《1 Engineering research fronts》

1 Engineering research fronts

《1.1 Trends in Top 10 engineering research fronts》

1.1 Trends in Top 10 engineering research fronts

The Top 10 engineering research fronts in the field of information and electronic engineering are summarized in Table 1.1.1, encompassing the subfields of electronic science and technology, optical engineering and technology, instrument science and technology, information and communication engineering, computer science and technology, and control science. Among them, “reconfigurable intelligent surface assisted wireless communications” is among the popular topics published by Clarivate, and the nine other fronts are recommended by researchers.

The number of core papers published from 2015 to 2020 related to each front are shown in Table 1.1.2. Of these research fronts, “reconfigurable intelligent surface assisted wireless communications” is the most significant one regarding the number of core papers published in recent years, which is followed by “in-memory computing technology for intelligent computing”.

(1)    In-memory computing technology for intelligent computing

The field of in-memory computing technology, as its name implies, is a computing paradigm integrating memory and computing. It aims to transform the traditional computing- centric architecture into a data-centric architecture for direct data processing within the memory. Intelligent computing is a method encompassing the implementation of computational intelligence systems, setting extremely high requirements for the information interaction capacity between the computing unit and the memory. Computational intelligence systems based on the traditional Von Neumann architecture feature the inherent problems of short effective computation time and low energy efficiency ratio due to the separation of the computing unit from the memory. In-memory computing technology effectively reduces data interaction during computing and has the potential to provide the best solutions to data-driven high-performance intelligent computing needs. For the efficient implementation of this technology, dedicated high-performance chips with in-memory computing function should be used. In line with different types of memory media, the mainstream research and development (R&D) of in- memory computing chips currently focuses on traditional volatile memories (such as SRAM and DRAM) and non-volatile

《Table 1.1.1》

Table 1.1.1 Top 10 engineering research fronts in information and electronic engineering

No. Engineering research front Core papers Citations Citations per paper Mean year
1 In-memory computing technology for intelligent computing 41 766 18.68 2019.1
2 Photonic-electronic integrated circuits 92 6831 74.25 2017.6
3 Integrated microwave photonics 169 13118 77.62 2017.7
4 General-purpose brain-inspired computing system 64 5815 90.86 2017.8
5 Intelligent perception and safety control of autonomous unmanned systems 43 2049 47.65 2018
6 Artificial intelligence enabled system engineering 100 3804 38.04 2018.4
7 Quantum intelligent algorithms 11 1393 126.64 2018.3
8 Ultrafast submicron microscopic imaging 28 341 12.18 2017.5
9 Multimodal automatic machine learning 137 11294 82.44 2018.5
10 Reconfigurable intelligent surface assisted wireless communications 83 6930 83.49 2018.8

《Table 1.1.2》

Table 1.1.2 Annual number of core papers published for the Top 10 engineering research fronts in information and electronic engineering

No. Engineering research front 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
1 In-memory computing technology for intelligent computing 0 0 2 7 15 17
2 Photonic-electronic integrated circuits 15 16 17 12 10 22
3 Integrated microwave photonics 17 28 28 36 33 27
4 General-purpose brain-inspired computing system 7 9 11 11 14 12
5 Intelligent perception and safety control of autonomous 4 5 6 8 10 10
  unmanned systems            
6 Artificial intelligence enabled system engineering 5 10 10 18 27 30
7 Quantum intelligent algorithms 1 1 1 2 3 3
8 Ultrafast submicron microscopic imaging 7 3 2 5 6 5
9 Multimodal automatic machine learning 10 8 14 24 36 45
10 Reconfigurable intelligent surface assisted wireless communications 4 6 7 10 16 40

memories (such as NOR Flash). In recent years, non-volatile memory technologies, such as resistive random access memory (RRAM), phase change memory (PCM), and magnetic random access memory (MRAM), have brought new hope for the efficient implementation of in-memory computing chips. In-memory computing technology is a subversive technology with great potential. Scientific research teams in many countries and regions, including China, the USA, Europe, Japan, and South Korea, have conducted exploratory research on various levels such as material and process, chip circuitry, computing architecture, system integration, or supporting software. The main research directions in the industry include generic near-memory computing architecture, SRAM in- memory computing, DRAM in-memory computing, and RRAM/ PCM/Flash multi-value in-memory computing. In-memory computing technology for intelligent computing has a broad application prospect in the field of artificial intelligence & Internet of Things (AIoT).

(2)  Photonic-electronic integrated circuits

With the development of technologies like mobile Internet, cloud computing, and autonomous driving, the demand for data interconnection, high-performance computing, and multi-modal sensing shows exponential growth. As Moore’s Law approaches its limitation, the performance improvement brought on by the evolution of integrated circuit technology tends to diminish. The use of integrated photonic functions to obtain microelectronic chips with boosted speed, reduced energy consumption, and extended capacity has become one of the main technological paths in the post-Moore era. Photonic-electronic integrated circuit (hereinafter abbreviated as PEIC) refers to a mixed-signal chip that incorporates photonic devices, photonic circuits, or photonic on-chip systems with large-scale circuits via packaging, bonding, or single-chip preparation. This kind of chip integrates multiple functions, such as optical-electronical/electronical-optical conversion, information transmission, and optoelectronic mixed signal processing, showing broad prospects for optical communication, mobile communication, high-performance computing, data center, quantum information, sensing measurement, biomedicine, among other applications. The main research directions of PEIC include photonic-electronic integrated materials, photonic-electronic integrated devices, photonic-electronic integrated processes, photonic-electronic integrated circuit control methods, photonic-electronic integrated circuit architecture, optoelectronic collaborative design simulation, and research on the application of photonic-electronic integrated circuits. The research on PEIC has shown rapid progress in the past 20 years, especially concerning those based on silicon-based optoelectronics platforms using the industrial basis of integrated circuits and learning from the experience of integrated circuit ecosystem development. Thus far, silicon-based PEIC has established an industrial basis for commercial design simulation software, fabs, packaging plants, and system integration, and it has provided important applications in the fields of optical transmission, optical interconnection, optical computing, and optical sensing. PEIC is rapidly evolving towards photonic-electronic fusion networks-on-chip. It is expected that optoelectronics and microelectronics will eventually be monolithically integrated to open up a new direction of development. Nonetheless, challenges in realizing this vision are still emerging. Considering the development of integrated circuits, the aforementioned process could be accelerated.

(3)  Integrated microwave photonics

Microwave photonics (MWP) is an emerging topic in which radio frequency (RF) signals are generated, distributed, processed, measured, and analyzed using photonic techniques. With the rapid evolution of information systems such as perceptual detection and interconnection communication under the direction of integration and intelligence, conventional microwave and electronic technologies have encountered an issue of limited bandwidth. MWP combines the advantages of photonics technologies (such as large bandwidth, high multiplex, and low loss) and those of microwave technologies (including high precision, flexibility, and ease of modification), turning into a technology enabling various functions that cannot be implemented in the microwave field alone. Recent advances in photonic integration have propelled microwave photonic technologies to new heights. The possibility to interface hybrid material platforms in order to enhance light-matter interactions has led to the development of ultra-small and high-bandwidth electro-optic modulators, low-noise frequency synthesizers, and chip signal processors with spectral resolution enhanced by orders of magnitude, featured by a significant reduction in size, weight, cost, and power consumption of the microwave photonic link. Besides, the perfection of high-volume semiconductor processing has finally enabled the complete integration of light sources, amplifiers, modulators, isolators, and detectors in a single microwave photonic processor chip, and it has ushered the creation of a complex signal processor with multifunctionality and reconfigurability akin to electronic devices. Integrated microwave photonics technology is expected to unify the discrete form of single devices in the microwave photonics system, achieving maximized resource optimization through integration and supporting the multifunctional integration form of future equipment systems. Therefore, it is considered a disruptive technology for the next generation of information systems.

The main research directions of integrated microwave photonics can be divided into two categories. One is to apply optical methods to microwave systems, such as radar and electronic confrontation using the huge advantage of high bandwidth of the optical system to transmit and process microwave signals. The other is to employ various microwave techniques to optical systems to promote optical communication networks and systems. Intelligence is the main trend of information society development; like analog and digital signals, it is an important aspect of information systems of the future. Further research in integrated microwave photonics will focus on solving the scientific problems of cross-band, cross-scale, and cross- material integration faced by radar and information systems to give full play to the advantages of integrated microwave photonics with large bandwidth, multi-function, and high energy efficiency. The current frontier research focuses mainly on mathematical model construction, system framework innovation, functional device/chip innovation, material and key manufacturing process breakthroughs, comprehensive energy efficiency evaluation, etc. Furthermore, integrated microwave photonics technology is predicted to be the core technology of electromagnetic space integration and future sixth-generation mobile communication (6G), and at the same time, a disruptive technology that supports the cross- generational transformation of radar, communications, and electromagnetic warfare information systems in the military field.

(4)  General-purpose brain-inspired computing systems

Brain-inspired computing refers to computational theories, system architectures, chips, algorithms, and applications that are motivated mainly by the information processing mode or structure of the brain. Various brain-inspired computing systems centered on neuromorphic chips are rapidly advancing and showing their benefits in dealing with certain intelligent problems with low power consumption. The current research is drawing inspiration from the design methodology and development history of existing general- purpose processors, in order to realize complete hardware in combination with application requirements based on the computational completeness theory. At the same time, research on the basic software of brain-inspired computing is proposing high-level programming abstraction and certain unified development frameworks that are independent of specific chips. All of these works promote the evolution of brain-inspired computing systems from “customized” to “general-purpose;” that is, they realize general-purpose brain-inspired computing systems.

From the perspective of design methods, most of the existing neuromorphic chips are customized; i.e., the hardware functions and interfaces are usually determined by induction based on the requirements of target applications, as well as the toolchain software. This design methodology features the tight coupling of system hardware and software, and increases the difficulty of application development and migration, which is particularly disadvantageous for interdisciplinary research such as brain-inspired computing. Moreover, the fields of application of brain-inspired computing are expanding rapidly. Thus, it is difficult to determine whether the hardware functions and interfaces summarized based on existing applications can support the emerging applications, and it is also challenging to compare and evaluate different systems.

Researchers have gradually realized this problem and embarked on researches on the brain-inspired computing completeness theory, the corresponding hardware function and chip design, and unified development frameworks. Specifically, drawing inspiration from the computational complete theory and the design methodology of system hierarchy of general-purpose computers, the related theories and system architectures for brain-inspired computing are under investigation, which is the theoretical basis for decoupling the software and hardware of brain-inspired computing systems. From the aspect of chip design, it is necessary to explore the balance of function completeness and application efficiency while maintaining the high performance of brain-inspired computing, and especially, giving full play to the processing capabilities of neuromorphic circuits/devices. As for the research related to basic software, it needs to implement some unified application development frameworks through the appropriate abstraction and layering between applications and chips, such that hardware specifications and constraints can become “transparent” to application development.

The transformation of brain-inspired computing systems from “customized” to “general-purpose” will enable all types of personnel involved in this interdisciplinary research to focus on their respective professional fields and bring significant improvement to R&D efficiency. This is one of the key steps to rapid development and the formation of future large-scale industries.

