《1. Introduction》

1. Introduction

The rapid development of nanotechnology is facilitating the exploration and application of nanomaterials in novel tools for a wide variety of applications, such as energy [1], catalysts [2], electronics [3,4], biomedicine [5–7], and the environment [8]. In particular, the biomedical applications of nanomaterials have attracted broad attention due to the unique and advantageous properties of such materials. Nowadays, dental cavities are one of the most common oral diseases. Tooth decay results in the formation of cavities in the teeth, and the enamel cannot regenerate once it becomes worn or eroded [9]. Without effective treatment, caries can progress until the teeth are destroyed [10]. Hence, reliable and versatile restoration materials are greatly required. Resin composites have been widely used in recent years for treating dental caries due to their numerous advantages, such as esthetics, biocompatibility, mechanical properties, and operability [11].

The main components in dental resin composites (DRCs) are organic matrices and inorganic fillers. The organic matrices, which mainly comprise polymerizable monomers and photoinitiators, can be converted from a liquid phase into a highly crosslinked polymer by being exposed to visible light [12]. Different inorganic fillers have various functions, such as enhancing mechanical properties, reducing polymerization shrinkage, altering thermal expansion behavior, and endowing DRCs with remineralization, radiopacity, and antibacterial abilities [13–16]. The type, size, shape, and structure of the inorganic fillers are the decisive factors in establishing the properties of DRCs [17–21].

The most commonly used inorganic fillers are reinforcing fillers, such as SiO2 and glasses, which are essential for nearly all commercial DRCs. These hard and chemically inert fillers are dispersed in organic matrices to provide the necessary structural reinforcement for clinical applications [22]. Although DRCs loaded with reinforcing fillers have been widely used to treat dental caries, secondary caries cannot be avoided at the tooth-restoration interfaces; this is one of the major reasons for restoration failure and results in 50%–70% failed restorations out of all restorations that are placed [23]. Therefore, antibacterial materials, such as fluorides, silver (Ag)-related fillers, and ZnO nanoparticles, have been adopted as co-fillers to give DRCs antibacterial activity [24–26]. Furthermore, dental clinics require DRCs to have radiopacity, which allows dentists to easily differentiate a restoration from a decayed tooth, evaluate voids, identify inappropriate contour in restorations, and diagnose secondary caries around the restorations [27]. Radiopacity can be achieved by incorporating an element with a relatively high atomic weight (e.g., Zr, Sr, or Ba) as the co-filler in DRCs [28]. According to the various requirements for DRCs, fillers with different functions must be embedded into DRCs to achieve multifunctional restorations. However, the direct addition of functional co-fillers may detrimentally affect the mechanical properties of DRCs due to incompatibility between the fillers and resin matrices [26,29,30].

Aside from filler type, filler structure is a crucial factor in determining the mechanical properties of DRCs [17,31,32]. Recent research has demonstrated that nanoparticle clusters (NCs) have a superior reinforcing effect, and NCs have been applied in commercial DRCs (e.g., Filtek Z350 XT, 3 M ESPE, USA). Several methods, including coupling [33], sintering [34], and solvent evaporation [35], have been used to prepare NCs as fillers for DRCs. However, to the best of our knowledge, few of these processes have been applied to construct NCs with more than one component.

Spray drying is an efficient and robust particle-production method that has been widely used in industrial processes [36], such as in the food [37], pharmaceutical [38], and chemical [39,40] industries. It enables the continuous and fast production of particles within a reasonable size range. In our previous work, SiO2 NCs (SNCs) [41], hydroxyapatite (HAp) NCs [42], and SiO2– ZnO complex NCs (CNCs) [43] were precisely constructed using a spray dryer with a two-fluid nozzle. The DRCs filled with these NCs showed significantly enhanced properties compared with those filled with the nanoparticle counterparts. In particular, DRCs filled with the SiO2–ZnO CNCs displayed enhanced antibacterial activity while maintaining good mechanical properties [43]. However, their lack of radiopacity makes such DRCs unsuitable for clinical applications.

