不同工况和应用场景下CAES-CFPP三联产系统特性分析

Jiajia Li, Peigang Yan, Guowen Zhou, Xingshuo Li, Qiang Li, Jinfu Liu, Daren Yu

工程(英文) ›› 2024, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3) : 233-245.

PDF(2247 KB)
PDF(2247 KB)
工程(英文) ›› 2024, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3) : 233-245. DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2023.06.015
研究论文

不同工况和应用场景下CAES-CFPP三联产系统特性分析

作者信息 +

Characteristics Analysis of Integrated CAES and CFPP Trigeneration System Considering Working Conditions and Application Scenarios

Author information +
History +

Highlight

・The CFPP-CAES combined cycle is proposed and analyzed from mechanism view.

・Optimal integration scheme is obtained and system RTE can be increased by 2.24%.

・Multiple energy generation can further enhance system performance.

・Regularities and guides in heat utilization for three operation modes are refined.

・The DPP is reduced by 11.33 years and IRR is increased by 5.20% for a given scene.

Abstract

To meet the goal of worldwide decarbonization, the transformation process toward clean and green energy structures has accelerated. In this context, coal-fired power plant (CFPP) and large-scale energy storage represented by compressed air energy storage (CAES) technology, are tasked with increasing renewable resource accommodation and maintaining the power system security. To achieve this, this paper proposes the concept of a CFPP-CAES combined cycle and a trigenerative system based on that. Considering the working conditions of the CFPP, thermal characteristics of three typical operation modes were studied and some general regularities were identified. The results of various potential integration schemes discussion indicated that extracting water from low-temperature points in the feedwater system to cool pressurized air and simultaneously increase the backwater temperature is beneficial for improving performance. In addition, preheating the pressurized air before the air expanders via low-grade water in the feedwater system as much as possible and reducing extracted steam contribute to increasing the efficiency. With the optimal integration scheme, 2.85 tonnes of coal can be saved per cycle and the round-trip efficiency can be increased by 2.24%. Through the cogeneration of heat and power, the system efficiency can reach 77.5%. In addition, the contribution degree of the three compression heat utilization methods to the performance improvement ranked from high to low, is preheating the feedwater before the boiler, supplying heat, and flowing into the CFPP feedwater system. In the cooling energy generation mode, the system efficiency can be increased to over 69%. Regardless of the operation mode, the benefit produced by integration is further enhanced when the CFPP operates at higher operating conditions because the coupling points parameters are changed. In addition, the dynamic payback period can be shortened by 11.33 years and the internal rate of return increases by 5.20% under a typical application scenario. Regarding the effect of different application scenarios in terms of economics, investing in the proposed system is more appropriate in regions with multiple energy demands, especially heating demand. These results demonstrate the technical advantages of the proposed system and provide guiding principles for its design, operation, and project investment.

Keywords

Compressed air energy storage / CFPP-CAES combined cycle / Thermodynamic performance / Technical economics

引用本文

导出引用
Jiajia Li, Peigang Yan, Guowen Zhou. . Engineering. 2024, 34(3): 233-245 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2023.06.015

