Journal Home Online First Current Issue Archive For Authors Journal Information 中文版

Engineering >> 2021, Volume 7, Issue 8 doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2021.06.008

Flexibility Prediction of Aggregated Electric Vehicles and Domestic Hot Water Systems in Smart Grids

a State Key Laboratory of Alternate Electrical Power System with Renewable Energy Sources (North China Electric Power University), Beijing 102206, China
b Division of Electric Power and Energy Systems, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm 10044, Sweden
c Center for Electric Power and Energy Department of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs Lyngby 2800, Denmark

Received: 2020-10-08 Revised: 2021-01-16 Accepted: 2021-03-29 Available online: 2021-06-24

Next Previous

Abstract

With the growth of intermittent renewable energy generation in power grids, there is an increasing demand for controllable resources to be deployed to guarantee power quality and frequency stability. The flexibility of demand response (DR) resources has become a valuable solution to this problem. However, existing research indicates that problems on flexibility prediction of DR resources have not been investigated. This study applied the temporal convolution network (TCN)-combined transformer, a deep learning technique to predict the aggregated flexibility of two types of DR resources, that is, electric vehicles (EVs) and domestic hot water system (DHWS). The prediction uses historical power consumption data of these DR resources and DR signals (DS) to facilitate prediction. The prediction can generate the size and maintenance time of the aggregated flexibility. The accuracy of the flexibility prediction results was verified through simulations of case studies. The simulation results show that under different maintenance times, the size of the flexibility changed. The proposed DR resource flexibility prediction method demonstrates its application in unlocking the demand-side flexibility to provide a reserve to grids.

Figures

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

Fig. 10

Fig. 11

References

[ 1 ] Hu J, Zhou H, Li Y, Hou P, Yang G. Multi-time scale energy management strategy of aggregator characterized by photovoltaic generation and electric vehicles. J Mod Power Syst Clean Energy 2020;8(4):727–36. link1

[ 2 ] Kumar A, Sekhar C. Demand response based congestion management in a mix of pool and bilateral electricity market model. Front Energy 2012;6(2):164–78. link1

[ 3 ] Hu J, Yang G, Ziras C, Kok K. Aggregator operation in the balancing market through network-constrained transactive energy. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2019;34(5):4071–80. link1

[ 4 ] Xue Y, Yu X. Beyond smart grid—cyber–physical–social system in energy future. Proc IEEE 2017;105(12):2290–2. link1

[ 5 ] International energy agency. Harnessing variable renewables: a guide to the balancing challenge. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2011. link1

[ 6 ] Chen Z, Sun Y, Ai X, Malik SM, Yang L. Integrated demand response characteristics of industrial park: a review. J Mod Power Syst Clean Energy 2020;8(1):15–26. link1

[ 7 ] Fattahi J, Samadi M, Erol-Kantarci M, Schriemer H. Transactive demand response operation at the grid edge using the IEEE 2030.5 standard. Engineering 2020;6(7):801–11. link1

[ 8 ] Li Z, Guo Q, Sun H, Wang J. Storage-like devices in load leveling: complementarity constraints and a new and exact relaxation method. Appl Energy 2015;151:13–22. link1

[ 9 ] Sanandaji BM, Vincent TL, Poolla K. Ramping rate flexibility of residential HVAC loads. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 2016;7(2):865–74. link1

[10] Hu K, Li W, Wang L, Cao S, Zhu F, Shou Z. Energy management for multimicrogrid system based on model predictive control. Front Inf Technol Electron Eng 2018;19(11):1340–51. link1

[11] Vivekananthan C, Mishra Y, Ledwich G, Li F. Demand response for residential appliances via customer reward scheme. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2014;5 (2):809–20. link1

[12] Wu J, Xue Y, Xie D, Yue D, Wen F, Zhao J. Evaluation and simulation analysis of reserve capability for electric vehicles. Autom Electr Power Syst 2018;42 (13):101–7. Chinese. link1

[13] Wang J, Jia Y, Mi Z, Chen H, Fang H. Reserve service strategy of electric vehicles based on double-incentive mechanism. Autom Electr Power Syst 2020;44 (10):68–76. Chinese. link1

