Next Frontiers of Aviation Safety: System-of-Systems Safety

Daqing Li , Anzhuo Yao , Kaifeng Feng , Hang Zhou , Ruixin Wang , Ming Cheng , Hang Li , Dongfang Wang , Shuiting Ding

Engineering ›› 2025, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (9) : 262 -277.

PDF (2381KB)
Engineering ›› 2025, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (9) :262 -277. DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2025.01.002
Research
Review
Next Frontiers of Aviation Safety: System-of-Systems Safety
Author information +
History +
PDF (2381KB)

Abstract

With the anticipated growth in air traffic complexity in the coming years, future civil aviation transportation system (CATS) is transforming into a complex cyber-physical-social system, surpassing all previous experiences in the history of civil aviation safety management. Therefore, a new safety concept based on a system-of-systems (SoS) perspective is proposed for the next-generation aviation. This article begins by elucidating the complexity of existing aviation risks and emphasizing the necessity for an updated safety concept. It then presents the challenges of current safety management and potential solutions from the new SoS perspective. To address future risks, the concept of SoS safety is introduced with the inspiration of the human immune system in terms of capability, logic, and architecture, which can serve as a guiding framework and methodology for safety engineering in complex large-scale CATS. This concept indicates the transition from “process and outcome-oriented" to “capability-oriented" intelligent safety management. Our research highlights the development directions and potential technological areas that need to be addressed at different stages of SoS safety. The integration of SoS design and operation through rapid iterations enabled by artificial intelligence (AI) will ultimately achieve endogenous SoS safety.

Keywords

Aviation safety management / System-of-systems / Complex system / Immune system

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Daqing Li, Anzhuo Yao, Kaifeng Feng, Hang Zhou, Ruixin Wang, Ming Cheng, Hang Li, Dongfang Wang, Shuiting Ding. Next Frontiers of Aviation Safety: System-of-Systems Safety. Engineering, 2025, 52 (9) : 262-277 DOI:10.1016/j.eng.2025.01.002

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Airbus SAS. Fatal accidents the number of accidents today is significantly lower than a comparable year in the previous decade [Internet]. Blagnac Cedex: Airbus SAS; [cited 2024 Nov 14]. Available from: https://accidentstats.airbus.com/fatal-accidents/

[2]

International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). Future of aviation [Internet]. Montréal: ICAO; [cited 2024 Nov 14]. Available from: https://www.icao.int/Meetings/FutureOfAviation/Pages/default.aspx

[3]

Sampigethaya K, Poovendran R. Aviation cyber-physical systems: foundations for future aircraft and air transport. Proc IEEE 2013; 101 (8):1834-55.

[4]

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. In-time aviation safety management:challenges and research for an evolving aviation systemin-time aviation safety management. Report. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2018.

[5]

International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). New digital era of aviation the path forward for airspace and traffic management [Internet]. Montréal: ICAO; [cited 2024 Nov 14]. Available from: https://www.icao.int/Meetings/innovation-series/Pages/New-Digital-Era-of-Aviation-The-Path-Forward-forAirspace-and-Traffic-Management.aspx

[6]

Goyal R, Reiche C, Fernando C, Serrao J, Kimmel S, Cohen A, et al. Urban air mobility market study. Report. Washington, DC: The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA); 2018.

[7]

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Air traffic by the numbers [Internet]. Washington, DC: FAA; 2024 Sep 9 [cited 2024 Nov 14]. Available from: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/by_the_numbers

[8]

Shiva Prakasha P, Naeem N, Ratei P, Nagel B. Aircraft architecture and fleet assessment framework for urban air mobility using a system of systems approach. Aerosp Sci Technol 2022; 125:107072.

[9]

Airbus. Commercial aviation accidents 1958-2014: a statistical analysis. Report. Blagnac Cedex: Airbus; 2015.

[10]

Wang K, Qu X. Urban aerial mobility: reshaping the future of urban transportation. Innovation 2023; 4(2):100392.

[11]

Yan Y, Wang K, Qu X. Urban air mobility (UAM) and ground transportation integration: a survey. Front Eng Manag 2024; 11(4):734-58.

[12]

Hill BP, De Carme D, Metcalfe M, Griffin C, Wiggins S, Metts C, et al. UAM vision concept of operations (ConOps) UAM maturity level (UML) 4 version 1.0. Report. Washington, DC: The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA); 2020. Report No.: 20205011091.

