Hysteretic Uncertainty and Anomaly Quantification of Reinforced Concrete Beams Strengthened with Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer and Ultra-High-Performance Concrete in Thermocyclic Distress

Engineering ›› DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2024.11.018

Ju-Hyung Kim ^a
, Yail J. Kim ^b

Author information +

History +

Received	Accepted	Published
2024-01-30	2024-11-14
Issue Date	Revised Date
2024-12-23

PDF (3389KB)

Abstract

Seismic strengthening with carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) sheets is a proven technique for improving the capacity and ductility of concrete members and has been used worldwide. In this study, the effects of multi-hazard loading on the behavior of reinforced concrete beams strengthened with CFRP and ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) jackets are investigated. This work is an unprecedented initiative in the rehabilitation sector. Based on a previously conducted experimental study, where load reversals are performed at elevated temperatures varying from 25 to 175 ℃, analytical responses are investigated focusing on the performance degradation, uncertainty quantification, hysteresis, and pinching mechanisms of the retrofitted beams. The uncertainty index, which measures the extent of the anomaly caused by the multi-hazard loading, clarified that the pinching of hysteresis loops during loading processes is the predominant factor causing a loss of energy dissipation capacity in the thermocyclic distress. The development of uncertainty correlated with the degree of drift ratios, demonstrated by the increased uncertainty index of 0.37 at 175 ℃, and the beam pinching is controlled by the retrofit schemes. The adjusted stiffness of the loops represents the accumulated damage and deformation resistance; meanwhile, the evolution of irreversible pinching alters hysteretic configurations in the subsequent unloading phases. The Eigen hysteretic properties of the beams are extracted to understand the contribution of individual modes to the progression of uncertainties. The first mode dominates the fourth mode by a factor of up to 127.9. Design recommendations are suggested to estimate thermocyclic damage in the strengthened beams with performance degradation factors ranging from 1.00 to 0.45, contingent upon temperature.

Keywords

Anomaly detection / Carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) / Design recommendations / Hysteresis / Multi-hazard / Performance degradation / Pinching / Strengthening / Thermocyclic loading / Ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) / Uncertainty

Cite this article

Download citation ▾

Ju-Hyung Kim, Yail J. Kim. Hysteretic Uncertainty and Anomaly Quantification of Reinforced Concrete Beams Strengthened with Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer and Ultra-High-Performance Concrete in Thermocyclic Distress. Engineering DOI:10.1016/j.eng.2024.11.018

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户忘记密码

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Ju-Hyung Kim: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing - original draft. Yail J. Kim: .

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the United States Department of Transportation through the Mountain-Plains Consortium and a grant from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (RS-2023-00218832), for which the authors are grateful. The technical content presented here is based on the opinion of the writers and does not necessarily reflect the opinions of others.

Compliance with ethics guidelines

Ju-Hyung Kim, and Yail J. Kim declare that they have no conflict of interest or financial conflicts to disclose.

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within

[1]	B. Ge, Y. Yang, S. Kim. Time-dependent multi-hazard seismic vulnerability and risk assessment of deteriorating reinforced concrete bridges considering climate change. Structures, 55 ( 2023), pp. 995- 1010

[2]	M. Bruneau, M. Barbato, J.E. Padgett, A.E. Zaghi, J. Mitrani-Reiser, Y. Li. State of the art of multihazard design. J Struct Eng, 143 ( 10) ( 2017), Article 03117002

[3]	A.E. Zaghi, J.E. Padgett, M. Bruneau, M. Barbato, Y. Li, J. Mitrani-Reiser, et al. . Establishing common nomenclature, characterizing the problem, and identifying future opportunities in multihazard design. J Struct Eng, 142 ( 12) ( 2016), Article H2516001

[4]	Q. Tong, T. Gernay. A hierarchical Bayesian model for predicting fire ignitions after an earthquake with application to California. Nat Hazards, 111 ( 2) ( 2022), pp. 1637- 1660

[5]	M.J. Davenport. The great San Francisco earthquake and fire of 1906: the longest minute. St. Martin’s Publishing Group, New York City ( 2023)

[6]	F.E.M. Agency. Short-period building collapse performance and recommendations for improving seismic design (FEMA P-2139-4). Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington ( 2020)

[7]	W.Q. Jia, C. Wang, L.Z. Li, R.F. Zhang, Z.D. Lu. Residual seismic performance of fire-damaged reinforced concrete frame structure with metallic yielding dampers. J Struct Eng, 148 ( 4) (2022), Article 04022003

[8]	T. Lou, W. Wang. Post-fire seismic behaviour of a self-centering connection with buckling-restrained plates and pre-stressed bars. Eng Struct, 269 ( 2022), Article 114814

[9]	R. Gomasa, V. Talakakula, S.K.R. Jyosyula, T. Bansal. A review on health monitoring of concrete structures using embedded piezoelectric sensor. Constr Build Mater, 405 ( 2023), Article 133179

[10]	G.M. Verderame, P. Ricci, M.T. De Risi, C. Del Gaudio. Experimental assessment and numerical modelling of conforming and non-conforming rc frames with and without infills. J Earthquake Eng, 26 ( 2) ( 2022), pp. 573- 614

[11]	A. Habib, U. Yildirim, O. Eren. Column repair and strengthening using RC jacketing: a brief state-of-the-art review. Innov Infrast Solu, 5 ( 3) ( 2020), p. 75