[14] Yao W, Zhao J, Wen F, Xue Y, Chen F, Li L. Frequency regulation strategy for electric vehicles with centralized charging. Autom Electr Power Syst 2014;38 (9):69–76. Chinese. link1

[15] Zhang B, Xu G. Rolling horizon optimization for grid-connected electric vehicles considering demand difference. Autom Electr Power Syst 2020;44 (13):106–14. Chinese. link1

[16] Han B, Lu S, Xue F, Jiang L. Day-ahead electric vehicle aggregator bidding strategy using stochastic programming in an uncertain reserve market. IET Gener Transm Distrib 2019;13(12):2517–25. link1

[17] Wang Yi, Hug G, Liu Z, Zhang N. Modeling load forecast uncertainty using generative adversarial networks. Electr Power Syst Res 2020;189:106732. link1

[18] Chen K, Chen K, Wang Q, He Z, Hu J, He J. Short-term load forecasting with deep residual network. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2019;10(4):3943–52. link1

[19] Hong T, Pinson P, Wang Yi, Weron R, Yang D, Zareipour H. Energy forecasting: a review and outlook. IEEE Open Access J Power and Energy 2020;7:376–88. link1

[20] Divshali PH, Evens C. Behaviour analysis of electrical vehicle flexibility based on large-scale charging data. In: 2019 IEEE Milan PowerTech; 2019 Jun 23–27; Milan, Italy; 2019.

[21] Sajjad IA, Chicco G, Napoli R. Definitions of demand flexibility for aggregate residential loads. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2016;7(6):2633–43. link1

[22] Paridari K, Nordström L. Flexibility prediction, scheduling and control of aggregated TCLs. Electr Power Syst Res 2020;178:106004. link1

[23] Hochreiter S, Bengio Y, Frasconi P, Schmidhuber J. Gradient flow in recurrent nets: the diffificulty of learning long-term dependencies. In: John FK, Stefan CK, editors. A field guide to dynamical recurrent networks. New York: IEEE Press; 2001. p. 237–44. link1

[24] Bengio Y, Simard P, Frasconi P. Learning long-term dependencies with gradient descent is difficult. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 1994;5(2):157–66. link1

[25] Lu Z, Li H, Qiao Y. Power system flexibility planning and challenges considering high proportion of renewable energy. Autom Electr Power Syst 2016;40 (13):147–57. Chinese. link1

[26] Parlos AG, Rais OT, Atiya AF. Multi-step-ahead prediction using dynamic recurrent neural networks. Neural Netw 2000;13(7):765–86. link1

[27] Bao Y, Xiong T, Hu Z. Multi-step-ahead time series prediction using multipleoutput support vector regression. Neurocomputing 2014;129:482–93. link1

[28] Sutskever I, Vinyals O, Le QV. Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks. 2014. arXiv:1409.3215v3.

[29] Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, Uszkoreit J, Jones L, Gomez AN, et al. Attention is all you need. 2017. arXiv:1706.03762v5.

[30] Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J. Long short-term memory. Neural Comput 1997;9 (8):1735–80. link1

[31] Chung J, Gulcehre C, Cho K, Bengio Y. Empirical evaluation of gated recurrent neural networks on sequence modeling. 2014. arXiv:1412.3555v1.

[32] Bai S, Kolter JZ, Koltun V. An empirical evaluation of generic convolutional and recurrent networks for sequence modeling. 2018. arXiv:1803.01271.

[33] He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; 2016 Jun 27–30; Las Vegas, NV, USA; 2016.

[34] Salimans T, Kingma DP. Weight normalization: a simple reparameterization to accelerate training of deep neural networks. 2016. arXiv:1602.07868. link1

[35] Kingma DP, Ba JL. Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. 2017. arXiv:1412.6980v9.

[36] Luo Z, Hu Z, Song Y, Xu Z, Lu H. Optimal coordination of plug-in electric vehicles in power grids with cost-benefit analysis—part II: a case study in china. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2013;28(4):3556–65. link1

[37] Sandels C, Widén J, Nordström L. Forecasting household consumer electricity load profiles with a combined physical and behavioral approach. Appl Energy 2014;131:267–78. link1

Related Research