Intensity Theory and Test Verification

2007, Volume 9, Issue 12

Abstract

Keywords

Figures

References

Related Research

Strategic Study of CAE >> 2007, Volume 9, Issue 12

Intensity Theory and Test Verification

南京理工大学国家民爆检测中心, 南京210094,中国石化总公司扬子石油化工股份有限公司, 南京210048,哈尔滨工业大学大学材料科学与工程学院, 哈尔滨 150001,深圳岱宇实业有限公司,广东深圳518035

HTML683 PDF 25 Collect 0

Next Previous

Abstract

In this paper, a comprehensive analysis and comparison is fulfilled between the four classical intensity theories, Mohr´s intensity and a new balance particle intensity theories. A comparative study is developed between the test results of pulling or pressing in single direction and double directions. It is shown that the new balance particle intensity theory is more coincident with the test results than other five intensity theory. Especially, the intensity formula of pulling (bending)shear (torsion) deduced from the particle balance theory can easy explain the phenomena that pulling makes the destructions easy and suppression makes the destruction hard to achieve. This phenomenon cannot be well explained by the four classical intensity theories and Mohr’s intensity theory. The particle balance intensity theory clarifies the misunderstanding that if the equivalent stress is zero, the third and fourth intensity theory regard that the beam under three or fourdirections cannot be destroyed whatever the force is. The balance particle intensity theory figures out a contrary conclusion with the third intensity theory and fourth intensity theory.

Keywords

intensity theory ; test results ; yield ; stress state

Figures