[13]

Kabashkin I, Misnevs B, Zervina O. Artificial intelligence in aviation: new professionals for new technologies. Appl Sci 2023; 13(21):11660.

[14]

Yang C, Huang C. Natural language processing (NLP) in aviation safety: systematic review of research and outlook into the future. Aerospace 2023; 10 (7):600.

[15]

Park PS, Goldstein S, O’Gara A, Chen M, Hendrycks D. AI deception: a survey of examples, risks, and potential solutions. Patterns 2024; 5(5):100988.

[16]

Giudici P, Centurelli M, Turchetta S. Artificial intelligence risk measurement. Expert Syst Appl 2024; 235:121220.

[17]

The Malaysian ICAO Annex 13 Safety Investigation Team for MH370. Safety investigation report: Malaysia Airlines Boeing B777-200ER (9M-MRO) 08 March 2014. Report. London: SKYbrary; 2018.

[18]

Bauranov A, Rakas J. Designing airspace for urban air mobility: a review of concepts and approaches. Prog Aerosp Sci 2021; 125:100726.

[19]

International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). Safety management manual. Report. Montréal: ICAO; 2018. Report No.: Doc 9859.

[20]

Covert EE. Evolution of the commercial airliner. Sci Am 1995; 273(3):110-3.

[21]

Chatterjee B, Bhowmik S. Evolution of material selection in commercial aviation industry—a review. In: Kumar K, Zindani D, Davim P, editors. Sustainable engineering products and manufacturing technologies. London: Academic Press; 2019. p. 199-219.

[22]

Wikipedia. Boeing_737 [Internet]. San Francisco, CA: Wikipedia; 2025 Jan 14[cited 2024 Nov 14]. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_737

[23]

Wikipedia. Boeing_757 [Internet]. San Francisco, CA: Wikipedia; 2025 Jan 14[cited 2024 Nov 14]. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_ 757

[24]

Wikipedia. Boeing_787_dreamliner [Internet]. San Francisco, CA: Wikipedia; 2025 Jan 11 [cited 2024 Nov 14]. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_787_Dreamliner

[25]

Wikipedia. De havilland comet [Internet]. San Francisco, CA: Wikipedia; 2025 Jan 8 [cited 2024 Nov 14]. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_ Havilland_Comet

[26]

Hassan P, Mohd Rafie AS, Romili FL. Modern design trend of metal aircraft fuselage. In:Proceedings of the International Science Postgraduate Conference 2012 (ISPC 2012); 2012 Nov 27-30; Johor, Malaysia. Johor: University Technology Malaysia; 2012. p. 808-17.

[27]

Aviation Safety Network. Dh-106 comet statistics [Internet]. Alexandria: Aviation Safety Network; [cited 2024 Nov 14]. Available from: https://asn.flightsafety.org/database/types/de-Havilland-DH-106-Comet/statistics

[28]

Moriarty D. Practical human factors for pilots. London: Academic Press; 2015.

[29]

Vogt J, Leonhardt J, Koper B, Pennig S. Human factors in safety and business management. Ergonomics 2010; 53(2):149-63.

[30]

Kanki BG, Helmreich RL, Anca JM, editors. Crew resource management. London: Academic Press; 2010.

[31]

Bendak S, Rashid HSJ. Fatigue in aviation: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Ind Ergon 2020; 76:102928.

[32]

Hobbs A, Avers KB, Hiles JJ. Fatigue risk management in aviation maintenance:current best practices and potential future countermeasures. Report. Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration; 2011. Report No.: DOT/FAA/AM-11/10.

[33]

Federal Aviation Administration. Embraer EMB-120RT [Internet]. Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration; 2022 Dec 19 [cited 2024 Nov 14]. Available from: https://www.faa.gov/lessons_learned/transport_airplane/accidents/N33701

[34]

Flouris TG, Yilmaz AK. Risk management and corporate sustainability in aviation. New York City: Routledge; 2016.

[35]

Roughton JE, Crutchfield N, Waite M. Safety culture: an innovative leadership approach. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2019.

[36]

Alan J, Stolzer JJG. Safety management systems in aviation. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2016.

[37]

Air Accident Investigation Unit. Final report: on the accident on 1st June 2009 to the Airbus A330-203 registered F-GZCP operated by Air France flight AF 447 Rio de Janeiro-Paris. Final Report. Paris: Bureau d’Enquêtes et d’Analyses (BEA); 2014 Oct.

