Journal Home Online First Current Issue Archive For Authors Journal Information 中文版

Engineering >> 2019, Volume 5, Issue 6 doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2019.09.006

Research and Implementations of Structural Monitoring for Bridges and Buildings in Japan—A Review

a Institute of Advanced Sciences, Yokohama National University, Yokohama 240-8501, Japan
b Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, Kyoto 611-0011, Japan
c Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan

Received:2018-10-08 Revised:2019-04-15 Accepted: 2019-06-01 Available online:2019-09-29

Next Previous


This paper provides a review on the development of structural monitoring in Japan, with an emphasis on the type, strategy, and utilization of monitoring systems. The review focuses on bridge and building structures using vibration-based techniques. Structural monitoring systems in Japan historically started with the objective of evaluating structural responses against extreme events. In the development of structural monitoring, monitoring systems and collected data were used to verify design assumptions, update specifications, and facilitate the efficacy of vibration control systems. Strategies and case studies on monitoring for the design verification of long-span bridges and tall buildings, the performance of seismic isolation systems in building and bridges, the verification of structural retrofit, the verification of structural control systems (passive, semiactive, and active), structural assessment, and damage detection are described. More recently, the application
of monitoring systems has been extended to facilitate efficient operation and effective maintenance through the rationalization of risk and asset management using monitoring data. This paper also summarizes the lessons learned and feedback obtained from case studies on the structural monitoring of bridges and buildings in Japan.


Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

Fig. 10

Fig. 11

Fig. 12

Fig. 13

Fig. 14

Fig. 15

Fig. 16

Fig. 17

Fig. 18

Fig. 19

Fig. 20

Fig. 21

Fig. 22

Fig. 23

Fig. 24

Fig. 25

Fig. 26

Fig. 27

Fig. 28


[ 1 ] Nagai M, Okui Y, Kawai Y, Yamamoto M, Saito K. Bridge engineering in Japan. In: Chen WF, Duan L, editors. Handbook of international bridge engineering. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2013. p. 1037–86. link1

[ 2 ] Fujino Y, Kawai Y. Technical development in structural engineering with emphasis on steel bridges in Japan. J JSCE 2016;4(1):211–26. Japanese. link1

[ 3 ] Ohashi H. Honshu–Shikoku Bridge Authority Design of long-span highway and railway suspension bridges. Civ Eng Jpn 1988;27:33–41. Japanese. link1

[ 4 ] Honshu–Shikoku Bridge Authority. [Seto Ohashi bridge]. Honshu: Honshu– Shikoku Bridge Authority; 1989. Japanese.

[ 5 ] Committee on Editing of Honshu–Shikoku Bridge History. [Progress in Honshu–Shikoku Bridge]. Tokyo: Japan Bridge Engineering Center; 1985. Japanese.

[ 6 ] Fujino Y, Kimura K, Tanaka H. Wind resistant design of bridges in Japan: developments and practices. Tokyo: Springer Science & Business Media; 2012. link1

[ 7 ] Nakai M, Koshika N, Kawano K, Hirakawa K, Wada A. Performance-based seismic design for high-rise buildings in Japan. Int J High-Rise Build 2012;1 (3):155–67. link1

[ 8 ] Fujino Y. Vibration-based monitoring for performance evaluation of flexible civil structures in Japan. Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci 2018;94(2):98–128. link1

[ 9 ] Takahashi R. ‘‘SMAC” strong motion accelerometer. J Seismol Soc Jpn 1953;6 (3):117–21. Japanese. link1

[10] Muto K. Dynamic design for structures. Tokyo: Maruzen Publishing Co., Ltd.; 1977. Japanese. link1

[11] Nagayama T, Moinzadeh P, Mechitov K, Ushita M, Makihata N, Leiri M, et al. Reliable multi-hop communication for structural health monitoring. Smart Struct Syst 2010;6(5–6):481–504. link1

