Journal Home Online First Current Issue Archive For Authors Journal Information 中文版

Engineering >> 2020, Volume 6, Issue 9 doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2020.01.015

Laws of 4D Printing

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA

Received: 2019-07-30 Revised: 2019-10-27 Accepted: 2020-01-07 Available online: 2020-08-13

Next Previous

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) printing is an additive manufacturing process. Accordingly, four-dimensional (4D) printing is a manufacturing process that involves multiple research fields. 4D printing conserves the general attributes of 3D printing (such as material waste reduction, and elimination of molds, dies, and machining) and further enables the fourth dimension of products to provide intelligent behavior over time. This intelligent behavior is encoded (usually by an inverse mathematical problem) into stimuliresponsive multi-materials during printing, and is enabled by stimuli after printing. The main difference between 3D- and 4D-printed structures is the presence of one additional dimension, which provides for smart evolution over time. However, currently there is no general formula for modeling and predicting this additional dimension. Herein, by starting from fundamentals, we derive and validate a general biexponential formula with a particular format that can model the time-dependent behavior of nearly all 4D (hydro-, photochemical-, photothermal-, solvent-, pH-, moisture-, electrochemical-, electrothermal-, ultrasound-, etc. responsive) structures. We show that two types of time constants are needed to capture the correct time-dependent behavior of 4D multi-materials. We introduce the concept of mismatch-driven stress at the interface of active and passive materials in 4D multi-material structures, leading to one of the two time constants. We develop and extract the other time constant from our unified model of time-dependent behavior of nearly all stimuli-responsive materials. Our results starting from the most fundamental concepts and ending with governing equations can serve as general design principles for future research in the field of 4D printing, where time-dependent behaviors should be properly understood, modeled, and predicted.

Figures

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

Fig. 10

Fig. 11

Fig. 12

Fig. 13

Fig. 14

References

[ 1 ] Tibbits S. The emergence of ‘‘4D printing.” In: Proceedings of TED Conference 2013; 2013 Feb 25–Mar 1; Long Beach, CA, USA; 2013. link1

[ 2 ] Tibbits S. 4D printing: multi-material shape change. Archit Des 2014;84 (1):116–21. link1

[ 3 ] Tibbits S, McKnelly C, Olguin C, Dikovsky D, Hirsch S. 4D printing and universal transformation. In: Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture; 2014 Oct 23–25; Los Angeles, CA, USA; 2014. p. 539–48. link1

[ 4 ] Ge Q, Qi HJ, Dunn ML. Active materials by four-dimension printing. Appl Phys Lett 2013;103(13):131901. link1

[ 5 ] Gladman AS, Matsumoto EA, Nuzzo RG, Mahadevan L, Lewis JA. Biomimetic 4D printing. Nat Mater 2016;15(4):413–8. link1

[ 6 ] Momeni F, Hassani SMM, Liu X, Ni J. A review of 4D printing. Mater Des 2017;122:42–79. link1

[ 7 ] Rastogi P, Kandasubramanian B. Breakthrough in the printing tactics for stimuli-responsive materials: 4D printing. Chem Eng J 2019;366:264–304. link1

[ 8 ] Sun L, Huang WM, Ding Z, Zhao Y, Wang CC, Purnawali H, et al. Stimulusresponsive shape memory materials: a review. Mater Des 2012;33:577–640. link1

[ 9 ] Stuart MAC, Huck WTS, Genzer J, Müller M, Ober C, Stamm M, et al. Emerging applications of stimuli-responsive polymer materials. Nat Mater 2010;9 (2):101–13. link1

[10] Behl M, Lendlein A. Shape-memory polymers. Mater Today 2007;10(4):20–8. link1

[11] McAlpine KJ. 4D-printed structure changes shape when placed in water [Internet]. Cambridge: The Harvard Gazette; c2016 [cited 2019 Oct 1]. Available from: https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2016/01/4d-printedstructure-changes-shape-when-placed-in-water/. link1

[12] Kuang X, Roach DJ, Wu J, Hamel CM, Ding Z, Wang T, et al. Advances in 4D printing: materials and applications. Adv Funct Mater 2019;29(2):1805290. link1

[13] Kadic M, Milton GW, van Hecke M, Wegener M. 3D metamaterials. Nat Rev Phys 2019;1:198–210. link1

[14] Wei H, Zhang Q, Yao Y, Liu L, Liu Y, Leng J. Direct-write fabrication of 4D active shape-changing structures based on a shape memory polymer and its nanocomposite. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2017;9(1):876–83. link1

