[ 1 ] Wong THF, Breen P, Lloyd S. Water sensitive road design—design options for improving stormwater quality of road runoff. Report. Melbourne: Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology; 2000. link1

[ 2 ] Sun S, Barraud S, Castebrunet H, Aubin JB, Marmonier P. Long-term stormwater quantity and quality analysis using continuous measurements in a French urban catchment. Water Res 2015;85:432–42. link1

[ 3 ] Goonetilleke A, Thomas E, Ginn S, Gilbert D. Understanding the role of land use in urban stormwater quality management. J Environ Manage 2005;74 (1):31–42. link1

[ 4 ] Bratières K, Fletcher TD, Deletic A, Zinger Y. Nutrient and sediment removal by stormwater biofilters: a large-scale design optimisation study. Water Res 2008;42(14):3930–40. link1

[ 5 ] Dietz ME, Clausen JC. Stormwater runoff and export changes with development in a traditional and low impact subdivision. J Environ Manage 2008;87(4):560–6. link1

[ 6 ] Emerson CH, Traver RG. Multiyear and seasonal variation of infiltration from storm-water best management practices. J Irrig Drain Eng 2008;134 (5):598–605. link1

[ 7 ] Kazemi F, Beecham S, Gibbs J. Streetscale bioretention basins in Melbourne and their effect on local biodiversity. Ecol Eng 2009;35(10):1454–65. link1

[ 8 ] Laurenson G, Laurenson S, Bolan N, Beecham S, Clark I. The role of bioretention systems in the treatment of stormwater. Adv Agron 2013;120:223–74. link1

[ 9 ] Archer NAL, Quinton JN, Hess TM. Below-ground relationships of soil texture, roots, and hydraulic conductivity in two-phase mosaic vegetation in SouthEast Spain. J Arid Environ 2002;52(4):535–53. link1

[10] Le Coustumer S, Fletcher TD, Deletic A, Barraud S. Hydraulic performance of biofilters for stormwater management: first lessons from both laboratory and field studies. Water Sci Technol 2007;56:93–100. link1

[11] Clark SE, Pitt R. Targeting treatment technologies to address specific stormwater pollutants and numeric discharge limits. Water Res 2012;46(20):6715–30. link1

[12] Read J, Wevill T, Fletcher T, Deletic A. Variation among plant species in pollutant removal from stormwater in biofiltration systems. Water Res 2008;42(4–5):893–902. link1

[13] Davis AP, Hunt WF, Traver RG, Clar M. Bioretention technology: overview of current practice and future needs. J Environ Eng 2009;135(3):109–17. link1

[14] Singh OV, Labana S, Pandey G, Budhiraja R, Jain RK. Phytoremediation: an overview of metallic ion decontamination from soil. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2003;61(5–6):405–12. link1

[15] Adriano DC, Wenzel WW, Vangronsveld J, Bolan NS. Role of assisted natural remediation in environmental cleanup. Geoderma 2004;122(2–4):121–42. link1

[16] Robinson BH, Banuelos G, Conesa HM, Evangelou MWH, Schulin R. The phytomanagement of trace elements in soil. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci 2009;28 (4):240–66. link1

[17] Brisson J, Chazarenc F. Maximizing pollutant removal in constructed wetlands: should we pay more attention to macrophyte species selection? Sci Total Environ 2009;407(13):3923–30. link1

[18] Kumar D, Tripathi DK, Chauhan DK. Phytoremediation potential and nutrient status of Barringtonia acutangula Gaerth. Tree seedlings grown under different chromium (CrVI) treatments. Biol Trace Elem Res 2014;157(2):164–74. link1

[19] Read J, Fletcher TD, Wevill T, Deletic A. Plant traits that enhance pollutant removal from stormwater in biofiltration systems. Int J Phytoremediation 2009;12(1):34–53. link1

[20] Lim HS. Variations in the water quality of a small urban tropical catchment: implications for load estimation and water quality monitoring. Hydrobiologia 2003;494(1–3):57–63. link1

[21] Joshi UM, Balasubramanian R. Characteristics and environmental mobility of trace elements in urban runoff. Chemosphere 2010;80(3):310–8. link1

[22] Maxwell K, Johnson GN. Chlorophyll fluorescence–—a practical guide. J Exp Bot 2000;51(345):659–68. link1

