2022, Volume 18, Issue 11
Engineering >> 2022, Volume 18, Issue 11 doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2021.06.018
Frequency-Domain Full-Waveform Inversion Based on Tunnel Space Seismic Data
a Hubei Subsurface Multiscale Imaging Key Laboratory (SMIL), Institute of Geophysics and Geomatics, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
b Hubei Key Laboratory of Marine Geological Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
Next Previous
Abstract
Tunnel seismic detection methods are effective for obtaining the geological structure around the tunnel face, which is critical for safe construction and disaster mitigation in tunnel engineering. However, there is often a lack of accuracy in the acquired geological information and physical properties ahead of the tunnel face in the current tunnel seismic detection methods. Thus, we apply a frequency-domain acoustic full-waveform inversion (FWI) method to obtain high-resolution results for the tunnel structure. We discuss the influence of the frequency group selection strategy and the tunnel observation system settings regarding the inversion results and determine the structural imaging and physical property parameter inversion of abnormal geological bodies ahead of the tunnel face. Based on the conventional strategies of frequency-domain acoustic FWI, we propose a frequency group selection strategy that combines a low-frequency selection covering the vertical wavenumber and a high-frequency selection of anti-aliasing. This strategy can effectively obtain the spatial structure and physical parameters of the geology ahead of the tunnel face and improve the inversion resolution. In addition, by linearly increasing the side length of the tunnel observation system, we share the influence of the length of the two sides of the observation systems of different tunnels on the inversion results. We determined that the inversion results are best when the side length is approximately five times the width of the tunnel face, and the influence of increasing the side observation length beyond this range on the inversion results can be ignored. Finally, based on this approach, we invert for the complex multi-stratum model, and an accurate structure and physical property parameters of the complex stratum ahead of the tunnel face are obtained, which verifies the feasibility of the proposed method.
Keywords
Tunnel seismic detection ; Full-waveform inversion ; Frequency select strategy ; Observation system
Figures
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
References
[ 1 ] Li S, Liu B, Xu X, Nie L, Liu Z, Song J, et al. An overview of ahead geological prospecting in tunneling. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2017;63:69–94. link1
[ 2 ] Cardarelli E, Marrone C, Orlando L. Evaluation of tunnel stability using integrated geophysical methods. J Appl Geophys 2003;52(2–3):93–102. link1
[ 3 ] Huang JG, Wang JL, Ruan BY. A study on advanced detection using DC resistivity method in tunnel. Chin J Geophys 2006;49(5):1529–38. link1
[ 4 ] Wang L. Application of several kinds of advanced forecast of geology in tunnel construction. Metal Mine 2001;305:45–7. link1
[ 5 ] Slob E, Sato M, Olhoeft G. Surface and borehole ground-penetrating-radar developments. Geophysics 2010;75(5):75A–103A. link1
[ 6 ] Zeng Z. Prediction ahead of the tunnel face by the reflection methods. J Geophys 1994;37(2):268–71. link1
[ 7 ] Inazaki T, Isahai H, Kawamura S, Kurahashi T, Hayashi H. Stepwise application of horizontal seismic profiling for tunnel prediction ahead of the face. Leading Edge 1999;18(12):1429–31. link1
[ 8 ] Zhao Y, Jiang H, Zhao X. Tunnel seismic tomography method for geological prediction and its application. Appl Geophys 2006;3(2):69–74. link1
[ 9 ] Alimoradi A, Moradzadeh A, Naderi R, Salehi MZ, Etemadi A. Prediction of geological hazardous zones in front of a tunnel face using TSP-203 and artificial neural networks. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 2008;23(6):711–7. link1
[10] Hanson DR, Vandergrift TL, DeMarco MJ, Hanna K. Advanced techniques in site characterization and mining hazard detection for the underground coal industry. Int J Coal Geol 2002;50(1):275–301. link1
[11] Otto R, Button E, Bretterebner H, Schwab P. The application of TRT-true reflection tomography—at the Unterwald Tunnel. Felsbau 2002;20(2):51–6. link1
[12] Petronio L, Poletto F, Schleifer A. Interface prediction ahead of the excavation front by the tunnel-seismic-while-drilling (TSWD) method. Geophysics 2007;72(4):G39–44. link1
[13] Liu Y. TGP tunnel seismic wave forecast system and its technology. Ggephys Geochem Eeplor 2009;33(2):170–7. link1
[14] Lin C, Li S. Tunnel Seismic Prediction (TSP) and its application in tunnel engineering. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Civil Engineering and Transportation; 2013 Dec 14–15; Kunming, China.
