基于一种全新的优化多变量非等距模型对中国汉族成人左心室多普勒超声心动图测值生理性变异的校正方法

Guihua Yao, Xiangyun Chen, Wenjing Yang, Qing Zhang, Jing Liu, Huan Liang, Hui Sun, Yao Xu, Li Wang, Jinfeng Xu, Cheng Zhang, Fengrong Sun, Mei Zhang, Xueying Zeng, Yun Zhang

工程(英文) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (9) : 115-122.

PDF(880 KB)
PDF(880 KB)
工程(英文) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (9) : 115-122. DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2021.05.007
研究论文
Article

基于一种全新的优化多变量非等距模型对中国汉族成人左心室多普勒超声心动图测值生理性变异的校正方法

作者信息 +

Correction of Left Ventricular Doppler Echocardiographic Measurements for Physiological Variances Using a Novel Optimized Multivariable Allometric Model in Healthy Chinese Han Adults

Author information +
History +

摘要

多数左心室(LV)多普勒超声心动图参数测值随年龄和性别显著变化,因此有必要对其生理性差异进行校正。本研究旨在验证:不同的多普勒参数测值与生物学特征变量间呈异速非线性相关,且其校正常数与校正指数各不同。共测量了1224名健康成人的23个LV多普勒参数。随机选择70%数据(A组)建立优化多变量非线性模型(OMAM),在30%数据(B组)和183名超重人群数据(C组)中验证OMAM的可靠性,并与基于体表面积(BSA)的单变量等距模型(SVIM)进行比较。结果显示,校正前,23个LV多普勒参数均与一个或多个生物学特征变量显著相关,B组中47.8% (11/23)的参数存在性别间差异,经OMAM校正后,81.8% (9/11)的参数消除了性别间差异。OMAM对B组和C组数据的校正成功率分别为100% (23/23)和82.6% (19/23),建立了独立于生物学特征变量的多普勒参数的OMAM参考值,而基于BSA的SVIM校正成功率为零。不同的LV多普勒参数与一个或多个生物学特征变量呈异速非线性相关;本研究建立的OMAM成功校正了因生物学特征变量差异对健康和超重人群多普勒测值的生理性影响,其校正效果显著优于传统的SVIM。然而,OMAM针对其他种族、肥胖和疾病状态人群的适用性仍需进一步探究

Abstract

Most left ventricular (LV) Doppler measurements vary significantly with age and gender, making it necessary to correct them for physiological variances. We aimed to verify the hypothesis that different Doppler measurements correlate nonlinearly with different biometric variables raised to different scaling factors and exponents. In this work, a total of 23 LV Doppler parameters were measured in 1224 healthy Chinese adults. An optimized multivariable allometric model (OMAM) and scaling equations were developed in 70% of the subjects (group A), and the reliability of the model and equations was verified using the remaining 30% of the subjects (group B) as well as 183 overweight subjects (group C). The single-variable isometric model (SVIM) with body surface area (BSA) as a scaling variable was used for comparison. Before correction, all 23 LV Doppler parameters correlated significantly with one or more of the biometric variables. In group B, gender differences were found in 47.8% (11/23) of the parameters and were eliminated in 81.8% (9/11) of the parameters after correction with OMAM. The successful correction rate with OMAM was 100% (23/23) in group B and 82.6% (19/23) in group C. New reference values for corrected Doppler measurements independent of biometric variables were established. The SVIM with BSA successfully corrected none of the 23 parameters. In conclusion, different LV Doppler parameters allometrically correlated with one or more of the biometric variables. The novel OMAM developed in this study successfully corrected the effects of the physiological variances of most biometric variables on Doppler measurements in healthy and overweight subjects, and was found to be far superior to the SVIM. However, whether the OMAM equations can be applied to other ethnicities, obese subjects, and pathological conditions requires further investigation.

