The development of hydro-projects in China and a comparison with projects abroad
Tab.1 Top 10 highest dams in the world. |
Rank | Dam name | Country | Dam type | Dam height (m) | Total storage capacity (× 108 m3) | Installed capacity (MW) | Year of completion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Jinping I | China | Arch dam | 305.0 | 79.88 | 3 600 | 2014 |
2 | Nurek | Tajikistan | Earth-rock dam | 300.0 | 105.00 | 2 700 | 1980 |
3 | Xiaowan | China | Arch dam | 294.5 | 150.00 | 4 200 | 2012 |
4 | Xiluodu | China | Arch dam | 285.5 | 126.70 | 13 860 | 2015 |
5 | Grande Dixence | Switzerland | Gravity dam | 285.0 | 4.00 | 2 069 | 1962 |
6 | Kambarata-I | Kyrgyzstan | Earth-rock dam | 275.0 | 36.00 | 1 900 | 1996 |
7 | Inguri | Georgia | Arch dam | 271.5 | 11.00 | 1 320 | 1980 |
8 | Vajont | Italy | Arch dam | 262.0 | 1.69 | − | 1961 |
9 | Nuozhadu | China | Earth-rock dam | 261.5 | 237.03 | 5 850 | 2015 |
10 | Chicoasén | Mexico | Earth-rock dam | 261.0 | 16.80 | 2 430 | 1981 |
Tab.2 Top 10 reservoirs with the largest storage capacity in the world. |
Rank | Dam name | Country | Dam type | Dam height (m) | Total storage capacity (× 108 m3) | Installed capacity (MW) | Year of completion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Owen Falls | Uganda | Gravity dam | 31 | 2 048.0 | 180 | 1954 |
2 | Kariba | Zambia/Zimbabwe | Arch dam | 128 | 1 806.0 | 1 500 | 1976 |
3 | Bratsk | Russia | Gravity dam | 125 | 1 690.0 | 4 500 | 1964 |
4 | Aswan | Egypt | Earth-rock dam | 111 | 1 620.0 | 2 100 | 1970 |
5 | Akosombo | Ghana | Earth-rock dam | 134 | 1 500.0 | 1 020 | 1965 |
6 | Daniel-Johnson | Canada | Arch dam | 214 | 1 418.5 | 2 656 | 1968 |
7 | Guri | Venezuela | Gravity dam | 162 | 1 350.0 | 10 235 | 1986 |
8 | Bennett | Canada | Earth-rock dam | 183 | 743.0 | 2 730 | 1967 |
9 | Krasnoyarsk | Russia | Gravity dam | 124 | 733.0 | 6 000 | 1972 |
10 | Zeya | Russia | Gravity dam | 115 | 684.0 | 1 330 | 1978 |
The largest reservoir in China is the Three Gorges Reservoir with a storage capacity of 4.505 × 1010 m3, ranked the 24th in the world. |
Tab.3 Top 10 projects with the largest installed capacity in the world. |
Rank | Dam name | Country | Dam type | Dam height (m) | Total storage capacity (× 108 m3) | Installed capacity (MW) | Year of completion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Three Gorges | China | Gravity dam | 181.0 | 450.50 | 22 500 | 2010 |
2 | Itaipu | Brazil/Paraguay | Gravity dam | 196.0 | 290.00 | 14 000 | 1991 |
3 | Xiluodu | China | Arch dam | 285.5 | 126.70 | 13 860 | 2014 |
4 | Guri | Venezuela | Gravity dam | 162.0 | 1350.00 | 10 235 | 1986 |
5 | Tucuruí | Brazil | Earth-rock dam | 98.0 | 455.40 | 8 370 | 2002 |
6 | Sayano-Shushenskaya | Russia | Arch dam | 245.0 | 313.00 | 6 400 | 1989 |
7 | Xiangjiaba | China | Gravity dam | 162.0 | 51.63 | 6 400 | 2015 |
8 | Krasnoyarsk | Russia | Gravity dam | 124.0 | 733.00 | 6 000 | 1972 |
9 | Nuozhadu | China | Earth-rock dam | 261.5 | 237.03 | 5 850 | 2015 |
10 | Longtan | China | Gravity dam | 192.0 | 188.00 | 4 900 | Phase I, 2009 |
Technologies for guaranteeing safety of high dams
Behavior simulation, prevention of hydraulic fracture, and concrete-mix design for high concrete dams
Fig.6 Standard consistency relative water consumption test results. FA: fly ash; MF: micro fine powder; PC: Portland cement; SA: slag A; SB: slag B; SC: slag C; N stands for water requirement of standard consistency of the multi-component cementitious powders; M stands for weighted average of the water requirement of standard consistency of the multi-component cementitious powders. |
Deformation compatibility control and dynamic stability design of water-stop for concrete-faced rockfill dams (CFRDs)
Tab.4 Statistics of typical high concrete-faced rockfill dams (CFRDs) at home and abroad. |
Phase | Project | Dam height (m) | Settlement (cm) | Leakage (L·1) | Standard porosity of buildings rockfill | Construction parameters | Operation situations | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main rockfill area (%) | Downstream rockfill area (%) | |||||||
