2021, Volume 7, Issue 6
Engineering >> 2021, Volume 7, Issue 6 doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2020.12.021
A Multi-Layer Collaboration Framework for Industrial Parks with 5G Vehicle-to-Everything Networks
a Department of Mechanical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
b Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
c State Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacturing Equipment and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
Next Previous
Abstract
The fifth-generation (5G) wireless communication networks are expected to play an essential role in the transformation of vertical industries. Among many exciting applications to be enabled by 5G, logistics tasks in industry parks can be performed more efficiently via vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communications. In this paper, a multi-layer collaboration framework enabled by V2X is proposed for logistics management in industrial parks. The proposed framework includes three layers: a perception and execution layer, a logistics layer, and a configuration layer. In addition to the collaboration among these three layers, this study addresses the collaboration among devices, edge servers, and cloud services. For effective logistics in industrial parks, task collaboration is achieved through four functions: environmental perception and map construction, task allocation, path planning, and vehicle movement. To dynamically coordinate these functions, device–edge–cloud collaboration, which is supported by 5G slices and V2X communication technology, is applied. Then, the analytical target cascading method is adopted to configure and evaluate the collaboration schemes of industrial parks. Finally, a logistics analytical case study in industrial parks is employed to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed collaboration framework.
Keywords
5G ; Vehicle-to-everything ; Industrial park ; Logistics ; Device–edge–cloud collaboration ; Analytical target cascading
Figures
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
References
[ 1 ] Qiu X, Luo H, Xu G, Zhong R, Huang GQ. Physical assets and service sharing for IoT-enabled Supply Hub in Industrial Park (SHIP). Int J Prod Econ 2015;159:4–15. link1
[ 2 ] Qiu X, Huang GQ, Lam JSL. A bilevel analytical model for dynamic storage pricing in a Supply Hub in Industrial Park (SHIP). IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 2015;12(3):1017–32. link1
[ 3 ] Feng J, Li F, Xu C, Zhong RY. Data-driven analysis for RFID-enabled smart factory: a case study. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 2020;50(1):81–8. link1
[ 4 ] Yu W, Liang F, He X, Hatcher WG, Lu C, Lin J, et al. A survey on the edge computing for the Internet of Things. IEEE Access 2018;6:6900–19. link1
[ 5 ] Satyanarayanan M. The emergence of edge computing. Computer 2017;50 (1):30–9. link1
[ 6 ] Mao Y, You C, Zhang J, Huang K, Letaief KB. A survey on mobile edge computing: the communication perspective. IEEE Commun Surv Tut 2017;19 (4):2322–58. link1
[ 7 ] Ha K, Chen Z, Hu W, Richter W, Pillai P, Satyanarayanan M. Towards wearable cognitive assistance. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services; 2014 Jun 16–19; Bretton Woods, NH, USA; 2014. p. 68–81.
[ 8 ] Zhao Z, Lin P, Shen L, Zhang M, Huang GQ. IoT edge computing-enabled collaborative tracking system for manufacturing resources in industrial park. Adv Eng Inform 2020;43:101044. link1
[ 9 ] Qi B, Xia Y, Li B, Shi K, Xue M. Family energy management system based on edge computing: architecture, key technology and implementation. Electr Power Constr 2018;39(3):33–41. link1
[10] Lin W, Sharma P, Chatterjee S, Sharma D, Lee D, Iyer S, et al. Scaling persistent connections for cloud services. Comput Netw 2015;93:518–30. link1
[11] Chen Y. Integrated and intelligent manufacturing: perspectives and enablers. Engineering 2017;3(5):588–95. link1
[12] Lv L, Shi Y, Shen W. Mobility-as-a-service research trends of 5G-based vehicle platooning. Serv Oriented Comput Appl 2021;15(1):1–3.
[13] Shi Y, Lin N, Han Q, Zhang T, Shen W. A method for transportation planning and profit sharing in collaborative multi-carrier vehicle routing. Mathematics 2020;8(10):1788. link1
[14] Pocovi G, Shariatmadari H, Berardinelli G, Pedersen K, Steiner J, Li Z. Achieving ultra-reliable low-latency communications: challenges and envisioned system enhancements. IEEE Network 2018;32(2):8–15. link1
[15] Guevara L, Cheein FA. The role of 5G technologies: challenges in smart cities and intelligent transportation systems. Sustainability 2020;12(16):6469. link1
[16] Sawanobori TK. The next generation of wireless: 5G leadership in the US Washington [presentation]. In: CTIA EverythingWireless; 2016 Feb 9; Washington, DC, USA; 2016.