[15] Velasco-Hogan A, Xu J, Meyers MA. Additive manufacturing as a method to design and optimize bioinspired structures. Adv Mater 2018;30(52): e1800940. link1

[16] Campbell TA, Tibbits S, Garrett B. The programmable world. Sci Am 2014;311 (5):60–5. link1

[17] Byambaa B, Annabi N, Yue K, Trujillo-de Santiago G, Alvarez MM, Jia W, et al. Bioprinted osteogenic and vasculogenic patterns for engineering 3D bone tissue. Adv Healthc Mater 2017;6(16):1700015. link1

[18] Truby RL, Lewis JA. Printing soft matter in three dimensions. Nature 2016;540 (7633):371–8. link1

[19] Pei E, Hsiang LG. Technological considerations for 4D printing: an overview. Prog Addit Manuf 2018;3(1–2):95–107. link1

[20] Raviv D, Zhao W, McKnelly C, Papadopoulou A, Kadambi A, Shi B, et al. Active printed materials for complex self-evolving deformations. Sci Rep 2014;4:7422. link1

[21] Kwok TH, Chen Y. GDFE: geometry-driven finite element for fourdimensional printing. J Manuf Sci Eng 2017;139(11):111006. link1

[22] Sossou G, Demoly F, Montavon G, Gomes S. Towards a top-down design methodology for 4D printing. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 17); 2017 Aug 21–25; Vancouver, BC, Canada; 2017. p. 395–404. link1

[23] Sossou G, Demoly F, Montavon G, Gomes S. Design for 4D printing: rapidly exploring the design space around smart materials. Procedia CIRP 2018;70:120–5. link1

[24] Khare V, Sonkaria S, Lee GY, Ahn SH, Chu WS. From 3D to 4D printing—design, material and fabrication for multi-functional multi-materials. Int J Precis Eng Manuf Green Technol 2017;4(3):291–9. link1

[25] Ge Q, Sakhaei AH, Lee H, Dunn CK, Fang NX, Dunn ML. Multimaterial 4D printing with tailorable shape memory polymers. Sci Rep 2016;6:31110. link1

[26] Lind JU, Busbee TA, Valentine AD, Pasqualini FS, Yuan H, Yadid M, et al. Instrumented cardiac microphysiological devices via multimaterial threedimensional printing. Nat Mater 2017;16(3):303–8. link1

[27] Pioneering 4D printer developed [Internet]. Eureka: Sci-News; 2018 Mar 21 [cited 2019 May 1]. Available from: http://www.sci-news.com/technologies/ 4d-printer-05837.html. link1

[28] Major ML. Engineers create 4D printer that combines four 3D printing techniques [Internet]. San Francisco: Interesting Engineering; 2018 Mar 24 [cited 2019 May 1]. Available from: https://interestingengineering.com/ engineers-create-4d-printer-that-combines-four-3d-printing-techniques. link1

[29] Saunders S. Powerful new 4D printer speeds next-generation, nextdimension 3D printing [Internet]. New York: 3DPrint; 2018 Mar 22 [cited 2019 May 1]. Available from: https://3dprint.com/207493/4d-printer-at-acsmeeting/. link1

[30] Bandyopadhyay A, Heer B. Additive manufacturing of multi-material structures. Mater Sci Eng Rep 2018;129:1–16. link1

[31] MacDonald E, Wicker R. Multiprocess 3D printing for increasing component functionality. Science 2016;353(6307):aaf2093. link1

[32] Lopes LR, Silva AF, Carneiro OS. Multi-material 3D printing: the relevance of materials affinity on the boundary interface performance. Addit Manuf 2018;23:45–52. link1

[33] Demir AG, Previtali B. Multi-material selective laser melting of Fe/Al-12Si components. Manuf Lett 2017;11:8–11. link1

[34] Mao Y, Ding Z, Yuan C, Ai S, Isakov M, Wu J, et al. 3D printed reversible shape changing components with stimuli responsive materials. Sci Rep 2016;6:24761. link1

[35] Momeni F, Sabzpoushan S, Valizadeh R, Morad MR, Liu X, Ni J. Plant leafmimetic smart wind turbine blades by 4D printing. Renew Energy 2019;130:329–51. link1

[36] Tamagawa H. Thermo-responsive two-way shape changeable polymeric laminate. Mater Lett 2010;64(6):749–51. link1