[38]

Batuwangala E, Silva J, Wild G, Batuwangala E, Silva J, Wild G. The regulatory framework for safety management systems in airworthiness organisations. Aerospace 2018; 5(4):117.

[39]

Federal Aviation Administration. Nextgen implementation plan. Report. Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration; 2016.

[40]

Dinc E, Vondra M, Hofmann S, Schupke D, Prytz M, Bovelli S, et al. In-flight broadband connectivity: architectures and business models for high capacity air-to-ground communications. IEEE Comm Mag 2017; 55(9):142-9.

[41]

International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). 2016-2030 global air navigation plan. Report. Montréal: ICAO; 2016. Report No.: Doc 9750-AN/963.

[42]

Ball MO, Hoffman RL, Knorr D, Wetherly J, Wambsganss M. Assessing the benefits of collaborative decision making in air traffic management. In:Proceedings of the 3rd USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar; 2000 Jun 13-16; Napoli, Italy. Savannah: ATM Seminar; 2000. p. 239-52.

[43]

Miller ME, Hall WD. Collaborative trajectory option program demonstration. In:Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE/AIAA 34th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC); 2015 Sep 13-17; Prague, Czech Republic. New York City: IEEE; 2015.

[44]

Xu Y, Prats X, Delahaye D. Synchronised demand-capacity balancing in collaborative air traffic flow management. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 2020; 114:359-76.

[45]

Harris D, Stanton NA. Aviation as a system of systems: preface to the special issue of human factors in aviation. Ergonomics 2010; 53(2):145-8.

[46]

Rungta N, Brat G, Clancey WJ, Linde C, Raimondi F, Seah C, et al. Aviation safety:modeling and analyzing complex interactions between humans and automated systems. In:Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Application and Theory of Automation in Command and Control Systems; 2013 May 28-30; Naples, Italy. New York City: Machinery; 2013. p. 27-37.

[47]

Muecklich N, Sikora I, Paraskevas A, Padhra A. Safety and reliability in aviation— a systematic scoping review of normal accident theory, high-reliability theory, and resilience engineering in aviation. Saf Sci 2023; 162:106097.

[48]

O’Hare D. The ‘wheel of misfortune’: a taxonomic approach to human factors in accident investigation and analysis in aviation and other complex systems. Ergonomics 2000; 43(12):2001-19.

[49]

Heinrich HW. Industrial accident prevention. A scientific approach. New York City: McGraw-Hill; 1943.

[50]

Air Accident Investigation Sector. Air accident investigation report:uncontained cargo fire leading to loss of control inflight and uncontrolled descent into terrain. Final Report. Abu Dhabi: General Civil Aviation Authority of the United Arab Emirates; 2010.

[51]

Federal Aviation Administration. Boeing 747-44AF [Internet]. Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration; 2022 Dec 19 [cited 2024 Nov 14]. Available from: https://www.faa.gov/lessons_learned/transport_airplane/accidents/N571UP

[52]

John B, Sauser B. System of systems—the meaning of In: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/SMC International Conference on System of Systems Engineering; 2006 Apr 24-26; Los Angeles, CA, USA. New York City: IEEE; 2006. p. 118-23.

[53]

Kumar SV. A study on the crash of Boeing 737 max. Int J Sci Res 2020; 9 (8):411-4.

[54]

Chen X, Wan Y, Lao S. Graphical modeling and simulation for a multi-aircraft collision avoidance algorithm based on collaborative decisions. Symmetry 2020; 12(6):985.

[55]

National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). Left engine failure and subsequent depressurization, southwest airlines flight 1380, Boeing 737-7H4, N772SW, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, April 17, 2018. Report. Washington, DC: National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB); 2019. Report No.: NTSB/AAR-19/03.

[56]

Ravnair flights in Alaska canceled after cyber attack [Internet]. Alaska: Anchorage Daily News; 2019 Dec 22 [cited 2024 Nov 14]. Available from: https://www.adn.com/alaska-news/aviation/2019/12/21/ravnair-flights-inalaska-canceled-after-cyber-attack/

[57]

Federal Aviation Administration. McDonnell Douglas DC-9-32 [Internet]. Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration; 1996 May 11 [cited 2024 Nov 14]. Available from: https://www.faa.gov/lessons_learned/transport_airplane/accidents/N904VJ

[58]

Computer glitch grounds hundreds of flights in US [Internet]. London: BBC News; 2015 Aug 15 [cited 2024 Nov 14]. Available from: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-33950381

[59]

The Korea Aviation Accident Investigation Board (KAIB). Aircraft accident report:controlled flight into terrain air China international flight 129. Report. Seoul: KAIB; 2005. Report No.: KAIB/AAR F0201.