(5)  Intelligent perception and safety control of autonomous unmanned systems

This research front comprises the fields of intelligent recognition, understanding, and environmental cognition of autonomous unmanned systems, as well as the reliable and safe control of their self-motions and behaviors. In addition to the need for conventional performance indicators like stability and tracking, the intelligent perception and safety control of autonomous unmanned systems faces new challenges, such as complex open environments, random dynamics, and game confrontation, thus creating new scientific problems and technical solutions. ① The complex open environment requires the autonomous unmanned system to have high- precision situational awareness technology that can cope with the reconstruction of real-time noise reduction and dynamic prediction of urban scenes under open, highly dynamic, high density, and large noise conditions. Currently, this field has many technologies such as the multi-level instance segmentation of images and videos, interactive prediction of moving obstacles, or the real-time reconstruction of static environments. ② Random dynamics require the autonomous unmanned system to possess safe and reliable dynamic motion programming and scheduling technology that can deal with the high-dimensional and strong real- time problems of navigation and controlled decision-making under the condition of a complex and harsh environment with variable loads. The recently emerging relevant algorithms include multi-sensor tight coupling fusion, visual positioning based on feature learning, route conflict management, and automatic planning control. ③ Game confrontation requires the autonomous unmanned system to have intelligent collaborative decision-making technology that can cope with the interactive learning problems of multiple agents under the conditions of an uncertain environment, incomplete decision-making information, and restricted communication. The current associated technologies comprise multi-agent reinforcement learning, generative adversarial networks, and distributed robust optimization. For the intelligent perception and safety control of autonomous unmanned systems, the research directions include building a theoretical system, building simulation platforms, generating test cases, and establishing demonstration projects.

(6)  Artificial intelligence enabled system engineering

Artificial intelligence (AI) enabled system engineering, also known as intelligent system engineering (ISE), refers to the use of AI technology to integrate and innovate the organization and management methods of system planning, research, design, manufacturing, testing, and application, so as to make the realization and application of the system reach a new mode and higher efficiency. It is a novel concept and discipline emerging along the intellectualization of system engineering and AI engineering. According to the application of AI technology in different stages of system engineering, it is divided mainly into ISE modeling, ISE analysis, ISE synthesis, and ISE simulation.

Thus far, research on this front is still in its infancy, and the development of each branch direction is relatively independent. The existing achievements are aimed mainly at one aspect of a specific field, such as the modeling and analysis of complex systems in a particular subject; few studies have comprehensively integrated technologies at all levels to systematically solve the whole process problems of practical complex systems. With the continuous development of AI technology, the implementation methods of ISE are increasingly more diversified. The combination of data-driven deep learning methods and mechanism-driven traditional modeling optimization procedures will be further expanded both in depth and in breadth, and the technologies at different levels and along different directions will also be deeply integrated. At the same time, the application fields of ISE technology are expanding, which is conducive to finding more efficient ways to research, design, manufacture, test, and perform the operation management of various complex systems. As a trend, ISE technology will play an important role in promoting the development of cutting-edge technology fields (e.g., the manufacturing of complex industrial products and the R&D of aerospace equipment) and the efficient governance of social systems. Meanwhile, ISE is gradually showing the development trend of multi-disciplinary intersection and integration. The combination of big data technology, cloud computing technology, and knowledge automation in specific fields is going to become an important development layer of ISE.

(7)  Quantum intelligent algorithms

Quantum intelligent algorithms are a new type of algorithms combining quantum computing and classical intelligent algorithms, which can break through the limits of classical intelligent algorithms. In recent years, quantum intelligent algorithms have attracted extensive attention in both academia and industry. Compared with classical algorithms, several quantum intelligent algorithms have shown their superiority. For example, quantum support vector machines can provide a significant speedup in finding support vectors and calculating the kernel function matrices; combining the advantages of quantum computing and neural networks, quantum neural networks are expected to improve the computing efficiency of neural networks and solve the difficulties of big data and the slow training process in learning models. In addition, the quantum principal component analysis algorithm, the quantum reinforcement learning algorithm, and others, show incomparable superiority to classical algorithms. Quantum intelligent algorithms rely on the development of quantum computer hardware. In the new era of noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ), the theoretical research directions of quantum intelligent algorithms include the platform development of quantum intelligent algorithms, quantum convolutional neural network with parameterized quantum circuits, quantum adversarial generative neural network, the robustness and attack ability of quantum intelligence algorithms, etc. Currently, technology companies in the USA, such as IBM, Google, Microsoft, and Rigetti, are leading the development of quantum computer physical systems, architectures, software, and intelligent algorithms. Chinese technology companies, such as Alibaba, Tencent, Huawei, Baidu, JD.com, ByteDance, and Origin Quantum, have also deployed quantum intelligent computing industries. It can be predicted that killer applications will appear in the next few years on the NISQ processor, and quantum intelligence will play major roles in biomedicine, financial technology, material chemistry, military industry, and other fields.

(8)  Ultrafast submicron microscopic imaging

Ultrafast submicron microscopic imaging is a high-precision optoelectronic imaging technique with temporal and spatial resolution of <1 ns and <1 μm, respectively. It is of great importance to explore the microcosm of the world around us. Ultrafast optical spectroscopy could study the photo- dynamic processes and mechanism in matter on femto/ picosecond time scales. Moreover, commercial imaging microscopy is highly sensitive in the spatial domain, leaving the temporal domain largely unexplored. Ultrafast submicron imaging microscopy is a combination of ultrafast optical spectroscopy and high-precision imaging microscopy, which can be used to study various ultrafast dynamic processes on a submicron scale, which is crucial in physics, chemistry, material science, biomedicine, etc. According to the working principle, ultrafast submicron imaging microscopy can be divided into three major branches: ultrafast optical microscopy, ultrafast scanning probe microscopy, and ultrafast electron microscopy. Ultrafast optical microscopy relies on the combination of ultrafast laser pulses and optical microscopy, and these techniques are mature, low-cost and have high temporal and spatial resolution. However, the major disadvantage of this kind of microscopy is that its spatial resolution is limited by the optical diffraction limit. Ultrafast scanning probe microscopy is based on the combination of ultrafast laser pulses and scanning probe microscopy (such as SEM, AFM, and NSOM); therefore, its spatial resolution is considerably better than that of ultrafast optical microscopy. Notwithstanding, ultrafast scanning probe microscopy is still under development and has high cost. Ultrafast electron microscopy is based on the coherent imaging of the photoemission of electrons after ultrafast pulse excitation; it uniquely combines both nanometer-scale spatial resolution and sub-picosecond temporal resolution. The main disadvantages of this technique are its high cost and damage to the sample.

In material science, ultrafast submicron imaging microscopy can be used to visualize the correlation between the spatial distribution of carrier dynamics and the micromorphology of nanomaterials, which is crucial for a deeper understanding of the physical properties of materials. In biomedical research, ultrafast submicron imaging microscopy can resolve the distribution and evolution properties of tumor labels and the energy transfer processes of nanomaterials in vivo. This information is of great importance in the development of novel drugs and cancer therapies.

With the rapid development of laser and detector technology, novel ultrafast imaging microscopy with shorter wavelengths (UVC to X-ray), better spatial resolution (<100 nm), higher sensitivity (single molecule detection), and higher frame rate (>1 000 fps) will inevitably play a central role in modern optoelectronic technologies.

(9)  Multimodal automatic machine learning

Multimodal machine learning aims to process and understand multimodal information by means of machine learning. Multimodal machine learning emerged in the 1970s. It experienced several stages of development, and then entered the era of deep learning after 2010. Generally speaking, modality refers to “the way something happens or is perceived”, such as vision or touch. When a machine learning task contains multiple such modalities, it is called a multimodal problem. Multimodal machine learning focuses mainly on three modalities: natural language that can be written or spoken, visual signals usually represented by images or videos, and sound signals that encode sound and paralinguistic information, such as rhythm and sound expression.

The main challenge of multimodal machine learning is the heterogeneity of data. At present, there are five main research directions of multimodal machine learning. ① Multimodal representation learning, that is, to mine the complementarity among multiple modes and eliminate the redundancy in order to learn better feature representations. The heterogeneity of multimodal data makes it challenging to construct such a representation. For example, language is a symbol with highly abstract semantics, while audio and video are signals. ② Modal transformation, that is, to transform the information of one mode into the information of another mode, such as machine translation, speech translation, and picture description. ③ Modal alignment, that is, to find the corresponding relationship between the internal components of different modalities from the same object that is subject to analysis, for example, to associate and align a movie with its subtitles. ④ Multimodal fusion, that is, to perform target prediction by fusing multimodal information, including pattern recognition, semantic analysis, and other tasks. For instance, in speech recognition tasks, the accuracy of recognition can be improved by using the fusion data of speech signals, semantic features, and even lip movements. ⑤ Collaborative learning, that is, to carry out machine learning with the aid of information from another mode. When labeled samples are scarce, collaborative learning can effectively solve this problem.

In pace with the advance of deep learning, engineers need to decide the best neural network architecture, training process, regularization method, super-parameters, etc., all of which have a great impact on the algorithm performance. A multimodal task usually needs more complex neural networks and larger parameter optimization space than a unimodal task. Hence, it is difficult to make decisions manually. Multimodal automatic machine learning aims at designing automatic algorithms using data-driven methods. Its main research directions include: ① automatic feature engineering, that is, to automatically extract typical features from the original data; ② automatic model selection and hyperparameter optimization, that is, to find the most suitable algorithm model for solving task problems, and to automatically determine the hyperparameter of the model; and ③ neural architecture search, that is, to automatically find the best neural network architecture from a series of candidate architectures based on specific evaluation functions and search strategies.

The main development directions of multimodal automatic machine learning comprise: ① studies on automatic machine learning algorithms for multimodal tasks and multi-objective problems; ② research on more flexible variable representations for parameter space searching, and finding more convenient representation methods for modal migration; ③ designing more effective evaluation functions; and ④ research on transfer learning among multimodalities to further improve the efficiency of automatic machine learning.

(10)    Reconfigurable intelligent surface assisted wireless communications

Reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS) assisted wireless communications is a type of communication system based on RISs to freely regulate the wireless environment and construct a new system architecture. Developed from information metamaterial technology, RISs are artificial surface structures with programmable electromagnetic properties, and are usually composed of a large number of carefully designed electromagnetic unit cells. By applying control signals to the adjustable elements on the unit cells, the electromagnetic properties of the unit cells can be dynamically controlled. Hence, the space electromagnetic waves can be actively and intelligently controlled in a programmable fashion, and electromagnetic fields can be generated whose parameters, such as amplitude, phase, polarization, and frequency, are controllable. This technology provides a broad interface between the physical world of RISs and the digital world of information science, and is extremely attractive for the development of future wireless networks.

RISs have the characteristics of low cost, low energy consumption, field programmability, and ease of deployment, and thus are becoming the candidate technologies of 6G. At present, the main research directions of RISs are focused on: ① deployment on the surfaces of various objects in the wireless propagation environment to construct an intelligently programmable wireless environment, including applications such as coverage improvement, capacity enhancement, secure communication, interference suppression, wireless energy transmission, and RIS-aided positioning and sensing; and ② the direct modulation of baseband information to the radio frequency carrier by using RISs, which can be used to construct wireless transmitter systems with new architecture and reduce the hardware complexity and cost. The main future development trends of RIS assisted wireless communications include metasurface hardware architecture and control algorithms, new theories of intelligent environment communications and RIS baseband algorithms, new wireless network architectures, and the measurement verification of prototype systems.

