Journal Home Online First Current Issue Archive For Authors Journal Information 中文版

Engineering >> 2022, Volume 17, Issue 10 doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2021.02.024

Three-Dimensional Mesoscopic Investigation on the Impact of Specimen Geometry and Bearing Strip Size on the Splitting-Tensile Properties of Coral Aggregate Concrete

a Department of Civil and Airport Engineering, Civil Aviation College, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China
b School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
c Engineering Research Center of Safety and Protection of Explosion and Impact of Ministry of Education (ERCSPEIME), Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
d Army Engineering University of PLA, Nanjing 210007, China

Received: 2020-06-17 00:00:00 Revised: 2021-01-19 00:00:00 Accepted: 2021-02-02 00:00:00 Available online: 2021-12-14

Next Previous

Abstract

The use of coral aggregate concrete (CAC) as a novel construction material has attracted significant attention for the construction of reef engineering structures. To investigate the static splitting-tensile behaviors of CAC under the influence of two factors, namely specimen geometry and bearing strip size, a three-dimensional (3D) mesoscale modeling approach with consideration for aggregate randomness in shape and distribution was adopted in this study. We established 12 different specimen models with two specimen shapes (i.e., a cube with an edge length of 150 mm and a cylinder with dimensions of ϕ150 mm × 300 mm) and six strip widths (i.e., 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 20 mm) for calculation. The effects of specimen geometry and strip width on the splitting-tensile properties of CAC, such as failure processes, final failure patterns, and splitting-tensile strength (fst), are analyzed and discussed systematically. The results indicate the high reliability of the developed mesoscale modeling approach and reveal the optimal computational parameters for simulating and predicting the splitting-tensile properties of CAC. The fst values of CAC are associated with both the specimen geometry and width of the bearing strip. The fst values of the cube model are slightly higher than those of the cylinder model for the same bearing strip size, representing geometry effects that can be explained by differences in fracture area. Additionally, the fst value of CAC gradually increases with the relative width of the bearing strip ranging from 0.04 to 0.13. Based on the elastic solution theory, the variation area of CAC fst values with the relative width of the bearing strip was determined preliminarily, which has great significance for studying the tensile performance of CAC.

Figures

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

Fig. 10

Fig. 11

Fig. 12

Fig. 13

Fig. 14

References

[ 1 ] Wright PJF. Comments on an indirect tensile test on concrete cylinders. Mag Concr Res 1955;7(20):87–96.

[ 2 ] Guo Y, Gao G, Jing L, Shim VPW. Quasi-static and dynamic splitting of highstrength concretes-tensile stress–strain response and effects of strain rate. Int J Impact Eng 2019;125:188–211.

[ 3 ] Jin L, Yu W, Du X, Yang W. Mesoscopic numerical simulation of dynamic size effect on the splitting-tensile strength of concrete. Eng Fract Mech 2019;209:317–32.

[ 4 ] Chen X, Ge L, Zhou J, Wu S. Dynamic Brazilian test of concrete using split Hopkinson pressure bar. Mater Struct 2017;50:1.

[ 5 ] Heilmann HG. Relations between tensile and compressive strength of concrete. Beton 19(2): 68–70. German.

[ 6 ] Carneiro FL, Barcellos A. Tensile strength of concrete. RILEM Bull 1949;13:98–125. French.

[ 7 ] ASTM C496-90. Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. West Conshohocken: ASTM International; 1990.

[ 8 ] BS 1881-117. Testing concrete—part 117: method for the determination of tensile splitting strength. British Standard. London: British Standards Institution; 1983.

[ 9 ] Iso 4108. Concrete determination of tensile splitting strength of test specimen. ISO standard. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 1980.

[10] GB/T 50081. Standard for test method of mechanical properties on ordinary concrete. Chinese standard. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press; 2019.

[11] Nilsson S. The tensile strength of concrete determined by splitting tests on cubes. RILEM Bull 1961;11:63–7.

[12] Ince R. Determination of concrete fracture parameters based on peak-load method with diagonal split-tension cubes. Eng Fract Mech 2012;82:100–14.

[13] Rocco CG, Guinea GV, Planas J, Elices M. The effect of the boundary conditions on the cylinder splitting strength. In: Fracture Mechanics of Concrete Structures. Freiburg: Aedificatio Publishers; 1995. p. 75–84.