Our objective in the present work is to provide a general strategy to construct multifunctional fillers for DRCs using a spray dryer with a three-fluid nozzle. The use of a three-fluid nozzle avoids the aggregation of incompatible particles before the spray drying process, which may occur with the use of a traditional two-fluid nozzle due to its single feed line and nozzle [44,45]. In general, threefluid nozzle spray drying has been applied in biomedicines, especially for microencapsulation [46–48]. Herein, we report on the use of the three-fluid nozzle spray drying process for the first time in the construction of multifunctional CNCs. ZrO2 and ZnO nanoparticles were adopted as the co-fillers of SiO2 nanoparticles in order to realize radiopaque and antibacterial properties in the DRCs. The filling properties of the CNCs constructed by two- and three-fluid nozzles were compared. In addition, a heat treatment process was applied to strengthen the structure of the CNCs. The relationships between the SiO2–ZrO2 ratios in the heat-treated CNCs and the properties of the DRCs were investigated. The radiopacity and antibacterial activity of the DRCs filled with SiO2–ZrO2–ZnO CNCs were confirmed. The universality of threefluid nozzle spray drying was also explored.

《2. Experimental section》

2. Experimental section

《2.1. Reagents and materials》

2.1. Reagents and materials

Absolute ethyl alcohol (C2H5OH), tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS), ammonium hydroxide (NH3·H2O), sodium hydroxide (NaOH), n-propylamine, and cyclohexane were bought from Beijing Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. Zirconium oxychloride octahydrate (ZrOCl2·8H2O), triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA), bisphenol A glycerolate dimethacrylate (Bis-GMA), zinc acetylacetonate, oleic acid, phenylcarbinol, camphorquinone (CQ), and ethyl-4-dimethylaminobenzoate (4-EDMAB) were bought from Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. 3- Methacryloxypropyl trimethoxysilane (-MPS) was purchased from Alfa Aesar (China) Chemical Co., Ltd.

《2.2. Preparation of inorganic nanodispersions》

2.2. Preparation of inorganic nanodispersions

The SiO2 nanodispersion was obtained according to the Stöber method [49]. First, deionized water (70 mL), NH3·H2O (6.4 mL), and ethanol (190 mL) were mixed and stirred at 60 °C in a 1000 mL flask. Then, a mixture containing TEOS (30 mL) and ethanol (190 mL) was poured into the above flask. The reaction lasted for 3 h at 60 °C.

The ZrO2 nanodispersion was prepared based on a published work [50]. In brief, 10.473 g of ZrOCl2·8H2O was dissolved in 325 mL of deionized water at room temperature. A total of 190 mL of NaOH aqueous solution (0.125 mol∙L–1 ) was added dropwise into the above ZrOCl2 solution under vigorous stirring. The mixture was then stirred at 70 °C for 3 h, followed by a dialysis process to thoroughly wash the as-obtained zirconium hydroxide precursor. Finally, the precursor was heat-treated at 170 °C for 10 h in a 1 L Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclave to form the ZrO2 nanodispersion.

The preparation of the ZnO nanodispersion was based on our previous work [43]. First, 5.272 g of zinc acetylacetonate, 2.4 mL of oleic acid, and 120 mL of phenylcarbinol were mixed and stirred at 60 °C for 3 h. The mixture was then heat-treated at 150 °C for 10 h in a 200 mL Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclave. The obtained suspension was centrifuged and washed with ethyl alcohol for three times, followed by an ultrasonic treatment (ScientzIID, Ningbo Scientz Biotechnology Co., Ltd., China) to obtain the ZnO nanodispersion.