Deformation compatibility | Bakun | 203.5 | 227.5 | 170 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 25 t; rolling for 8 times | There is no structural crack or crushing failure in the face plate, and the dam operates in good condition |
Nam Ngum II | 182.0 | 160.0 | 40 | − | − | − | There is no structural crack or crushing failure in the face plate, and the dam operates in good condition | |
Jiudianxia | 136.5 + 56.0 | 138.0 | 65 | 17.3 | 19.1 | 25 t; rolling for 8 times | There are micro-cracks but no structural cracks or crushing failure in the face plate, and the dam operates in good condition | |
Deformation control | Shuibuya | 233.0 | 255.5 | 40 | 19.6 | 20.7 | 25 t and below; rolling for 8 times | There is slight crushing failure but no structural cracks in the face plate |
Sanbanxi | 185.5 | 175.1 | 300 | 19.3 | 19.5 | 20–25 t; rolling for 8–10 times | There are structural cracks and severe crushing failure in the face plate | |
Empirical design | Tianshengqiao I | 178.0 | 354.0 | 150–70 | 22.0 | 22.0–24.0 | 18 t; rolling for 6 times | There are a lot of structural cracks and crushing failure in the face plate |
Aguamilpa | 187.0 | 170.0 | 260 | − | 24.0 | 10 t; rolling for 4 times | There are structural cracks in the face plate. Infiltration is reduced by dump-filling | |
Campos Novos | 202.0 | > 310.0 | 1400 | 22.0 | − | 9–12 t; rolling for 6 times | There are severe crushing failure, cracks, and fractures, as well as severe leakage in the face plate. The reservoir is fully discharged for overhauling | |
Barra Grande | 185.0 | > 300.0 | 1284 | 22.0 | − | 9–12 t; rolling for 6 times | There are cracks, crushing failure, and severe leakage in the face plate |
Tab.5 Comparison of water-stop effects of dams at home and abroad. |
Projects with dynamic stable water-stop design | Overseas projects with conventional water-stop design | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dam name | Dam height (m) | Leakage (L·s-1) | Dam name | Dam height (m) | Leakage (L·s-1) |
Shuibuya | 233 | 40 | Campos Novos | 202 | 1400 |
Nam Ngum II | 182 | 40 | Barra Grande | 185 | 1284 |
Hongjiadu | 179.5 | 20 | Alto Anchicaya | 140 | 1800 |
Zipingpu | 156 | 54 | Shiroro | 130 | 1800 |
Longshou II | 146.5 | 76 | Itá | 125 | 1700 |
Gongboxia | 132.2 | 10 | Turimiquire | 115 | 6000 |
Seismic safety of high dams
Flood discharge and energy dissipation of high dams
Tab.6 Hydraulic parameters of flood discharge for domestic and overseas high arch dams. |
Project name | Country | Dam height (m) | Fall (m) | Flow (m3·1) | Flood discharging power (MW) | Channel width (m) | Valley shape | Year of completion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Inguri | Georgia | 271.5 | 230.0 | 2 500 | 5 040 | 25 | 1980 | |
El Cajón | Honduras | 234.0 | 184.0 | 8 590 | 15 500 | 100 | 1985 | |
Mratinje | Yugoslavia | 220.0 | 175.0 | 2 200 | 3 890 | 35 | 1976 | |
Ertan | China | 240.0 | 166.3 | 16 300 | 26 560 | 80–100 | V | 2000 |
Jinping I | China | 305.0 | 225.0 | 10 074 | 22 210 | 80–100 | V | 2014 |
Xiaowan | China | 294.5 | 225.5 | 15 600 | 34 600 | 80–100 | V | 2012 |
Xiluodu | China | 285.5 | 189.5 | 31 496 | 58 490 | 70–100 | U | 2015 |
Baihetan | China | 289.0 | 200.7 | 30 000 | 59 006 | 50–90 | V | In progress |
River harnessing and the theory of non-equilibrium transport for non-uniform sediment
Inter-basin water diversion project
Giant hydropower units and pumped storage power stations
Tab.7 Comparison of test rig parameters. |
Test rig name | Country | Maximum test water head (m) | Maximum test flow (m3·s-1) | Total uncertainty of efficiency measurement (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research (IWHR) | China | 150 | 2.20 | 0.20 |
Institute of Hydraulic Machines and Fluid Mécanique (IMHEF) | Switzerland | 120 | 1.40 | 0.25 |
Voith | Germany | 100 | 1.50 | 0.25 |
Voith | US | 134 | 1.57 | 0.30 |
Alstom | France | 120 | 1.50 | 0.25 |
Rainpower | Norway | 150 | 1.50 | 0.30 |
VVATECH | Switzerland | 120 | 1.10 | 0.25 |
Harbin Electric Corporation (HEC) | China | 150 | 2.00 | 0.25 |
Dongfang Electric Corporation (DEC) | China | 100 | 1.50 | 0.25 |