Journal Home Online First Current Issue Archive For Authors Journal Information 中文版

Engineering >> 2021, Volume 7, Issue 2 doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2020.05.022

Suitable Weir Heights to Improve the Provision of Environmental Flows in Urban Rivers

State Key Laboratory of Water Environment Simulation, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

Received: 2020-03-09 Revised: 2020-05-08 Accepted: 2020-05-28 Available online: 2020-09-29

Next Previous

Abstract

Many studies have been conducted on environmental flow (e-flow) assessment and supply, but e-flow shortages remain common in many urban rivers. In addition to known reasons such as ever-increasing competition among water users and inadequate execution of designed e-flow supply plans, we propose that designing weir heights without explicitly considering e-flows is another major cause of this problem. In this paper, we suggest that the measures for satisfying e-flows be extended from the water supply stage to the river channel design stage. We establish a new weir height determination framework that would more effectively satisfy the required e-flows. The new framework differs from previous frameworks, in which flood control and water retention are the major concerns and the flow during floods is set as the inflow. In the new framework, e-flow provision and flow velocity maintenance are added concerns and the actual flows for e-flow supply are set as the inflow. As a case study of the new framework’s effectiveness, we applied it to the Shiwuli River in Hefei, China, a typical channelized urban river in China. The old framework specified too-high weir height to meet the e-flow requirements, whereas the new framework offered more reasonable heights that improved e-flow provision.

Figures

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

References

[ 1 ] Morley SA, Karr JR. Assessing and restoring the health of urban streams in the Puget Sound Basin. Conserv Biol 2002;16(6):1498–509. link1

[ 2 ] Chin A. Urban transformation of river landscapes in a global context. Geomorphology 2006;79(3–4):460–87. link1

[ 3 ] Toth LA, Melvin SM, Arrington DA, Chamberlain J. Hydrologic manipulations of the channelized Kissimmee River. Bioscience 1998;48(9):757–64. link1

[ 4 ] Petts GE, Sparks R, Campbell I. River restoration in developing countries. In: Boon PJ, Davies BR, Pelts GE, editors. Global perspectives on river conservation. Chichester: John Wiley; 2000. p. 493–508. link1

[ 5 ] Walsh CJ, Fletcher TD, Ladson AR. Stream restoration in urban catchments through redesigning stormwater systems: looking to the catchment to save the stream. J N Am Benthol Soc 2005;24(3):690–705. link1

[ 6 ] Richter BD, Baumgartner JV, Wigington R, Braun DP. How much water does a river need? Freshw Biol 1997;37(1):231–49. link1

[ 7 ] Horne A, Szemis AM, Kaur S, Webb JA, Stewardson MJ, Costa A, et al. Optimization tools for environmental water decisions: a review of strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities to improve adoption. Environ Model Softw 2016;84:326–38. link1

[ 8 ] Wang C, Wang PF. Management and construction of urban water system. Beijing: Science Press; 2004. Chinese.

[ 9 ] Tharme RE. A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. River Res Appl 2003;19(5–6):397–441. link1

[10] Chang FJ, Tsai YH, Chen PA, Coynel A, Vachaud G. Modeling water quality in an urban river using hydrological factors—data driven approaches. J Environ Manage 2015;151:87–96. link1

[11] Willis AD, Campbell AM, Fowler AC, Babcock CA, Howard JK, Deas ML, et al. Instream flows: new tools to quantify water quality conditions for returning adult chinook salmon. J Water Resour Plan Manage 2016;142(2):04015056. link1

[12] Jia H, Ma H, Wei M. Calculation of the minimum ecological water requirement of an urban river system and its deployment: a case study in Beijing central region. Ecol Modell 2011;222(17):3271–6. link1

[13] Safavi HR, Golmohammadi MH, Sandoval-Solis S. Scenario analysis for integrated water resources planning and management under uncertainty in the Zayandehrud river basin. J Hydrol 2016;539:625–39. link1

[14] Pauls MA, Wurbs RA. Environmental flow attainment metrics for water allocation modeling. J Water Resour Plan Manage 2016;142(8):04016018.1–9.

[15] Petts GE. Instream flow science for sustainable river management. J Am Water Resour Assoc 2009;45(5):1071–86. link1

[16] Brewer SK, McManamay RA, Miller AD, Mollenhauer R, Worthington TA, Arsuffi T. Advancing environmental flow science: developing frameworks for altered landscapes and integrating efforts across disciplines. Environ Manage 2016;58(2):175–92. link1

[17] Morrison RR, Stone MC. Spatially implemented Bayesian network model to assess environmental impacts of water management. Water Resour Res 2014;50(50):8107–24. link1

[18] Morrison RR, Stone MC. Evaluating the impacts of environmental flow alternatives on reservoir and recreational operation using system dynamics modeling. J Am Water Resour Assoc 2015;51(1):33–46. link1

[19] Lorenz S, Szemisa JM, Kaura S, Webb JA, Stewardson MJ, Costa A, et al. Fuzzy cognitive mapping for predicting hydromorphological responses to multiple pressures in rivers. J Appl Ecol 2016;53(2):559–66. link1