[60]

The Central People’s Government of the People’s Republic of China. Henan airlines Heilongjiang Yichun "8 24" investigation report of a particularly serious aircraft crash [Internet]. Beijing: The Central People’s Government of the People’s Republic of China; 2012 Jan 29 [cited 2024 Nov 14]. Available from: https://www.gov.cn/gzdt/2012-06/29/content_2173243.htmChinese.

[61]

The Ethiopian Airplane Accident Investigation Bureau (EAIB). Aircraft accident investigation report B737- MAX 8, ET-AVJ operated by Ethiopian Airlines. Report. Ethiopia: EAIB; 2022. Report No.: AI-01/19.

[62]

Aircraft accident investigation report. Lion Mentari Airlines Boeing 737-8 (MAX). Report. Jakarta: National Transportation Safety Committee (KNKT); 2019. Report No.: KNKT.18.10.35.04.

[63]

Dutch Safety Board. Crash of Malaysia airlines flight mh17 [Internet]. Hague: Dutch Safety Board; 2015 Oct 13 [cited 2024 Nov 14]. Available from: https://onderzoeksraad.nl/en/onderzoek/crash-mh17-17-july-2014/

[64]

Bureau d’Enquêtes et d’Analyses pour la Sécurité de l’Aviation Civile (BEA). Final investigation report:accident to the airbus a320-211, registered D-AIPX and operated by Germanwings, flight GWI18G, on 03/24/15 at prads-hautebléone. Report. Le Bourget: BEA; 2016. Report No.: BEA2015-0125.

[65]

Hale A, Kirwan B, Kjellén U. Safe by design: where are we now. Safety Science 2007; 45(1-2):305-27.

[66]

Ouedghiri D, Baskcomb S. Design for reliability in aviation (a must to improve life cycle cost, safety and availability). In: Sgobba T, Rongier I, editors. Space safety is no accident. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015. p. 333-41.

[67]

Denney E, Pai G, Whiteside I. The role of safety architectures in aviation safety cases. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2019; 191:106502.

[68]

Karanikas N, Chionis D, Plioutsias A. "Old" and "new" safety thinking: perspectives of aviation safety investigators. Saf Sci 2020; 125:104632.

[69]

Zhang X, Mahadevan S. Bayesian network modeling of accident investigation reports for aviation safety assessment. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2021; 209:107371.

[70]

Xue Y, Fu G. A modified accident analysis and investigation model for the general aviation industry: emphasizing on human and organizational factors. J Saf Res 2018; 67:1-15.

[71]

Aven T. A risk science perspective on the discussion concerning Safety I, Safety II and Safety III. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2022; 217:108077.

[72]

Hadjimichael M. A fuzzy expert system for aviation risk assessment. Expert Syst Appl 2009; 36(3):6512-9.

[73]

Mohaghegh Z, Kazemi R, Mosleh A. Incorporating organizational factors into probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) of complex socio-technical systems: a hybrid technique formalization. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2009; 94(5):1000-18.

[74]

Song X, Qi L, Liu S, Ding S, Li D. Simple analysis of complex system safety based on finite state machine network and phase space theory. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2024; 249:110205.

[75]

Ellis K, Koelling J, Davies M, Krois P. In-time system-wide safety assurance (ISSA) concept of operations and design considerations for urban air mobility (UAM). Report. Hampton: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA); 2020. Report No.: NASA/TM—20205003981.

[76]

Zhang Y, Xi Q, Wang J, Gu S. Architecture and algorithm design for civil aviation data real-time analysis system. IEEE Access 2024; 12:66382-97.

[77]

Ancel E, Capristan FM, Foster JV, Condotta RC. Real-time risk assessment framework for unmanned aircraft system (UAS) traffic management (UTM). In:Proceedings of the 17th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference; 2017 Jun 5-9; Denver, CO, USA. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA); 2017. p. 3273.

[78]

Corbetta M, Banerjee P, Okolo W, Gorospe G, Luchinsky DG. Real-time UAV trajectory prediction for safety monitoring in low-altitude airspace. In: Proceedings of the AIAA Aviation 2019 Forum; 2019 Jun 17-21; Dallas, TX, USA. Washington, DC: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA); 2019. p. 3514.