《2.3. Construction of CNCs using a spray dryer with a three-fluid nozzle》

2.3. Construction of CNCs using a spray dryer with a three-fluid nozzle

The SiO2–ZrO2 CNCs were constructed using a spray dryer with a three-fluid nozzle. SiO2 and ZrO2 nanodispersions with a solid content of 2% in mass fraction were simultaneously pumped into the spray dryer through two different liquid channels in the three-fluid nozzle. The aspirator level, inlet temperature, compressed air flow rate, and total feed rate were set at 100%, 100 °C, 600 L∙h–1 , and 0.4 L∙h–1 , respectively. For comparison, SiO2–ZrO2 CNCs and SNCs were also constructed by means of a two-fluid nozzle under the same spray drying conditions.

In order to prepare the SiO2–ZrO2–ZnO CNCs, first, the SiO2 and ZnO nanodispersions (2% in mass fraction) were mixed to obtain a SiO2–ZnO dispersion. Then, the above dispersion and the ZrO2 nanodispersion (2% in mass fraction) were respectively pumped into the spray dryer through the three-fluid nozzle. The aspirator level, inlet temperature, compressed air flow rate, and total feed rate were set at 100%, 100 °C, 600 L∙h–1 , and 0.4 L∙h–1 , respectively. Other CNCs including SiO2–ZnO–CaF2 CNCs, SiO2–TiO2–CaF2 CNCs, SiO2–ZnO– ZrO2–TiO2 CNCs, and SiO2–ZnO–TiO2–CaF2 CNCs were constructed using the same three-fluid nozzle spray drying process as described above; the distributions of the raw materials in the two channels of the three-fluid nozzle are shown in Table S1 in Appendix A.

To confirm the influence of heat treatment on the filling properties of the SiO2–ZrO2 and SiO2–ZrO2–ZnO CNCs, the CNCs were calcined in a muffle furnace (LH 30/13, Nabertherm, China) at 500 °C for 3 h. All the inorganic fillers were coded, as shown in Table 1.

《Table 1》

Table 1 Codes of different inorganic fillers.

《2.4. Preparation of DRCs》

2.4. Preparation of DRCs

All the fillers were further silanized before being blended with the resin matrices (Bis-GMA and TEGDMA at a mass ratio of 1:1) and photoinitiators (CQ and 4-EDMAB at a mass ratio of 1:4, 1% in mass fraction of the matrices). The silanization process was done according to our previous work [41]. All the components were premixed by hand and then thoroughly blended using a three-roll mixer (TR50M, Trilos Precision Equipment Co., Ltd., China). The filler content was fixed at 70% in mass fraction. The well-mixed pastes were filled into different silicone rubber molds with various shapes and photopolymerized by means of light-emitting diode (LED) light curing (SLC-VIII B, 430–490 nm, Hangzhou Sifang Medical Apparatus Co., Ltd., China) for 120 s. All specimens were polished with silicon carbide papers before testing.

《2.5. Characterization of CNCs》

2.5. Characterization of CNCs

A transmission electron microscope (TEM; JEOL-7800, JEOL, Japan) was used to observe the nanoparticles at an accelerating voltage of 120 kV. The surface potentials of the nanoparticles were measured using a particle size and zeta potential analyzer (Nano ZS90, Malvern, UK). The morphology and size of the CNCs could be clearly seen via scanning electron microscopy (SEM; JSM6701F, JEOL) with a 5 kV operating voltage. The crystal structures of the CNCs were confirmed by means of an X-ray diffractometer (D8 Advance, Bruker Optik GmbH, Germany). The distribution of the silicon (Si), zirconium (Zr), zinc (Zn), and oxygen (O) elements in the CNCs were observed using scanning electron microscopyenergy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (SEM-EDS) at 20 kV.