[15] Cheng F, Liu J, Qu N, Mao M, Zhou L. Two-dimensional pre-stack reverse time imaging based on tunnel space. J Appl Geophys 2014;104:106–13. link1
[16] Xue Y, Li Z, Qiu D, Yang W, Zhang L, Tao Y, et al. Prediction model for subway tunnel collapse risk based on delphi-ideal point method and geological forecast. Soil Mech Found Eng 2019;56(3):191–9. link1
[17] Bamberger A, Chavent G, Hemon Ch, Lailly P. Inversion of normal incidence seismograms. Geophysics 1982;47(5):757–70. link1
[18] Poirier JP, Tarantola A. A logarithmic equation of state. Phys Earth Planet Inter 1998;109(1–2):1–8. link1
[19] Lailly P. The seismic inverse problem as a sequence of before stack migrations: conference on inverse scattering, theory and application. Auckland: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics; 1983. p. 206–20. link1
[20] Alkhalifah T. Full model wavenumber inversion (FMWI): an emphasize on the appropriate wavenumber continuation. Geophysics 2016;81(3): R89–98. link1
[21] Wu Z, Alkhalifah T. Simultaneous inversion of the background velocity and perturbations in full waveform inversion. Geophysics 2015;80(6): R317–29. link1
[22] Oh J, Kalita M, Alkhalifah T. 3D elastic full waveform inversion using P-wave excitation amplitude: application to real OBC data. Geophysics 2018;83(2): R129–40. link1
[23] Choi Y, Alkhalifah T. Unwrapped phase inversion with an exponential damping. Geophysics 2015;80(5):R251–64. link1
[24] Kolb P, Collino F, Lailly P. Pre-stack inversion of a 1-D medium. Proc IEEE 1986;74(3):498–508. link1
[25] Tarantola A, Valette B. Generalized nonlinear inverse problems solved using the least squares criterion. Rev Geophys 1982;20(2):219–32. link1
[26] Bunks C, Saleck FM, Zaleski S, Chavent G. Multiscale seismic waveform inversion. Geophysics 1995;60(5):1457–73. link1
[27] Pratt RG, Worthington MH. Inverse theory applied to multi-source cross-hole tomography. Geophys Prospect 1990;38(3):287–310. link1
[28] Operto S, Virieux J, Ribodetti A, Anderson JE. Finite-difference frequencydomain modeling of visco-acoustic wave propagation in two-dimensional (2D) tilted transversely isotropic (TTI) media. Geophysics 2009;74(5):T75–95. link1
[29] Choi Y, Alkhalifah T. Frequency-domain waveform inversion using the phase derivative. Geophys J Int 2013;195(3):1904–16. link1
[30] Prieux V, Lambaré G, Operto S, Virieux J. Building starting models for full waveform inversion (FWI) from wide-aperture data by stereo-tomography. Geophys Prospect 2013;61:109–37. link1
[31] Anagaw AY, Sacchi MD. Comparison of multifrequency selection strategies for simultaneous-source full-waveform inversion. Geophysics 2014;79(5): R165–81. link1
[32] Musayev K, Lamert A, Hackl K, Friederich W, Baitsch M. Predicting the geological structure ahead of a tunnel using full waveform inversion—a blind test. In: Proceedings of the Eage Conference and Exhibition; 2016 May 30–Jun 2; Vienna, Austria.
[33] Musayev K. Seismic reconnaissance in a tunnel environment using full waveform inversion. Universitätsbibliothek der Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum; 2017. link1
[34] Nguyen LT, Nestorovic´ T. Reconstructing disturbance zones ahead of the tunnel face by elastic waveform inversion supported by a parametric level-set representation. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 2018;115:606–21. link1
[35] Nguyen LT, Nestorovic´ T. Unscented hybrid simulated annealing for fast inversion of tunnel seismic waves. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2016;301:281–99. link1
[36] Bharadwaj P, Drijkoningen G, Mulder W, Thorbecke J, Neducza B, Jenneskens R. A shear-wave seismic system using full-waveform inversion to look ahead of a tunnel-boring machine. Near Surf Geophys 2017;15(3):210–25. link1
[37] Lamert A, Nguyen LT, Friederich W, Nestorovic´ T. Imaging disturbance zones ahead of a tunnel by elastic full-waveform inversion: adjoint gradient based inversion vs. parameter space reduction using a level-set method. Undergr Space 2018;3(1):21–33. link1
[38] Zhang C, Zhang F, Li Y. Study of FWI of advance tunnel geological prediction by ground penetrating radar. Tunnel Constr 2019;39:102–9. link1
[39] Li M. Rock wave velocity prediction research in front of tunnel based on fullwaveform inversion of frequency-domain [dissertation]. Shandong University, 2018.
[40] Feng D, Wang X, Zhang B. Improving reconstruction of tunnel lining defects from ground-penetrating radar profiles by multi-scale inversion and biparametric full-waveform inversion. Adv Eng Inform 2019;41:100931. link1
[41] Hustedt B, Operto S, Virieux J. Mixed-grid and staggered-grid finite-difference methods for frequency-domain acoustic wave modelling. Geophys J Int 2004;157(3):1269–96. link1
[42] Jo CH, Shin C, Suh JH. An optimal 9-point, finite-difference, frequency-space, 2- D scalar wave extrapolator. Geophysics 1996;61(2):529–37. link1
[43] Berenger JP. A perfect matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves. J Comput Phys 1994;114(2):185–200. link1
[44] Tarantola A. Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation. Geophysics 1984;49(8):1259–66. link1
[45] Ke R, Yang Y. Simultaneous multifrequency inversion strategy applied and implemented in frequency-domain FWI. Semicond Optoelectron 2017;38 (1):131–5. link1
[46] Sirgue L, Pratt RG. Efficient waveform inversion and imaging: a strategy for selecting temporal frequencies. Geophysics 2004;69(1):231–48. link1
[47] Wang Y, Rao Y. Reflection seismic waveform tomography. J Geophys Res 2009;114(B3):B03304. link1
[48] Bradford JH, Privette J, Wilkins D, Ford R. Reverse-time migration from rugged topography to image ground-penetrating radar data in complex environments. Engineering 2018;4(5):661–6. link1
[49] Chen H, Liu S. Advanced geological prediction technology of tunnel based on image recognition. Arab J Geosci 2019;12(19):12. link1
[50] Wang Y, Fu N, Lu X, Fu Z. Application of a new geophone and geometry in tunnel seismic detection. Sensors 2019;19(5):1246. link1
[51] Fichtner A. Full seismic waveform modelling and inversion. Des Moines: Springer Science & Business Media; 2010. link1
[52] Peng S, Xia J, Cheng J. Applications of geophysics in resource detection and environmental protection. Engineering 2018;4(5):584–5. link1
京公网安备 11010502051620号