《1.2 Interpretations for three key engineering research fronts》

1.2 Interpretations for three key engineering research fronts

1.2.1 In-memory computing technology for intelligent computing

The basic concept of in-memory computing technology can be traced back to the concept of “logic-in-memory computer”, which was first put forward by Kautz et al. of Stanford Research Institute in 1969. Due to the constraints of chip design complexity and manufacturing cost, as well as the lack of killer applications of big data, the research on in- memory computing technology in the early stage stayed in the laboratory. Since 2012, the deep neural network (DNN) algorithm has developed rapidly in the field of intelligent computing, breaking the computing-centric rule of traditional algorithms and generating a data-centric computing requirement instead. The layout with the memory separated from the computing unit on the basis of the classical Von Neumann architecture has encountered serious bottlenecks in terms of performance and power consumption, and the crisis of Moore’s Law that came about in the same period has accelerated the deterioration of this situation. In this context, in-memory computing technology has become a research hotspot in the academic community and has entered a fast track to industrialization. Since intelligent computing applications such as DNN are not only computing- intensive but also data-intensive, there is a pressing need to improve the hardware computing power and memory access bandwidth. The concept of “in-memory computing”, which took a back seat in the 1990s, was resurrected by the designers of AI computing architecture, thanks to alleviating or eliminating problems such as performance bottleneck and low energy efficiency caused by the traditional Von Neumann architecture. In the scenario of intelligent computing, more than 95% of operations in the most widely used DNN algorithm are vector matrix multiplication; in- memory computing is used mainly to accelerate this part of operations. According to the literature, the paradigm of in- memory computing can increase the speed by more than 50 times with about 5% of the power consumption of the Von Neumann architecture. At the International Symposium on Microarchitecture 2017 (Micro 2017), NVIDIA Corporation, Intel Corporation, Microsoft Corporation, Samsung Electronics, ETH, University of California, Santa Barbara, and others, launched their prototypes of in-memory computing systems.

According to the data representation method, in-memory computing technology may belong to digital architecture, analog architecture, and hybrid digital-analog architecture; meanwhile, based on the implemented basic device structure, it may fall into general near-memory computing architecture, SRAM in-memory computing, DRAM in-memory computing, RRAM/PCM/Flash multi-value in-memory computing, and RRAM/PCM/MRAM two-value in-memory computing. In recent years, academic research has focused on the in-memory computing implemented by RRAM, and Duke University, Purdue University, Stanford University, University of Massachusetts, Nanyang Technological University of Singapore, Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P., Intel Corporation, and Micron Technology, Inc. have all released their related test chip prototypes. The entrepreneurial hotspot of the industry is the in-memory computing chip of NOR Flash. Mythic and Syntiant of the USA, and Witintech Co., Ltd. and Zbit Semiconductor, Inc. of China have all launched products that can be mass-produced for commercial purpose. In addition, in recent years, researchers have begun to explore ways to implement intelligent computing by the close integration of perception, memory, and computing. For example, a perceptive in-memory computing unit may be formed by adding binary metallic oxides, perovskite, polymers, and organic materials in the back end of line, so as to further reduce system delay, improve performance, and reduce power consumption, and it may find future applications in various fields such as computer vision, tactile sensory neuron system, and speech recognition.

Table 1.2.1 lists the countries with the greatest output of core papers on “in-memory computing technology for intelligent computing”. Both with a solid research foundation, China and the USA are ranked first and second, respectively, regarding their output of core papers. The main international cooperation partner of China is the USA (Figure 1.2.1). Among the Top 10 institutions with the greatest output of core papers (Table 1.2.2), four are from China. In terms of institutional cooperation (Figure 1.2.2), three Chinese research institutions collaborate closely with each other, and all of them are linked

《Table 1.2.1》

Table 1.2.1 Countries with the greatest output of core papers on “in-memory computing technology for intelligent computing”

No. Country Core papers Percentage of core papers Citations Percentage of citations Mean year
1 China 14 34.15% 161 11.5 2019.6
2 USA 12 29.27% 309 25.75 2019
3 Switzerland 6 14.63% 149 24.83 2019.3
4 Greece 3 7.32% 39 13 2019
5 Germany 2 4.88% 77 38.5 2019
6 India 2 4.88% 35 17.5 2017.5
7 United Arab Emirates 2 4.88% 7 3.5 2019
8 France 1 2.44% 20 20 2018
9 Japan 1 2.44% 12 12 2019
10 UK 1 2.44% 11 11 2020

with RWTH Aachen University. As for the number of cited core papers (Table 1.2.3), China accounts for 34.99%, 10.25% higher than the second place holder (the USA). Among the Top 10 institutions with the greatest output of citing papers, the top six are all from China (Table 1.2.4), which shows that this country pays great attention to this research front.

1.2.2 Photonic-electronic integrated circuits

Currently, no recognized technical solution or research roadmap exists for photonic-electronic integrated circuits. Researchers around the world are in pursuit of technological breakthroughs or solutions at various levels, such as process devices, design software, and system applications. The concept of photonic-electronic integrated circuits was put forward more than 20 years ago, and early on, photonic devices were dedicated to be integrated with passive circuits on a single chip. Due to the lack of high-speed transistors and microwave devices in the circuit, the first photoelectronic integrated chips could achieve only simple photoelectronic signal conversion or optical multiplexing functions. The integration of large-scale photonic and electronic integrated circuits is the feature of the present photonic-electronic integrated circuits. The package integration or monolithic integration of a large number of optoelectronic unit devices allows for the multi-function and system-level integration

《Table 1.2.2》

Table 1.2.2 Institutions with the greatest output of core papers on “in-memory computing technology for intelligent computing”

No. Institution Core papers Percentage of core papers Citations Percentage of citations Mean year
1 IBM Research Zurich 4 9.76% 137 34.25 2019.5
2 Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich 4 9.76% 31 7.75 2019.2
3 Xi'an Jiaotong University 3 7.32% 82 27.33 2019.7
4 Georgia Institute of Technology 3 7.32% 41 13.67 2019.7
5 Shenzhen University 2 4.88% 78 39 2019
6 RWTH Aachen University 2 4.88% 77 38.5 2019
7 Chinese Academy of Sciences 2 4.88% 71 35.5 2019.5
8 Shivaji University 2 4.88% 35 17.5 2017.5
9 University of Electronic Science and Technology of China 2 4.88% 21 10.5 2020
10 University of Patras 2 4.88% 19 9.5 2019.5

《Figure 1.2.1》

Figure 1.2.1 Collaboration network among major countries in the engineering research front of “in-memory computing technology for intelligent computing”

《Figure 1.2.2》

Figure 1.2.2 Collaboration network among major institutions in the engineering research front of “in-memory computing technology for intelligent computing”

《Table 1.2.3》

Table 1.2.3 Countries with the greatest output of citing papers on “in-memory computing technology for intelligent computing”

No. Country Citing papers Percentage of citing papers Mean year
1 China 232 34.99% 2020.2
2 USA 164 24.74% 2020
3 South Korea 60 9.05% 2020.1
4 Germany 36 5.43% 2020.5
5 Switzerland 33 4.98% 2020.4
6 UK 29 4.37% 2020.4
7 India 27 4.07% 2019.7
8 France 23 3.47% 2020
9 Singapore 20 3.02% 2020.2
10 Italy 20 3.02% 2020.5

《Table 1.2.4》

Table 1.2.4 Institutions with the greatest output of citing papers on “in-memory computing technology for intelligent computing”

No. Institution Citing papers Percentage of citing papers Mean year
1 Chinese Academy of Sciences 39 16.39% 2019.8
2 Tsinghua University 35 14.71% 2019.8
3 Huazhong University of Science and Technology 24 10.08% 2019.8
4 Fudan University 24 10.08% 2019.8
5 Shenzhen University 19 7.98% 2020
6 Xi'an Jiaotong University 18 7.56% 2019.9
7 Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich 17 7.14% 2020
8 RWTH Aachen University 16 6.72% 2020
9 Purdue University 16 6.72% 2019.8
10 Georgia Institute of Technology 15 6.30% 2019.7

that is similar to microelectronic chips. To realize large-scale photonic-electronic integrated circuits, it is necessary to make breakthroughs in the four aspects of process, device, design, and application. Therefore, the interpretation of technological frontiers in this field is also carried out from the four aspects discussed below:

First, the processes of photonic-electronic integrated circuits are divided mainly into monolithic integration and packaging integration. Monolithic integration relies mainly on silicon- based CMOS and SiGe BiCMOS processes, which makes photonic and electronic circuits monolithically prepared on the same substrate in the wafer preparation process. On the other hand, packaging integration adopts different processes to integrate photonic and electronic circuits on different chips, and then applies hybrid integration into core particles through 2D/2.5D/3D packaging processes. The main R&D institutions pursuing this direction include Intel, Global Foundries, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), Tower, STMicroelectronics, Innovations for High Performance microelectronics (IHP), and the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST) of Japan, etc. The capability of chip processing technology is basic support for the development of the entire photonic-electronic integrated circuits, and it also determines the degree of autonomy and controllability. However, the selection of process nodes and integration routes of photonic-electronic integrated circuits is still challenging, especially while considering the comprehensive performance, capacity, and cost.

Second, the materials and devices of photonic-electronic integrated circuits are mainly photonic and optoelectronic devices. At present, silicon-based and indium phosphide (InP) based optical devices have a relatively high level of practicality. Although the functions, performance, and mass manufacturing capabilities of some chips have reached the commercial requirements, there is still much room for improvement in terms of power consumption and the size of lasers, modulators, and detectors. The main R&D institutions performing research in this direction include University of California-Santa Barbara (UCSB), Interuniversity Microelectronics Centre (IMEC), Intel, Fraunhofer Heinrich Hertz Institute (HHI), Photonics Electronics Technology Research Association (PETRA), Singapore Institute of Microelectronics (IME), Chinese Academy of Sciences, etc. Silicon-based and InP-based routes are expected to develop in parallel for a long time. In the short term, InP-based chips should be superior in terms of performance and maturity. In the future, however, silicon-based photonic-electronic integrated circuits have greater development prospects with the increase of communication speed, integration, and demand.

Third, similar to integrated circuit chips, the design tools of photonic-electronic integrated circuits are also evolving in the direction of standardization, modularization, and optoelectronic collaboration. Internationally, manufacturers such as Cadence, Synopsis, Mentor, and ANSYS have established electronic design automation (EDA) software and simulation tools for optoelectronic collaborative design and vertical integration. Meanwhile, China has a relatively weak industrial foundation, as few companies are currently focusing on this field, and there are no mature photonic-electronic integrated circuit design tools available. Photonic-electronic integrated design software is not only an important boost for the hybrid integration of photonic and electronic circuits, but also the core technology for system-level chip integration.