关键词

多普勒超声心动图 / 生理性变异 / 非等距模型 / 正常参考值

Keywords

Doppler echocardiography / Physiological variance / Allometric model / Normal reference values

引用本文

导出引用
Guihua Yao, Xiangyun Chen, Wenjing Yang. 基于一种全新的优化多变量非等距模型对中国汉族成人左心室多普勒超声心动图测值生理性变异的校正方法. Engineering. 2022, 16(9): 115-122 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2021.05.007

参考文献

[1]
Nagueh SF, Smiseth OA, Appleton CP, Byrd BF 3rd, Dokainish H, Edvardsen T, et al.; Houston, Texas; Oslo, Norway; Phoenix, Arizona; Nashville, Tennessee; Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Uppsala, Sweden; Ghent and Liège, Belgium; Cleveland, Ohio; Novara, Italy; Rochester, Minnesota; Bucharest, Romania; and St. Louis, Missouri. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;17(12):1321–60.
[2]
Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;16(3):233–70.
[3]
Caballero L, Kou S, Dulgheru R, Gonjilashvili N, Athanassopoulos GD, Barone D, et al. Echocardiographic reference ranges for normal cardiac Doppler data: results from the NORRE Study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;16 (9):1031–41.
[4]
Yao GH, Zhang M, Yin LX, Zhang C, Xu MJ, Deng Y, et al.; the Echocardiographic Measurements in Normal Chinese Adults (EMINCA) Study Investigators. Doppler echocardiographic measurements in normal Chinese adults (EMINCA): a prospective, nationwide, and multicentre study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;17(5):512–22.
[5]
Daimon M, Watanabe H, Abe Y, Hirata K, Hozumi T, Ishii K, et al.; the JAMP Study Investigators. Normal values of echocardiographic parameters in relation to age in a healthy Japanese population: the JAMP study. Circ J 2008;72(11):1859–66.
[6]
Roberson DA, Cui W, Chen Z, Madronero LF, Cuneo BF. Annular and septal Doppler tissue imaging in children: normal z-score tables and effects of age, heart rate, and body surface area. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2007;20 (11):1276–84.
[7]
Cantinotti M, Lopez L. Nomograms for blood flow and tissue Doppler velocities to evaluate diastolic function in children: a critical review. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2013;26(2):126–41.
[8]
Yao GH, Chen XY, Zhang Q, Zeng XY, Li XL, Zhang S, et al. A novel mathematical model for correcting the physiologic variances of two-dimensional echocardiographic measurements in healthy Chinese adults. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2019;32(7):876–83.e11.
[9]
Yao GH, Deng Y, Liu Y, Xu MJ, Zhang C, Deng YB, et al.; the Echocardiographic Measurements in Normal Chinese Adults (EMINCA) Study Investigators. Echocardiographic measurements in normal Chinese adults focusing on cardiac chambers and great arteries: a prospective, nationwide, and multicenter study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2015;28(5):570–9.
[10]
Nagueh SF, Appleton CP, Gillebert TC, Marino PN, Oh JK, Smiseth OA, et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009;22(2):107–33.
[11]
Neilan TG, Pradhan AD, Weyman AE. Derivation of a size-independent variable for scaling of cardiac dimensions in a normal adult population. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008;21(7):779–85.
[12]
Du Bois D, Du Bois EF. A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. Arch Intern Med 1916;17:863–71.
[13]
Satumora S. Ultrasonic Doppler method for the inspection of cardiac function. J Acoust Soc Am 1957;29(11):1181–5.
[14]
Popovic´ ZB, Sun JP, Yamada H, Drinko J, Mauer K, Greenberg NL, et al. Differences in left ventricular long-axis function from mice to humans follow allometric scaling to ventricular size. J Physiol 2005;568(Pt 1):255–65.
[15]
Henry WL, Ware J, Gardin JM, Hepner SI, McKay J, Weiner M. Echocardiographic measurements in normal subjects. Growth-related changes that occur between infancy and early adulthood. Circulation 1978;57(2):278–85.
[16]
Dalen H, Thorstensen A, Vatten LJ, Aase SA, Stoylen A. Reference values and distribution of conventional echocardiographic Doppler measures and longitudinal tissue Doppler velocities in a population free from cardiovascular disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;3(5):614–22.
[17]
Patey O, Carvalho JS, Thilaganathan B. Intervendor discordance of fetal and neonatal myocardial tissue Doppler and speckle-tracking measurements. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2019;32(10):1339–49.e23.
[18]
Kuznetsova T, Herbots L, López B, Jin Y, Richart T, Thijs L, et al. Prevalence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in a general population. Circ Heart Fail 2009;2(2):105–12.
[19]
Asch FM, Miyoshi T, Addetia K, Citro R, Daimon M, Desale S, et al.; the WASE Investigators. Similarities and differences in left ventricular size and function among races and nationalities. Results of the World Alliance of Societies of Echocardiography (WASE) normal values study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2019;32(11):1396–406.e2.
PDF(880 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/