[79]

Hollnagel E, Wears RL, Braithwaite J. From Safety-I to Safety-II:a white paper. Report. Phoenix, Odense, Gainesville, FL, Sydney: The Resilient Health Care Net, University of Southern Denmark, University of Florida, Macquarie University; 2015.

[80]

Hollnagel E. Safety-I and Safety-II:the past and future of safety management. New York City: CRC Press; 2014.

[81]

Leveson NG. Engineering a safer world: systems thinking applied to safety (engineering systems). Cambridge: MIT Press; 2011.

[82]

Leveson N. A new accident model for engineering safer systems. Saf Sci 2004; 42(4):237-70.

[83]

Wikipedia. System of systems [Internet]. San Francisco, CA: Wikipedia; 2024 Dec 7[cited 2024 Nov 14]. Available from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_of_systems

[84]

Everdij MHC, Blom HAP, Scholte JJ, Nollet JW, Kraan B. Developing a framework for safety validation of multi-stakeholder changes in air transport operations. Saf Sci 2009; 47(3):405-20.

[85]

Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Walter P. Helper T cells and lymphocyte activation. 4th ed. In: Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Walter P, editors. Molecular biology of the cell. New York City: Garland Science; 2002.

[86]

Condotta SA, Richer MJ. The immune battlefield: the impact of inflammatory cytokines on CD8+ T-cell immunity. PLoS Pathog 2017; 13(10):e1006618.

[87]

Vivier E, Raulet DH, Moretta A, Caligiuri MA, Zitvogel L, Lanier LL, et al. Innate or adaptive immunity? The example of natural killer cells. Science 2011; 331 (6013):44-9.

[88]

Chaplin DD. Overview of the immune response. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010; 125(2):S3-S23.

[89]

Hopp AK, Rupp A, Lukacs-Kornek V. Self-antigen presentation by dendritic cells in autoimmunity. Front Immunol 2014; 5:555.

[90]

Wikipedia. Ooda_loop [Internet]. San Francisco, CA: Wikipedia; 2024 Dec 12[cited 2024 Nov 14]. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OODA_loop

[91]

The Object Management Group. MBSE Wiki [Internet]. Milford: The Object Management Group; 2024 Dec 17[cited 2024 Nov 14]. Available from: https://www.omgwiki.org/MBSE/doku.php

[92]

Wang WY, Hou J, Mao YX, Jin J, Lu Z. Application and development of MBSE in aerospace. J Phy Conf Ser 2022; 2235:012021.

[93]

Ramos AL, Ferreira JV, Barceló J. Model-based systems engineering: an emerging approach for modern systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev 2012; 42(1):101-11.

[94]

Defense Acquisition University. Digital engineering [Internet]. Fort Belvoir: Defense Acquisition University; [cited 2024 Nov 14]. Available from: https://www.dau.edu/glossary/digital-engineering

[95]

VanDerHorn E, Mahadevan S. Digital twin: generalization, characterization and implementation. Decis Support Syst 2021; 145:113524.

[96]

Fang X, Wang H, Liu G, Tian X, Ding G, Zhang H. Industry application of digital twin: from concept to implementation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2022; 121(7- 8):4289-312.

[97]

Wang FY. Parallel system methods for management and control of complex systems. Control Decis 2004; 19(5):485-9.

[98]

Wang FY. Parallel control and management for intelligent transportation systems: concepts, architectures, and applications. IEEE Trans Intell Trans Syst 2010; 11(3):630-8.

[99]

Feiyue W, Feiyue W. Digital doctors and parallel healthcare: from medical knowledge automation to intelligent metasystems medicine. Med J Peking Union Med Coll Hosp 2021; 12(6):829-33.

[100]

Chen L, Hu X, Wang G, Cao D, Li L, Wang FY. Parallel mining operating systems:from digital twins to mining intelligence. In:Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 1st International Conference on Digital Twins and Parallel Intelligence (DTPI); 2021 Jul 15-Aug 15; Beijing, China. New York City: IEEE; 2024. p. 469-73.

[101]

Kang M, Wang FY. From parallel plants to smart plants: intelligent control and management for plant growth. IEEE/CAA J Autom Sin 2017; 4(2):161-6.

[102]

Day D. Advanced aerial mobility: a national blueprint. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2020.