[37] Zhang Q, Zhang K, Hu G. Smart three-dimensional lightweight structure triggered from a thin composite sheet via 3D printing technique. Sci Rep 2016;6:22431. link1

[38] Otero TF, Martinez JG, Arias-Pardilla J. Biomimetic electrochemistry from conducting polymers. A review: artificial muscles, smart membranes, smart drug delivery and computer/neuron interfaces. Electrochim Acta 2012;84:112–8. link1

[39] Yang C, Wang B, Li D, Tian X. Modelling and characterisation for the responsive performance of CF/PLA and CF/PEEK smart materials fabricated by 4D printing. Virtual Phys Prototyp 2017;12(1):69–76. link1

[40] Lee AY, An J, Chu CK, Zhang Y. Preliminary investigation of the reversible 4D printing of a dual-layer component. Engineering 2019;5(6):1159–70. link1

[41] Shiblee MNI, Ahmed K, Kawakami M, Furukawa H. 4D printing of shapememory hydrogels for soft-robotic functions. Adv Mater Tech 2019;4 (8):1900071. link1

[42] Hamel C, Roach D, Long K, Demoly F, Dunn M, Qi H. Machine-learning based design of active composite structures for 4D printing. Smart Mater Struct 2019;28(6):065005. link1

[43] Wang G, Yang H, Yan Z, Gecer Ulu N, Tao Y, Gu J, et al. 4DMesh: 4D printing morphing non-developable mesh surfaces. In: Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology; 2018 Oct 14–17; Berlin, Germany; 2018 p. 623–35. link1

[44] Sossou G, Demoly F, Belkebir H, Qi HJ, Gomes S, Montavon G. Design for 4D printing: a voxel-based modeling and simulation of smart materials. Mater Des 2019;175:107798. link1

[45] Sossou G, Demoly F, Belkebir H, Qi HJ, Gomes S, Montavon G. Design for 4D printing: modeling and computation of smart materials distributions. Mater Des 2019;181:108074. link1

[46] Ding Z, Weeger O, Qi HJ, Dunn ML. 4D rods: 3D structures via programmable 1D composite rods. Mater Des 2018;137:256–65. link1

[47] Timoshenko S. Analysis of bi-metal thermostats. JOSA 1925;11(3):233–55. link1

[48] Odent J, Vanderstappen S, Toncheva A, Pichon E, Wallin TJ, Wang K, et al. Hierarchical chemomechanical encoding of multi-responsive hydrogel actuators via 3D printing. J Mater Chem A 2019;25(7):15395–403. link1

[49] Teoh JEM, An J, Chua CK, Lv M, Krishnasamy V, Liu Y. Hierarchically selfmorphing structure through 4D printing. Virtual Phys Prototyp 2017;12 (1):61–8. link1

[50] Zolfagharian A, Kouzani AZ, Maheepala M, Yang Khoo S, Kaynak A. Bending control of a 3D printed polyelectrolyte soft actuator with uncertain model. Sens Actuators A Phys 2019;288:134–43. link1

[51] Deng D, Chen Y. Origami-based self-folding structure design and fabrication using projection based stereolithography. J Mech Des 2015;137(2):021701. link1

[52] Wang W, Yu CY, Serrano PAA, Ahn SH. Soft grasping mechanisms composed of shape memory polymer based self-bending units. Compos Part B 2019;164:198–204. link1

[53] Van Hoa S. Development of composite springs using 4D printing method. Compos Struct 2019;210:869–76. link1

[54] Ge Q, Dunn CK, Qi HJ, Dunn ML. Active origami by 4D printing. Smart Mater Struct 2014;23(9):094007. link1

[55] Wu J, Yuan C, Ding Z, Isakov M, Mao Y, Wang T, et al. Multi-shape active composites by 3D printing of digital shape memory polymers. Sci Rep 2016;6:24224. link1

[56] Su JW, Tao X, Deng H, Zhang C, Jiang S, Lin Y, et al. 4D printing of a selfmorphing polymer driven by a swellable guest medium. Soft Matter 2018;14 (5):765–72. link1

[57] Stroganov V, Pant J, Stoychev G, Janke A, Jehnichen D, Fery A, et al. 4D biofabrication: 3D cell patterning using shape-changing films. Adv Funct Mater 2018;28(11):1706248. link1

[58] Ji Z, Yan C, Yu B, Zhang X, Cai M, Jia X, et al. 3D printing of hydrogel architectures with complex and controllable shape deformation. Adv Mater Tech 2019;4(4):1800713. link1