《2.6. Characterization of resin composites》

2.6. Characterization of resin composites

2.6.1. Mechanical properties

According to International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 4049:2009, the flexural strength and modulus of the DRCs were determined by means of a three-point bending test using a universal testing machine (CMT6503, MTS Industrial Systems Co., Ltd., China). Six specimens (25 mm × 2 mm × 2 mm) were bent in the machine with a span of 20 mm and crosshead speed of 0.75 mm∙min–1 , respectively. Compressive strength was also tested by the universal testing machine using cylindrical specimens (Φ4 mm × 6 mm, n = 6) with 0.75 mm∙min1 crosshead speed. Vickers microhardness was tested on the cylindrical samples (Φ6 mm × 4 mm, n = 6) using a microhardness tester (HXD1000TMC/LCD, Shanghai Taiming Optical Instrument Co., Ltd., China) under a 50 g load for 10 s.

2.6.2. Degree of conversion

A Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer equipped with an attenuated total reflectance crystal accessory (Vertex 70v, Bruker Optik GmbH) was used to analyze the degree of conversion of the DRCs. The spectra of cured and uncured DRCs were recorded in the range of 1700–1550 cm–1 with a resolution of 4 cm–1 . The conversion degree data were calculated based on the Eq. (1), where A1637 and A1608 represent the peak absorption of aliphatic C=C (1637 cm–1 ) and aromatic C=C (1608 cm–1 ), respectively.

2.6.3. Radiopacity

Disc-shaped samples (Φ10 mm × 1 mm) were prepared for each type of DRC and were irradiated with X-rays (70 kV, 8 mA, 0.1 s), along with a standard aluminum (Al) step-wedge having 12 steps ranging from 0.5 to 6 mm, to obtain radiographs. The optical density of each material in the radiographs was measured using an optical density meter (LS117, Shenzhen Linshang Technology Co. Ltd., China). The radiopacity of the samples was expressed in terms of equivalent Al thickness (mm).

2.6.4. Antibacterial activity

The antibacterial activity of the DRCs was determined through a quantitative analysis based on American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) E2180–07(2012). Inoculated molten agar slurry (0.08 mL) containing approximately 106 colony-forming units (CFU) of Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) was pipetted onto the DRCs (Φ20 mm × 2 mm, n = 3) and was then incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The surviving S. mutans after incubation was obtained by the elution of the agar slurry inoculum with Dey/Engley (D/E) neutralizing broth. The serial dilutions were spread on tryptic soy agar, and then incubated for 48 h. Finally, the bacterial colonies were counted and recorded. The S. mutans incubated without DRCs was adopted as a blank sample. The antibacterial ratio of the DRCs was calculated by Eq. (2).

where represents the antilog of the geometric mean of the number of bacteria recovered from the incubation period in the blank samples, and b represents the antilog of the geometric mean of the number of bacteria recovered from the incubation period in the experimental samples.

《2.7. Statistical analysis》

2.7. Statistical analysis

The statistical significance was evaluated with SPSS software using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s test with a 95% confidence interval.

《3. Results and discussion》

3. Results and discussion

Fig. 1 shows a schematic diagram for the preparation process of SiO2–ZrO2 CNCs by means of a spray dryer with a two-fluid nozzle and a three-fluid nozzle, respectively. The raw materials (SiO2 and ZrO2 nanodispersions) for the spray drying process were transparent, and the nanoparticles were well dispersed in the mediums (Figs. 1(a) and (b)). A two-fluid nozzle has only one liquid channel and one gas channel (Fig. 1(d)), whereas a three-fluid nozzle includes two liquid channels (Fig. 1(g)). Therefore, the SiO2 and ZrO2 nanodispersions had to be mixed before being pumped into the spray dryer through the two-fluid nozzle. However, the zeta potentials of the SiO2 (–31 mV) and ZrO2 (+47 mV) nanoparticles are opposite. This resulted in severe aggregation of nanoparticles, the formation of an opaque nanodispersion, and even precipitation after both nanodispersions were mixed (Fig. 1(c)). As a result, the SiO2–ZrO2 CNCs fabricated by the two-fluid nozzle appeared to have an irregular shape (Fig. 1(e)).