Fourth, the application fields of photonic-electronic integrated circuits are relatively diverse. For optical communications, photonic-electronic integrated circuits are packaged and integrated into standardized and small-sized optical modules to achieve high transmission rates and low cost. For high- performance computing, an optoelectronic transceiver and a calculation engine are manufactured through co- packaged optics (CPO) or monolithic integration to achieve high-density, low-latency interconnection and high- throughput processing. For multi-modal sensing, sensory- storage-computing integrated core particles are constructed through heterogeneous bonding and the three-dimensional integration of photonic and electronic circuits to realize real-time perception and processing for three-dimensional images. In addition, photonic-electronic integrated circuits have successively verified their significant advantages, such as ultra-high speed, ultra-miniaturization, and ultra-large integration, in the fields of quantum communication and quantum computing, AI and neural networks, biological detection, microwave photonics technology, and optical sensing. These applications are regarded as key research directions for new chips in the post-Moore era by most countries or regions such as the USA, Europe, Japan, and China, which have made high investments in this field in all walks of life. Note that the USA currently leads China in the number of papers and citations in this field, and its focus has shifted from device-level R&D to system-level chip integration.

Table 1.2.5 lists the countries with the greatest output of core papers on this research front. It can be seen that the USA and China have obvious advantages, with their core paper outputs ranking first and second, respectively. The international cooperation partners of the USA are mainly China and Germany (Figure 1.2.3). Among the Top 10 institutions with the greatest output of core papers (Table 1.2.2), there are four in the USA, four in Europe, one in China, and one in Canada. Concerning institutional cooperation (Figure 1.2.4), several research institutions in the USA and Europe cooperate closely with each other, while the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Stanford University are the most active in foreign cooperation and exchanges. As for the number of core citing papers (Table 1.2.7), China ranks first with 31.65%, the USA ranks second with 25.00%, and other countries account for below 7% each. Among the Top 10 institutions with the greatest output of citing papers (Table 1.2.8), four institutions come from China and three are based in the USA, which shows that these two countries have had a lot of focus on this research front.

1.2.3 Integrated microwave photonics

The field of microwave photonics, which has been closely watched by scientific and industrial circles over the past 30 years, was the core driver of the early development of

《Table 1.2.5》

Table 1.2.5 Countries with the greatest output of core papers on “photonic-electronic integrated circuits”

No. Country Core papers Percentage of core papers Citations Percentage of citations Mean year
1 USA 40 43.48% 3 303 82.58 2017.8
2 China 22 23.91% 1512 68.73 2017.4
3 UK 12 13.04% 848 70.67 2017.5
4 Germany 11 11.96% 643 58.45 2018.2
5 Switzerland 11 11.96% 466 42.36 2018.4
6 Canada 10 10.87% 901 90.1 2017.4
7 Spain 8 8.70% 608 76 2017.6
8 Belgium 7 7.61% 513 73.29 2017
9 France 6 6.52% 321 53.5 2017
10 Australia 5 5.43% 434 86.8 2017

《Table 1.2.6》

Table 1.2.6 Institutions with the greatest output of core papers on “photonic-electronic integrated circuits”

No. Institution Core papers Percentage of core papers Citations Percentage of citations Mean year
1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology 10 10.87% 1406 140.6 2017.3
2 Chinese Academy of Sciences 8 8.70% 490 61.25 2016.9
3 Swiss Federal Institute ofTechnology in Zurich 7 7.61% 310 44.29 2018
4 University of Ottawa 5 5.43% 648 129.6 2017
5 Ghent University 5 5.43% 430 86 2016.8
6 Universidad Politcnica de Valencia 5 5.43% 429 85.8 2018.8
7 National Institute of Standards and Technology 5 5.43% 302 60.4 2018.4
8 Stanford University 5 5.43% 289 57.8 2019.2
9 University of California, Berkeley 4 4.35% 756 189 2017
10 University of Munster 4 4.35% 321 80.25 2018.2

《Figure 1.2.3》

Figure 1.2.3 Collaboration network among major countries in the engineering research front of “photonic-electronic integrated circuits”

《Figure 1.2.4》

Figure 1.2.4 Collaboration network among major institutions in the engineering research front of “photonic-electronic integrated circuits”

《Table 1.2.7》

Table 1.2.7 Countries with the greatest output of citing papers on “photonic-electronic integrated circuits”

No. Country Citing papers Percentage of citing papers Mean year
1 China 1919 31.65% 2019.2
2 USA 1516 25.00% 2018.8
3 UK 414 6.83% 2018.9
4 Germany 378 6.23% 2019
5 Canada 327 5.39% 2019
6 France 314 5.18% 2018.6
7 Australia 291 4.80% 2018.6
8 Japan 273 4.50% 2018.8
9 Russia 227 3.74% 2018.7
10 Switzerland 207 3.41% 2018.9

《Table 1.2.8》

Table 1.2.8 Institutions with the greatest output of citing papers on “photonic-electronic integrated circuits”

No. Institution Citing papers Percentage of citing papers Mean year
1 Chinese Academy of Sciences 314 21.96% 2018.9
2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology 182 12.73% 2018.6
3 Huazhong University of Science and Technology 145 10.14% 2019
4 Zhejiang University 115 8.04% 2019.3
5 The University of Sydney 109 7.62% 2018.1
6 Swiss Federal Institute ofTechnology in Zurich 101 7.06% 2019
7 Stanford University 97 6.78% 2019.1
8 Ghent University 95 6.64% 2018.5
9 Shanghai Jiao Tong University 94 6.57% 2019.2
10 National Institute of Standards and Technology 91 6.36% 2019

this technology due to the rich processing bandwidth, low- loss optical fiber transmission, and handling flexibility for complex regulatory functions. From the perspective of global frontier research, countries and regions such as the USA, China, Russia, the European Union, and Australia have been dominant. Among them, the USA is in the first echelon in frontier research progress due to its solid research foundation. China’s research activity in the field of integrated microwave photonics progressed almost at the same pace as the international one. In recent years, China has ranked second globally after the USA in terms of the number of frontier publications. Representatives of the progress and breakthroughs include the generation of ultra-broadband signals, the distribution and transmission of RF signals in optical fibers, programmable microwave photonic filters, photonic enhancement radar systems, etc. At present, microwave photon devices and functions used in radar and communication systems are still distinct, and many fundamental scientific problems and technical challenges exist in improving performance indicators such as the linearity of core devices.

With the rapid synchronous development of photonic integration technology, the combination of the two above fields has had a profound impact, resulting in the birth of integrated microwave photonics. In 2007, Nature Photonics published a review of the importance of microwave photonics, combining two worlds and developing microwave photonics. In 2019, a new review in Nature Photonics stated that integration was the future direction of microwave photonics. Integrated microwave photonics enables the maintenance of the high complexity of microwave photonic systems while greatly reducing the size of the whole system, allowing for an ultra-broadband spectrum range and greater instantaneous bandwidth, and providing sufficient frequency freedom and better functionality, higher rates, smaller volumes, high energy efficiency, low power consumption, as well as the expectation of overcoming loss, crosstalk problems and improving device linearity in discrete devices. These benefits make microwave photonics systems superior to RF circuits, and it is expected that the multiplexing and parallel processing of guidance, detection, communication, sensing, storage, computing, and other functions can also be realized at a later stage.

The current trends in integrated microwave photonics are as follows:

1)  In the system architecture, make use of the advantages of microwave photon technology, avoid the current immature integration technology caused by microwave photon device volume, weight and other problems, and give full play to the performance advantages of large bandwidth, easy multiplexing, and low loss and long-distance transmission. For example, through the top-level optimization design of system framework, scholars in Australia have realized the airborne integrated electronic information system with multiple functions including distribution, reconnaissance, navigation, and detection, greatly improving the bandwidth of the information system, and reducing the volume, weight, and power consumption of the entire system.

2)   In terms of functional discrete devices, radar, electronic countermeasures, and network communication are all developing rapidly in the direction of widening the time domain, frequency domain, and airspace. Under the existing system framework, researches are targeting high-performance functions such as broadband filter, frequency conversion, frequency beamforming, and analog-to-digital conversion unit, to obtain a replacement to the original microwave electronic discrete devices, thus greatly enhancing the performance of the existing information system. For example, Russia has improved the resolution of traditional imaging radars by an order of magnitude, based on information processing technologies such as a high-performance microwave photonic integrated radar front end. The Institute of Electronics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the 14th Institute of China Electronics Technology Group, the 38th Institute of China Electronics Technology Group, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, and other agencies have conducted relevant radar innovation work and passed the field test verification, in which the bandwidth and imaging resolution of traditional radar has been significantly improved. Based on the function of microwave photon beamforming network, the 29th Institute of China Electronics Technology Group has realized the transformation and improvement of spectrum detection capability.

3)  In the aspect of photonic chip integration based on different materials, the relevant research should achieve breakthroughs in compatibility and matching between materials, realize the low-loss coupling of multiple physical fields, improve unit device efficiency, strengthen process innovation to improve process tolerance, and explore carbon (such as graphene) based new material devices. For example, excimer-laser based direct writing techniques have been presented in Germany to reduce the loss of heterogeneous waveguides to less than 1 dB. In 2018, Harvard University reported a broadband thin- film lithium niobate modulator with a bandwidth greater than 70 GHz, which greatly improves the half-wave voltage, bandwidth, and other key technical indicators. China Shandong NANOLN and Shanghai Institute of Microsystems have made a quantum leap in the wafer bonding technology of silica-based lithium niobate, which belongs to the kind of large-mismatch heterogeneous materials. The Semiconductor Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, and other organizations have broken through the bottleneck of lithium niobate waveguide etching technique and have fabricated lithium niobate chip modulators covering the S-Ka band.

The countries and institutions with the greatest output of core papers on this research front are shown in Tables 1.2.9 and 1.2.10, respectively. The USA has a solid research foundation in microwave photonics, with core papers accounting for about half of the world’s output. The main institutions include Stanford University, California Institute of Technology, and Harvard University. The output of core papers of China is second only to that of the USA, accounting for about 25% of the world’s, with institutions that contribute most being Chinese Academy of Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, and University of Electronic Science and Technology of China. The core papers from Canada, Australia, the Netherlands, and Switzerland are equally distributed within the third tier globally, where the main institutions are the University of Sydney, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Delft University of Technology, and Swiss Federal Institute

《Table 1.2.9》

Table 1.2.9 Countries with the greatest output of core papers on “integrated microwave photonics”

No. Country Core papers Percentage of core papers Citations Percentage of citations Mean year
1 USA 80 47.34% 7162 89.53 2017.8
2 China 43 25.44% 3 070 71.4 2018.1
3 Canada 25 14.79% 1517 60.68 2018
4 Australia 22 13.02% 1460 66.36 2017.8
5 Netherlands 18 10.65% 1900 105.56 2017.7
6 Switzerland 15 8.88% 1065 71 2017.5
7 Germany 13 7.69% 737 56.69 2017.9
8 Russia 11 6.51% 476 43.27 2018.5
9 France 8 4.73% 933 116.62 2017.1
10 Spain 8 4.73% 804 100.5 2017.2

of Technology in Lausanne. International cooperation between major countries is shown in Figure 1.2.5, which is mainly limited to that between China, the USA, Canada, and Australia. In addition to cooperation among the three above-mentioned institutions of China, the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology has close cooperation with these three Chinese institutions, as shown in Figure 1.2.6. In terms of core citing papers, China and the USA are still the main players, accounting for 31.29% and 26.36% respectively, as shown in Table 1.2.11. Among the institutions, Chinese Academy of Sciences has the largest percentage of citing papers of 19.84%, followed by National Institute of Standards and Technology, California Institute of Technology, and Huazhong University of Science and Technology, each with a percentage of about 10% (Table 1.2.12).