[12] Suzuki M, Jinno K, Tashiro Y, Katsumata Y, Liao CH, Nagayama T. Development and field experiment of routing-free multi-hop wireless sensor networks for structural monitoring. In: Mair RJ, Soga K, Jin Y, Parlikad AK, Schooling JM, editors. Transforming the future of infrastructure through smarter information: Proceedings of the International Conference on Smart Infrastructure and Construction; 2016 Jun 27–29; Cambridge, UK. London: ICE Publishing; 2016. p. 179–84. link1

[13] Okauchi I. Research on wind resistant design principles of Honshu–Shikoku Bridge. J Wind Eng 1978;3:13–23. Japanese. link1

[14] Katsuchi H, Tada K, Kitagawa M. A study on wind resistant design of long–span bridges based on field observation result. Proc Jpn Soc Civ Eng 1996;1996 (543):163–73. link1

[15] Miyata T, Yamada H, Katsuchi H, Kitagawa M. Full-scale measurement of Akashi Kaikyo Bridge during typhoon. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 2002;90(12– 15):1517–27. link1

[16] Abe M, Fujino Y. Maximum displacement response estimation from acceleration record for random excitation. Proc Jpn Soc Civ Eng A 2010;66 (3):477–90. Japanese. link1

[17] Toyama N, Yamada I, Kusuhara S. Analytical result of health monitored data on long-span bridge. In: Proceedings of the 19th National Symposium on Wind Engineering; 2006 Nov 29–Dec 1; Tokyo, Japan;2006. p. 495–500. Japanese.

[18] Nagayama T, Abe M, Fujino Y, Ikeda K. Structural identification of a nonproportionally damped system and its application to a full-scale suspension bridge. J Struct Eng 2005;131(10):1536–45. link1

[19] Siringoringo DM, Fujino Y. System identification of suspension bridge from ambient vibration response. Eng Struct 2008;30(2):462–77. link1

[20] Siringoringo DM, Fujino Y. Seismic responses of a suspension bridge: insights from long-term full-scale seismic monitoring system. Struct Contr Health Monit 2018;25(11):e2252. link1

[21] Kawato C, Kawaguchi K, Furumura M. Design verification of Tatara Bridge by seismic analysis. In: Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Japan Society of Civil Engineers; 2005 Sep 7–9; Tokyo, Japan; 2005. Japanese.

[22] Yoshida O. Comparative study on the recorded and analyzed response of Ohnaruto Bridge due to Hyogoken-Nanbu Earthquake. J Steel Struct 1999;6 (22):41–56. Japanese. link1

[23] Ogiwara K, Nitta T, Nishimori K, Ota H. On dynamic response of Akinada Bridge during Geiyo Earthquake. J Earthquake Eng 2001;26:1021–4. Japanese. link1

[24] Abe M, Fujino Y. Bridge monitoring in Japan. In: Boller C, Chang F, Fujino Y, editors. Encyclopedia of structural health monitoring. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Inc.; 2009. p. 2131–48. link1

[25] Kawashima K, Unjoh S, Azuta Y. Analysis of damping characteristics of a cable stayed bridge based on strong motion records. Proc Jpn Soc Civ Eng 1990;1990 (416):181–90. link1

[26] Kawashima K, Unjoh S, Tsunomoto M. Damping characteristics of cable stayed bridges for seismic design. J Res Jpn 1991;27:1–79. link1

[27] Yamamoto Y, Fujino Y, Yabe M. Comparison of seismic records with seismic response of long span cable-supported bridges identified using a dynamic analytical model. Proc Jpn Soc Civ Eng A 2009;65(3):738–57. Japanese. link1

[28] Siringoringo DM, Fujino Y. Observed dynamic performance of the Yokoha Bay Bridge from system identification using seismic records. Struct Contr Health Monit 2006;13(1):226–44. link1

[29] Kawashima K, Nagashima H, Masumoto S, Hara K. Response analysis of Miyagawa Bridge based on a measured acceleration record. J Struct Eng 1994;40:991–9. link1

[30] Chaudhary MTA, Abe M, Fujino Y, Yoshida J. System identification of two baseisolated bridges using seismic records. J Struct Eng 2000;126(10):1187–95. link1

