Journal Home Online First Current Issue Archive For Authors Journal Information 中文版

Engineering >> 2022, Volume 14, Issue 7 doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2021.12.019

Near-Real-Time Carbon Emission Accounting Technology Toward Carbon Neutrality

a Department of Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
b Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 27599, USA
c College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Received: 2021-07-26 Revised: 2021-11-02 Accepted: 2021-12-27 Available online: 2022-03-15

Next Previous

Abstract

Climate change is the greatest environmental threat to humans and the planet in the 21st century. Global anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions are one of the main causes of the increasing number of extreme climate events. Cumulative carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions showed a linear relationship with cumulative temperature rise since the pre-industrial stage, and this accounts for approximately 80% of the total anthropogenic greenhouse gases. Therefore, accurate and reliable carbon emission data are the foundation and scientific basis for most emission reduction policymaking and target setting. Currently, China has made clear the ambitious goal of achieving the peak of carbon emissions by 2030 and achieving carbon neutrality by 2060. The development of a finer-grained spatiotemporal carbon emission database is urgently needed to achieve more accurate carbon emission monitoring for continuous implementation and the iterative improvement of emission reduction policies. Near-real-time carbon emission monitoring is not only a major national demand but also a scientific question at the frontier of this discipline. This article reviews existing annual-based carbon accounting methods, with a focus on the newly developed real-time carbon emission technology and its current application trends. We also present a framework for the latest near-real-time carbon emission accounting technology that can be widely used. The development of relevant data and methods will provide strong database support to the policymaking for China's "carbon neutrality” strategy. Finally, this article provides an outlook on the future of real-time carbon emission monitoring technology.

Figures

Fig. 1

References

[ 1 ] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Summary for policymakers. In: Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Fifth assessment report. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014.

[ 2 ] Ma C, Xu H, Su M. The research progress on greenhouse gas inventory methods. Prog Geogr 2013;32(3):400–7. Chinese. link1

[ 3 ] Liu Z, Guang DB, Wang W. Carbon emission accounting in China. Scientia Sinica Terrae 2018;48(07):878–87. Chinese. link1

[ 4 ] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate change 2007—the physical science basis: working group I contribution to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.

[ 5 ] Guan D, Peters GP, Weber CL, Hubacek K. Journey to world top emitter: an analysis of the driving forces of China’s recent CO2 emissions surge. Geophys Res Lett 2009;36(4):L04709. link1

[ 6 ] Shan Y, Guan D, Zheng H, Ou J, Li Y, Meng J, et al. China CO2 emission accounts 1997–2015. Sci Data 2018;5(1):17201. link1

[ 7 ] Muntean M, Guizzardi D, Schaaf E, Crippa M, Solazzo E, Olivier J, et al. Fossil CO2 emissions of all world countries—2018 report. Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2018.

[ 8 ] Friedlingstein P, Jones MW, O’Sullivan M, Andrew RM, Hauck J, Peters GP, et al. Global carbon budget 2019. Earth Syst Sci Data 2019;11(4):1783–838. link1

[ 9 ] Friedlingstein P, O’Sullivan M, Jones MW, Andrew RM, Hauck J, Olsen A, et al. Global carbon budget 2020. Earth Syst Sci Data 2020;12(4):3269–340. link1

[10] IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories [Internet]. Geneva: IPCC; 1996 [cited 2022 Feb 22]. Available from: https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges. or.jp/public/gl/invs1.html. link1

[11] 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories [Internet]. Geneva: IPCC; 2006 [cited 2022 Feb 22]. Available from: https://www.ipccnggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/index.html. link1

[12] National Communication [Internet]. Beijing: Department of Climate Change of National Development and Reform Commission; 2015 [cited 2022 Feb 22]. Available from: https://tnc.ccchina.org.cn/. Chinese. link1

[13] Outline of the National Medium and Long-term Scientific and Technological Development Plan [Internet]. Beijing: State Council of the People’s Republic of China; 2006 [cited 2022 Feb 22]. Available from: http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/ 2006-02/09/content_183787.htm. Chinese. link1

[14] The Twelfth Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development [Internet]. Beijing: The Central People’s Government of the People’s Republic of China; 2011 [cited 2022 Feb 22]. Available from: http://www.gov.cn/ 2011lh/content_1825838.htm#. Chinese. link1