《2 Engineering development fronts》

2 Engineering development fronts

《2.1 Trends in Top 10 engineering development fronts》

2.1 Trends in Top 10 engineering development fronts

The Top 10 engineering development fronts in the field of information and electronic engineering are summarized in Table 2.1.1, encompassing the sub-fields of electronic science and technology, optical engineering and technology, instrument science and technology, information and communication engineering, computer science and technology, and control science. Among these 10 fronts, “high- resolution millimeter-wave radar 4D imaging technology”, “autonomous operation and cooperative control technologies

《Table 1.2.10》

Table 1.2.10 Institutions with the greatest output of core papers on “integrated microwave photonics”

No. Institution Core papers Percentage of core papers Citations Percentage of citations Mean year
1 Chinese Academy of Sciences 16 9.47% 707 44.19 2018.1
2 City University of Hong Kong 13 7.69% 1074 82.62 2018.8
3 Stanford University 11 6.51% 562 51.09 2019.5
4 California Institute ofTechnology 10 5.92% 1038 103.8 2017.5
5 The University of Sydney 10 5.92% 765 76.5 2017.1
6 Royal Melbourne Institute ofTechnology 10 5.92% 447 44.7 2018.7
7 University of Electronic Science and Technology of China 10 5.92% 389 38.9 2018.9
8 Harvard University 9 5.33% 1154 128.22 2018.3
9 Delft University ofTechnology 9 5.33% 1113 123.67 2017.1
10 Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne 9 5.33% 683 75.89 2017.6

《Figure 1.2.5》

Figure 1.2.5 Collaboration network among major countries in the engineering research front of “integrated microwave photonics”

《Figure 1.2.6》

Figure 1.2.6 Collaboration network among major institutions in the engineering research front of “integrated microwave photonics”

《Table 1.2.11》

Table 1.2.11 Countries with the greatest output of citing papers on “integrated microwave photonics”

No. Country Citing papers Percentage of citing papers Mean year
1 China 3198 31.29% 2019.4
2 USA 2 694 26.36% 2019
3 Germany 677 6.62% 2019.2
4 UK 631 6.17% 2019.1
5 France 531 5.20% 2019.1
6 Canada 462 4.52% 2019
7 Australia 447 4.37% 2018.9
8 Japan 441 4.32% 2019.1
9 Switzerland 403 3.94% 2018.9
10 Russia 381 3.73% 2019.1

《Table 1.2.12》

Table 1.2.12 Institutions with the greatest output of citing papers on “integrated microwave photonics”

No. Institution Citing papers Percentage of citing papers Mean year
1 Chinese Academy of Sciences 438 19.84% 2019.3
2 National Institute of Standards and Technology 232 10.51% 2019
3 California Institute ofTechnology 205 9.28% 2018.5
4 Huazhong University of Science and Technology 205 9.28% 2019.1
5 Massachusetts Institute ofTechnology 187 8.47% 2018.9
6 Zhejiang University 174 7.88% 2019.4
7 Swiss Federal Institute of Tech no logy in Zurich 161 7.29% 2019.2
8 Tsinghua University 161 7.29% 2019.2
9 Shanghai Jiao Tong University 151 6.84% 2019.3
10 Nanjing University 150 6.79% 2019.5

for unmanned swarm systems”, “intelligent control of soft robotic systems”, “medical image analysis based on deep learning”, and “technology for securing trustworthy intelligent systems” are published based on the analysis of Derwent Innovation of Clarivate, and the five other fronts are recommended by researchers.

The annual disclosure of core patents involved in the above 10 development fronts for the period of 2015 to 2020 is shown in Table 2.1.2.

(1)  Chiplet design and chip-level three-dimensional stacking microsystem integration technology

Chiplets are small dies with specific functions and standard interconnected interfaces. Chip-level three-dimensional stacking microsystem integration technology means that some chiplets or other components previously produced with different functions, processes, materials, or by different manufacturers, are integrated into a single package according to length, width, and height in three dimensions. The system-

《Table 2.1.1》

Table 2.1.1 Top 10 engineering development fronts in information and electronic engineering

No. Engineering development front Published patents Citations Citations per patent Mean year
1 Chiplet design and chip-level three-dimensional stacking microsystem integration technology 399 1292 3.24 2017.6
2 High-resolution millimeter-wave radar 4D imaging technology 469 3 670 7.83 2017.5
3 Ultra fast laser cross-scale micro-nano manufacturing technology 439 2 978 6.78 2017.3
4 Autonomous operation and cooperative control technologies for unmanned swarm systems 587 5 313 9.05 2017.6
5 Multi-modality super-resolution live imaging device 246 2 203 8.96 2016.9
6 Intelligent control of soft robotic systems 457 1874 4.1 2017.6
7 Medical image analysis based on deep learning 523 4163 7.96 2018.5
8 Multifunctional integrated photonic signal processor 411 3 054 7.43 2017
9 Technology to secure trustworthy intelligent systems 449 1870 4.16 2018.1
10 Intelligent technology for integrated circuit layout design 219 332 1.52 2018

《Table 2.1.2》

Table 2.1.2 Annual number of core patents published for the Top 10 engineering development fronts in information and electronic

No. Engineering development front 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
1 Chiplet design and chip-level three-dimensional stacking microsystem integration technology 80 52 56 62 60 89
2 High-resolution millimeter-wave radar 4D imaging technology 66 76 77 107 110 33
3 Ultrafast laser cross-scale micro-nano manufacturing technology 77 71 88 93 79 31
4 Autonomous operation and cooperative control technologies for unmanned swarm systems 44 79 162 130 146 26
5 Multi-modality super-resolution live imaging device 54 55 41 57 29 10
6 Intelligent control of soft robotic systems 48 82 60 121 113 33
7 Medical image analysis based on deep learning 3 13 77 137 189 104
8 Multifunctional integrated photonic signal processor 88 79 78 90 62 14
9 Technology to secure trustworthy intelligent systems 34 57 81 66 104 107
10 Intelligent technology for integrated circuit layout design 23 26 30 41 54 45

level components with higher integration and more complex functions could be constructed by stacking through a variety of micro-machining technologies of constituents.

Compared with circuit boards, system-level components based on the chiplet heterogeneous integration technology have more advantages in product size, performance, power consumption, etc., which can therefore meet the development needs of miniaturization and light weight of electronic systems. Compared with the traditional monolithic integration chip, the chiplet heterogeneous integration technology can quickly customize the design and manufacturing of products for specific applications based on mature products and process technology. Chiplet heterogeneous integration technology has the characteristics of short design cycle, low R&D risks, and good yield controllability, and is regarded as one of the essential technologies supporting the sustainable development of the semiconductor industry in the “post- Moore’s Law era”.

The key to improve chiplet design in a chip-level three- dimensional stacking microsystem integration technology is to break through the multi-chiplet co-design methodology, mass-produce reusable chiplets, design interconnection standards and interfaces between chiplets, implement high- density packaging integration processes, define reliable testing standards and methods, etc. Subsequently, a standardized industrial system for the entire process from design and manufacturing to integration and testing could be established.

In the future, the three-dimensional stacking microsystem integration technology based on chiplets will probably create a “super heterogeneous microsystem” platform for merging digital, radio frequency, optoelectronics, and other types of device units at the chip level, which can bring more to the integrated circuit industry and increase the flexibility and development opportunities.

(2)    High-resolution millimeter-wave radar 4D imaging technology

This technology is designed to obtain the high-resolution three-dimensional shape and velocity information of the target, i.e., perform 4D imaging from the echo of the electromagnetic wave with a transmission wavelength of 1–10 mm of the millimeter-wave radar. The millimeter-wave radar has very good robustness against weather and light. Due to its small wavelength, millimeter-wave radar has a narrower beam and its angular resolution and angle measurement accuracy are higher than those of ordinary radar. Because of the high operating frequency, a large signal bandwidth (such as gigahertz) and Doppler frequency shift can be obtained, which is conducive to improving the measurement accuracy and the resolution of range and velocity, and to analyzing the characteristics of targets. The 4D high-resolution imaging based on millimeter wave is expected to yield a very broad range of applications.

The main technical directions of 4D imaging by high- resolution millimeter wave radar include: ① Upgrading the resolution. Resolution, which is the ability of a radar to distinguish objects, directly determines the quality of a 4D image. ② Obtaining a large field of view without blurring. Based on the redundancy requirements of multi-sensor fusion and driven by auto-driving capabilities, 4D imaging technology needs to satisfy at least 90 degrees of viewing angle. The traditional radar angle measurement has multiple purposes; that is, a target may calculate multiple angle directions. The 4D imaging technology achieves angle blurring and accurate target recognition through antenna arrangement and signal processing optimization. ③ Increasing the point cloud density. The higher the density of point clouds, the better the 4D image depicts the environment.

There are three main trends in 4D imaging technology for high-resolution millimeter-wave radar: ① Unmanned vehicles. With the rapid development of L3 and the above advanced auto-driving feature, the accuracy of environmental monitoring is increasingly important. Four-dimensional high-resolution millimeter-wave radar imaging technology consists one of the frontiers of automotive unmanned driving technology. ② Unmanned aerial vehicle technology. Four- dimensional imaging technology can greatly improve the space situational awareness capabilities of unmanned aerial vehicles. ③ Vital sign monitoring. Since millimeter waves can penetrate clothes and are harmless to humans, this technique can be used for vital sign monitoring.

(3)   Ultrafast laser cross-scale micro-nano manufacturing technology

Ultrafast lasers include femtosecond laser and picosecond laser with a pulse width shorter than 10 ps, which have extremely narrow pulse duration and particularly high laser fluence, leading to very short light-matter interaction times. Ultrafast laser processing is one of the leading technologies in the field of advanced manufacturing due to its advantages of processing strength, speed, and precision. The unique interaction mechanism between ultrafast laser and materials could alter the material states and properties, and realize the control of their shape and function from micrometer to nanometer. Examples of popular ultrafast laser processing techniques include femtosecond laser direct writing, two- photon polymerization, interference lithography, laser- induced surface nanostructures and nanoparticles, etc. Ultrafast laser cross-scale micro-nano manufacturing has promising applications in the surface functionalization of aircraft bodies, such as anti-icing, drag reduction, and anti- reflection structures, as well as new energy devices, including micro-batteries, micro-capacitors, and so on.

Ultrafast laser cross-scale micro-nano manufacturing technology presents two core issues: ensuring nano-scale processing precision, and accomplishing cross-scale structure fabrication, involving multiple disciplines, such as mechanics, physics, chemistry, biology, material science, and information science.

The main future research directions are as follows:

1)   Develop a thorough theoretical model to accurately describe the interaction between ultrafast lasers and materials, and study the influence of the light field of ultrafast laser in the time/space/frequency domains on the electronic dynamics and properties of materials.

