| [1] |
P. Weiss. CRISPR use in humans shows promise while experts weigh ethical concerns. Engineering, 6 (7) (2020), pp. 719-722
|
| [2] |
S.C.P. Williams. CRISPR narrows gap between genetically altered foods and consumers. Engineering, 20 (2023), pp. 6-8
|
| [3] |
Torrella K. Gene editing could upend the future of factory farming—for better or worse [Internet]. New York City:Vox Media, LLC; 2022 Mar 25 [cited 2023 Nov 14]. Available from:
|
| [4] |
J. Welsh. First CRISPR-based therapy poised to reach patients. Engineering, 30 (2023), pp. 3-6
|
| [5] |
A.L. Van Eenennaam. New genomic techniques (NGT) in animals and their agri/food/feed products. EFSA Support Publ, 20 (9) (2023), p. 8311E
|
| [6] |
S.C.P. Williams. First pig-to-live human xenotransplant produces mixed results. Engineering, 16 (2022), pp. 6-8
|
| [7] |
A. Menchaca, P.C. dos Santos-Neto, A.P. Mulet, M. Crispo. CRISPR in livestock: from editing to printing. Theriogenology, 150 (2020), pp. 247-254
|
| [8] |
D.F. Carlson, C.A. Lancto, B. Zang, E.S. Kim, M. Walton, D. Oldeschulte, et al. Production of hornless dairy cattle from genome-edited cell lines. Nat Biotechnol, 34 (5) (2016), pp. 479-481
|
| [9] |
A. Young, T.A. Mansour, B.R. McNabb, J.R. Owen, J.F. Trott, C.T. Brown, et al. Genomic and phenotypic analyses of six offspring of a genome-edited hornless bull. Nat Biotechnol, 38 (2) (2020), pp. 225-232
|
| [10] |
Krieger LM. They were designed to be safer: how de-horned cows created at UC Davis were doomed [Internet]. Denver: MediaNews Group; 2023 May 29 [cited 2023 Nov 14]. Available from: Subscription required.
|
| [11] |
Regalado A. Gene editing has made pigs immune to a deadly epidemic [Internet]. Cambridge: MIT Technology Review; 2020 Dec 11 [cited 2023 Nov 14]. Available from:
|
| [12] |
A. Idoko-Akoh, D.H. Goldhill, C.M. Sheppard, D. Bialy, J.L. Quantrill, K. Sukhova, et al. Creating resistance to avian influenza infection through genome editing of the ANP32 gene family. Nat Commun, 14 (1) (2023), p. 6136
|
| [13] |
De Jesús EG. Gene editing can make chickens resistant to bird flu [Internet]. Washington, DC: Society for Science & the Public; 2023 Oct 10 [cited 2023 Nov 14]. Available from:
|
| [14] |
Anthes E. Scientists use CRISPR to make chickens more resistant to bird flu [Internet]. New York City:The New York Times Company; 2023 Oct 10 [cited 2023 Nov 14]. Available from:
|
| [15] |
G.M. Gim, D.H. Kwon, K.H. Eom, J.H. Moon, J.H. Park, W.W. Lee, et al. Production of MSTN-mutated cattle without exogenous gene integration using CRISPR-Cas9. Biotechnol J, 17 (7) (2022), Article 2100198
|
| [16] |
K. Wang, H. Ouyang, Z. Xie, C. Yao, N. Guo, M. Li, et al. Efficient generation of myostatin mutations in pigs using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Sci Rep, 5 (1) (2015), p. 16623
|
| [17] |
M. Crispo, A.P. Mulet, L. Tesson, N. Barrera, F. Cuadro, P.C. dos Santos-Neto, et al. Efficient generation of myostatin knock-out sheep using CRISPR/Cas 9 technology and microinjection into zygotes. PLoS One, 10 (8) (2015), Article e0136690
|
| [18] |
R. Guo, Y. Wan, D. Xu, L. Cui, M. Deng, G. Zhang, et al. Generation and evaluation of myostatin knock-out rabbits and goats using CRISPR/Cas9 system. Sci Rep, 6 (1) (2016), p. 29855
|
| [19] |
Japan embraces CRISPR-edited fish. Nat Biotechnol, 40 (1) (2022), p. 10
|
| [20] |
M. Ohama, Y. Washio, K. Kishimoto, M. Kinoshita, K. Kato. Growth performance of myostatin knockout red sea bream Pagrus major juveniles produced by genome editing with CRISPR/Cas9. Aquaculture, 529 (2020), Article 735672
|
| [21] |
Loew C. Gene-edited pufferfish and sea bream hit menus in Japan [Internet]. Portland: Diversified Communications; 2022 Jul 22 [cited 2023 Nov 14]. Available from:
|
| [22] |
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Human genome editing: science, ethics, and governance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2017.
|
| [23] |
With stringent oversight, heritable human genome editing could be allowed for serious conditions [Internet]. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences; 2017 Feb 14 [2023 Nov 14] . Available from:
|
| [24] |
D. Liang, A. Mikhalchenko, H. Ma, N. Martí Gutiérrez, T. Chen, Y. Lee, et al. Limitations of gene editing assessments in human preimplantation embryos. Nat Commun, 14 (1) (2023), p. 1219
|
| [25] |
Rana P, Fan W. Chinese scientist claims world’s first genetically modified babies [Internet]. New York City: Dow Jones & Company, Inc.; 2018 Nov 26 [cited 2023 Nov 14].
|
| [26] |
Regalado A. The creator of the CRISPR babies has been released from a Chinese prison [Internet]. Cambridge: MIT Technology Review; 2022 Apr 4 [cited 2023 Nov 14]. Available from:
|
| [27] |
National Academy of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences, the Royal Society. Heritable human genome editing. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2020.
|
| [28] |
Collins F. Experts conclude heritable human genome editing not ready for clinical applications [Internet]. Washington, DC: NIH Director’s Blog; 2020 Sep 17 [cited 2023 Nov 14]. Available from:
|
PDF(644 KB)