[15] The Special Plan for Science and Technology Development to Address Climate Change in China’s Twelfth Five-Year Plan [Internet]. Beijing: The Central People’s Government of the People’s Republic of China; 2012 [cited 2022 Feb 22]. Available from: http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2012-07/11/content_2181012. htm. Chinese. link1

[16] The National Climate Change Plan to Address Climate Change (2014–2020) [Internet]. Beijing: State Council of the People’s Republic of China; 2014 [cited 2022 Feb 22]. Available from: http://www.scio.gov.cn/xwfbh/xwbfbh/wqfbh/ 2015/20151119/xgzc33810/document/1455885/1455885.htm. Chinese. link1

[17] Wei W, Ren X, Cai Z, Hou Q, Liu Y, Li Q. Research on China’s greenhouse gas emission—progress on emission inventory from the CAS strategic priority research program. Bull Chin Acad Sci 2015;30(6):839–47. Chinese. link1

[18] National Development and Reform Commission of China. Enhanced actions on climate change in 2015—China’s intended nationally determined contributions. Beijing: Department of Climate Change, National Development and Reform Commission of China; 2015. Chinese. link1

[19] China’s achievements, new goals and new measures for nationally determined contributions [Internet]. Glasgow: United Nations Climate Change Conference; 2020 [cited 2022 Feb 22]. Available from: https://www4.unfccc. int/sites/ndcstaging/PublishedDocuments/China%20First/China%E2%80%99s% 20Achievements,%20New%20Goals%20and%20New%20Measures%20for%20Na tionally%20Determined%20Contributions.pdf. link1

[20] Eggleston S, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K. 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Report. Kanagawa: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES); 2006.

[21] Zhu SL. Comparison and analysis of CO2 emissions data for China. Adv Clim Chang Res 2014;5(1):17–27. link1

[22] Liu Z, Guan D, Wei W, Davis SJ, Ciais P, Bai J, et al. Reduced carbon emission estimates from fossil fuel combustion and cement production in China. Nature 2015;524(7565):335–8. link1

[23] Shan Y, Huang Q, Guan D, Hubacek K. China CO2 emission accounts 2016– 2017. Sci Data 2020;7:54. link1

[24] Cai B, Liang S, Zhou J, Wang J, Cao L, Qu S, et al. China high resolution emission database (CHRED) with point emission sources, gridded emission data, and supplementary socioeconomic data. Resour Conserv Recycling 2018;129:232–9. link1

[25] Xu H, Ren Y, Zhang W, Meng W, Yun X, Yu X, et al. Updated global black carbon emissions from 1960 to 2017: improvements, trends, and drivers. Environ Sci Technol 2021;55(12):7869–79. link1

[26] Luo J, Han Y, Zhao Y, Liu X, Huang Y, Wang L, et al. An inter-comparative evaluation of PKU-FUEL global SO2 emission inventory. Sci Total Environ 2020;722:105709. link1

[27] Zhong Q, Shen H, Yun X, Chen Y, Ren Y, Xu H, et al. Global sulfur dioxide emissions and the driving forces. Environ Sci Technol 2020;54(11): 6508–17. link1

[28] Ren Y, Shen GF, Shen H, Zhong Q, Xu H, Meng W. Contributions of biomass burning to global and regional SO2 emissions. Atmos Res 2021;260:105709. link1

[29] Chen H, Huang Ye, Shen H, Chen Y, Ru M, Chen Y, et al. Modeling temporal variations in global residential energy consumption and pollutant emissions. Appl Energy 2016;184:820–9. link1

[30] Wang R, Tao S, Ciais P, Shen HZ, Huang Y, Chen H, et al. High-resolution mapping of combustion processes and implications for CO2 emissions. Atmos Chem Phys 2013;13(10):5189–203. link1

[31] Wang H, Lu X, Deng Y, Sun Y, Nielsen CP, Liu Y, et al. China’s CO2 peak before 2030 implied from characteristics and growth of cities. Nat Sustain 2019;2 (8):748–54. link1

[32] Liu M, Wang H, Wang H, Oda T, Zhao Y, Yang X, et al. Refined estimate of China’s CO2 emissions in spatiotemporal distributions. Atmos Chem Phys 2013;13(21):10873–82. link1

[33] Publicly Available Specification 2050—specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services standard. London: British Standards Institution; 2008.