[14] Zhou H, Che Y, Chen G, Song Y. Size effect on tensile strength of concrete cubes and cylinders. Concrete 2010;8:13–5. Chinese.

[15] Davies J, Bose D. Stress distribution in splitting test. ACI J Proc 1968;65 (8):662–9.

[16] Tang T. Effects of load-distributed width on split tension of unnotched and notched cylindrical specimens. J Test Eval 1994;22(5):401–9.

[17] Rocco C, Guinea GV, Planas J, Elices M. Size effect and boundary condition in the Brazilian tests: theoretical analysis. Mater Struct 1999;32(6):437–44.

[18] Rocco C, Guinea GV, Planas J, Elices M. Size effect and boundary condition in the Brazilian tests: experimental verification. Mater Struct 1999;32(3):210–7.

[19] Rocco C, Guinea GV, Planas J, Elices M. Review of the splitting-test standards from a fracture mechanics point of view. Cement Concr Res 2001;31(1):73–82.

[20] Wu Z, Yu H, Ma H, Zhang J, Da B, Zhu H. Rebar corrosion in coral aggregate concrete: determination of chloride threshold by LPR. Corros Sci 2020;163:108238.

[21] Wu Z, Zhang J, Yu H, Ma H, Chen L, Dong W, et al. Coupling effect of strain rate and specimen size on the compressive properties of coral aggregate concrete: a 3D mesoscopic study. Compos Part B Eng 2020;200:108299.

[22] Lorman WK. Characteristics of coral aggregate from selected locations in the Pacific Ocean area. Report. Port Hueneme: USN Civil Engineering Laboratory; 1958. Report No.: TN-335A.

[23] Lorman WK. Characteristics of coral mortars. Report. Port Hueneme: US Naval Civil Engineering Laboratory; 1960. Report No.:TR-041.

[24] Lorman WK. Coral and Coral Concrete. Report. Port Hueneme: US Naval Civil Engineering Laboratory; 1960. Report No.: TR-068.

[25] Scholer CH. Examination and study of certain structures in the Pacific Ocean area. Report. Port Hueneme: US Naval Civil Engineering Laboratory. 1959. Report No.: NBy-3171.

[26] Howdyshell PA. The use of coral as an aggregate for Portland cement concrete structures. Report. Urbana-Champaign: US Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory; 1974.

[27] Yu H, Da B, Ma H, Zhu H, Yu Q, Ye H, et al. Durability of concrete structures in tropical atoll environment. Ocean Eng 2017;135:1–10.

[28] Da B, Yu H, Ma H, Tan Y, Mi R, Dou X. Experimental investigation of whole stress–strain curves of coral concrete. Constr Build Mater 2016;122:81–9.

[29] Mi R, Yu H, Ma H. Study on the mechanical property of the coral concrete. Ocean Eng 2016;34:48–54.

[30] Ma H, Wu Z, Zhang J, Yue C. Experimental and three-dimensional mesoscopic investigation of coral aggregate concrete under dynamic splitting-tensile loading. Mater Struct 2020;53(1):12.

[31] Suchorzewski J, Tejchman J, Nitka M, Bobin´ ski J. Meso-scale analyses of size effect in brittle materials using DEM. Granul Matter 2019;21:9.

[32] Skarzyn _ ´ ski L, Nitka M, Tejchman J. Modelling of concrete fracture at aggregate level using FEM and DEM based on x-ray lCT images of internal structure. Eng Fract Mech 2015;147:13–35.

[33] Zhou X, Hao H. Mesoscale modelling of concrete tensile failure mechanism at high strain rates. Comput Struc 2008;86(21–22):2013–26.

[34] Schlangen E, Van Mier JGM. Experimental and numerical analysis of micromechanisms of fracture of cement-based composites. Cement Concr Compos 1992;14(2):105–18.

[35] Bazˇant ZP, Tabbara MR, Kazemi MT, Pijaudier-Cabot G. Random particle models for fracture of aggregate or fiber composites. J Eng Mech 1990;116 (8):1686–705.

[36] Mohamed AR, Hansen W. Micromechanical modeling of concrete response under static loading—part 1: model development and validation. ACI Mater J 1999;96(2):196–203.