The use of a three-fluid nozzle can avoid unwanted aggregation before the spray drying process by separating nanodispersions with opposite zeta potentials; in this case, the SiO2 and ZrO2 nanodispersions were simultaneously and respectively pumped into the spray dryer through different channels of the three-fluid nozzle (Fig. 1(f)). The nanodispersions were instantaneously mixed and immediately atomized into microdroplets by compressed air at the end of the nozzle. Meanwhile, the solvent was evaporated from the droplet surface by a gas stream at 100 °C. The SiO2–ZrO2 CNCs were thus constructed when the solvent was completely evaporated. Fig. 1(h) displays an SEM image of Si60Zr10-3. The regular shape and closely packed structure (similar to those of the SNCs [41]) demonstrate that the incorporation of ZrO2 nanoparticles did not affect the morphology of the NCs.

《Fig. 1》

Fig. 1. Schematic diagrams for the preparation process of SiO2–ZrO2 CNCs using a spray dryer equipped with a two-fluid nozzle or a three-fluid nozzle. (a) TEM image and photograph of the SiO2 nanodispersion; (b) TEM image and photograph of the ZrO2 nanodispersion; (c) TEM image and photograph of the SiO2 and ZrO2 mixture; (d) photograph of the two-fluid nozzle; (e) SEM images of Si60Zr10-2; (f) scheme of SiO2 and ZrO2 nanodispersions in the three-fluid nozzle; (g) photograph of the three-fluid nozzle; (h) SEM images of Si60Zr10-3.

The mechanical properties of the DRCs filled with SNCs, Si60Zr10--2, and Si60Zr10-3 are shown in Fig. 2. Compared with the performances of the SNCs-filled DRCs, the flexural strength and compressive strength of the Si60Zr10--2-filled DRCs showed a significant decrease (of 16% and 17%, respectively), which was probably due to the irregular and relatively loose structure of Si60Zr10--2. In contrast, the Si60Zr10--3-filled DRCs exhibited good mechanical properties comparable to those of the SNC-filled DRCs, thus demonstrating that the structure of the CNCs is important for their filling properties, and that the three-fluid nozzle is suitable for spray drying components that are incompatible due to opposite zeta potentials.

《Fig. 2》

Fig. 2. (a) Flexural strength, (b) flexural modulus, (c) compressive strength, and (d) hardness of DRCs filled with SNCs, Si60Zr10-2, and Si60Zr10-3, respectively. *: p < 0.05 compared with the DRCs filled with SNCs.

CNCs with different SiO2–ZrO2 ratios were further constructed by means of the three-fluid nozzle, and were then heat-treated at 500 °C for 3 h to improve their filling properties (labeled as HSi64Zr6-3, H-Si62Zr8-3, H-Si60Zr10-3, and H-Si58Zr12-3), since our previous work [51] demonstrated that the heat treatment process can strengthen the CNC structure. The morphologies of the SiO2– ZrO2 CNCs are shown in Fig. 3, and the corresponding size distributions are displayed in Fig. S1 in Appendix A. All the CNCs exhibited a regular shape and closely packed structure. Their average sizes increased from 1.20 to 1.89 μm as the ZrO2 content was increased from 6/70 to 12/70.

《Fig. 3》

Fig. 3. SEM images of (a) H-Si64Zr6-3, (b) H-Si62Zr8-3, (c) H-Si60Zr10-3, and (d) H-Si58Zr12-3.

Fig. 4 shows the X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of CNCs with different SiO2–ZrO2 ratios. The broad diffraction peak at 23° indicates that the SiO2 nanoparticles are amorphous, which is specified in Powder Diffraction File (PDF) card No. 29–0085. The diffraction peaks at 28.34°, 31.48°, 40.89°, and 45.51° belong to monoclinicphase ZrO2, according to PDF card No. 80–0966, and the peaks at 30°, 35°, 50.37°, and 60.19° can be ascribed to tetragonal-phase ZrO2 (PDF card No. 88–1007). These findings indicate that the ZrO2 nanocrystals are a mixture of tetragonal and monoclinic phases [50]. In addition, the peaks of ZrO2 became stronger with the increase of ZrO2 content. To confirm the distributions of SiO2 and ZrO2 in the CNCs, the O, Si, and Zr elements in H-Si60Zr10-3 were directly observed using SEM-EDS maps (Fig. 5). Fig. 5(a) clearly shows that all the elements are evenly distributed in HSi60Zr10-3, as is also evidenced by the even and spherical distribution of the Si and Zr elements in Fig. 5(b). These results demonstrate that the CNCs are successfully composed of ZrO2 and SiO2 nanoparticles with even distributions.

