988; Denver, CO, USA. Denver: Environment and Engineering Geophysical Society; 1988. link1
[22] Baker GS, Young R, editors. Processing near-surface seismic-reflection data: a primer. Tulsa: Society of Exploration Geophysicists; 1999.
京公网安备 11010502051620号