[59] Boley JW, van Rees WM, Lissandrello C, Horenstein MN, Truby RL, Kotikian A, et al. Shape-shifting structured lattices via multimaterial 4D printing. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2019;116(42):20856–62. link1

[60] Wang Q, Tian X, Huang L, Li D, Malakhov AV, Polilov AN. Programmable morphing composites with embedded continuous fibers by 4D printing. Mater Des 2018;155:404–13. link1

[61] Kim B, La Flamme K, Peppas NA. Dynamic swelling behavior of pH-sensitive anionic hydrogels used for protein delivery. J Appl Polym Sci 2003;89 (6):1606–13. link1

[62] Berens AR, Hopfenberg HB. Diffusion and relaxation in glassy polymer powders: 2. separation of diffusion and relaxation parameters. Polymer 1978;19(5):489–96. link1

[63] Czugala M, O’Connell C, Blin C, Fischer P, Fraser KJ, Benito-Lopez F, et al. Swelling and shrinking behaviour of photoresponsive phosphonium-based ionogel microstructures. Sens Actuators B Chem 2014;194:105–13. link1

[64] Pytel A, Kiusalaas J. Mechanics of materials. 2nd ed. Stamford: Cengage Learning; 2012. link1

[65] Kaviany M. Essentials of heat transfer: principles, materials, and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2011. link1

[66] Glavatska NI, Rudenko AA, L’vov VA. Time-dependent magnetostrain effect and stress relaxation in the martensitic phase of Ni–Mn–Ga. J Magn Magn Mater 2002;241(2–3):287–91. link1

[67] Muliana A. Time dependent behavior of ferroelectric materials undergoing changes in their material properties with electric field and temperature. Int J Solids Struct 2011;48(19):2718–31. link1

[68] Kundys B. Photostrictive materials. Appl Phys Rev 2015;2(1):011301. link1

[69] Naumov P, Chizhik S, Panda MK, Nath NK, Boldyreva E. Mechanically responsive molecular crystals. Chem Rev 2015;115(22):12440–90. link1

[70] Young RJ, Lovell PA. Introduction to polymers. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall; 1991. link1

[71] Von Bertalanffy L. A quantitative theory of organic growth (inquiries on growth laws. II). Hum Biol 1938;10(2):181–213. link1

[72] Malthus TR. An essay on the principle of population. London: J. Johnson; 1798. link1

[73] Verhulst PF. Notice sur la loi que la population suit dans son accroissement. Corresp Math Phys 1838;10:113–21. France. link1

[74] Matsumoto E. Phytomimetic 4D printing [Internet]. Santa Barbara: KITP; 2016 Jan 22 [cited 2017 Dec 1]. Available from: http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/ online/sheets16/matsumoto/. link1

[75] Duffy S. Linear viscoelasticity: mechanical (rheological) models [Internet]. Cleveland: Cleveland State University; [cited 2017 Dec 1]. Available from: http://academic.csuohio.edu/duffy_s/Linear_Visco.pdf. link1

[76] Hu J, Zhu Y, Huang H, Lu J. Recent advances in shape-memory polymers: structure, mechanism, functionality, modeling and applications. Prog Polym Sci 2012;37(12):1720–63. link1

[77] Hager MD, Bode S, Weber C, Schubert US. Shape memory polymers: past, present and future developments. Prog Polym Sci 2015;49–50:3–33. link1

[78] Bakarich SE, Gorkin R III, Panhuis M, Spinks GM. 4D printing with mechanically robust, thermally actuating hydrogels. Macromol Rapid Commun 2015;36(12):1211–7. link1

[79] Nadgorny M, Xiao Z, Chen C, Connal LA. Three-dimensional printing of pHresponsive and functional polymers on an affordable desktop printer. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2016;8(42):28946–54. link1

[80] Le Duigou A, Castro M, Bevan R, Martin N. 3D printing of wood fibre biocomposites: from mechanical to actuation functionality. Mater Des 2016;96:106–14. link1

[81] Alipour N, Andersson RL, Olsson RT, Gedde UW, Hedenqvist MS. VOC-induced flexing of single and multilayer polyethylene films as gas sensors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2016;8(15):9946–53. link1

[82] Nath NK, Pejov L, Nichols SM, Hu C, Saleh N, Kahr B, et al. Model for photoinduced bending of slender molecular crystals. J Am Chem Soc 2014;136(7):2757–66. link1

