Strategic Study of Chinese Academy of Engineering >
Strategic Updating of Internet Plus Considering Digital Transformation
Received date: 03 Jun 2020
Published date: 11 Aug 2020
Since the Internet Plus initiative was proposed five years ago, innovations associated with the new-generation information technology have accelerated and digital transformation of the economy and society has exhibited many new features. These necessitate the construction of a new system and exploration of new paths for the transformation, and measures currently taken under the Internet Plus initiative need to be evolved and upgraded. This study follows the objective laws of technological industry transformation and is based on the theoretical paradigm of technology economics. It analyzes the new trend and research frontiers of digital transformation at the technology, application, and policy levels. The study reveals that the current technology system and technological capabilities of digital transformation have gradually improved, a new blueprint for the transformation has emerged, and the integration of information technology with the real economy has entered a new stage. However, the digital transformation framework system needs to be reconstructed, the key elements of transformation needs to be strengthened, and key breakthroughs need to be achieved. To this end, in the follow-up policy design of the Internet Plus initiative and during the formulation of the 14th Five-Year Plan, China should focus on exploring the potentials of digital elements, promote the construction of the digital transformation ecology, establish transformation and innovation networks, and upgrade the policy support system for the Internet Plus initiative, thereby promoting the digital transformation of economy and society to a higher level.
Wei He , Weidong Zhang , Chaoxian Wang . Strategic Updating of Internet Plus Considering Digital Transformation[J]. Strategic Study of Chinese Academy of Engineering, 2020 , 22(4) : 10 -17 . DOI: 10.15302/J-SSCAE-2020.04.002
[1] |
工业互联网产业联盟. 工业互联网体系架构 [R]. 北京: 工业互 联网产业联盟, 2016. Alliance of Industrial Internet. Industrial Internet architecture [R]. Beijing: Alliance of Industrial Internet, 2016.
|
[2] |
国务院发展研究中心课题组. 传统产业数字化转型的模式和路 径 [R]. 北京: 国务院发展研究中心, 2018. Workshop of the Development Research Cernter of the State Council. Digital transformation of traditional industries: Its pattern and path [R]. Beijing: Development Research Cernter of the State Council, 2018.
|
[3] |
华为技术有限公司. 华为行业数字化转型方法论白皮书2019 [R]. 深圳: 华为技术有限公司, 2019. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Huawei industry digital transformation methodology white paper 2019 [R]. Shenzhen: Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., 2019.
|
[4] |
黄阳华. 工业革命中生产组织方式变革的历史考察与展望—— 基于康德拉季耶夫长波的分析 [J]. 中国人民大学学报, 2016, 30(3): 66–77. Huang Y H. A retrospect of the evolution of production organization in industrial revolutions and beyond: An analysis based on Kondratiev long wave [J]. Journal of Renmin University of China, 2016, 30(3): 72–83.
|
[5] |
安筱鹏. 工业互联网: 通向知识分工2.0之路 [J]. 企业观察家, 2019 (3): 56–59. An X P. Industrial Internet: The road to knowledge division 2.0 [J]. Enterprise Observer, 2019 (3): 56–59.
|
[6] |
余晓晖, 张恒升, 彭炎, 等. 工业互联网网络连接架构和发展趋 势 [J]. 中国工程科学, 2018, 20(4): 79–84. Yu X H, Zhang H S, Peng Y, et al. Networking architecture and development trend of Industrial Internet [J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 2018, 20(4): 79–84.
|
[7] |
余晓晖, 刘默, 蒋昕昊, 等. 工业互联网体系架构2.0 [J]. 计算机 集成制造系统, 2019, 25(12): 2983–2996. Yu X H, Liu M, Jiang X H, et al. Industrial Internet architecture 2.0 [J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2019, 25(12): 2983–2996.
|
[8] |
彭瑜. OT与IT融合,一个长期演进的过程 [EB/OL]. (2019-11-18) [2020-05-16]. http://www.cniteyes.com/archives/35762. Peng Y. The integration of OT and IT is a long-term evolution process [EB/OL]. (2019-11-18) [2020-05-16]. http://www. cniteyes.com/archives/35762.
|
[9] |
张伟东, 王超贤, 孙克. 探索制造业数字化转型的新路径 [J]. 信 息通信技术与政策, 2019 (9): 31–34. Zhang W D, Wang C X, Sun K. Exploring the new path of digital transformation of manufacturing industry [J]. Information and Communications Technology and Policy, 2019 (9): 31–34.
|
/
〈 | 〉 |