《Fig. 4》

Fig. 4. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of H-Si64Zr6-3, H-Si62Zr8-3, H-Si60Zr10-3, and H-Si58Zr12-3.

《Fig. 5》

Fig. 5. SEM-EDS maps for O, Si, and Zr in H-Si60Zr10-3. (a) Holistic element distributions; (b) element distributions in a single CNC.

Fig. 6 shows the mechanical properties of the DRCs containing heat-treated CNCs (H-Si60Zr10-3) and untreated CNCs (Si60Zr10-3). The heat treatment process clearly and dramatically enhanced the filling properties of the CNCs, especially in terms of the flexural modulus and hardness of the DRCs, which increased by 18% and 40% compared with those of the DRCs filled with untreated CNCs. The main reason for this increase is that the heat treatment process enhanced the interaction among the nanoparticles, resulting in a more compact structure and a densified framework in the CNCs [46], as evidenced by the fracture surfaces of the DRCs (Fig. 7). The Si60Zr10-3-filled DRCs exhibited a flat surface (Fig. 7(a)), indicating weak resistance to an externally applied force. The CNC structure cannot be clearly seen in Fig. 7(a); this demonstrates that the nanoparticles in the untreated CNCs are unstable, which may result in destruction after they are extruded from the three-roll extruder. After the heat treatment process, the H-Si60Zr10-3 exhibited a stronger structure, since many complete H-Si60Zr10-3 can be seen on the cross-section of the DRCs (red circles in Fig. 7(b)). The DRCs displayed a coarse fracture surface with several curved steps, demonstrating the crack deflection caused by the addition of H-Si60Zr10-3 and the higher fracture energy of the DRCs [42]. The conversion degrees showed no significant difference between the heat-treated and untreated CNC-filled DRCs (Fig. S2 in Appendix A).

《Fig. 6》

Fig. 6. (a) Flexural strength, (b) flexural modulus, (c) compressive strength, and (d) hardness of the DRCs filled with Si60Zr10-3 and H-Si60Zr10-3. *: p < 0.05 compared with the DRCs filled with Si60Zr10-3.

《Fig. 7》

Fig. 7. SEM images of the fracture surfaces of DRCs filled with (a) Si60Zr10-3 and (b) H-Si60Zr10-3.

Fig. 8 gives the radiographs and radiopacity of DRCs filled with different types of fillers; the corresponding data are listed in Appendix A Table S2. Fig. 8(a) shows the radiograph of the Al steps and the DRCs filled with SNCs, Si60Zr10-3, and H-Si60Zr10-3. The optical densities of the Al steps in the radiograph show a linear decline (Fig. 8(c)) with the increased thicknesses, indicating the enhanced radiopacity. The SNC-filled DRC displays the lowest radiopacity, which is only equivalent to a 0.14 mm Al step (Table S2), while the DRCs filled with Si60Zr10-3 and H-Si60Zr10-3 are equivalent to the 0.57 and 1.02 mm Al steps, respectively. These results indicate that the addition of ZrO2 nanoparticles significantly improves the radiopacity of the DRCs, and that the heat treatment process for the fillers can further strengthen this property.