2)  Understand the scaling effect and surface/interface effect that occur during the processing, forming, modification, and cross-scale fabrication steps of ultrafast laser micro-nano manufacturing.

3)  Clarify the evolution mechanism of material structure and its relationship with device function, explore the structure- property relation as the manufacturing feature is downsized from macro to micro, and establish the fundamental theory, processing equipment, and characterization/measurement methods of ultrafast laser micro-nano manufacturing technology.

(4)    Autonomous operation and cooperative control technologies for unmanned swarm systems

The autonomous operation and cooperative control techniques for unmanned swarm systems usually refer to a kind of special function of numerous homogeneous/ heterogeneous cross-domain cooperative systems, which include unmanned space systems, unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) systems, unmanned ground vehicle (UGV) systems, unmanned surface vehicle (USV) systems, and unmanned submarine (US) systems. To complete the missions more efficiently, the unmanned swarm systems can execute the autonomous cooperative perception, making decisions and achieving control by using the AI technology; thus, their autonomous operation and cooperative control can be realized. The related technologies of autonomous operation and cooperative control techniques for unmanned swarm systems can make different unmanned platforms cooperatively work in the cross domain, and in a low-cost and highly decentralized form. Information sharing, anti- disturbance, and self-healing can be achieved through the decentralization of ad-hoc network. Distributed cooperative control and optimization can also be realized, which can improve the overall operation efficiency and safety emergency processing ability of unmanned swarm systems. The main technical directions of autonomous operation and cooperative control for unmanned swarm systems include environmental cooperative perception and comprehension, multi-source information sharing and fusion, cooperative task planning and decision-making, cooperative obstacle avoidance and safety control, distributed intelligent optimization technologies, etc. The environmental cooperative perception and comprehension of unmanned swarm systems involves mainly sensor configuration optimization, high-precision construction of environmental maps, cooperative detection for dynamic targets, and cooperative tracking of multiple targets. Multi- source information sharing and fusion includes mainly spatio- temporal alignment of multi-source heterogeneous sensor information, intelligent fusion of incomplete information, and distributed communication ad-hoc network. Cooperative task planning and decision-making comprises mainly cooperative task allocation, cooperative path planning, cooperative autonomous decision-making, and effectiveness evaluation for tasks. Cooperative obstacle avoidance and safety control includes primarily obstacle online identification, cooperative obstacle avoidance planning and control, safety cooperative control subject to the compounded influence of disturbance and communication constraints, and the like. Distributed intelligent optimization is essentially represented by the distributed optimization algorithm design, algorithm convergence proof, algorithm complexity analysis, and so on. Finally, the future development trends of autonomous operation and cooperative control techniques for unmanned swarm systems can be concluded as follows. ① The unmanned swarm systems will be expanded from several traditional unmanned systems to dozens or even hundreds of unmanned systems, whose efficiency, real-time and global optimization ability of operation, and cooperative control need to be further improved. ② Unmanned swarm systems are engaged mainly in complex adversarial tasks in unstructured environments. Thus, they strongly require excellent autonomous operation and cooperative control methods with learning ability, self-evolution, and self-organization potential. ③ The integrated technology and anti-attack ability should be further strengthened when the unmanned swarm systems execute their tasks in heterogeneous cross- domain operation and cooperative control in multi-task situations. ④ The health management of autonomous operation and cooperative control for unmanned swarm systems is the basis to guarantee the safety and stability of the system operation. Related technologies, including the construction of the health feature set of unmanned swarm systems, health degree and efficiency evaluation, and the network propagation mechanism and isolation of faults, need to be further investigated.

(5)  Multi-modality super-resolution live imaging device

Multi-modality super-resolution live imaging devices employ various imaging technologies to show the biological processes of living organisms at the molecular and cellular levels. They are essential in live animal experiments for understanding the human metabolism. Live animal experiments play key roles in studying basic pathology, pharmacology, and clinical practical applications, and are crucial in the research fields of oncology, neurology, cardiovasology, immune system, lemology, gene therapy, targeted medicine, and so on. The accumulation of knowledge in physics, mathematics, and engineering accelerates the development of CT, MR, PET, SPECT, fluorescence microscopy, and other live imaging technologies. To overcome the limitations of images provided by the live imaging technologies of single modality, multi- modality super-resolution live imaging devices have been proposed, such as microPET/CT, microPET/MR, microSPECT/ CT, which act as powerful tools for qualitative and quantitative analysis in live animal research based on their live imaging capability.

The development tendencies of multi-modality super- resolution live imaging devices are as follows:

1)   From dual-modality to multi-modality. The long-term applications of dual-modality devices, such as microPET/ CT, have demonstrated that dual-modality can provide more information than a combination of single-modality devices. However, limitations still exist for dual-modality devices. For instance, the abnormal metabolism shown in PET scanning results can result from either cancer or inflammation. A PET image alone for tracing the metabolism of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose is not sufficient to distinguish cancer from inflammation. If SPECT can be added to a PET/ CT scanner, it will be helpful for diagnosing the disease. Thus, multi-modality is a tendency in the development of image technology. Harvesting the advantages of various imaging technologies, such as CT, PET, SPECT, and optical imaging technology, and combining images based on different tracers for corresponding imaging technologies can provide enhanced information for clinical diagnosis. Furthermore, it extends the application fields of multi-modality super-resolution live imaging devices.

2)   High image quality and spatial resolution. In addition to high sensitivity and high signal-to-noise ratio, super fine spatial resolution is a crucial requirement for live imaging devices considering the size of small animals. For example, the microCT based on a photon counting detector provides added energy information, which can improve the sensitivity and the contrast of different materials in a high-quality image.

3)  High intelligence and efficiency. The combination of cutting- edge technologies in communication technology, automation, cloud service, and AI will facilitate the development of multi- modality technology in life sciences research, as well as the medicine development, cancer mechanism research, or gene/ immune/cell therapy.

As seen from the above, there are strong incentives to devise a multi-modality device including microPET/SPECT/optical/ CT with super fine spatial resolution and sensitivity. With the help of automation and AI, various imaging technologies can cooperate seamlessly to provide much more metabolism information than a combination of the four separate modalities, such that the 1+1+1+1>>4 goal can be achieved. Customized multi-modality devices based on the four separate modalities according to the clients’ requirements can not only provide more than the expected biological metabolism and structure information for scholars, but also inspire their enthusiasm for research.

(6)  Intelligent control of soft robotic systems

A key challenge for the current robotic research community is safe interaction with nature and performing tasks in an unstructured environment. Soft robots, which have the features of flexibility and large deformation ability, can interact with unstructured environments and natural organisms efficiently in a risk-free manner. Soft robotic systems target mainly human-computer interactions, medical rehabilitation, special surgical procedures, among other missions where the traditional rigid robots are less competent. Under the guidance of biological inspiration, soft robots have realized a variety of biomimetic movements such as grasping, crawling, jumping, rolling, and swimming. Novel soft actuation and sensing methods, flexible structures and materials, modeling and control, as well as system integration have been widely explored in the past decade to implement these tasks. Soft robots have infinite passive degrees of freedom and nonlinear material characteristics; therefore, realizing accurate real- time control is highly challenging. At present, the main research difficulties of soft robotic control are three-fold: ① integration of flexible actuation and high-density sensing: combination of flexible drives and circuits to meet the needs of soft robots, such as multimodal sensing, high stretchability (>100%), integrated chip (such as power amplifier, sensing, computing, and communication chip); ② kinematic and dynamic modeling of highly deformable robotic material and structure: sensor feedback control of soft robots with flexible circuit integrating multimodal sensing and exploring the dynamic modeling of flexible robot operation in unstructured environments; and ③ flexible human-computer interactions: realizing the interaction between the human body and soft robots through soft wearable and haptic devices. The future trends of soft robotic developments include the following: ① using machine learning to optimize the distribution and data processing of multimodal flexible sensors and improve the cognitive ability of flexible robots in complex environments; ② developing dynamic modeling and control of soft robots to complement the tradeoff between the accuracy and efficiency of operations; and ③ improving the physical intelligence of soft robots to reduce the cost of computation and control, and thus to realize enhanced human-soft robot interactions.

(7)  Medical image analysis based on deep learning

With the widespread application of medical imaging technology in the clinic, the slow increase in the number of radiologists cannot meet the rapidly expanding demand for medical image analysis, which greatly hinders the healthcare requirements of patients. In this context, deep learning technology has rapidly progressed into a research hotspot in medical image analysis. Different from the existing manual feature extraction technique, deep learning can automatically retrieve hidden disease diagnosis features from medical big data by constructing a multi-layer neural network. In recent years, deep learning technology has been widely applied in the analysis of medical images such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET), ultrasound images, X-rays, and pathological images. The main tasks to accomplish include medical image classification, detection, segmentation, registration, retrieval, image reconstruction and enhancement, etc. Deep learning based approaches have demonstrated high accuracy and timeliness in the quantitative and qualitative analysis of diseases.

Medical image analysis based on deep learning should be guided by clinical needs, and it has three main aspects: ① there is an urgent need to develop accurate and fast deep learning technology to improve the efficiency of clinical diagnosis and reduce the burden of misdiagnosis by clinicians; ② it is vital to overcome the bottleneck of current medical imaging technology based on deep learning, such as by making quantitative and qualitative analysis of diseases that are difficult for doctors to make judgments on; and ③ the clinical application of deep learning technology should be promoted, and it should be ensured that the deep model still maintains a stable performance in a complex data environment.

(8)  Multifunctional integrated photonic signal processor

Multifunctional integrated photonic signal processors have different computational functions, and they include a large number of optical passive and active devices on chip by employing nano-photonics and silicon photonics technologies. Compared to an electronic processor, a photonic signal processor has higher parallelism, lower energy consumption, and larger bandwidth, and comprises one of the most popular research directions in the post- Moore’s law era. Coordinated by an optical-electrical hybrid computing architecture, photonic signal processors show unique advantages in certain application scenarios.

Photonic signal processors can be classified as digital photonic signal processors and analog photonic signal processors based on the theories of computational operations they realize. A digital photonic signal processor is uncompetitive because its performance is limited by the number of integrated optical devices and the logical operation is difficult to realize in the optical domain. Nevertheless, analog photonic processes, realizing the computational functions after optical physical processing, are becoming the main research trend. The most popular approach of constructing an analog photonic signal processor is the MZI array based vector-matrix multiplication adder, which was proposed by MIT in 2017. In addition, the micro-ring-based photonic signal processor with crossbar architecture is paid increasing attention. Compared to the MZI-based photonic signal processor, the photonic signal processor with crossbar architecture has lower scale and maturity, while it features better universality with data entry. With respect to applications, the photonic signal processor is used mainly for convolutional neural network acceleration. Reservoir computing acceleration is another hot topic in the application of photonic signal processor; specifically, NTT Electronics has realized a large-scale photonic reservoir computing processor based on MZI array together with time multiplexing. Photonic signal processor construction for solving Ising problems is another research path worth pursuing.

