2012, Volume 14, Issue 12
Strategic Study of CAE >> 2012, Volume 14, Issue 12
Dynamic decision-making theories and methodologies on engineering management of complicated product development
1. School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Process Optimization and Intelligent Decision-making, Ministry of Education, Hefei 230009, China
Next Previous
Abstract
Complicated product development (CPD) is a system engineering that combines technology with management deeply. The diverse values of development engineering practice should be integrated from the height of strategic coordination are demonstrated in this paper. The management principles of CPD engineering are proposed. The theoretical framework of dynamic decision making, which consists of the strategic choice of the CPD projects, the decomposition and hierarchical optimization of the development projects, the dynamic management of the development process, skilled staff scheduling, collaborative management of suppliers, and corresponding decision support systems techniques, is constructed. Variety of optimization, scheduling and decision models and their corresponding solving methods are designed. The decision support system techniques based on information resources database, decision methods database and multi-stage feedback decision support system techniques are also proposed. The common methods used in the engineering management of CPD are summarized and the application of cloud computing to the engineering management of CPD is forecasted.
Keywords
engineering management of complicated product development ; theoretical system of dynamic decision-making ; hierarchical optimization ; dynamic management ; workforce scheduling ; supplier collaborative management ; decision support system
Figures
图1
图2
图3
图4
图5
图6
图7
References
[ 1 ] 李伯虎,柴旭东,朱文海.复杂产品集成制造系统技术[J].航空制造技术,2002(12):17-20. link1
[ 2 ] 殷瑞钰,汪应洛,李伯聪.工程哲学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2007.
[ 3 ] 汪应洛,王宏波.工程科学与工程哲学[J].自然辩证法研究,2005,21(9):59-63. link1
[ 4 ] 何继善,王孟钧.哲学视野中的工程管理[J].科技进步与对策,2008,25(10):1-3. link1
[ 5 ] 赫伯特·西蒙.管理决策新科学[M].李柱流译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1982.
[ 6 ] Kaplan S R, Norton D P. The balanced score cardmeasures thatdrive performance, harvard business review [ J] . Harvard Business Review, 1992, January - February: 71 -79.
[ 7 ] 杨善林.复杂产品开发工程管理理论与方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2012.
[ 8 ] Zadeh L A. Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility [ J] .Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1978, 1( 1) : 3 -28. link1
[ 9 ] Liang C Y, Wang Y S, Jiang L Y. Optimization study of projectportfolio selection considering resources conversion under uncertainconditions [ C] / / The 4th Conference on Systems Science, Management Science & System Dynamics ( SSMSSD) , 2010.
[10] 王勇胜,梁昌勇,鞠彦忠.不确定多期滚动项目组合选择优化模型[J].系统工程理论与实践,2010,32(6):1290-1297. link1
[11] Winner R I, Pennel J P, Bertrand H E. The role of concurrentengineering in weapons system acquisition [ R] . Alexandria,VA: Institute for Defense Analysis, 1998.
[12] Goldratt E M. Critical Chain [ M] . North River Press PublishingCorporation, Great Barrington, MA, 1997.
[13] Querenet B. The CIMOSA integrating infrastructure [ J] . Computer Control Engineering Journal, 1991, 2( 3) : 118 -125. link1
[14] Akao Y, Mazur G H. The leading edge in QFD: Past, presentand future [ J] . International Journal of Quality & ReliabilityManagement, 2003, 20( 1) : 20 -35. link1
[15] 王众托.创建知识系统工程学科[J].中国工程科学,2006,8(12):1-9. link1
[16] Pun K H, Hamdi M, Distro. A distributed static roundrobinscheduling algorithm for bufferless closenetwork switches [ C] / /IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2002: 2298 -2302.
[17] Schmid U, Blieberger J. Some investigations on FCFS schedulingin hard real time applications [ J] . Journal of Computer and Systems Sciences, 1992, 45( 3) : 493 -512.
[18] Lu W C, Hsieh J W, Shih W K. A faster exact schedule abilityanalysis for fixedpriority scheduling [ J] . Journal of Systems andSoftware, 2006, 79( 12) : 1744 - 1753. link1
[19] Kant K. MVA approximations for SJN scheduling [ J] . Performance Evaluation, 1992, 15( 1) : 41 -61. link1
[20] Dickson G W. An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions [ J] . Journal of Purchasing, 1966, 2( 1) : 5 -17. link1
[21] Saaty T L. Decision Making in Complex Environments — The Analytic Network Process for Decision Making with Dependence andFeedback [ M] . USA: RWS Publications, 2001.
[22] Supply Chain Council. Overview of the SCOR model V10. 0[ EB/ OL] . [ 2012, 6] . http: / / supply - chain. org/ f/ SCOR -Overview - Web. pdf.
[23] Handfield R B, Walton S V, Sroufe R, et al. Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: A study in the applicationof the analytical Hierarchy process [ J] . European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 141( 1) : 70 -87. link1
[24] Yang J B, Singh M G. An evidential reasoning approach for multipleattribute decision making with uncertainty [ J] . IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics,1994,24( 1) :1 -18. link1
[25] Li L, Lai K K. A fuzzy approach to the multiobjective transportation problem[ J] . Computer and Operations Research, 2000, 27( 1) : 43 -57. link1
[26] Fu C, Yang S L. The group consensus based evidential reasoningapproach for multiple attributive group decision analysis [ J] . European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 206: 601 -608. link1
京公网安备 11010502051620号