[103]

Ellis KK, Krois P, Koelling J, Prinzel LJ, Davies M, Mah R. A concept of operations (ConOps) of an in-time aviation safety management system (IASMS) for advanced air mobility (AAM). In: Proceedings of the AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum; 2021 Jan 11-21; Reston, VA, USA. Washington, DC: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA); 2021. p. 1978.

[104]

Ellis KK, Prinze LJ, Krois P, Davies MD, Oza N, Stephens C, et al. A future intime aviation safety management system (IASMS) perspective for commercial air carriers. In: Proceedings of the AIAA Aviation 2022 Forum; 2022 Jun 27-Jul 1; Chicago, IL, USA. Washington, DC: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA); 2022. p. 3220.

[105]

The Interstate Aviation Committee (IAC). Strengthening regional safety oversight organizations (RSOOs). In:Proceedings of the thirteenth air navigation conference; 2018 Oct 9-19; Montréal, QC, Canada. Montréal: International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO); 2018.

[106]

European Union Aviation Safety Agency. The European plan for aviation safety (EPAS) 2018-2022 [Internet]. Cologne: European Union Aviation Safety Agency; 2018 Apr 17 [cited 2024 Nov 14]. Available from: https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/document-library/general-publications/european-plan-aviationsafety-epas-2018-2022-leaflet

[107]

Future flight initial aviation safety framework [Internet]. London: UK Research and Innovation; 2022 Jan 14[cited 2024 Nov 14]. Available from: https://www.ukri.org/publications/future-flight-challenge-initialsafety-case-framework/

[108]

Ruishan S, Lei W, Junjie L. An overview and prospect of civil aviation safety in China. J Transp Inf Saf 2016; 34(4):1-5. Chinese.

[109]

The People’s Republic of China. Development of safety management system in China civil aviation. In:Proceedings of the 2nd Meeting of the Regional Aviation Safety Group-Asia and Pacific Regions (RASG-APAC/2); 2012 Oct 8-9; New Delhi, India. Montréal: International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO); 2012.

[110]

The People’s Republic of China. Effectiveness evaluation mechanism for civil aviation safety management system. In: Working papers of the 41st session of the International Civil Aviation Organization; 2022 Jan 8; Montréal, Canada. Montréal: International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO); 2022.

[111]

The People’s Republic of China. Effectively promoting the implementation of state safety programmes. In: Proceedings of the thirteenth air navigation conference; 2018 Oct 9-19; Montréal, Canada. Montréal: International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO); 2022.

[112]

Vugrin ED, Warren DE, Ehlen MA, Camphouse RC. A framework for assessing the resilience of infrastructure and economic systems. In: Gopalakrishnan K, Peeta S, editors. Sustainable and resilient critical infrastructure systems. Berlin: Springer; 2010. p. 77-116.

[113]

Francis R, Bekera B. A metric and frameworks for resilience analysis of engineered and infrastructure systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2014; 121:90-103.

[114]

Faturechi R, Miller-Hooks E. Measuring the performance of transportation infrastructure systems in disasters: a comprehensive review. J Infrast Syst 2015; 21(1):04014025.

[115]

Hollnagel E. Safety-II in practice: developing the resilience potentials. London: Routledge; 2017.

[116]

Flight Safety Foundation. Learning from all operations:expanding the field of vision to improve aviation safety. Report. Flight Safety Foundation white paper. Alexandria: Flight Safety Foundation; 2021.

[117]

International Flight Support (IFS). Success stories:airline triumphs with electronic flight bags [Internet]. Denmark: International Flight Support (IFS); [cited 2024 Nov 14]. Available from: https://ifs.aero/electronic-flight-bagsuccess/

[118]

Gontar P, Kurth P. Local safety surveys: from auditing to understanding [Internet]. Hong Kong: SKYbrary Aviation Safety; 2020 Dec 18 [cited 2024 Nov 14]. Available from: https://skybrary.aero/bookshelf/hindsight-31-localsafety-surveys-auditing-understanding

[119]

European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (EUROCONTROL). Toolkit for air traffic management occurrence investigation [Internet]. Brussels: EUROCONTROL; [cited 2024 Nov 14]. Available from: https:// www.eurocontrol.int/tool/toolkit-air-traffic-management-occurrenceinvestigation

[120]

European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (EUROCONTROL). The systemic potentials management: building a basis for resilient performance [Internet]. Brussels: EUROCONTROL; 2021 Sep 30[cited 2024 Nov 14]. Available from: https://skybrary.aero/bookshelf/systemic-potentialsmanagement-building-basis-resilient-performance

[121]

Mirhoseini A, Goldie A, Yazgan M, Jiang JW, Songhori E, Wang S, et al. A graph placement methodology for fast chip design. Nature 2021; 594(7862):207-12.