[83] Zhou Y, Hauser AW, Bende NP, Kuzyk MG, Hayward RC. Waveguiding microactuators based on a photothermally responsive nanocomposite hydrogel. Adv Funct Mater 2016;26(30):5447–52. link1

[84] Li G, Yan Q, Xia H, Zhao Y. Therapeutic-ultrasound-triggered shape memory of a melamine-enhanced poly (vinyl alcohol) physical hydrogel. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2015;7(22):12067–73. link1

[85] Levenberg K. A method for the solution of certain non-linear problems in least squares. Q Appl Math 1944;2(2):164–8. link1

[86] Marquardt DW. An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. J Soc Ind Appl Math 1963;11(2):431–41. link1

[87] Botean AI. Thermal expansion coefficient determination of polylactic acid using digital image correlation. E3S Web Conf 2018. 32:01007. link1

[88] Farah S, Anderson DG, Langer R. Physical and mechanical properties of PLA, and their functions in widespread applications—a comprehensive review. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2016;107:367–92. link1

[89] Mortazavi B, Hassouna F, Laachachi A, Rajabpour A, Ahzi S, Chapron D, et al. Experimental and multiscale modeling of thermal conductivity and elastic properties of PLA/expanded graphite polymer nanocomposites. Thermochim Acta 2013;552:106–13. link1

[90] Thermal conductivity of selected materials and gases [Internet]. Location: Engineering ToolBox; [cited 2019 May 1]. Available from: https://www. engineeringtoolbox.com/thermal-conductivity-d_429.html. link1

[91] Zhang Q, Yan D, Zhang K, Hu G. Pattern transformation of heat-shrinkable polymer by three-dimensional (3D) printing technique. Sci Rep 2015;5:8936. link1

[92] Zhang X, Yu Z, Wang C, Zarrouk D, Seo JWT, Cheng JC, et al. Photoactuators and motors based on carbon nanotubes with selective chirality distributions. Nat Commun 2014;5:2983. link1

[93] Hirano A, Hashimoto T, Kitagawa D, Kono K, Kobatake S. Dependence of photoinduced bending behavior of diarylethene crystals on ultraviolet irradiation power. Cryst Growth Des 2017;17(9):4819–25. link1

[94] De Volder MF, Tawfick SH, Baughman RH, Hart AJ. Carbon nanotubes: present and future commercial applications. Science 2013;339(6119):535–9. link1

[95] He S, Chen P, Sun X, Peng H. Stimuli-responsive materials from carbon nanotubes. In: Peng H, Li Q, Chen T, editors. Industrial applications of carbon nanotubes. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2017. link1

[96] Le Duigou A, Chabaud G, Scarpa F, Castro M. Bioinspired electro–thermo– hygro reversible shape-changing materials by 4D printing. Adv Funct Mater 2019;29(40):1903280. link1

[97] Ligon SC, Liska R, Stampfl J, Gurr M, Mülhaupt R. Polymers for 3D printing and customized additive manufacturing. Chem Rev 2017;117(15):10212–90. link1

[98] Yuan C, Ding Z, Wang TJ, Dunn ML, Qi HJ. Shape forming by thermal expansion mismatch and shape memory locking in polymer/elastomer laminates. Smart Mater Struct 2017;26(10):105027. link1

[99] Bonner M, Montes de Oca H, Brown M, Ward IM. A novel approach to predict the recovery time of shape memory polymers. Polymer 2010;51(6):1432–6. link1

[100] Li F, Larock RC. New soybean oil–styrene–divinylbenzene thermosetting copolymers. v. shape memory effect. J Appl Polym Sci 2002;84(8):1533–43. link1

[101] Lin JR, Chen LW. Shape-memorized crosslinked ester-type polyurethane and its mechanical viscoelastic model. J Appl Polym Sci 1999;73(7):1305–19. link1

[102] Diani J, Liu Y, Gall K. Finite strain 3D thermoviscoelastic constitutive model for shape memory polymers. Polym Eng Sci 2006;46(4):486–92. link1

[103] Gu J, Leng J, Sun H, Zeng H, Cai Z. Thermomechanical constitutive modeling of fiber reinforced shape memory polymer composites based on thermodynamics with internal state variables. Mech Mater 2019;130:9–19. link1

[104] Zeng H, Xie Z, Gu J, Sun H. A 1D thermomechanical network transition constitutive model coupled with multiple structural relaxation for shape memory polymers. Smart Mater Struct 2018;27(3):035024. link1