[37] Yan P, Zhang J, Fang Q, Zhang Y, Fan J. 3D numerical modelling of solid particles with randomness in shape considering convexity and concavity. Powder Technol 2016;301:131–40.

[38] Xu W, Chen H. Numerical investigation of effect of particle shape and particle size distribution on fresh cement paste microstructure via random sequential packing of dodecahedral cement particles. Comput Struc 2013;114:35–45.

[39] Wittmann FH, Roelfstra PE, Sadouki H. Simulation and analysis of composite structures. Mater Sci Eng 1985;68(2):239–48.

[40] Wang ZM, Kwan AKH, Chan HC. Mesoscopic study of concrete I: generation of random aggregate structure and finite element mesh. Comput Struc 1999;70 (5):533–44.

[41] Häfner S, Eckardt S, Luther T, Könke C. Mesoscale modelling of concrete: geometry and numerics. Comput Struc 2006;84(7):450–61.

[42] Wriggers P, Moftah SO. Mesoscale models for concrete: homogenisation and damage behaviour. Finite Elem Anal Des 2006;42(7):623–36.

[43] Ma H, Song L, Xu W. A novel numerical scheme for random parameterized convex aggregate models with a high-volume fraction of aggregates in concrete-like granular materials. Comput Struc 2018;209:57–64.

[44] Fang Q, Zhang J. 3D numerical modeling of projectile penetration into rockrubble overlays accounting for random distribution of rock-rubble. Int J Impact Eng 2014;63:118–28.

[45] Chen G, Hao Y, Hao H. 3D meso-scale modelling of concrete material in spall tests. Mater Struct 2015;48(6):1887–99.

[46] Xu Z, Hao H, Li H. Mesoscale modelling of dynamic tensile behaviour of fibre reinforced concrete with spiral fibres. Cement Concr Res 2012;42 (11):1475–93.

[47] Guo R, Ren H, Zhang L, Long Z, Jiang X, Wu X, et al. Direct dynamic tensile study of concrete materials based on mesoscale model. Int J Impact Eng 2020;143:103598.

[48] Malvar LJ, Crawford JE, Wesevich JW, Simons D. A new concrete material model for DYNA3D—release II: shear dilation and directional rate enhancements. Report. Glendale: Karagozian and Case Structural Engineers; 1996. Report No.: TM-96-2.1.

[49] Malvar LJ, Crawford JE, Morrill KB. K&C concrete material model—release III: Automated generation of material model input. Report. Glendale: Karagozian and Case Structural Engineers; 2000. Report No.: TR-99-24-B1.

[50] Jin Y, Chen T, Meng Q, Hu M. Difference of coral skeletal structure revealed by compressive strength measurements. J Trop Oceanogr 2017;36(2):33–9.

[51] Wang X, Wang R, Meng Q, Chen J. Research on characteristics of coral reef calcareous rock in Nansha Islands. Chin J Rocks Mech Eng 2008;27: 2221–6.

[52] Kim SM, Abu Al-Rub RK. Meso-scale computational modeling of the plasticdamage response of cementitious composites. Cement Concr Res 2011;41 (3):339–58.

[53] Wu Z, Yu H, Ma H. Study on the mechanical properties of new coral aggregate seawater concrete. Ocean Eng 2018;36(3):59–68.

[54] Yuan Y. Mix design and property of coral aggregate concrete [dissertation]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics; 2015.

[55] Zhou Z, Zou Y, Li X, Jiang Y. Stress evolution and failure process of Brazilian disc under impact. J Cent South Univ 2013;20(1):172–7.

[56] Neville AM. Properties of concrete. London: Pitman Press; 1981.

[57] Kadlecˇek V, Modry´ S, Kadlecˇek V. Size effect of test specimens on tensile splitting strength of concrete: general relation. Mater Struct 2002;35 (1):28–34.

[58] Malhotra VM. Effect of specimen size on tensile strength of concrete. Appl Clin Inform J 1970;67(6):467–9.

[59] Neville AM. General relation for strengths of concrete specimens of different shapes and sizes. Appl Clin Inform J 1966;63(10):1095–109.

[60] Olesen JF, Ostergaard L, Stang H. Nonlinear fracture mechanics and plasticity of the split cylinder test. Mater Struct 2006;2006(39):421–32.

Related Research