[122]

Watson JL, Juergens D, Bennett NR, Trippe BL, Yim J, Eisenach HE, et al. De novo design of protein structure and function with RF diffusion. Nature 2023; 620(7976):1089-100.

[123]

Segler MHS, Preuss M, Waller MP. Planning chemical syntheses with deep neural networks and symbolic AI. Nature 2018; 555(7698):604-10.

[124]

Zheng Y, Lin Y, Zhao L, Wu T, Jin D, Li Y. Spatial planning of urban communities via deep reinforcement learning. Nat Comput Sci 2023; 3 (9):748-62.

[125]

Hu J, Chen S, Chen DF, Kang JX, Wang H. Model-based safety analysis for an aviation software specification. Int J Perform Eng 2020; 16(2):238.

[126]

Gradel S, Aigner B, Stumpf E. Model-based safety assessment for conceptual aircraft systems design. CEAS Aeronaut J 2022; 13(1):281-94.

[127]

Mbaye S, Jones G, Infeld SI, Okon S, Davies MD. A model-based systems engineering evaluation of the evolution to an in-time aviation safety management system. In: Proceedings of the AIAA Aviation 2022 Forum; 2022 Jun 27-Jul 1; Chicago, IL, USA. Washington, DC: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA); 2022. p. 3423.

[128]

Almeaibed S, Al-Rubaye S, Tsourdos A, Avdelidis NP. Digital twin analysis to promote safety and security in autonomous vehicles. IEEE Commun Stand Mag 2021; 5(1):40-6.

[129]

Löcklin A, Müller M, Jung T, Jazdi N, White D, Weyrich M. Digital twin for verification and validation of industrial automation systems—a survey. In:Proceedings of the 2020 25th IEEE international conference on emerging technologies and factory automation (ETFA); 2020 Sep 8-11; Wien, Austria. New York City: IEEE; 2024. p. 851-8.

[130]

Dong Y. Implementing deep learning for comprehensive aircraft icing and actuator/sensor fault detection/identification. Eng Appl Artif Intell 2019; 83:28-44.

[131]

Li J, King S, Jennions I, Li J, King S, Jennions I. Intelligent fault diagnosis of an aircraft fuel system using machine learning—a literature review. Machines 2023; 11:481.

[132]

Zolghadri A. A review of fault management issues in aircraft systems: current status and future directions. Prog Aerosp Sci 2024; 147:101008.

[133]

Kosova F, Altay Ö, Ünver . Structural health monitoring in aviation: a comprehensive review and future directions for machine learning. Nondestruct Test Eval 2025; 40(1):1-60.

[134]

Xiong M, Wang H, Che C, Sun M. Application of text mining and coupling theory to depth cognition of aviation safety risk. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2024; 245:110032.

[135]

Xiong M, Wang H, Wong YD, Hou Z. Enhancing aviation safety and mitigating accidents: a study on aviation safety hazard identification. Adv Eng Info 2024; 62:102732.

[136]

Gheorghioiu N. Knowledge risk management in aviation. In:Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence 2020; 2020 Jun 11-12; Online. Bucharest: Bucharest University of Economic Studies; 2020. p. 657-63.

[137]

Papanikou M. Risk assessment: knowledge management paradigms, big data, and aviation policy making. Knowledge management practices in the public sector. IGI Global 2020:47-75.

[138]

Xiong M, Wang H. Digital twin applications in aviation industry: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 2022; 121(9-10):5677-92.

[139]

Sadeghi A, Bellavista P, Song W, Yazdani-Asrami M. Digital twins for condition and fleet monitoring of aircraft: toward more-intelligent electrified aviation systems. IEEE Access 2024; 12:99806-32.

[140]

Liu H, Sun Y, Cao J, Chen S, Pan N, Dai Y, et al. Study on UAV parallel planning system for transmission line project acceptance under the background of industry 5.0. IEEE Trans Industr Inform 2022; 18(8):5537-46.

PDF (2381KB)

12555

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/