从生态学角度研究低影响开发技术对乔治亚州亚特兰大市不同居住区的影响

Zackery B. Morris; Stephen M. Malone; Abigail R. Cohen; Marc J. Weissburg; Bert Bras

doi:10.1016/j.eng.2018.03.005

PDF(691 KB)

工程（英文） ›› 2018, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (2) : 194-199. DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2018.03.005

研究论文

Research

从生态学角度研究低影响开发技术对乔治亚州亚特兰大市不同居住区的影响

作者信息 +

Impact of Low-Impact Development Technologies from an Ecological Perspective in Different Residential Zones of the City of Atlanta, Georgia

Author information +

History +

Abstract

Low-impact development (LID) technologies have a great potential to reduce water usage and stormwater runoff and are therefore seen as sustainable improvements that can be made to traditional water infrastructure. These technologies include bioretention areas, rainwater capturing, and xeriscaping, all of which can be used in residential zones. Within the City of Atlanta, residential water usage accounts for 53% of the total water consumption; therefore, residential zones offer significant impact potential for the implementation of LID. This study analyzes the use of LID strategies within the different residential zones of the City of Atlanta from an ecological perspective by drawing analogies to natural ecosystems. The analysis shows that these technologies, especially with the addition of a graywater system, work to improve the conventional residential water network based upon these ecological metrics. The higher metric values suggest greater parity with healthy, natural ecosystems.

Keywords

Low-impact development / Ecological network analysis / Residential water consumption

引用本文

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

导出引用

Zackery B. Morris, Stephen M. Malone, Abigail R. Cohen. 从生态学角度研究低影响开发技术对乔治亚州亚特兰大市不同居住区的影响. Engineering. 2018, 4(2): 194-199 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2018.03.005

参考文献

原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序

[1]	United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World urbanization prospects: the 2014 revision, highlights. New York: United Nations; 2014.
[2]	C. Kennedy, J. Cuddihy, J. Engel-Yan. The changing metabolism of cities. J Ind Ecol, 11 (2) (2007), pp. 43-59. DOI: 10.1162/jie.2007.1107
[3]	N. Golubiewski.Golubiewski N. Is there a metabolism of an urban ecosystem? An ecological critique. Ambio, 41 (7) (2012), pp. 751-764. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-011-0232-7
[4]	A.C. Layton. Food webs: realizing biological inspirations for sustainable industrial resource networks.[dissertation]. Goergia Institute of Technology, Atlanta (2014)
[5]	A. Layton, B. Bras, M. Weissburg. Designing industrial networks using ecological food web metrics. Environ Sci Technol, 50 (20) (2016), pp. 11243-11252. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b03066
[6]	E.H. Decker, S. Elliott, F.A. Smith, D.R. Blake, F.S. Rowland. Energy and material flow through the urban ecosystem. Annu Rev Energy Environ, 25 (1) (2000), pp. 685-740. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.685
[7]	M.E. Dietz. Low impact development practices: a review of current research and recommendations for future directions. Water Air Soil Pollut, 186 (1-4) (2007), pp. 351-363. DOI: 10.1007/s11270-007-9484-z
[8]	M.J. Hood, J.C. Clausen, G.S. Warner. Comparison of stormwater lag times for low impact and traditional residential development. J Am Water Resour Assoc, 43 (4) (2007), pp. 1036-1046. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00085.x
[9]	T. Bowman, J.C. Tyndall, J. Thompson, J. Kliebenstein, J.P. Colletti. Multiple approaches to valuation of conservation design and low-impact development features in residential subdivisions. J Environ Manage, 104 (2012), pp. 101-113.
[10]	X. Zhang, X. Guo, M. Hu. Hydrological effect of typical low impact development approaches in a residential district. Nat Hazards, 80 (1) (2016), pp. 389-400. DOI: 10.1007/s11069-015-1974-5
[11]	AECOM. Water supply and water conservation management plan [Internet]. Atlanta: Metropolitan North Georgia Water Planning District; [cited 2017 Oct 5]. Available: http://documents.northgeorgiawater.org/Water_Supply_Water_Conservation_Plan_May2009.pdf.
[12]	H. Jeong, O.A. Broesicke, B. Drew, D. Li, J.C. Crittenden. Life cycle assessment of low impact development technologies combined with conventional centralized water systems for the city of Atlanta, Georgia. Front Environ Sci Eng, 10 (6) (2016), pp. 3-15. DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781139207713.002
[13]	S.R. Borrett, B.D. Fath, B.C. Patten. Functional integration of ecological networks through pathway proliferation. J Theor Biol, 245 (1) (2007), pp. 98-111.
[14]	S.L. Pimm. Food webs. Chapman & Hall, London (1982)
[15]	T.W. Schoener. Food webs from the small to the large. Ecology, 70 (6) (1989), pp. 1559-1589. DOI: 10.2307/1938088
[16]	R.E. Ulanowicz. Ascendancy: a measure of ecosystem performance. S.E. Jørgensen, F. Müller (Eds.), Handbook of ecosystem theories and management, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton (2000), pp. 303-315
[17]	A. Bodini, C. Bondavalli. Towards a sustainable use of water resources: a whole-ecosystem approach using network analysis. Int J Environ Pollut, 18 (5) (2002), pp. 463-485. DOI: 10.1504/IJEP.2002.002340
[18]	B.D. Fath, G. Halnes. Cyclic energy pathways in ecological food webs. Ecol Modell, 208 (1) (2007), pp. 17-24.
[19]	A. Bodini, C. Bondavalli, S. Allesina. Cities as ecosystems: growth, development and implications for sustainability. Ecol Modell, 245 (2012), pp. 185-198.
[20]	B.D. Fath. Quantifying economic and ecological sustainability. Ocean Coast Manag, 108 (2014), pp. 13-19.
[21]	Atlanta zoning districts—complete listing [Internet]. Atlanta: the City of Atlanta, Department of City Planning; [cited 2017 Oct 5]. Available from: https://www.atlantaga.gov/home/showdocument?id=2173.
[22]	National Weather Service. Peachtree City: US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; [Rainfall scorecard [Internet]. cited 2017 Oct 5]. Available from: http://www.weather.gov/ffc/rainfall_scorecard.