[105] Gu J, Leng J, Sun H. A constitutive model for amorphous shape memory polymers based on thermodynamics with internal state variables. Mech Mater 2017;111:1–14. link1

[106] Yu K, McClung AJ, Tandon GP, Baur JW, Qi HJ. A thermomechanical constitutive model for an epoxy based shape memory polymer and its parameter identifications. Mech Time Depend Mater 2014;18(2):453–74. link1

[107] Westbrook KK, Kao PH, Castro F, Ding Y, Qi HJ. A 3D finite deformation constitutive model for amorphous shape memory polymers: a multi-branch modeling approach for nonequilibrium relaxation processes. Mech Mater 2011;43(12):853–69. link1

[108] Li Y, He Y, Liu Z. A viscoelastic constitutive model for shape memory polymers based on multiplicative decompositions of the deformation gradient. Int J Plast 2017;91:300–17. link1

[109] Zeng H, Leng J, Gu J, Sun H. A thermoviscoelastic model incorporated with uncoupled structural and stress relaxation mechanisms for amorphous shape memory polymers. Mech Mater 2018;124:18–25. link1

[110] Gu J, Sun H, Fang C. A finite deformation constitutive model for thermally activated amorphous shape memory polymers. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 2015;26(12):1530–8. link1

[111] Lei M, Yu K, Lu H, Qi HJ. Influence of structural relaxation on thermomechanical and shape memory performance of amorphous polymers. Polymer 2017;109:216–28. link1

[112] Chen J, Liu L, Liu Y, Leng J. Thermoviscoelastic shape memory behavior for epoxy-shape memory polymer. Smart Mater Struct 2014;23(5):055025. link1

[113] Nguyen TD, Qi HJ, Castro F, Long KN. A thermoviscoelastic model for amorphous shape memory polymers: incorporating structural and stress relaxation. J Mech Phys Solids 2008;56(9):2792–814. link1

[114] Wang ZD, Li DF, Xiong ZY, Chang RN. Modeling thermomechanical behaviors of shape memory polymer. J Appl Polym Sci 2009;113(1):651–6. link1

[115] Wagermaier W, Kratz K, Heuchel M, Lendlein A. Characterization methods for shape-memory polymers. In: Lendlein A, editor. Shape-memory polymers. Berlin: Springer; 2009. link1

[116] Lagace PA. Unit 9 effects of the environment [Internet]. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; c2001 [cited 2019 Oct 1]. Available from: https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/aeronautics-and-astronautics/16-20- structural-mechanics-fall-2002/lecture-notes/unit9.pdf. link1

[117] Liu Y, Gall K, Dunn ML, Greenberg AR, Diani J. Thermomechanics of shape memory polymers: uniaxial experiments and constitutive modeling. Int J Plast 2006;22(2):279–313. link1

[118] Chen YC, Lagoudas DC. A constitutive theory for shape memory polymers. Part II: a linearized model for small deformations. J Mech Phys Solids 2008;56 (5):1766–78. link1

[119] Kazakevicˇiute ˙ -Makovska R, Heuchel M, Kratz K, Steeb H. Universal relations in linear thermoelastic theories of thermally responsive shape memory polymers. Int J Eng Sci 2014;82:140–58. link1

[120] Qi HJ, Nguyen TD, Castro F, Yakacki CM, Shandas R. Finite deformation thermo-mechanical behavior of thermally induced shape memory polymers. J Mech Phys Solids 2008;56(5):1730–51. link1

[121] Athanasopoulos N, Siakavellas N. Variable emissivity through multilayer patterned surfaces for passive thermal control: preliminary thermal design of a nano-satellite. In: Proceedings of the 48th International Conference on Environmental Systems; 2018 Jul 8–12; Albuquerque, NM, USA; 2018. link1

[122] Athanasopoulos N, Siakavellas NJ. Smart patterned surfaces with programmable thermal emissivity and their design through combinatorial strategies. Sci Rep 2017;7:12908. link1

[123] Ding Z, Yuan C, Peng X, Wang T, Qi HJ, Dunn ML. Direct 4D printing via active composite materials. Sci Adv 2017;3(4):e1602890. link1

[124] Van Manen T, Janbaz S, Zadpoor AA. Programming 2D/3D shape-shifting with hobbyist 3D printers. Mater Horiz 2017;4(6):1064–9. link1

Related Research