[12]	C.C. Hung, H.J. Hsiao, Y. Shao, C.H. Yen. A comparative study on the seismic performance of RC beam-column joints retrofitted by ECC, FRP, and concrete jacketing methods. J Build Mater, 64 ( 2023), Article 105691

[13]	A. Zaiter, T.L. Lau. Experimental study of jacket height and reinforcement effects on seismic retrofitting of concrete columns. Structures, 31 ( 2021), pp. 1084- 1095

[14]	C. Li, H. Aoude. Effect of UHPC jacketing on the shear and flexural behaviour of high-strength concrete beams. Structures, 51 ( 2023), pp. 1972- 1996

[15]	A. Hasnat, N. Ghafoori. Properties of ultra-high performance concrete using optimization of traditional aggregates and pozzolans. Constr Build Mater, 299 ( 2021), Article 123907

[16]	H. Bahmani, D. Mostofinejad. Microstructure of ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC)—a review study. J Build Eng, 50 ( 2022), Article 104118

[17]	M. Amran, G. Murali, N. Makul, W.C. Tang, A.A. Eid. Sustainable development of eco-friendly ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC): cost, carbon emission, and structural ductility. Constr Build Mater, 398 ( 2023), Article 132477

[18]	Y.M. Saeed, W.A. Aules, F.N. Rad. Post-strengthening rapid repair of damaged RC columns using CFRP sheets for confinement and NSM-CFRP ropes for flexural strengthening. Structures, 43 ( 2022), pp. 1315- 1333

[19]	Aci. 440.2R-17: Guide for the design and construction of externally bonded FRP systems for strengthening concrete structures. ACI standard. Farmington Hill: American Concrete Institute ( 2017)

[20]	A. Zhou, Q. Qiu, C.L. Chow, D. Lau. Interfacial performance of aramid, basalt and carbon fiber reinforced polymer bonded concrete exposed to high temperature. Composites Part A, 131 ( 2020), Article 105802

[21]	H. Elci. Seismic strengthening of improperly repaired reinforced concrete columns using CFRP confinement. Structures, 28 ( 2020), pp. 266- 275

[22]	Y. Zhu, Y. Zhang, H.H. Hussein, G. Chen. Numerical modeling for damaged reinforced concrete slab strengthened by ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) layer. Eng Struct, 209 ( 2020), Article 110031

[23]	Y. Huang, M.G. Lee, Y.C. Kan, W.C. Wang, Y.C. Wang, W.B. Pan. Reinforced concrete beams retrofitted with UHPC or CFRP. Case Stud Constr Mater, 17 ( 2022), Article e01507

[24]	C. Chen, H. Cai, L. Cheng. Shear strengthening of corroded RC beams using UHPC-FRP composites. J Bridge Eng, 26 ( 1) ( 2021), Article 04020111

[25]	M.A. Al-Osta, K.M. Kharma, S. Ahmad, M. Maslehuddin, M. Al-Huri, H. Khalid. Strategies for strengthening of corroded reinforced concrete beams using CFRP laminates and UHPC jacketing. Struct Concr, 24 ( 1) ( 2023), pp. 1546- 1571

[26]	P.B. Julià, T.M. Ferreira. From single-to multi-hazard vulnerability and risk in Historic Urban Areas: a literature review. Nat Hazards, 108 ( 1) ( 2021), pp. 93- 128

[27]	T. Roy, V. Matsagar. Multi-hazard analysis and design of structures: status and research trends. Struct Infrastruct Eng, 19 ( 6) ( 2023), pp. 845- 874

[28]	H. Hao, K. Bi, W. Chen, T.M. Pham, J. Li. Towards next generation design of sustainable, durable, multi-hazard resistant, resilient, and smart civil engineering structures. Eng Struct, 277 ( 2023), Article 115477

[29]	ASCE/SEI 7- 16: Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. ASCE standard. Reston: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2016.

[30]	A. Alisawi, P.E.F. Collins, K.A. Cashell. Nonlinear analysis of a steel frame structure exposed to post-earthquake fire. Fire, 4 ( 4) ( 2021), p. 73

[31]	Kim YJ, Bumadian, I. Thermomechanical hysteresis of RC beams retrofitted with CFRP and UHPC. ACI Struct J. In press.

[32]	B.K. Williams. Fire performance of FRP-strengthened reinforced concrete flexural members [dissertation]. Queen’s University, Kingston ( 2004)

[33]	F.E.M. Agency. Interim testing protocols for determining the seismic performance characteristics of structural and nonstructural components. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington ( 2007)

[34]	P. Sengupta, B. Li. Hysteresis modeling of reinforced concrete structures: state of the art. ACI Struct J, 114 ( 1) ( 2017), pp. 25- 38

[35]	Aci. 374.2R-13: Guide for testing reinforced concrete structural elements under slowly applied simulated seismic loads. ACI standard. Farmington Hill: American Concrete Institute ( 2013)

[36]	J. Bisgard. Linear algebra: the singular value decomposition and applications. American Mathematical Society, Providence ( 2020)

[37]	S.L. Brunton, J.N. Kutz. Data-driven science and engineering: machine learning, dynamical systems, and control. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge ( 2022)

[38]	J. Yu, K. Yu, X. Shang, Z. Lu. New extended finite element method for pinching effect in reinforced concrete columns. ACI Struct J, 113 ( 4) ( 2016), pp. 689- 699

[39]	M. Al-Madani, M.A. Al-Osta, S. Ahmad, H.R. Khalid, M. Al-Huri. Interfacial bond behavior between ultra high performance concrete and normal concrete substrates. Constr Build Mater, 320 ( 2022), Article 126229