《Fig. 8》

Fig. 8. (a, b) Radiographs and (c, d) radiopacity data of DRCs filled with different types of fillers. 1: SNCs; 2: Si60Zr10-3; 3: H-Si60Zr10-3. A: H-Si64Zr6-3; B: H-Si62Zr8-3; C: HSi60Zr10-3; D: H-Si58Zr12-3. The aluminum steps were used as a reference.

DRCs loaded with H-Si64Zr6-3, H-Si62Zr8-3, H-Si60Zr10-3, and H-Si58Zr12-3 were prepared in order to explore the influence of ZrO2 content on the radiopacity (Fig. 8(b)). It became evident that an increase of ZrO2 content from 6% to 12% in mass fraction led to a significant increment from 0.36 to 1.3 mm of the radiopacity of the DRCs (Table S2). According to ISO 4049:2009, the radiopacity of DRCs must be equal to or higher than that of the same thickness of Al, which means that the H-Si60Zr10-3-filled DRCs and H-Si58Zr12-3-filled DRCs can meet this standard.

S. mutans is commonly regarded as the primary pathogenic bacteria of dental caries [52,53]. Plaque accumulating at the margin of DRCs may result in secondary caries, and may shorten the service life of the DRCs [54,55]. Therefore, ZnO nanoparticles (Fig. S3 in Appendix A) were introduced into the CNCs by means of a threefluid nozzle spray drying process in order to provide the DRCs with antibacterial activity. Fig. 9 shows SEM images of H-Si56Zr10Zn4-3, along with the corresponding XRD pattern and SEM-EDS maps. H-Si56Zr10Zn4-3 maintains a regular shape (Fig. 9(a)), and all the components are successfully imbedded into the CNCs (Fig. 9(b)). The element distributions of O, Si, Zr, and Zn are even (Figs. 9(c) and (d)), which is due to the good dispersion of the raw materials pumped into the spray dryer.

《Fig. 9》

Fig. 9. (a) SEM images and (b) XRD pattern of H-Si56Zr10Zn4-3; (c, d) SEM-EDS maps for O, Si, Zr, and Zn elements in H-Si56Zr10Zn4-3.

Fig. 10 shows the properties of the H-Si60Zr10-3-filled and HSi56Zr10Zn4-3-filled DRCs. The flexural properties, compressive strength, and degree of conversion of the H-Si56Zr10Zn4-3-filled DRCs show no significant difference in comparison with those of the H-Si60Zr10-3-filled DRCs, which demonstrates that the introduction of the ZnO nanoparticles did not destroy the advantageous structure of the CNCs. However, the hardness decreases from (64.5 ± 0.7) to (61.7 ± 0.2) HV. This decrease is mainly because the ZnO nanoparticles are not as hard as the SiO2 and ZrO2 nanoparticles. In addition, the radiopacity of the DRCs slightly increases from 1.02 to 1.08 mm (in terms of equivalent Al thickness).

《Fig. 10》

Fig. 10. (a) Flexural strength, (b) flexural modulus, (c) compressive strength, (d) hardness, (e) degree of conversion, and (f) radiopacity of H-Si60Zr10-3-filled and HSi56Zr10Zn4-3-filled DRCs. *: p < 0.05 compared with the DRCs filled with H-Si60Zr10-3.

To quantitatively analyze the antibacterial activity of the HSi56Zr10Zn4-3-filled DRCs, S. mutans was adopted in this study. Fig. 11 shows photographs of surviving S. mutans after being incubated for different times in the blank and experimental groups. For the blank group, the number of live S. mutans significantly increased after being incubated for 24 h (Figs. 11(a) and (b)). The number of S. mutans cultured on the H-Si60Zr10-3-filled DRCs for 24 h showed no significant difference in comparison with those cultured on the blank group, indicating that the composites loaded with the SiO2–ZrO2 CNCs have no antibacterial activity. In contrast, the growth of the S. mutans incubated on the H-Si56Zr10Zn4-3-filled DRCs was obviously inhibited (Fig. 11(d)), and the antibacterial ratio exceeded 99.9%. These results demonstrate that HSi56Zr10Zn4-3 has great potential as an antibacterial filler.