[31] Chaudhary MTA, Abe M, Fujino Y. Performance evaluation of base-isolated Yama-age Bridge with high damping rubber bearings using recorded seismic data. Eng Struct 2001;23(8):902–10. link1

[32] Unjoh S. Menshin (seismic isolation) bridges in Japan. Tsukuba: Public Works Research Institute; 2014. link1

[33] Siringoringo DM, Fujino Y. System identification applied to long-span cablesupported bridges using seismic records. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 2008;37 (3):361–86. link1

[34] Fujino Y, Kikkawa H, Namikawa K, Mizoguchi T. Seismic retrofit design of longspan bridges on metropolitan expressways in Tokyo. Transp Res Rec 2005(CD 11-S):335–42. link1

[35] Fujino Y, Siringoringo DM. Bridge monitoring in Japan: the needs and strategies. Struct Infrastruct Eng 2011;7(7–8):597–611. link1

[36] Matsuda K. Aerodynamic response of large-span bridges and its stabilizations. J Jpn Soc Fluid Mech 2002;21(3):269–73. Japanese. link1

[37] Furuya M, Miyazaki M. Wind induced vibration of parallel hangers in Akashi Kaikyo Bridge and its aerodynamic remedy. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Symposium on Cable Dynamics; 1999 Aug 16–18; Trondheim, Norway; 1999.

[38] Hikami Y, Shiraishi N. Rain–wind induced vibrations of cables stayed bridges. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 1988;29(1–3):409–18. link1

[39] Yamaguchi H. Analytical study on growth mechanism of rain vibration of cables. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 1990;33(1–2):73–80. link1

[40] Fujino Y, Siringoringo DM. Vibration mechanisms and controls of long-span bridges: a review. Struct Eng Int 2013;23(3):248–68. link1

[41] Siringoringo DM, Fujino Y. Observed along-wind vibration of a suspension bridge tower. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 2012;103:107–21. link1

[42] Mizutani T, Kobayashi T, Fujino Y, Siringoringo DM. Along-wind almostharmonic vibration observed at Hakucho Bridge pylons and its wind tunnel experiments. J Wind Eng 2016;41(4):136–47. Japanese. link1

[43] Lin A, Uda S. Tectonic history of the Akashi Strait and the fault model associated with the Southern Hyogo Prefecture Earthquake. J Jpn Soc Eng Geol 1996;37(3):160–71. Japanese. link1

[44] Okuda M, Yano Y, Kon K. Comparison of seismic response record with analysis for Minami Bisan-Seto Bridge. J Struc Engrg 1997;43A:821–31. link1

[45] Yoshizawa T, Moritani T, Fukunaga S, Kawabata A. Seismic behavior and simulation analysis of Honshu–Shikoku Bridge. J Struc Eng 2000;46A:685–94. link1

[46] Ganev T, Yamazaki F, Ishizaki H, Kitazawa M. Response analysis of the HigashiKobe Bridge and surrounding soil in the 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu Earthquake. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 1998;27(6):557–76. link1

[47] Siringoringo DM, Fujino Y, Namikawa K. Seismic response analyses of the Yokohama Bay cable-stayed bridge in the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake. J Bridge Eng 2013;19(8):A4014006.

[48] Siringoringo D, Takamoto G, Fujino Y. Analysis of tower-girder transfer pounding on the Yokohama Bay cable-stayed bridge during the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake. In: Elegance in Structures: IABSE Conference Nara 2015; 2015 May 13–15; Nara, Japan. Zurich: International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering; 2015. p. 1–8. link1

[49] Takeda T, Mizutani T, Nagayama T, Fujino Y. Reproduction of cable-stayed bridge seismic responses involving tower–girder pounding and damage process estimation for large earthquakes. J Bridge Eng 2019;24(2): 04018112.

