Journal Home Online First Current Issue Archive For Authors Journal Information 中文版

Engineering >> 2022, Volume 14, Issue 7 doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2021.08.023

Controlling the Reconstruction of Ni/CeO2 Catalyst during Reduction for Enhanced CO Methanation

a State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China
b Operando Molecular Spectroscopy and Catalysis Research Laboratory, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA
c Department of Instrument Science and Engineering, School of Electronic Information and Electrical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
d Dalian Research Institute of Petroleum and Petrochemicals, SINOPEC, Dalian 116045, China

Received: 2021-01-19 00:00:00 Revised: 2021-04-30 00:00:00 Accepted: 2021-08-17 00:00:00 Available online: 2021-12-08

Next Previous

Abstract

Reductive pretreatment is an important step for activating supported metal catalysts but has received little attention. In this study, reconstruction of the supported nickel catalyst was found to be sensitive to pretreatment conditions. In contrast to the traditional activation procedure in hydrogen, activating the catalyst in syngas created supported Ni nanoparticles with a polycrystalline structure containing an abundance of grain boundaries. The unique post-activation catalyst structure offered enhanced CO adsorption and an improved CO methanation rate. The current strategy to tune the catalyst structure via manipulating the activation conditions can potentially guide the rational design of other supported metal catalysts.

Figures

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

References

[ 1 ] Liu J, Cui D, Yao C, Yu J, Su F, Xu G. Syngas methanation in fluidized bed for an advanced two-stage process of SNG production. Fuel Process Technol 2016;141:130–7. link1

[ 2 ] Rönsch S, Schneider J, Matthischke S, Schlüter M, Götz M, Lefebvre J, et al. Review on methanation—from fundamentals to current projects. Fuel 2016;166:276–96. link1

[ 3 ] Bligaard T, Nørskov JK, Dahl S, Matthiesen J, Christensen CH, Sehested J. The Brønsted–Evans–Polanyi relation and the volcano curve in heterogeneous catalysis. J Catal 2004;224(1):206–17. link1

[ 4 ] van Meerten RZC, Vollenbroek JG, de Croon MHJM, van Nisselrooy PFMT, Coenen JWE. The kinetics and mechanism of the methanation of carbon monoxide on a nickel–silica catalyst. Appl Catal 1982;3(1):29–56. link1

[ 5 ] Tsipouriari VA, Verykios XE. Carbon and oxygen reaction pathways of CO2 reforming of methane over Ni/La2O3 and Ni/Al2O3 catalysts studied by isotopic tracing techniques. J Catal 1999;187(1):85–94. link1

[ 6 ] Tian H, Li Z, Feng G, Yang Z, Fox D, Wang M, et al. Stable, high-performance, dendrite-free, seawater-based aqueous batteries. Nat Commun 2021;12(1):237. link1

[ 7 ] Pan F, Yang Y. Designing CO2 reduction electrode materials by morphology and interface engineering. Energy Environ Sci 2020;13(8):2275–309. link1

[ 8 ] Chee SW, Arce-Ramos JM, Li W, Genest A, Mirsaidov U. Structural changes in noble metal nanoparticles during CO oxidation and their impact on catalyst activity. Nat Commun 2020;11:2133. link1

[ 9 ] Beniya A, Higashi S, Ohba N, Jinnouchi R, Hirata H, Watanabe Y. CO oxidation activity of non-reducible oxide-supported mass-selected few-atom Pt singleclusters. Nat Commun 2020;11:1888. link1

[10] Liu Q, Yang H, Dong H, Zhang W, Bian B, He Q, et al. Effects of preparation method and Sm2O3 promoter on CO methanation by a mesoporous NiO– Sm2O3/Al2O3 catalyst. New J Chem 2018;42(15):13096–106. link1

[11] Liu Q, Tian Y. One-pot synthesis of NiO/SBA-15 monolith catalyst with a threedimensional framework for CO2 methanation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2017;42 (17):12295–300. link1

[12] Zhang J, Xin Z, Meng X, Tao M. Synthesis, characterization and properties of anti-sintering nickel incorporated MCM-41 methanation catalysts. Fuel 2013;109:693–701. link1

[13] Kamata H, Tian ZQ, Izumi Y, Choong CKS, Chang J, Schreyer M, et al. Dispersed and high loading Ni catalyst stabilized in porous SiO2 matrix for substituted natural gas production. Catal Today 2018;299:193–200. link1

[14] Ebadi A, Tourani S, Khorasheh F. Synthesis of highly dispersed nanosized NiO/ MgO-Al2O3 catalyst for the production of synthetic natural gas with enhanced activity and resistance to coke formation. Ind Eng Chem Res 2018;57 (38):12700–14. link1

[15] Lin X, Lin L, Huang K, Chen X, Dai W, Fu X. CO methanation promoted by UV irradiation over Ni/TiO2. Appl Catal B Environ 2015;168–169:416–22. link1

[16] Zhu M, Tian P, Cao X, Chen J, Pu T, Shi B, et al. Vacancy engineering of the nickel-based catalysts for enhanced CO2 methanation. Appl Catal B Environ 2021;282:119561. link1

[17] Dong J, Fu Q, Li H, Xiao J, Yang B, Zhang B, et al. Reaction-induced strong metal–support interactions between metals and inert boron nitride nanosheets. J Am Chem Soc 2020;142:17167–74.