(9)  Technology to secure trustworthy intelligent systems

Intelligent systems are facing many serious security and privacy threats. Techniques to secure intelligent systems focus mainly on revealing potential security threats against them and designing countermeasures to mitigate such threats, comprising a path towards building trustworthy intelligent systems. The main research topics on trustworthy intelligent systems include: ① attacks against these systems, which exploit the vulnerability of intelligent models or datasets; and ② defenses against such attacks based on the enhancement of intelligent model robustness or the detection of malicious data samples. The main attack strategies include adversarial machine learning, backdoor learning, private data theft, and intelligent model extraction. These tactics use the vulnerability of intelligent models in these systems to achieve different attack goals, such as maliciously misleading these systems (e.g., adversarial machine learning and backdoor learning) or compromising the valuable private data or model (e.g., private data theft and intelligent model extraction). In addition to various attack goals and scenarios, a developing trend of these attack techniques is to generate perturbations in the physical world (e.g., misleading autonomous driving systems with the perturbation of a laser pen) instead of using the vulnerability of intelligent models. On the other hand, the main defense techniques for intelligent systems include model-oriented enhancement and data-oriented defense. The data-oriented defenses principally include: ① detecting or filtering malicious perturbation to mitigate adversarial machine learning or backdoor learning; and ② detecting malicious queries or randomizing the query samples to mitigate the data or model reconstruction attacks. In addition, model-oriented enhancements can improve the robustness of various intelligent models by adversarial training; this topic has recently attracted growing interest.

(10)  Intelligent technology for integrated circuit layout design

This technology refers to the use of EDA tools based on AI technology in integrated circuit design to complete logic synthesis and physical implementation tasks. The main technical directions include logic synthesis, placement, clock tree synthesis, routing, etc. Logic synthesis refers to the process of mapping the register transfer level (RTL) code to the gate- level circuit formed by the components in a standard cell library; placement technology solves the challenge of how to determine the reasonable position of hundreds of millions of standard cells on a given chip area while considering the optimization goals such as wire length, delay, routability, power, and manufacturability; clock tree synthesis relates to the realization of clock network on the physical layout, using mainly H-tree, balance tree, and spine clock network technology; routing technology completes the physical connection of nets, determines the layer and positions of all wires and the vias, and optimizes the wire length, critical network delays, number of vias and redundant vias, electromigration, crosstalk noise, and manufacturability related to multiple pattern exposure technologies, on the premise of meeting all design rules. The future development trend of this technology is three-fold: ① for the in-depth intelligent integration of logic synthesis with placement and routing, various physical effects are taken into account during the synthesis stage to improve the PPA (performance, power, and area) of the design; ② design new algorithms more suitable for distributed high-performance computing and heterogeneous computing, to accelerate the process of comprehensive placement and routing and reduce the design cycle of the chip; and ③ study the machine learning based multi-parameter multi-objective model using the theory and technology of AI and machine learning while focusing on the key issues of multi-objective and multi- constraint optimization in physical design; apply this model to investigate the intelligent placement and routing technology based on machine learning; on this basis, further refine and establish a back-end physical parameter prediction model for front-end design, to improve the overall EDA full-flow intelligence and convergence.

《2.2 Interpretations for three key engineering development fronts》

2.2 Interpretations for three key engineering development fronts

2.2.1 Chiplet design and chip-level three-dimensional stacking microsystem integration technology

Driven by Moore’s law, the traditional chip plane processing and scaling process has become unsustainable under the burdens of technical complexity and economic cost. At present, only a few industry players still use the method of improving chip performance through feature size reduction. The further integration of multiple small dies in a single package in a 3D/quasi-3D stacking manner has become an inevitable path to promote the continuous improvement of chip integration.

The greatest advantage of chiplet-based design is that the fully validated chiplets under different process nodes can be directly integrated according to the design requirements, so as to quickly develop new products with low cost and high reliability. Thus, a large number of mature and reliable chiplets is the first and most important target. Such chiplets will inevitably promote the emergence of specialized chiplet suppliers besides traditional IP and chip suppliers. At present, due to the lack of such suppliers, chiplet-based designs are adopted mainly by US head chip design companies, such as Intel and AMD.

The new dimensions of system-level chip brought about by chiplets are added via the traditional chip design, including functional division, process selection, interconnection design, multi-physics simulation, and so on. To take full advantage of these new dimensions, novel design methodology and design automatic tools are needed. Among the three major EDA vendors, Cadence and Synopsys recently developed a new layout of auxiliary design tools, which have already entered commercial use.

The chiplet-based design must depend on the integration of more dies in a limited space, and the design of chiplets is realized on the basis of three-dimensional stacking system integration technology. As shown in Table 2.2.1, at present, considering the main output of core patents on this development front, the total number of core patents is 399 (113/28.32%). Among them, the USA and China published 113 each. This indicates that the main R&D activities are concentrated in the USA and China. However, the number and proportion of citations of US patents is much higher than that of Chinese patents, and the US industry has a higher degree of recognition. To a certain extent, this can indicate that the USA is ahead of China in technological R&D in this area.

Figure 2.2.1 shows the cooperation among major countries with the greatest output of core patents. The USA as a technologically advanced country in this field is at the center of cooperation that is the strongest between China and the USA. Although Singapore has a small number of patents, it has reached cooperation with Japan, South Korea, and the USA, indicating that a certain technology in this country has a high technical value in this field. Note that China has a single technology partner (i.e., the USA), and there is a risk of technological limitations when cooperating with only one country.

Table 2.2.2 shows the main output institutions of patents on this front. Among them, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. has published 116 patents, which is far more compared to other companies, and the average number of patent citations ranks second. On the whole, the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. is in a leading position in the industry in this field. Among the above-mentioned institutions, five are from China and three are from the USA. Also, note that although the number of patents by Invensys of the UK is small, their average number of citations is the highest, indicating that a specific patented technology of this company has a key role and is further referenced by other technologies.

Figure 2.2.2 presents the cooperation among major institutions with the greatest output of core patents. Only two companies in the USA are in cooperation, while other major institutions focus on independent R&D.

Overall, this development front presents a new direction for the development of the entire microelectronic integrated circuit industry using a new chip design style based on chiplets, which can bring more flexibility and opportunities for the development of the industry. At present, the technology is still in the initial stage of decentralized development, and various countries and regions are taking an active part in the planning process.

2.2.2 High-resolution millimeter-wave radar 4D imaging technology

This radar technology has evolved from the current popular vehicle-borne 3D radar technology, which can detect target distance, azimuth, and velocity in three dimensions. A 4D radar is a vertical array based on 3D radar to realize pitch measurement; that is, 4D radar can detect the distance, azimuth, pitch, and speed of the object relative to the radar. Therefore, it is considered cutting-edge technology in the field of unmanned driving technology. In automotive unmanned driving technology, at the L2+/L3 levels or above, the number of radar sensors is further increased compared to that of L1, and the requirements for sensor performance

《Table 2.2.1》

Table 2.2.1 Countries with the greatest output of core patents on “chiplet design and chip-level three-dimensional stacking microsystem integration technology”

No. Country Published patents Percentage of published patents Citations Percentage of citations Citations per patent
1 USA 113 28.32% 448 34.67% 3.96
2 China 113 28.32% 109 8.44% 0.96
3 South Korea 16 4.01% 21 1.63% 1.31
4 Japan 4 1.00% 6 0.46% 1.5
5 Sweden 2 0.50% 8 0.62% 4
6 Singapore 2 0.50% 2 0.15% 1
7 Switzerland 2 0.50% 1 0.08% 0.5
8 Germany 1 0.25% 0 0.00% 0
9 France 1 0.25% 0 0.00% 0
10 India 1 0.25% 0 0.00% 0

《Table 2.2.2》

Table 2.2.2 Institutions with the greatest output of core patents on “chiplet design and chip-level three-dimensional stacking microsystem integration technology”

No. Institution Country Published patents Percentage of published patents Citations Percentage of citations Citations per patent
1 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. China 116 29.07% 619 47.91% 5.34
2 International Business Machines Corporation USA 23 5.76% 77 5.96% 3.35
3 Intel Corporation USA 21 5.26% 71 5.50% 3.38
4 China Electronics Technology Group Corporation China 13 3.26% 8 0.62% 0.62
5 Invensys PLC UK 8 2.01% 58 4.49% 7.25
6 Global Foundries USA 8 2.01% 7 0.54% 0.88
7 Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. China 7 1.75% 22 1.70% 3.14
8 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. South Korea 7 1.75% 18 1.39% 2.57
9 Semiconductor Manufacturing International (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. China 7 1.75% 6 0.46% 0.86
10 Jiangsu Normal University China 7 1.75% 1 0.08% 0.14

《Figure 2.2.1》

Figure 2.2.1 Collaboration network among major countries in the engineering development front of “chiplet design and chip-level three-dimensional stacking microsystem integration technology”

《Figure 2.2.2》

Figure 2.2.2 Collaboration network among major institutions in the engineering development front of “chiplet design and chip-level three-dimensional stacking microsystem integration technology”

are greatly improved. At the L3+ level, 4D imaging technology is necessary. High-resolution millimeter-wave radar 4D imaging technology will likely first appear in luxury cars and auto-driving taxis. Due to the wide angle of view, 4D high-resolution millimeter-wave radar can detect roadside obstacles (generally, traditional radar is limited to the driving area) and small targets, such as mineral water bottles and tire fragments. Furthermore, as some of the pedestrians or riders are obscured, it is possible to determine whether or not and in which direction they are moving. In addition, based on multisensor fusion, cameras and lidar can be “guided” to potential risk areas, which greatly improves security performance. The 4D radar can emit dense signals in all directions, and can work inside the car to classify children and adults, monitor vital signs, and detect passenger positions. It can also be used to optimize airbag deployment and seat belt tensioners, provide seat belt warnings, and detect intruders in or around the car. Generally speaking, high- resolution millimeter-wave radar 4D imaging technology is the cornerstone technology for future automobile unmanned driving. For UAVs, they require imaging by observation of obstacles in the three-dimensional space. Traditional two-dimensional radar can detect only the front and rear directions; in contrast, high-resolution millimeter-wave radar 4D imaging technology can greatly improve the UAV’s spatial situational awareness ability.

The weather and light resistance of the high-resolution millimeter-wave radar is excellent. In contrast, the lidar is expensive, and the scanning speed is slow; thus, it cannot be used normally in foggy weather and sandstorm, and the camera is sensitive to light. Therefore, a further important capacity in the 4D imaging technology of the high-resolution millimeter-wave radar is to combine the 4D information with the 3D and 2D information. As a fusion platform for multiple sensors, data from different sensors such as cameras and lasers can be fused to obtain richer and more accurate information. The higher the resolution of 4D millimeter-wave radar and the higher the density of point cloud, the better the fusion effect.

