Tall Buildings with Dynamic Facade Under Winds
Received date: 16 Jan 2020
Published date: 24 Jan 2020
Burgeoning growth of tall buildings in urban areas around the world is placing new demands on their performance under winds. This involves selection of the building form that minimizes wind loads and structural topologies that efficiently transfer loads. Current practice is to search for optimal shapes, but this limits buildings with static or fixed form. Aerodynamic shape tailoring that consists of modifying the external form of the building has shown great promise in reducing wind loads and associated structural motions as reflected in the design of Taipei 101 and Burj Khalifa. In these buildings, corner modifications of the cross-section and tapering along the height are introduced. An appealing alternative is to design a building that can adapt its form to the changing complex wind environment in urban areas with clusters of tall buildings, i.e., by implementing a dynamic facade. To leap beyond the static shape optimization, autonomous dynamic morphing of the building shape is advanced in this study, which is implemented through a cyber–physical system that fuses together sensing, computing, actuating and engineering informatics. This approach will permit a building to intelligently morph its profile to minimize the source of dynamic wind load excitation, and holds the promise of revolutionizing tall buildings from conventional static to dynamic facades by taking advantage of the burgeoning advances in computational design.
Fei Ding , Ahsan Kareem . Tall Buildings with Dynamic Facade Under Winds[J]. Engineering, 2020 , 6(12) : 1443 -1453 . DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2020.07.020
[1] |
Kareem A, Kijewski T, Tamura Y. Mitigation of motions of tall buildings with specific examples of recent applications. Wind Struct 1999;2(3):201–51.
|
[2] |
Irwin PA. Bluff body aerodynamics in wind engineering. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 2008;96(6–7):701–12.
|
[3] |
Irwin PA. Wind engineering challenges of the new generation of supertall buildings. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 2009;97(7–8):328–34.
|
[4] |
Kareem A, Spence SM, Bernardini E, Bobby S, Wei D. Wind engineering: using computational fluid dynamics to optimize tall building design. CTBUH J 2013;3:38–43.
|
[5] |
Bernardini E, Spence SM, Wei D, Kareem A. Aerodynamic shape optimization of civil structures: a CFD-enabled Kriging-based approach. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 2015;144:154–64.
|
[6] |
Ding F, Kareem A, Wan J. Aerodynamic tailoring of structures using computational fluid dynamics. Struct Eng Int 2019;29(1):26–39.
|
[7] |
Brewick P, Divel L, Butler K, Bashor R, Kareem A. Consequence of urban aerodynamics and debris impact in extreme wind events. In: Proceedings of the 11th Americas conference on wind engineering; 2009 Jun 22–26; San Juan, Puerto Rico; 2009.
|
[8] |
Chan AKC. Tackling global grand challenges in our cities. Engineering 2016;2 (1):10–5.
|
[9] |
Crawley EF. Intelligent structures for aerospace—a technology overview and assessment. AIAA J 1994;32(8):1689–99.
|
[10] |
Korkmaz S. A review of active structural control: challenges for engineering informatics. Comput Struc 2011;89(23–24):2113–32.
|
[11] |
Karanouh A, Kerber E. Innovations in dynamic architecture. J Facade Des Eng 2015;3(2):185–221.
|
[12] |
Kwok K, Wilhelm P, Wilkie B. Effect of edge configuration on wind-induced response of tall buildings. Eng Struct 1988;10(2):135–40.
|
[13] |
Miyashita K, Katagiri J, Nakamura O, Ohkuma T, Tamura Y, Itoh M, et al. Windinduced response of high-rise buildings effects of corner cuts or openings in square buildings. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 1993;50:319–28.
|
[14] |
Tanaka H, Tamura Y, Ohtake K, Nakai M, Kim YC. Experimental investigation of aerodynamic forces and wind pressures acting on tall buildings with various unconventional configurations. JWind Eng Ind Aerodyn 2012;107–108:179–91.
|
[15] |
Xie J. Aerodynamic optimization of super-tall buildings and its effectiveness assessment. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 2014;130:88–98.
|
[16] |
Konak A, Coit DW, Smith AE. Multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithms: a tutorial. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2006;91(9):992–1007.
|
[17] |
Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 2002;6(2):182–97.
|
[18] |
Forrester A, Sobester A, Keane A. Engineering design via surrogate modelling: a practical guide. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Inc.; 2008.
|
[19] |
Ferziger JH, Peric M. Computational methods for fluid dynamics. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media; 2012.
|
[20] |
Ding F, Kareem A. A multi-fidelity shape optimization via surrogate modeling for civil structures. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 2018;178:49–56.
|
[21] |
McEvoy MA, Correll N. Materials that couple sensing, actuation, computation, and communication. Science 2015;347(6228):1261689.
|
[22] |
Bengisu M, Ferrara M. Materials that move: smart materials, intelligent design. Cham: Springer; 2018.
|
[23] |
Valasek J. Morphing aerospace vehicles and structures. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Inc.; 2012.
|
[24] |
Sanders B, Crowe R, Garcia E. Defense advanced research projects agency— smart materials and structures demonstration program overview. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 2004;15(4):227–33.
|
[25] |
Chen T, Bilal OR, Lang R, Daraio C, Shea K. Autonomous deployment of a solar panel using elastic origami and distributed shape-memory polymer actuators. Phys Rev Appl 2019;11(6):064069.
|
[26] |
Rosenfield K. TEDx: Metal that breathes/Doris Kim Sung [Internet]. ArchDaily; c2008–2020 [cited 2019 Jul 29]. Available from: https://www.archdaily.com/ 293386/ tedx-metal-that-breathes-doris-kim-sung/.