[18] Galhardo TS, Braga AH, Arpini BH, Szanyi J, Gonçalves RV, Zornio BF, et al. Optimizing active sites for high CO selectivity during CO2 hydrogenation over supported nickel catalysts. J Am Chem Soc 2021;143(11):4268–80. link1

[19] Kokka A, Ramantani T, Petala A, Panagiotopoulou P. Effect of the nature of the support, operating and pretreatment conditions on the catalytic performance of supported Ni catalysts for the selective methanation of CO. Catal Today 2020;355:832–43. link1

[20] Du G, Lim S, Yang Y, Wang C, Pfefferle L, Haller G. Methanation of carbon dioxide on Ni-incorporated MCM-41 catalysts: the influence of catalyst pretreatment and study of steady-state reaction. J Catal 2007;249(2):370–9. link1

[21] Yang C, Yang J, Duan X, Hu G, Liu Q, Ren S, et al. Roles of photo-generated holes and oxygen vacancies in enhancing photocatalytic performance over CeO2 prepared by molten salt method. Adv Powder Technol 2020;31 (9):4072–81. link1

[22] Kosacki I, Petrovsky V, Anderson HU, Colomban P. Raman spectroscopy of nanocrystalline ceria and zirconia thin films. J Am Ceram Soc 2002;85:2646– 50.

[23] Wu Z, Li M, Howe J, Meyer HM, Overbury SH. Probing defect sites on CeO2 nanocrystals with well-defined surface planes by Raman spectroscopy and O2 adsorption. Langmuir 2010;26(21):16595–606. link1

[24] Spanier JE, Robinson RD, Zhang F, Chan SW, Herman IP. Size-dependent properties of CeO2 nanoparticles as studied by Raman scattering. Phys Rev B 2001;64:245407. link1

[25] Dresselhaus MS, Jorio A, Hofmann M, Dresselhaus G, Saito R. Perspectives on carbon nanotubes and graphene Raman spectroscopy. Nano Lett 2010;10:751–8.

[26] Jalama K, Ma W, Jacobs G, Sparks D, Qian D, Davis BH. Fischer–Tropsch synthesis over Pt/Co/Al2O3 catalyst: improvement in catalyst stability by activation with diluted CO. Appl Catal A Gen 2020;602:117645.

[27] Bêche E, Charvin P, Perarnau D, Abanades S, Flamant G. Ce 3d XPS investigation of cerium oxides and mixed cerium oxide (CexTiyOz). Surf Interface Anal 2008;40(3–4):264–7. link1

[28] Mariano RG, McKelvey K, White HS, Kanan MW. Selective increase in CO2 electroreduction activity at grain-boundary surface terminations. Science 2017;358(6367):1187–92. link1

[29] Feng X, Jiang K, Fan S, Kanan MW. Grain-boundary-dependent CO2 electroreduction activity. J Am Chem Soc 2015;137(14):4606–9. link1

[30] Chen Z, Wang T, Liu B, Cheng D, Hu C, Zhang G, et al. Grain-boundary-rich copper for efficient solar-driven electrochemical CO2 reduction to ethylene and ethanol. J Am Chem Soc 2020;142(15):6878–83. link1

[31] Jia X, Zhang X, Rui N, Hu X, Liu C. Structural effect of Ni/ZrO2 catalyst on CO2 methanation with enhanced activity. Appl Catal B Environ 2019;244:159–69. link1

[32] Tang H, Su Y, Zhang B, Lee AF, Isaacs MA, Wilson K, et al. Classical strong metal–support interactions between gold nanoparticles and titanium dioxide. Sci Adv 2017;3:1–9. link1

[33] Tao F, Grass ME, Zhang Y, Butcher DR, Renzas JR, Liu Z, et al. Reaction-driven restructuring of Rh–Pd and Pt–Pd core–shell nanoparticles. Science 2008;322 (5903):932–4. link1

[34] Lee AF, Ellis CV, Naughton JN, Newton MA, Parlett CMA, Wilson K. Reaction-driven surface restructuring and selectivity control in allylic alcohol catalytic aerobic oxidation over Pd. J Am Chem Soc 2011;133 (15):5724–7. link1

[35] Chen S, Abdel-Mageed AM, Dyballa M, Parlinska-Wojtan M, Bansmann J, Pollastri S, et al. Raising the COx methanation activity of a Ru/c-Al2O3 catalyst by activated modification of metal–support interactions. Angew Chem Int Ed 2020;59(50):22763–70.

[36] van Deelen TW, Hernández Mejía C, de Jong KP. Control of metal–support interactions in heterogeneous catalysts to enhance activity and selectivity. Nat Catal 2019;2(11):955–70. link1

[37] Chaudhri MM. Subsurface strain distribution around Vickers hardness indentations in annealed polycrystalline copper. Acta Mater 1998;46 (9):3047–56. link1

[38] Ghosh R, Basak D, Fujihara S. Effect of substrate-induced strain on the structural, electrical, and optical properties of polycrystalline ZnO thin films. J Appl Phys 2004;96(5):2689–92. link1

[39] Adelung R, Aktas OC, Franc J, Biswas A, Kunz R, Elbahri M, et al. Straincontrolled growth of nanowires within thin-film cracks. Nat Mater 2004;3 (6):375–9. link1

[40] Zhang Y, Cao C, Zhang C, Zhang Z, Liu X, Yang Z, et al. The study of structureperformance relationship of iron catalyst during a full life cycle for CO2 hydrogenation. J Catal 2019;378:51–62. link1

Related Research