The countries and institutions with the greatest output of core patents on this development front are shown in Tables 2.2.3 and 2.2.4, respectively, and the collaboration networks among the major countries and institutions are shown in Figures 2.2.3 and 2.2.4, respectively. From Table 2.2.3, we can see that China has published the most core patents, even more than the total of core patents published by the nine other countries, and that China is second only to the USA in terms of the number of citations. From Table 2.2.4, it can be established that six institutions come from China with the total number of core patents reaching 80. From Figures 2.2.3 and 2.2.4, we can see that the USA has strong cooperation with Israel. In terms of cooperating institutions, there is no partnership between

《Table 2.2.3》

Table 2.2.3 Countries with the greatest output of core patents on “high-resolution millimeter-wave radar 4D imaging technology”

No. Country Published patents Percentage of published patents Citations Percentage of citations Citations per patent
1 China 306 65.25% 1141 31.09% 3.73
2 USA 84 17.91% 1649 44.93% 19.63
3 Japan 30 6.40% 193 5.26% 6.43
4 Germany 23 4.90% 142 3.87% 6.17
5 South Korea 15 3.20% 35 0.95% 2.33
6 Israel 3 0.64% 497 13.54% 165.67
7 UK 3 0.64% 12 0.33% 4
8 Luxembourg 3 0.64% 12 0.33% 4
9 Denmark 1 0.21% 3 0.08% 3
10 Italy 1 0.21% 3 0.08% 3

《Table 2.2.4》

Table 2.2.4 Institutions with the greatest output of core patents on “high-resolution millimeter-wave radar 4D imaging technology”

No. Institution Country Published patents Percentage of published patents Citations Percentage of citations Citations per patent
1 Xidian University China 25 5.33% 114 3.11% 4.56
2 Google, Inc. USA 20 4.26% 518 14.11% 25.9
3 China Aerospace Academy of Systems Science and Engineering China 15 3.20% 37 1.01% 2.47
4 Nidec Corporation Jan 14 2.99% 119 3.24% 8.5
5 University of Electronic Science and Technology of China China 14 2.99% 37 1.01% 2.64
6 WGRCo.,Ltd. Japan 13 2.77% 105 2.86% 8.08
7 China Electronics Technology Group Corporation China 11 2.35% 30 0.82% 2.73
8 Infineon Technologies Germany 10 2.13% 27 0.74% 2.7
9 Zhejiang University China 8 1.71% 45 1.23% 5.63
10 Bei ha ng University China 7 1.49% 38 1.04% 5.43

the major organizations, except for Nidec Corporation and WGR Co., Ltd.

2.2.3 Ultrafast laser cross-scale micro-nano manufacturing technology

A principal feature of ultrafast pulsed laser is very short pulse duration, which is less than 10–11 s. Ultrafast laser has the characteristics of ultrahigh power density, low ablation threshold, ultrafine processing, and cold processing capability, and thus it has received substantial attention from both academia and industry. Ultrafast laser micro-nano manufacturing is one of the most popular advanced manufacturing technologies, which involves the interdisciplinary integration of machinery, optics, chemistry, materials, etc., and is widely used in aviation, new energy, communications, sensing, bionics, integrated circuit, and other fields.

The generation of picosecond pulsed lasers can be traced back to the 1960s. Some researchers later discovered that the ablation zone produced by femtosecond laser has almost no heat-affected zone, and the multiphoton absorption caused by ultrafast laser could be used for non-destructive cleaning of transparent materials. In the early 1990s, chirped pulse amplification technology came to existence and developed rapidly, which further increased the peak power of laser without destroying the optical components, greatly reducing the threshold for ultrafast lasers. Subsequently, new technologies were developed, such as ultrafast laser surface microstructure preparation and 3D printing in

《Figure 2.2.3》

Figure 2.2.3 Collaboration network among major countries in the engineering development front of “high-resolution millimeter-wave radar

《Figure 2.2.4》

Figure 2.2.4  Collaboration network among major institutions in the engineering development front of “high-resolution millimeter-wave radar 4D imaging technology”

transparent materials. With the gradual advancement of chirped pulse amplification technology, ultrafast laser cross- scale micro-nano manufacturing technology can provide a new manufacturing method for engineering, material science, life sciences, and other frontier interdisciplinary disciplines. At present, ultrafast laser processing has been widely used in the hard/brittle material processing applications, such as screen cutting, sapphire cover cutting for mobile phones, special material marking, invisible QR code marking, high- performance flexible printed circuit cutting, organic light- emitting diode (OLED) material cutting, and solar passivated emitter and rear cell (PERC) battery material processing.

Ultrafast laser micro-nano manufacturing technology can be used to fabricate structures scaled from several nanometers to hundreds of micrometers, making it a groundbreaking manufacturing technology. The rapid development of ultrafast laser technology has allowed for the generation of ultrafast laser with pulse widths on the scale of several femtoseconds to sub-picoseconds, high repetition rates of hundreds of kilohertz to megahertz, and high average power of tens of watts to even hundreds of watts, making it possible to address the inherent compromise among quality, accuracy, and efficiency. Traditional manufacturing technologies are limited to observation and manipulation at the atomic, molecular, or higher levels; however, the emergence of ultrafast laser chemistry enables observation and manipulation at the electronic level. This could bring significant breakthroughs in the existing manufacturing principles and methods. The interaction between ultrafast laser and material is a complex non-linear, non-equilibrium, and multi-scale process. One of the current development trends of ultrafast laser micro-nano manufacturing technology is studying the influence of light field manipulation on the electronic dynamics and properties of materials, and establishing a complete fundamental theory.

The countries and institutions with the greatest output of core patents on this development front are shown in Tables 2.2.5 and 2.2.6, respectively, and the collaboration networks among the major countries and institutions are shown in Figures 2.2.5 and 2.2.6, respectively. In terms of the output of core patents, China accounts for more than half of the total number of patents, while the USA occupies a leading position in the number of citations, with about 20% of patents that received close to 50% of the citations (Table 2.2.5). In terms of the main output institutions of core patents, Cochrane Inc. and Corning Incorporated take the lead, while China has six institutions in the Top 10, five of which are universities; the top three companies regarding the number of citations and the average number of citations are based in the USA (Table 2.2.6). In terms of collaboration among major countries, the leading countries are the USA, China, and Canada (Figure 2.2.5). Collaboration among the major institutions is not close enough and exists only between several institutions in China (Tsinghua University and Beijing Institute of Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong University, and Inno Laser Technology Co., Ltd.).

《Table 2.2.5》

Table 2.2.5 Countries with the greatest output of core patents on “ultrafast laser cross-scale micro-nano manufacturing technology”

No. Country Published patents Percentage of published patents Citations Percentage of citations Citations per patent
1 China 253 57.63% 864 29.01% 3.42
2 USA 88 20.05% 1461 49.06% 16.6
3 Germany 36 8.20% 246 8.26% 6.83
4 Japan 23 5.24% 200 6.72% 8.7
5 South Korea 13 2.96% 44 1.48% 3.38
6 UK 5 1.14% 60 2.01% 12
7 Switzerland 3 0.68% 14 0.47% 4.67
8 Sweden 1 0.23% 33 1.11% 33
9 France 1 0.23% 13 0.44% 13
10 Canada 1 0.23% 8 0.27% 8

《Table 2.2.6》

Table 2.2.6 Institutions with the greatest output of core patents on “ultrafast laser cross-scale micro-nano manufacturing technology”

No. Institution Country Published patents Percentage of published patents Citations Percentage of citations Citations per patent
1 Coherent Inc. USA 17 3.87% 491 16.49% 28.88
2 Corning Incorporated USA 17 3.87% 297 9.97% 17.47
3 TRUMPF Co., Ltd. Germany 10 2.28% 55 1.85% 5.5
4 Guangdong University of Technology China 10 2.28% 26 0.87% 2.6
5 Inno Laser Technology Co., Ltd. China 10 2.28% 23 0.77% 2.3
6 Beijing Institute of Technology China 9 2.05% 68 2.28% 7.56
7 Huazhong University of Science and Technology China 9 2.05% 29 0.97% 3.22
8 General Electric Company USA 8 1.82% 185 6.21% 23.13
9 Tsinghua University China 8 1.82% 31 1.04% 3.88
10 Xi'an Jiaotong University China 8 1.82% 21 0.71% 2.63

《Figure 2.2.5》

Figure 2.2.5 Collaboration network among major countries in the engineering development front of “ultrafast laser cross-scale micro-nano manufacturing technology”

《Figure 2.2.6》

Figure 2.2.6 Collaboration network among major institutions in the engineering development front of “ultrafast laser cross-scale micro-na- no manufacturing technology”


 

 

 

Participants of the Field Group

Team of Experts for Reviewing the Fronts

Leaders: PAN Yunhe, LU Xicheng

Members (in alphabetical order of the last names):

Group 1: JIANG Huilin, LI Tianchu, LIU Zejin, LUO Xiangang, LYU Yueguang, TAN Jiubin, ZHANG Guangjun

Group 2: CHEN Zhijie, DING Wenhua, DUAN Baoyan, SU Donglin, WU Hanming, WU Manqing, YAO Fuqiang,

YU Shaohua, ZHANG Ping

Group 3: CHAI Tianyou, CHEN Jie, FEI Aiguo, LU Xicheng, PAN Yunhe, SUN Ninghui, WANG Yaonan, WEI Yiyin,

ZHAO Qinping, ZHENG Weimin

 

Team of Experts for Selecting the Fronts (in alphabetical order of the last names, subject convenors are marked *)

Group 1: CHEN Lin, HAO Xiang, HE Wei, JIANG Tian, LI Xiong, LIU Jianguo, LU Zhengang*, MA Yaoguang,

SHAN Guangcun, SONG Yinglin, WANG Dan, WU Guanhao, XIAO Dingbang, YANG Jun, YANG Zongyin,

ZHANG Fumin, ZHANG Han*, ZHANG Wenxi

Group 2: CAI Yimao, CHEN Xiaoming, FAN Hongqi, FENG Zhihong, LIU An, LIU Leibo*, LIU Wei*, MA Jun, SHI Longfei,

TIAN Xiaohua, WANG Haiming, WANG Jun, WEI Jinghe, WU Qi, YI Wei, ZHANG Chuan, ZHANG Jianhua*,

ZHANG Rui, ZHAO Bo

Group 3: BAO Yungang*, CHEN Mou*, CUI Wei, GUAN Naiyang, JI Shouling, KANG Shiyin, LI Huaqing, LI Zhiping,

PENG Shaoliang, SHI Xuanhua, SONG Chuang, WANG Hongfa, XIE Haibin, XIN Bin, XIONG Feiyu, YANG Bo,

ZHANG Guangyan, ZHANG Hui, ZHANG Quanshi, ZHANG Yue

 

Library and Information Specialists

Literature: CHEN Zhenying, LI Hong, ZHAO Huifang, XIONG Jinsu

Patent: YANG Weiqiang, LIANG Jianghai, LIU Shulei, WU Ji, XU Haiyang, SONG Rui, HUO Ningkun, GENG Guotong

Report Writers (in alphabetical order of the last names)

For the engineering research fronts: CUI Tiejun, CUI Wei, LI Ming, LIU Jianguo, SONG Chuang, SONG Yinglin,

TIAN Xin, XIN Bin, ZENG Yonghong, ZHANG Tao, ZHANG Youhui

For the engineering development fronts: CHEN Mou, DONG Xiaowen, LI Bin, LI Xiaowei, LI Yachao, LIU Huafeng,

LIU Weiping, WANG Xi, WEI Jinghe, WEN Li, XING Yao, ZHANG Chao

 

Working Group

Liaisons: HUANG Haitao, GAO Xiang, ZHANG Jia, ZHANG Chunjie, DENG Huanghuang, WANG Bing

Secretaries: ZHAI Ziyang, CHEN Qunfang, YANG Weiqiang, CHEN Zhenying, HUO Ningkun, HU Xiaonv