参考文献

[1]
C. Mitchell. Momentum is increasing towards a flexible electricity system based on renewables. Nat Energy, 1 (2) (2016), p. 15030.
[2]
International Energy Agency (IEA). World energy outlook 2020 Report International Energy Agency, Paris (2020).
[3]
National Energy Administration. 2022 energy work guidance [Internet]. Beijing: National Energy Administration; 2022 Mar 17 [cited 2023 Aug 1]. Available from: https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2022-03/29/content_5682278.htmChinese.
[4]
National Development and Reform Commission; National Energy Administration. Opinions on improving the system, mechanism and policy measures for green and low carbon energy transformation [Internet]. Beijing: National Development and Reform Commission 2022 Jan 30 [cited 2023 Aug 1]. Available from: https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xxgk/zcfb/tz/202202/t20220210_1314511_ext.htmlChinese.
[5]
Z. Li, X. Qiao, Z. Miao. Low load performance of tangentially-fired boiler with annularly combined multiple airflows. Energy, 224 (2021), 120131.
[6]
P. Eser, A. Singh, N. Chokani, R.S. Abhari. Effect of increased renewables generation on operation of thermal power plants. Appl Energy, 164 (2016), pp. 723-732.
[7]
S. Garoarsdottir. Improving the flexibility of coal-fired power generators: impact on the composition of a cost-optimal electricity system. Appl Energy, 209 (2018), pp. 277-289.
[8]
F.R. Zaloudek, R.W. Reilly. An assessment of second-generation compressed-air energy-storage concepts. Report US Department of Energy, Washington, DC (1982) Report No.: DE82019513.
[9]
J.A. Fort. Thermodynamic analysis of five compressed-air energy-storage cycles Report US Department of Energy, Washington, DC (1983).
[10]
M. Soltani, F.M. Kashkooli, H. Jafarizadeh, H. Hatefi, K. Gharali, J. Nathwanli, et al. Diabatic compressed air energy storage (CAES) systems:state of the art. Encyclopedia of energy storage, Elsevier, Amsterdam (2022), pp. 173-187.
[11]
Z. Tong, Z. Cheng, S. Tong. A review on the development of compressed air energy storage in China: technical and economic challenges to commercialization. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 135 (2021), 110178.
[12]
G. Jia, W. Xu, M. Cai, Y. Shi. Micron-sized water spray-cooled quasi-isothermal compression for compressed air energy storage. Exp Therm Fluid Sci, 96 (2018), pp. 470-481.
[13]
H. Jafarizadeh, M. Soltani, J. Nathwani. Assessment of the Huntorf compressed air energy storage plant performance under enhanced modifications. Energy Convers Manage, 209 (2020), 112662.
[14]
A.R. Razmi, M. Janbaz. Exergoeconomic assessment with reliability consideration of a green cogeneration system based on compressed air energy storage (CAES). Energy Convers Manag, 204 (2020), 112320.
[15]
A. Razmi, M. Soltani, C. Aghanajafi, M. Torabi. Thermodynamic and economic investigation of a novel integration of the absorption-recompression refrigeration system with compressed air energy storage (CAES). Energy Convers Manage, 187 (2019), pp. 262-273.
[16]
E. Yao, H. Wang, L. Wang, G. Xi, F. Maréchal. Multi-objective optimization and exergoeconomic analysis of a combined cooling, heating and power based compressed air energy storage system. Energy Convers Manage, 138 (2017), pp. 199-209.
[17]
S.M. Alirahmi, S.B. Mousavi, A.R. Razmi, P. Ahmadi. A comprehensive techno-economic analysis and multi-criteria optimization of a compressed air energy storage (CAES) hybridized with solar and desalination units. Energy Convers Manage, 236 (2021), 114053.
[18]
P. Pan, M. Zhang, W. Peng, H. Chen, G. Xu, T. Liu. Thermodynamic evaluation and sensitivity analysis of a novel compressed air energy storage system incorporated with a coal-fired power plant. Entropy, 22 (11) (2020), p. 1316.
[19]
L. Zhang, J. Cui, Y. Zhang, T. Yang, J. Li, W. Gao. Performance analysis of a compressed air energy storage system integrated into a coal-fired power plant. Energy Convers Manage, 225 (2020), 113446.
[20]
B. Li, J. Chen, C.X. Li, H.S. Chen, L. Ji. Research on coupling schemes of a compressed air energy storage system and thermal power unit. J Chin Soc Power Eng, 41 (03) (2021), pp. 244-250.Chinese.
[21]
Y. Wang, K. Lv, T.S. Ma, W.P. Ju, J.Y. Zhang, P.J. Xu, et al. Analysis of compressed air energy storage system coupled with coal-fired power unit. Therm Power Gener, 50 (08) (2021), pp. 54-63.Chinese.