|
[27] |
Tibbits S. 4D printing: multi-material shape change. Archit Des 2014;84 (1):116–21.
|
[28] |
Al-Obaidi KM, Azzam Ismail M, Hussein H, Abdul Rahman AM. Biomimetic building skins: an adaptive approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2017;79:1472–91.
|
[29] |
Dean B, Bhushan B. Shark-skin surfaces for fluid-drag reduction in turbulent flow: a review. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 1929;2010(368):4775–806.
|
[30] |
ICD/ITKE University of Stuttgart [Internet]. Urbach Tower [cited 2019 Jul 29]. Available from: https://www.icd.uni-stuttgart.de/projects/remstalgartenschau-2019-urbach-turm/.
|
[31] |
One ocean, Thematic Pavilion EXPO 2012/soma [Internet]. ArchDaily; c2008– 2020 [cited 2019 Jul 29]. Available from: https://www.archdaily.com/236979/ one-ocean-thematic-pavilion-expo-2012-soma.
|
[32] |
Del Grosso A, Basso P. Adaptive building skin structures. Smart Mater Struct 2010;19(12):124011.
|
[33] |
Easy K–Kenneth Snelson. Gibbs Farm Sculpture Park [Internet]. Flickr. Available from: https://www.flickr.com/photos/robinzblog/8576091099.
|
[34] |
Tibert A, Pellegrino S. Review of form-finding methods for tensegrity structures. Int J Space Structures 2003;18(4):209–23.
|
[35] |
Wikimedia Commons. File:Tokyo dome.JPG [Internet]. Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository; 2020 [updated 2020 Sep 7; cited 2020 Sep 9]. Available from: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File: Tokyo_dome.JPG&oldid=451300758.
|
[36] |
Puig L, Barton A, Rando N. A review on large deployable structures for astrophysics missions. Acta Astronaut 2010;67(1–2):12–26.
|
[37] |
Min Z, Kien VK, Richard LJ. Aircraft morphing wing concepts with radical geometry change. IES J Part A Civ Struct Eng 2010;3(3):188–95.
|
[38] |
Reis PM, López Jiménez F, Marthelot J. Transforming architectures inspired by origami. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2015;112(40):12234–5.
|
[39] |
Filipov ET, Tachi T, Paulino GH. Origami tubes assembled into stiff, yet reconfigurable structures and metamaterials. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2015;112 (40):12321–6.
|
[40] |
Tachi T. Geometric considerations for the design of rigid origami structures. In: Proceedings of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures (IASS) Symposium; 2010 Aug 3–7; Shanghai, China; 2010.
|
[41] |
LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature 2015;521(7553):436–44.
|
[42] |
Arulkumaran K, Deisenroth MP, Brundage M, Bharath AA. A brief survey of deep reinforcement learning. IEEE Signal Process Mag 2017;34(6):26–38.
|
[43] |
Murphy KP. Machine learning: a probabilistic perspective. Cambridge: MIT press; 2012.
|
[44] |
Sallab AE, Abdou M, Perot E, Yogamani S. Deep reinforcement learning framework for autonomous driving. Electron Imaging 2017;2017(19):70–6.
|
[45] |
Goecks VG, Leal PB, White T, Valasek J, Hartl DJ. Control of morphing wing shapes with deep reinforcement learning. In: Proceedings of the 2018 AIAA Information Systems-AIAA Infotech@Aerospace; 2018 Jan 8–12; Kissimmee, FL, USA; 2018.
|
[46] |
Lillicrap TP, Hunt JJ, Pritzel A, Heess N, Erez T, Tassa Y, et al. Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning. In: Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Learning Representations; 2016 May 2–4; San Juan, Puerto Rico; 2016.
|
[47] |
Åström KJ, Hägglund T. The future of PID control. Control Eng Pract 2001;9 (11):1163–75.
|
[48] |
Mei G, Kareem A, Kantor JC. Model predictive control of wind-excited building: benchmark study. J Eng Mech 2004;130(4):459–65.
|
[49] |
Lee EA. Cyber physical systems: design challenges. In: Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Symposium on Object and Component-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC); 2008 May 5–7; Orlando, FL, USA; 2008.
|
[50] |
Atzori L, Iera A, Morabito G. The Internet of Things: a survey. Comput Netw 2010;54(15):2787–805.
|
[51] |
Zanella A, Bui N, Castellani A, Vangelista L, Zorzi M. Internet of Things for smart cities. IEEE Internet Things J 2014;1(1):22–32.
|
[52] |
Lynch JP, Loh KJ. A summary review of wireless sensors and sensor networks for structural health monitoring. Shock Vib Dig 2006;38(2):91–128.
|
[53] |
Feng Z, Katafygiotis L. The effect of non-synchronous sensing on structural identification and its correction. Smart Struct Syst 2016;18(3):541–68.
|
[54] |
Guo Y, Kwon DK, Kareem A. Near-real-time hybrid system identification framework for civil structures with application to Burj Khalifa. J Struct Eng 2016;142(2):04015132.
|
[55] |
Rabault J, Kuchta M, Jensen A, R’eglade U, Cerardi N. Artificial neural networks trained through deep reinforcement learning discover control strategies for active flow control. J Fluid Mech 2019;865:281–302.
|
[56] |
Sutton RS, Barto AG. Reinforcement learning: an introduction. Cambridge: MIT press; 2018.
|
[57] |
Rabault J, Ren F, Zhang W, Tang H, Xu H. Deep reinforcement learning in fluid mechanics: a promising method for both active flow control and shape optimization. J Hydrodyn 2020;32:234–46.
|
[58] |
Kingma DP, Ba J. Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference for Learning Representations; 2015 May 7–9; San Diego, CA, USA; 2015.
|
/
〈 | 〉 |