[ 1 ] Negative emissions technologies and reliable sequestration [Internet]. Washington, DC: United States National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine; 2018 Oct 24 [cited 2019 Sep 3]. Available from: https:// www.nap.edu/catalog/25259/negative-emissions-technologies-and-reliablesequestration-a-research-agenda. link1

[ 2 ] What is the Paris Agreement? [Internet]. United Nations Climate Change; 2016 Nov 4 [cited 2019 Sep 3]. Available from: https://unfccc.int/process-andmeetings/the-paris-agreement/what-is-the-paris-agreement. link1

[ 3 ] Special report: global warming of 1.5 C [Internet]. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; 2018 Oct 8 [cited 2019 Sep 3]. Available from: https://www. ipcc.ch/sr15/. link1

[ 4 ] Fuss S, Lamb WF, Callaghan MW, Hilaire J, Creutzig F, Amann T, et al. Negative emissions—part 2: costs, potentials and side effects. Environ Res Lett 2018;13 (6):063002. link1

[ 5 ] Carbon dioxide removal options: a literature review identifying carbon removal potentials and costs [Internet]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Energy Institute; 2017 Apr 10 [cited 2019 Sep 3]. Available from: https:// energy.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/carbon16.pdf. link1

[ 6 ] Le Quéré C, Andrew RM, Friedlingstein P, Sitch S, Hauck J, Pongratz J, et al. Global carbon budget 2018. Earth Syst Sci Data 2018;10:2141–94.

[ 7 ] Minx JC, Lamb WF, Callaghan MW, Fuss S, Hilaire J, Creutzig F, et al. Negative emissions—part 1: research landscape and synthesis. Environ Res Lett 2018;13 (6):063001. link1

[ 8 ] Baston JF, Finegold Y, Garcia C, Mollicone D, Rezende M, Routh D, et al. The global tree restoration potential. Science 2019;365(6448):76–9.

[ 9 ] Lang C. Planting trees and restoring forests is not going to stop climate breakdown [Internet]. Redd Monitor; 2019 Aug 8 [cited 2019 Sep 10]. Available from: https://redd-monitor.org/2019/08/08/planting-trees-andrestoring-forests-is-not-going-to-stop-climate-breakdown-we-need-a-rapidend-to-fossil-energy-use-precisely-because-we-want-to-preserve-the-worldsexisting-forests/. link1

[10] Realmonte G, Drouet L, Gambhir A, Glynn J, Hawkes A, Koberle A, et al. An inter-model assessment of the role of direct air capture in deep mitigation pathways. Nat Commun 2019;10:3277. link1

[11] Fajardy M, Koberle A, MacDowell N, Fantuzzi A. BECCS deployment: a reality check [Internet]. London: Imperial College London Grantham Institute; 2019 Jan 28 [cited 2019 Sep 3]. Available from: https://www.imperial.ac. uk/media/imperial-college/grantham-institute/public/publications/briefingpapers/BECCS-deployment—a-reality-check.pdf. link1

[12] He Y, Trumbore SE, Torn MS, Harden JW, Vaughn LJS, Dllison SD, et al. Radiocarbon constraints imply reduced carbon uptake by soils during the 21st century. Science 2016;353(6306):1419–24. link1

[13] Smith P, Davis SJ, Creutzig F, Fuss S, Minx JC, Gabrille B, et al. Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions. Nat Clim Chang 2016;6:42–50. link1

[14] Popp A, Calvin K, Fujimori S, Havlik P, Humpernoder F, Stehfest E, et al. Landuse futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. Glob Environ Chang 2017;42:331–45. link1