[34] The greenhouse gas protocol standard. Washington, DC: World Business Council for Sustainable Development; 2011.

[35] ISO/TS 14067: Greenhouse gases—carbon footprint of products—requirements and guidelines for quantification and communication. ISO standard. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2013.

[36] The greenhouse gas protocol standard. Washington, DC: World Business Council for Sustainable Development; 2004.

[37] ISO 14064-1:2006: Greenhouse gases—part 1: specification with guidance at the organization level for quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions and removals. ISO standard. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2006.

[38] ISO 14064-1:2018: Greenhouse gases—part 1: specification with guidance at the organization level for quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions and removals. ISO standard. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2018.

[39] ISO 14069: Greenhouse gases—quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions for organizations—guidance for the application of ISO 14064-1. ISO standard. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2013.

[40] ISO 14072: Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines for organizational life cycle assessment. ISO standard. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2014.

[41] PAS 2060 carbon neutrality standard. London: British Standard Institution; 2014.

[42] Davis SJ, Caldeira K. Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107(12):5687–92. link1

[43] Meng J, Mi Z, Guan D, Li J, Tao S, Li Y, et al. The rise of South–South trade and its effect on global CO2 emissions. Nat Commun 2018;9(1):1871. link1

[44] Yang Y, Qu S, Cai B, Liang S, Wang Z, Wang J, et al. Mapping global carbon footprint in China. Nat Commun 2020;11(1):2237. link1

[45] Mi Z, Zheng J, Meng J, Ou J, Hubacek K, Liu Z, et al. Economic development and converging household carbon footprints in China. Nat Sustain 2020;3 (7):529–37. link1

[46] Shan Y, Ou J, Wang D, Zeng Z, Zhang S, Guan D, et al. Impacts of COVID-19 and fiscal stimuli on global emissions and the Paris Agreement. Nat Clim Chang 2021;11(3):200–6. link1

[47] Doblas J, Shimabukuro Y, Sant’Anna S, Carneiro A, Aragão L, Almeida C. Optimizing near real-time detection of deforestation on tropical rainforests using sentinel-1 data. Remote Sens 2020;12(23):3922. link1

[48] Csillik O, Asner GP. Aboveground carbon emissions from gold mining in the Peruvian Amazon. Environ Res Lett 2020;15(1):014006.

[49] Tang X, Bullock EL, Olofsson P, Estel S, Woodcock CE. Near real-time monitoring of tropical forest disturbance: new algorithms and assessment framework. Remote Sens Environ 2019;224:202–18. link1

[50] Musinsky J, Tabor K, Cano CA, Ledezma JC, Mendoza E, Rasolohery A, et al. Conservation impacts of a near real-time forest monitoring and alert system for the tropics. Remote Sens Ecol Conserv 2018;4(3):189–96. link1

[51] Messinger M, Asner GP, Silman M. Rapid assessments of Amazon forest structure and biomass using small unmanned aerial systems. Remote Sens 2016;8(8):615. link1

[52] Pascal M, Margolis HG, Etzel RA. Greening the international society for environmental epidemiology. Epidemiology 2021;32(4):466–8. link1

[53] Nguyen XP, Hoang AT, Ölçer AI, Huynh TT. Record decline in global CO2 emissions prompted by COVID-19 pandemic and its implications on future climate change policies. Energy Sources A Recovery Util Environ Effects 2021;32(4):466–8. link1

[54] Joshi M, Caceres J, Ko S, Epps SM, Bartter T. Unprecedented: the toxic synergism of COVID-19 and climate change. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2021;27 (2):66–72. link1

[55] Stoll C, Mehling MA. COVID-19: clinching the climate opportunity. One Earth 2020;3(4):400–4. link1

[56] Siddique A, Shahzad A, Lawler J, Mahmoud KA, Lee DS, Ali N, et al. Unprecedented environmental and energy impacts and challenges of COVID19 pandemic. Environ Res 2021;193:110443. link1

