2006, Volume 8, Issue 1
Strategic Study of CAE >> 2006, Volume 8, Issue 1
The Following-observing Method for Substance Flow Analysis
SEPA Key Laboratory on Eco-industry , Northeastern University , Shenyang 110004 , China
Next Previous
Abstract
The fundamental argument set forth in the paper is that flow is the common feature of fluid flow and substance flow. In view of this, a short review of two ways of describing the motion of fluid in fluid-dynamics was given: one of them was developed by Lagrange, and the other-by Euler. Correspondingly, two methods for substance flow analysis were advanced : one of them is “ following-observing ” method, and the other-“standing-observing” method. The exposition was focused on the former, because it is the new one, on which no information could be found in literature. It is emphasized that the following-observing method is applicable not only for studying steady substance flow (constant output of product), but also for unsteady substance flow (increasing or decreasing output of product). The following-observing model of substance flow was explained by using iron flow diagram in the life cycle of steel products. Introducing the degree of unsteady-state, a set of basic equations for calculating the indexes of substance flow and the relationship between them were derived. The lead flow in Swedish lead-acid battery system was analyzed as a case study, including the calculation of indexes of lead flow.
Keywords
methods of substance flow analysis ; following-observing method for substance flow analysis ; basic equations for substance flow analysis ; degree of unsteadiness of substance flow
Figures
图 1
图 2
图 3
图 4
图 5
图 6
图 7
图 8
图 9
图 10
References
[ 1 ] Ayres R U. The greening of industrial ecosystems[A]Industrial metabolism:Theory and policy[ M].（edited by Allenby B R, Richards D J） Washington, DC:National Academy Press, 1994
[ 2 ] Michael D F, Iron and steel recycling in the United state in 1998[R]. Open file report, 1999. 01-224U GEological Survey, US Department of the Interior
[ 3 ] Michaelis P, Jackson T. Material and energy flow through the UK iron and steel sector. （ Part 1:19541994）[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling2000，（29）：131~156 link1
[ 4 ] Michaelis P, Jackson T. Material and energy flow through the UK iron and steel sector（ Part 2:1994-2019）[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling，2000，（29）：209~230 link1
[ 5 ] Kapur A, et al. The contemporary copper cycle of Asiav[J]. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag. 2003，（5）：143~156 link1
[ 6 ] Melo M T. Statistical Resources, Conservation an999，（26）：91~113
[ 7 ] Spatari S, et al. The contemporary European copper cycle:I year stocks and. flows [J ]：Ecological Economics，2002,42（1,2）：27-42 link1
[ 8 ] Spatari S, et al. The contemporary European Zinc cycle:I year stocks and flows [J].Resources Conservation and Recycling, 2003， 39（2）：137-160 link1
[ 9 ] Karlsson S. Closing the technosphere flow of toxic metals:Modeling lead losses from a lead-acid battery system for Sweden[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology1999,3（1）：23~40 link1
[10] Kleijn R, et al. Dynamic substance flow analysis:The delaying mechanism of stocks, with the case of PVC in Sweden[J]. Ecological Economics, 2000， 32（2）：241~254 link1
[11] Sundin E, et al. Materials and energy flow analysis of paper consumption in the United Kingdom（ 1987-2010）[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2001， 5（3）：89~105 link1
[12] Ayres R U. Metals recycling:Economic and environmental implications [J].Resources Conservation and Recycling, 1997，（21）：145-173 link1
[13] Graedel T E, Allenby B R. Industrial ecology [M]N:Prentice Hall, 2003
[14] Hansen E, Lassen C. Experience with the use of substance flow analysis in Denmark[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2002， 6（3， 4）：201--219 link1
[15] Kleijn R. In=Out, the trivial central paradigm of MFA. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 1999， 3 （2， 3）：8-10 link1
[16] 陆钟武。关于钢铁工业废钢资源的基础研究[J].金属学报，2000,36（7）：728-734 link1
[17] 陆钟武。论钢铁工业的废钢资源[J].钢铁，2002,37（4）：66~70 link1
[18] 许唯德。流体力学[M].北京：国防工业出版社，1979:31~34
京公网安备 11010502051620号