[22]
X. Wang, H. Guo, H. Zhang, Y. Xu, Y.J. Liu, H.S. Chen. Analysis of energy coupling characteristics between cogeneration units and compressed air energy storage integrated systems in thermal power plants. Energy Stor Sci Technol, 10 (02) (2021), pp. 598-610.Chinese.
[23]
M. Fiebrandt, J. Röder, H.J. Wagner. Minimum loads of coal-fired power plants and the potential suitability for energy storage using the example of Germany. Int J Energy Res, 46 (4) (2022), pp. 4975-4993.
[24]
Y. Zhou, Q. Zhai, L. Wu. Multistage transmission-constrained unit commitment with renewable energy and energy storage: implicit and explicit decision methods. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy, 12 (2) (2020), pp. 1032-1043.
[25]
D.K. Kreid. Technical and economic feasibility analysis of the no-fuel compressed air energy storage concept. Report Battelle Pacific Northwest Labs, Richland (1976).
[26]
M. Budt, D. Wolf, R. Span, J. Yan. A review on compressed air energy storage: basic principles, past milestones and recent developments. Appl Energy, 170 (2016), pp. 250-268.
[27]
P. Li, Q. Hu, Z. Han, C. Wang, R. Wang, X. Han, et al. Thermodynamic analysis and multi-objective optimization of a trigenerative system based on compressed air energy storage under different working media and heating storage media. Energy, 239 (Pt D) (2022), 122252.
[28]
Y. Sanjay, O. Singh, B.N. Prasad. Energy and exergy analysis of steam cooled reheat gas-steam combined cycle. Appl Therm Eng, 27 (17-18) (2007), pp. 2779-2790.
[29]
M. Minutillo, A.L. Lavadera, E. Jannelli. Assessment of design and operating parameters for a small compressed air energy storage system integrated with a stand-alone renewable power plant. J Energy Storage, 4 (2015), pp. 135-144.
[30]
M. Cheayb, M.M. Gallego, M. Tazerout, S. Poncet. Modelling and experimental validation of a small-scale trigenerative compressed air energy storage system. Appl Energy, 239 (2019), pp. 1371-1384.
[31]
R. Li, H. Wang, H. Zhang. Dynamic simulation of a cooling, heating and power system based on adiabatic compressed air energy storage. Renew Energy, 138 (2019), pp. 326-339.
[32]
S. Lu, R. Lin. Gas turbine steady-state design and off-design characteristic general model. J Eng Thermophys, 17 (1996), pp. 407-409.
[33]
R. Kumar. Thermodynamic modeling and validation of a 210-MW capacity coal-fired power plant. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Mech Eng, 40 (3) (2016), pp. 233-242.
[34]
A. Mohammadi, M.H. Ahmadi, M. Bidi, F. Joda, A. Valero, S. Uson. Exergy analysis of a combined cooling, heating and power system integrated with wind turbine and compressed air energy storage system. Energy Convers Manage, 131 (2017), pp. 69-78.
[35]
R. Jiang, H. Yin, K. Peng, Y. Xu. Multi-objective optimization. design and performance analysis of an advanced trigenerative micro compressed air energy storage system. Energy Convers Manage, 186 (2019), pp. 323-333.
[36]
E. Jannelli, M. Minutillo, A.L. Lavadera, G. Falcucci. A small-scale CAES (compressed air energy storage) system for stand-alone renewable energy power plant for a radio base station: a sizing-design methodology. Energy, 78 (2014), pp. 313-322.
[37]
K. Rashid, S.M. Safdarnejad, K. Ellingwood, K.M. Powell. Techno-economic evaluation of different hybridization schemes for a solar thermal/gas power plant. Energy, 181 (2019), pp. 91-106.
[38]
J.R. Couper, W.R. Penney, J.R. Fair. Chemical process equipment-selection and design. (2nd ed.), Gulf Professional Publishing, Houston (2009).
[39]
G.D. Ulrich. A guide to chemical engineering process design and economics. Wiley, New York City (1984).
[40]
X. Zhang, R. Zeng, Q. Deng, X. Gu, H. Liu, Y. He, et al. Energy, exergy and economic analysis of biomass and geothermal energy based CCHP system integrated with compressed air energy storage (CAES). Energy Convers Manage, 199 (2019), 111953.
[41]
D.M. You. Technical economy and project economic evaluation. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing (2009).Chinese.
[42]
Notice on soliciting opinions on the operation rules of northeast electric power auxiliary service market. Report. Shenyang: Northeast China Energy Regulatory Bureau of the National Energy Administration of the People's Republic of China; 2020. Chinese.
PDF(2247 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/