Journal Home Online First Current Issue Archive For Authors Journal Information 中文版

Strategic Study of CAE >> 2019, Volume 21, Issue 6 doi: 10.15302/J-SSCAE-2019.06.002

Development and Challenges of Antarctic Marine Protected Areas

China Institute for Marine Affairs, Ministry of Natural Resources of the PRC, Beijing, 100161, China

Funding project:中国工程院咨询项目“海洋强国战略研究2035”(2018-ZD-08); 国家社科基金“新时代海洋强国建设”重大研究专项项目“提升我国在国际涉海事务中的话语权和制度性权利研究”( 批准号18VHQ006) Received: 2019-08-10 Revised: 2019-10-18

Next Previous

Abstract

The Antarctic marine protected areas (MPAs) have developed rapidly in the past decade and are the focus of ocean governance in the Antarctic, attracting much attention. This paper introduces the establishment process and legal basis of the Antarctic MPAs, discusses the challenges in the development process, and raises some policy proposals. Some disagreement and controversy remain among the members of the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) in terms of legal regime, political issues, scientific basis, management, and monitoring, which are the major challenges in the development of Antarctic MPAs. In order to implement the important concept of “Marine Community of Shared Future” and fulfill the obligations as a member of CCAMLR, China should deeply participate in the affairs of the Antarctic MPAs, improve domestic legal regime on MPAs, and strengthen scientific research on marine ecology and environment of the Antarctica.
 

Figures

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

References

[ 1 ] Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources. Report of the 23rd meeting of the commission [R]. Hobart: Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources, 2004.

[ 2 ] Tang J Y. The practice of establishing marine protected areas in the Southern Ocean and related legal and political debates [J]. Chinese Journal of Polar Research, 2016, 28(3): 370–380. Chinese. link1

[ 3 ] Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources. Report of the 33rd meeting of the commission [R]. Hobart: Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources, 2014.

[ 4 ] Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources. Report of the 38th meeting of the commission [R]. Hobart: Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources, 2019.

[ 5 ] Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources. Conservation measure 91-05 (2016)-Ross Sea region marine protected area [R]. Hobart: Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources, 2016.

[ 6 ] Chen L. Study on the international legal bases of Antarctic Marine protected area [J]. Fudan Journal (Social Sciences Edition), 2016 (2): 153-154. Chinese. link1

[ 7 ] Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources. Conservation measure 91-04 (2011)-general framework for the establishment of CCAMLR marine protected areas [R]. Hobart: Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources, 2011.

[ 8 ] Yang L, Han Z X, Chen D H, et al. Analysis on the problems with the “general framework for the establishment of CCAMLR marine protected areas” [J]. Chinese Journal of Polar Research, 2014, 26(4): 522-534. Chinese. link1

[ 9 ] Brady A M. New Zealand’s strategic interests in Antarctica [J]. Polar Record, 2011, 47(2): 126-134.

[10] Smith D, Jabour J. MPAs in ABNJ: Lessons from two high seas regimes [J]. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 2018, 75(1): 417–425. link1

[11] Denzil M. Sustainable management in the Southern Ocean: CCAMLR science [M]. Washington DC: Science Diplomacy: Antarctica, Science, and the Governance of International Spaces, 2011. link1

[12] Tang J Y. China’s engagement in the establishment of marine protected areas in the Southern Ocean: From reactive to active [J]. Marine Policy, 2017, 75: 68-74. link1

Related Research