[17] Campolo C, Molinaro A, Iera A, Menichella F. 5G network slicing for vehicle-toeverything services. IEEE Wirel Commun 2017;24(6):38–45. link1
[18] Shi Y, Han Q, Shen W, Zhang H. Potential applications of 5G communication technologies in collaborative intelligent manufacturing. IET Collab Intell Manuf 2019;1(4):109–16. link1
[19] Zhong RY, Xu X, Klotz E, Newman ST. Intelligent manufacturing in the context of Industry 4.0: a review. Engineering 2017;3(5):616–30. link1
[20] Kumar PM, Gandhi UD, Manogaran G, Sundarasekar R, Chilamkurti N, Varatharajan R. Ant colony optimization algorithm with Internet of Vehicles for intelligent traffic control system. Comput Netw 2018;144:154–62. link1
[21] Tolba A. Content accessibility preference approach for improving service optimality in internet of vehicles. Comput Netw 2019;152:78–86. link1
[22] Akpakwu GA, Silva BJ, Hancke GP, Abu-Mahfouz AM. A survey on 5G networks for the Internet of Things: communication technologies and challenges. IEEE Access 2018;6:3619–47. link1
[23] Butt TA, Iqbal R, Shah SC, Umar T. Social Internet of Vehicles: architecture and enabling technologies. Comput Electr Eng 2018;69:68–84. link1
[24] Li W, Xiao M, Yi Y, Gao L. Maximum variation analysis based analytical target cascading for multidisciplinary robust design optimization under interval uncertainty. Adv Eng Inform 2019;40:81–92. link1
[25] Rawat DB, Alsabet R, Bajracharya C, Song M. On the performance of cognitive Internet-of-Vehicles with unlicensed user-mobility and licensed user-activity. Comput Netw 2018;137:98–106. link1
[26] 3rd Generation Partnership Project; technical specification group services and system aspects; release 16 description. Report. Valbonne: 3GPP Support Office; 2020.
[27] Abdel Hakeem SA, Hady AA, Kim HW. 5G–V2X: standardization, architecture, use cases, network-slicing, and edge-computing. Wirel Netw 2020;26 (8):6015–41. link1
[28] Casas P, Schatz R. Quality of experience in cloud services: survey and measurements. Comput Netw 2014;68:149–65. link1
[29] Selimi M, Khan AM, Dimogerontakis E, Freitag F, Centelles RP. Cloud services in the Guifi.net community network. Comput Netw 2015;93:373–88. link1
[30] Schreiber M, Knöppel C, Franke U. LaneLoc: lane marking based localization using highly accurate maps. In: Proceedings of 2013 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV); 2013 Jun 23–26; Gold Coast, QLD, Australia; 2013. p. 449–54.
[31] Liu Z, Yu S, Zheng N. A co-point mapping-based approach to drivable area detection for self-driving cars. Engineering 2018;4(4):479–90. link1
[32] Xu X, Hao J, Yu L, Deng Y. Fuzzy optimal allocation model for task–resource assignment problem in a collaborative logistics network. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 2019;27(5):1112–25. link1
[33] Shriyam S, Gupta SK. Incorporation of contingency tasks in task allocation for multirobot teams. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 2020;17(2):809–22. link1
[34] Ma H, Koenig S. AI Buzzwords explained: multi-agent path finding (MAPF). AI Matters 2017;3(3):15–9. link1
[35] Hönig W, Kumar TKS, Cohen L, Ma H, Xu H, Ayanian N, et al. Multi-agent path finding with kinematic constraints. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence; 2017 Aug 19–25; Melbourne, VIC, Australia; 2017. p. 4869–73.
[36] Shen W, Wang L, Hao Q. Agent-based distributed manufacturing process planning and scheduling: a state-of-the-art survey. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern C 2006;36(4):563–77. link1
[37] Goldenberg M, Felner A, Stern R, Sharon G, Sturtevant N, Holte RC, et al. Enhanced partial expansion A*. J Artif Intell Res 2014;50:141–87. link1
[38] Wagner G, Choset H. Subdimensional expansion for multirobot path planning. Artif Intell 2015;219:1–24. link1
[39] Sharon G, Stern R, Goldenberg M, Felner A. The increasing cost tree search for optimal multi-agent pathfinding. Artif Intell 2013;195:470–95. link1
[40] Sharon G, Stern R, Felner A, Sturtevant NR. Conflict-based search for optimal multi-agent pathfinding. Artif Intell 2015;219:40–66. link1
[41] Jiang K, Yang D, Liu C, Zhang T, Xiao Z. A flexible multi-layer map model designed for lane-level route planning in autonomous vehicles. Engineering 2019;5(2):305–18. link1
[42] Talgorn B, Kokkolaras M. Compact implementation of non-hierarchical analytical target cascading for coordinating distributed multidisciplinary design optimization problems. Struct Multidiscipl Optim 2017;56 (6):1597–602. link1
[43] Guarneri P, Leverenz JT, Wiecek MM, Fadel G. Optimization of nonhierarchically decomposed problems. J Comput Appl Math 2013;246:312–9. link1
[44] Ghosh S, Mavris DN. A methodology for probabilistic analysis of distributed multidisciplinary architecture (PADMA). In: Proceeding of 17th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference; 2016 Jun 13–17; Wahington, DC, USA; 2016. p. 3210.
京公网安备 11010502051620号