[50] Ishii T, Kaneko T, Sanuki Y, Sugimoto M. On form-observation and vibration characteristics of Wakato Bridge during its widening construction. Proc Jpn Soc Civ Eng 1991;427:123–31. Japanese. link1

[51] Kitagawa M, Furuya K, Nakamura S, Suzumura K. A study on anti-corrosion capacity of dry air injection system of suspension bridge cables. Proc Jpn Soc Civ Eng 2001;672:145–54. Japanese. link1

[52] Kurino S, Yumiyama S. Observation of condition of scour prevention system installed at pylon foundations of Akashi Kaikyo Bridge. In: Proceedings of the 57th annual meeting of the Japan Society of Civil Engineers; 2002 Sep 25–27; Hokkaido, Japan; 2002. Japanese.

[53] Okuda M, Yamada I, Hasegawa Y. Preventive maintenance and technical development on long-span bridges. In: Frangopol D, Sause R, Kusko C, editors. Bridge maintenance, safety, management and life-cycle optimization: Proceedings of the 5th International IABMAS Conference; 2010 Jul 11–15; Philadelphia, PA, USA. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2010. p. 509. link1

[54] Okawa M, Kurihara T. Preventive maintenance on highway-railway combined bridges. In: Proceedings of IABSE-JSCE Joint Conference on Advances in Bridge Engineering-II; 2010 Aug 8–10; Dhaka, Bangladesh; 2010. p. 478–87.

[55] Siringoringo DM, Fujino Y. Estimating bridge fundamental frequency from vibration response of instrumented passing vehicle: analytical and experimental study. Adv Struct Eng 2012;15(3):417–33. link1

[56] Wang H, Nagayama T, Nakasuka J, Zhao B, Su D. Extraction of bridge fundamental frequency from estimated vehicle excitation through a particle filter approach. J Sound Vibrat 2018;428:44–58. link1

[57] Zhao B, Nagayama T, Toyoda M, Makihata N, Takahashi M, Ieiri M. Vehicle model calibration in the frequency domain and its application to large-scale IRI estimation. J Disaster Res 2017;12(3):446–55. link1

[58] Yagi K. Response type roughness measurement and cracking detection method by using smartphone. In: Pavement and asset management: proceedings of the World Conference on Pavement and Asset Management; 2017 June 12–16; Baveno, Italy. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2017. p. 815–22. link1

[59] Saravanan TJ, Zhao B, Su D, Nagayama T. An observability analysis for profile estimation through vehicle response measurement. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Smart Infrastructure and Construction; 2016 June 27–29; Cambridge, UK; 2016.

[60] Zhao B. Road roughness evaluation based on the identification of vehicle rigid body motion models and inverse analysis of vehicle responses [dissertation]. Tokyo: The University of Tokyo; 2018. link1

[61] Wang H, Nagayama T, Su D. Estimation of dynamic tire force by measurement of vehicle body responses with numerical and experimental validation. Mech Syst Signal Process 2019;123:369–85. link1

[62] Nakasuka J, Wang H, Nagayama T. Extraction of the bridge natural frequency based on road profile estimation using vehicle response measurement. J Struct Eng A 2018;64A:325–32. Japanese. link1

[63] Mizutani T, Nakamura N, Yamaguchi T, Tarumi M, Ando Y, Hara I. Bridge slab damage detection by signal processing of UHF-band ground penetrating radar data. J Disaster Res 2017;12(3):415–21. link1

[64] Mizutani T, Nakamura N, Yamaguchi T, Tarumi M, Ando Y. Signal processing for fast RC bridge slab damage detection by using UHF-band radar. Procedia Eng 2017;188:377–84. link1

[65] Nishitani A, Inoue Y. Overview of the application of active/semi-active control to building structures in Japan. Earthq Eng Struc Dynam. 2001;30 (11):1565–74. link1

[66] Ikeda Y. Active and semi-active vibration control of buildings in Japan— practical applications and verification. Struct Contr Health Monit 2009;16(7– 8):703–23. link1

[67] Shimizu K, Orui S, Kurino H, Omika Y, Koshika N. Control effect of hydraulic dampers installed in high-rise building observed during earthquakes. In: Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat; 2008 Mar 3–5; Dubai, Arab;2008. p. 529–35.