[23] Gorbe E, Calatayud A. Applications of chlorophyll fluorescence imaging technique in horticultural research: a review. Sci Hortic 2012;138:24–35. link1

[24] Lawlor DW. Carbon and nitrogen assimilation in relation to yield: mechanisms are the key to understanding production systems. J Exp Bot 2002;53 (370):773–87. link1

[25] Qiu Z, Wang M, Lai W, He F, Chen Z. Plant growth and nutrient removal in constructed monoculture and mixed wetlands related to stubble attributes. Hydrobiologia 2011;661(1):251–60. link1

[26] Foyer CH, Ferrario-Mery S, Noctor G. Interactions between carbon and nitrogen metabolism. In: Lea PJ, Morot-Gaudry J, editors. Plant nitrogen. Berlin: Springer; 2001. p. 237–54. link1

[27] Lawlor DW, Lemaire G, Gastal F. Nitrogen, plant growth and crop yield. In: Lea PJ, Morot-Gaudry J, editors. Plant nitrogen. Berlin: Springer; 2001. p. 343–67. link1

[28] Ågren GI, Wetterstedt JA, Billberger MF. Nutrient limitation on terrestrial plant growth—modeling the interaction between nitrogen and phosphorus. New Phytol 2012;194(4):953–60. link1

[29] Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Wright IJ, Niklas KJ, Hedin L, Elser JJ. Evidence of a general 2/3—power law of scaling leaf nitrogen to phosphorus among major plant groups and biomes. Proc Biol Sci 2010;277(1683):877–83. link1

[30] Belmont MA, Metcalfe CD. Feasibility of using ornamental plants (Zantedeschia aethiopica) in subsurface flow treatment wetlands to remove nitrogen, chemical oxygen demand and nonylphenol ethoxylate surfactants—a laboratory-scale study. Ecol Eng 2003;21(4–5):233–47. link1

[31] Calheiros CSC, Bessa VS, Mesquita RBR, Brix H, Rangel AOSS, Castro PML. Constructed wetland with a polyculture of ornamental plants for wastewater treatment at a rural tourism facility. Ecol Eng 2015;79:1–7. link1

[32] Alofs KM, Fowler NL. Loss of native herbaceous species due to woody plant encroachment facilitates the establishment of an invasive grass. Ecology 2013;94(3):751–60. link1

[33] Rodríguez M, Brisson J. Pollutant removal efficiency of native versus exotic common reed (Phragmites australis) in North American treatment wetlands. Ecol Eng 2015;74:364–70. link1

[34] Keane RM, Crawley MJ. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol Evol 2002;17(4):164–70. link1

[35] Avanesyan A, Culley TM. Herbivory of native and exotic North-American prairie grasses by nymph Melanoplus grasshoppers. Plant Ecol 2015;216 (3):451–64. link1

[36] Gherardi LA, Sala OE, Yahdjian L. Preference for different inorganic nitrogen forms among plant functional types and species of the Patagonian steppe. Oecologia 2013;173(3):1075–81. link1

[37] Jabloun M, Schelde K, Tao F, Olesen JE. Effect of temperature and precipitation on nitrate leaching from organic cereal cropping systems in Denmark. Eur J Agron 2015;62:55–64. link1

[38] Shekhar V, Stӧckle D, Thellmann M, Vermeer JEM. The role of plant root systems in evolutionary adaptation. Curr Top Dev Biol 2019;131:55–80. link1

[39] Dhillon KS, Dhillon SK, Thind HS. Evaluation of different agroforestry tree species for their suitability in the phytoremediation of seleniferous soils. Soil Use Manage 2008;24(2):208–16. link1

[40] Warren CR. Why does temperature affect relative uptake rates of nitrate, ammonium and glycine: a test with Eucalyptus pauciflora. Soil Biol Biochem 2009;41(4):778–84. link1

[41] Inselsbacher E, Näsholm T. A novel method to measure the effect of temperature on diffusion of plant-available nitrogen in soil. Plant Soil 2012;354(1–2):251–7. link1

[42] Yan Q, Duan Z, Mao J, Li X, Dong F. Effects of root–zone temperature and N, P, and K supplies on nutrient uptake of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) seedlings in hydroponics. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 2012;58(6):707–17. link1