[57] Rowan NJ, Galanakis CM. Unlocking challenges and opportunities presented by COVID-19 pandemic for cross-cutting disruption in agri-food and green deal innovations: Quo Vadis? Sci Total Environ 2020;748:141362. link1

[58] Tian X, An C, Chen Z, Tian Z. Assessing the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on urban transportation and air quality in Canada. Sci Total Environ 2021;765:144270. link1

[59] Lian J, Lauvaux T, Utard H, Broquet G, Bréon FM, Ramonet M, et al. Assessing the effectiveness of an urban CO2 monitoring network through the COVID-19 lockdown natural experiment. In: European Geosciences Union (EGU) General Assembly 2021; 2021 Apr 19–30; online. Göttingen: Copernicus Meetings; 2021. p. EGU21-16098.

[60] Liu D, Sun W, Zeng N, Han P, Yao B, Liu Z, et al. Observed decreases in on-road CO2 concentrations in Beijing during COVID-19 restrictions. Atmos Chem Phys 2021;21(6):4599–614. link1

[61] Turner AJ, Kim J, Fitzmaurice H, Newman C, Worthington K, Chan K, et al. Observed impacts of COVID-19 on urban CO2 emissions. Geophys Res Lett 2020;47(22). e2020GL090037. link1

[62] Zheng B, Geng G, Ciais P, Davis SJ, Martin RV, Meng J, et al. Satellite-based estimates of decline and rebound in China’s CO2 emissions during COVID-19 pandemic. Sci Adv 2020;6(49):eabd4998. link1

[63] Cai Z, Che K, Liu Y, Yang D, Liu C, Yue X. Decreased anthropogenic CO2 emissions during the COVID-19 pandemic estimated from FTS and MAX-DOAS measurements at urban Beijing. Remote Sens 2021;13(3):517. link1

[64] Buchwitz M, Reuter M, Noël S, Bramstedt K, Schneising O, Hilker M, et al. Can a regional-scale reduction of atmospheric CO2 during the COVID-19 pandemic be detected from space? A case study for East China using satellite XCO2 retrievals. Atmos Meas Tech 2021;14(3):2141–66. link1

[65] Liu Z, Ciais P, Deng Z, Davis SJ, Zheng B, Wang Y, et al. Carbon monitor, a nearreal-time daily dataset of global CO2 emission from fossil fuel and cement production. Sci Data 2020;7(1):392. link1

[66] Liu Z, Ciais P, Deng Z, Lei R, Davis SJ, Feng S, et al. Near-real-time monitoring of global CO2 emissions reveals the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Nat Commun 2020;11:5172. link1

[67] Hong C, Ciais P, Liu Z, Boucher O, Zhao W, Gentine P, et al. Near-real-time and state-level monitoring of US CO2 emissions. 2021. EarthArXiv: X5BS5B.

[68] Cui D, Liu Z, Duan CC, Deng Z, Deng X, Song X, et al. Daily CO2 emission for China’s provinces in 2019 and 2020. Earth Syst Sci Data Discussions 2021. arXiv:essd-2021-153. link1

[69] Wang Y, Deng Z, Ciais P, Liu Z, Davis SJ, Gentine P, et al. Transportation CO2 emissions stayed high despite recurrent COVID outbreaks. 2021. arXiv:2101.06450.

[70] United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Emissions gap report 2021: the heat is on—a world of climate promises not yet delivered. Report. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and UNEP DTU Partnership; 2021.

[71] Balashov N, Ott LE, Weir B, Knowland KE, Davis KJ, Keller CA, et al. Novel application of NASA’s GEOS-CF CO2 forecasting system to ACT-America Airborne Campaign [abstract]. In: American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting; 2019 Dec 9–13; San Francisco, CA, USA; 2020.

[72] Knowland EK, Keller CA, Ott LE, Pawson S, Saunders E, Wales PA, et al. Local to global air quality simulations using the NASA GEOS composition forecast model GEOS-CF. Washington, DC, USA: The STI Repository (NTRS); 2020. link1

[73] Janssens-Maenhout G, Pinty B, Dowell M, Zunker H, Andersson E, Balsamo G, et al. Toward an operational anthropogenic CO2 emissions monitoring and verification support capacity. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 2020;101(8):E1439–51. link1

Related Research