[68] Number of VC buildings in Japan (by year) & usage ratio of VC devices (2004– 2015) [Internet]. Tokyo: The Japan Society of Seismic Isolation; 2016 [cited 2019 Sep 12]. Available from: VC_data_2016.pdf. link1

[69] The Japan Society of Seismic Isolation (JSSI). Report on the performance of base-isolated and vibration-controlled buildings during the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake. Tokyo: The Japan Society of Seismic Isolation (JSSI); 2012. Japanese. link1

[70] Ikeda Y. The aspects of structural control before and after the 2011 Great Tohoku Earthquake. Panel discussion on the state-of-the art of structural control and preparation for coming earthquakes. In: The 2013 Annual Meeting of Architectural Institute of Japan; 2013 Aug 30–Sep 1, Hokkaido, Japan; 2013. p. 15–24. Japanese.

[71] Orui S, Sugimoto Y, Mizuno H, Goto K, Yamamoto K, Kanda K, et al. Improvement of building damage estimation system for electric power company—part 2. Estimation of building characteristics based on system identification analysis. In: Summaries of technical papers of annual meeting of Architectural Institute of Japan: structure II; 2016 Aug 24–26; Fukuoka, Japan; 2016. p. 611–2. Japanese.

[72] Architectural Institute of Japan (AIJ). Symposium report on tall buildings excited by long-period ground motions. Tokyo: AIJ; 2012. Japanese. link1

[73] Ikeda Y, Hisada Y. Earthquake responses on all floors in a building estimated by observation records on some restricted floors. J Jpn Assoc Earthq Eng 2013;13 (4):38–54. Japanese. link1

[74] Morii T, Okada K, Shiraishi M, Sugimoto K, Terada T, Sato T, et al. Seismic response estimation of whole building based on limited number of acceleration records for structural health monitoring system shortly after an earthquake—system application for large shaking table test of a 18-story steel building. J Struct Constr Eng 2016;81(730):2045–55. Japanese. link1

[75] Yamashita T, Hisada Y, Sakamoto T, Kubo T. Vibration characteristics of highrise steel building in Shinjuku skyscraper district before and after the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake. J Jpn Assoc Earthq Eng 2015;15 (3):17–31. link1

[76] Public page for waveform observation data by Kogakuin University (Shinjuku Campus): Tohoku Earthquake [Internet]. Tokyo: Hisada Laboratory; c2015 [cited 2019 Sep 12]. Available from: observation/shinjukutouhoku.html.

[77] Hatada T, Ikeda Y, Hagiwara H, Nitta Y, Nishitani A. Verification of damage monitoring and evaluation method for high-rise buildings based on acceleration measurement on some restricted floors in e-defense shaking table test. In: Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering; 2018 Jun 18–21; Thessaloniki, Greece; 2018.

[78] Kodera K, Nishitani A, Okihara Y. Cubic spline interpolation based estimation of all story seismic responses with acceleration measurement at a limited number of floors. J Struct Construc Eng 2018;83(746):527–35. Japanese. link1

[79] Kashima T. Study on changes in dynamic characteristics of high-rise steelframed buildings base on strong motion data. Procedia Eng 2017;199:194–9. link1

[80] Ikeda Y. Amplitude-dependency evaluation of building’s dynamic properties only by seismic main shock record. In: Proceedings of 2018 Disaster Prevention Research Institute Annual Meeting; 2018 Feb 20–21; Kyoto, Japan; 2018. Japanese.

[81] Ikeda Y. An effective use of measurements under main shock of earthquake to predict structural dynamic properties under aftershocks. In: Proceedings of the 7th World Conference on Structural Control and Monitoring; 2018 July 22–25; Qingdao, China; 2018.

[82] Spence SMJ, Kareem A. Tall buildings and damping: a concept-based datadriven model. J Struct Eng 2014;140(5):04014005. link1

Related Research