[20] Yin X, Yang Z, Petts GE. Reservoir operating rules to sustain environmental flows in regulated rivers. Water Resour Res 2011;47(8):427–38. link1

[21] Yin X, Yang Z, Petts GE. Optimizing environmental flows below dams. River Res Appl 2012;28(6):703–16. link1

[22] Yin X, Yang Z, Petts GE, Kondolf GM. A reservoir operating method for riverine ecosystem protection, reservoir sedimentation control and water supply. J Hydrol 2014;512(6):379–87. link1

[23] Yin X, Yang Z, Yang W, Zhao Y, Chen H. Optimized reservoir operation to balance human and riverine ecosystem needs: model development, and a case study for the Tanghe reservoir, Tang river basin. China. Hydrol Processes 2010;24(4):461–71. link1

[24] Tofiq FA, Guven A. Semi-theoretical approach to optimisation of gate ratio for small concrete dams and weirs. Eur J Environ Civ Eng 2016;20(3):251–62. link1

[25] Schindler DW, Hecky RE, Findlay DL, Stainton MP, Parker BR, Paterson MJ, et al. Eutrophication of lakes cannot be controlled by reducing nitrogen input: results of a 37-year whole-ecosystem experiment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105(32):11254–8. link1

[26] Chanson H. Hydraulics of open channel flow. 2nd ed. Oxford: ButterworthHeinemann Press; 2004. link1

[27] Zhao Z, He J. Hydraulics. 2nd ed. Beijing: Tsinghua Press; 2010. Chinese. link1

[28] Piccinini M, Caro AS, Gultemiriam ML, Giorgi A. Estimating the selfdepuration capacity of a reach of the Luján River. Int J Environ Res 2015;9 (3):1037–46. link1

[29] Lian J, Yao Y, Ma C, Guo Q. Reservoir operation rules for controlling algal blooms in a tributary to the impoundment of Three Gorges Dam. Water 2014;6 (10):3200–23. link1

[30] Eder BL, Steffensen KD, Haas JD, Adams JD. Short-term survival and dispersal of hatchery-reared juvenile pallid sturgeon stocked in the channelized Missouri River. J Appl Ichthyology 2015;31(6):991–6. link1

[31] Goeller B, Wolter C. Performance of bottom ramps to mitigate gravel habitat bottlenecks in a channelized lowland river. Restor Ecol 2015;23(5):595–606. link1

[32] Hogberg NP, Hamel MJ, Pegg MA. Age-0 channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus growth related to environmental conditions in the channelized Missouri River, Nebraska. River Res Appl 2016;32(4):744–52. link1

[33] Niazkar M, Afzali SH. Optimum design of lined channel sections. Water Resour Manage 2015;29(6):1921–32. link1

[34] Yang W, Sun D, Yang Z. A simulation framework for water allocation to meet the environmental requirements of urban rivers: model development and a case study for the Liming River in Daqing City, China. Environ Fluid Mech 2008;8(4):333–47. link1

[35] Sun D, Yang W. Genetic algorithm solution of grey nonlinear water environment management models developed for the Liming River in Daqing, China. J Environ Eng 2007;133(3):287–93. link1

[36] Escartın J, Aubrey DG. Flow structure and dispersion within algal mats. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 1995;40(4):451–72. link1

[37] Mitrovic SM, Oliver RL, Rees C, Bowling LC, Buckney RT. Critical flow velocities for the growth and dominance of Anabaena circinalis in some turbid freshwater rivers. Freshw Biol 2003;48(1):164–74. link1

[38] Liu F, Jin F. Control effect of current velocity on alga growth in eutrophication water. Water Sav Irrig 2009;9:52–4. Chinese.

[39] Dong K. Research on the impact of flow velocity on eutrophication in channel reservoir—study the growth of algae [dissertation]. Chongqing: Chongqing University; 2010. Chinese.

[40] Ministry of Ecology and Environment of People’s Republic of China; State Administration for Market Regulation. GB 3838-2002: Environmental quality standard for surface water. Chinese standard. Beijing: China Environment Publishing Group; 2002. Chinese.

[41] Zhang L, Yuan B, Yin X, Zhao Y. The influence of channel morphological changes on environmental flow requirements in urban rivers. Water 2019;11 (9):1800. link1

[42] Zhang H, Chen R, Li F, Chen L. Effect of flow rate on environmental variables and phytoplankton dynamics: results from field enclosures. Chin J Oceanology Limnol 2015;33(2):430–8. link1

[43] Carpenter SR. Phosphorus control is critical to mitigating eutrophication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105(32):11039–40. link1

[44] Sindelar C, Schobesberger J, Habersack H. Effects of weir height and reservoir widening on sediment continuity at run-of-river hydropower plants in gravel bed rivers. Geomorphology 2017;291:106–15. link1

[45] Chorus I, Bartram J, editors. Toxic cyanobacteria in water: a guide to their public health consequences, monitoring and management. London: E&FN Spon Press; 1999. link1

[46] Smith VH, Schindler DW. Eutrophication science: Where do we go from here? Trends Ecol Evol 2009;24(4):201–7. link1

Related Research