《Fig. 11》

Fig. 11. Photographs of surviving S. mutans after being incubated for different times. (a) 0 h, blank group; (b) 24 h, blank group; (c) 24 h, H-Si60Zr10-3-filled DRCs; (d) 24 h, H-Si56Zr10Zn4-3-filled DRCs.

To confirm the universality of three-fluid nozzle spray drying, TiO2 (Fig. S4(a) in Appendix A) and CaF2 (Fig. S4(b) in Appendix A) nanoparticles—which are also commonly used dental fillers— were adopted as co-fillers of SiO2 nanoparticles to construct CNCs. The zeta potentials of CaF2 and TiO2 nanoparticles are +55.6 and +45.2 mV, which are opposite with that of SiO2 nanoparticles. Therefore, it is appropriate to use three-fluid nozzle spray drying. Various CNCs were constructed using three or four kinds of nanoparticles as building blocks, including SiO2–ZnO–CaF2 CNCs (Fig. 12(a)), SiO2–TiO2–CaF2 CNCs (Fig. 12(b)), SiO2–ZnO–ZrO2– TiO2 CNCs (Fig. 12(c)), and SiO2–ZnO–TiO2–CaF2 CNCs (Fig. 12(d)). The mass ratios of the different nanoparticles are shown in Table S1. All the CNCs exhibited a regular shape, thereby demonstrating that three-fluid nozzle spray drying is a feasible and general strategy for constructing multifunctional fillers for DRCs.

《Fig. 12》

Fig. 12. SEM images of (a) SiO2–ZnO–CaF2 CNCs, (b) SiO2–TiO2–CaF2 CNCs, (c) SiO2– ZnO–ZrO2–TiO2 CNCs, and (d) SiO2–ZnO–TiO2–CaF2 CNCs constructed by means of the three-fluid nozzle spray drying technique.

《4. Conclusions》

4. Conclusions

In this study, multifunctional CNCs were successfully constructed using a spray dryer with a three-fluid nozzle for DRCs. The use of the three-fluid nozzle effectively avoided the unwanted aggregation of different nanoparticles with opposite zeta potentials before the spray drying process, thus achieving regularshaped CNCs with evenly distributed elements. For the SiO2–ZrO2 binary system, the mechanical properties of the Si60Zr10-3-filled DRCs were consistent with those of SNC-filled DRCs because the regular CNC structure was maintained. The CNCs were also heat treated to reinforce their structure, thus obtaining better filling properties. Compared with the DRCs filled with untreated CNCs, the heat-treated CNC-filled DRCs exhibited significantly improved mechanical properties, particularly in terms of the flexural modulus (an increase of 18%) and hardness (an increase of 40%). In addition, increasing the ZrO2 content and using the heat treatment process for the CNCs resulted in DRCs with significantly enhanced radiopacity. The heat-treated CNC-filled DRCs containing over 10% (in mass fraction) ZrO2 nanoparticles meet the requirement for radiopaque fillers. For the SiO2–ZrO2–ZnO ternary system, the antibacterial ratio of the H-Si56Zr10Zn4-3-filled DRCs reached 99.9% while the mechanical properties remained stable. This method can also be extended to other ternary and even quaternary systems. Therefore, this work provides a general strategy to construct high-performance multifunctional cluster fillers for DRCs, especially when simultaneously considering the mechanical performance, radiopacity, and antibacterial activity.

《Acknowledgments》

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFA0201701) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21878015).

《Compliance with ethics guidelines》

Compliance with ethics guidelines

Dan-Lei Yang, Dan Wang, Hao Niu, Rui-Li Wang, Mei Liu, Fei-Min Zhang, Jie-Xin Wang, and Mei-Fang Zhu declare that they have no conflict of interest or financial conflicts to disclose.

《Appendix A. Supplementary data》

Appendix A. Supplementary data

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2021.08.001.