
A Perspective on Smart Process Manufacturing Research Challenges for Process Systems Engineers
Ian David Lockhart Bogle
Engineering ›› 2017, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (2) : 161-165.
A Perspective on Smart Process Manufacturing Research Challenges for Process Systems Engineers
The challenges posed by smart manufacturing for the process industries and for process systems engineering (PSE) researchers are discussed in this article. Much progress has been made in achieving plant- and site-wide optimization, but benchmarking would give greater confidence. Technical challenges confronting process systems engineers in developing enabling tools and techniques are discussed regarding flexibility and uncertainty, responsiveness and agility, robustness and security, the prediction of mixture properties and function, and new modeling and mathematics paradigms. Exploiting intelligence from big data to drive agility will require tackling new challenges, such as how to ensure the consistency and confidentiality of data through long and complex supply chains. Modeling challenges also exist, and involve ensuring that all key aspects are properly modeled, particularly where health, safety, and environmental concerns require accurate predictions of small but critical amounts at specific locations. Environmental concerns will require us to keep a closer track on all molecular species so that they are optimally used to create sustainable solutions. Disruptive business models may result, particularly from new personalized products, but that is difficult to predict.
Smart manufacturing / Process systems engineering / Uncertainty / Flexibility / Optimization / Model-based control
[1] |
Davis J, Edgar T, Porter J, Bernaden J, Sarli M. Smart manufacturing, manufacturing intelligence and demand-dynamic performance. Comput Chem Eng 2012;47:145–56.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Kumar A, Baldea M, Edgar TF, Ezekoye OA. Smart manufacturing approach for efficient operation of industrial steam-methane reformers. Ind Eng Chem Res 2015;54(16):4360–70.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
Li D. Perspective for smart factory in petrochemical industry. Comput Chem Eng 2016;91:136–48.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Grossmann IE, Doherty MF, Harold MP. A tribute to Roger Sargent. AIChE J 2016;62(9):2950.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Smith R. Chemical process: Design and integration. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; 2005.
|
[6] |
Douglas JM. Conceptual design of chemical processes. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company; 1988.
|
[7] |
Biegler LT, Grossmann IE, Westerberg AW. Systematic methods of chemical process design. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1997.
|
[8] |
Jaksland CA, Gani R, Lien KM. Separation process design and synthesis based on thermodynamic insights. Chem Eng Sci 1995;50(3):511–30.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Dijkema GPJ, Basson L. Complexity and industrial ecology: Foundations for a transformation from analysis to action. J Ind Ecol 2009;13(2):157–64.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Hebert D. Real-time optimization with MPC. Control [Internet]. 2013 Sep 12 [cited 2016 Oct 20]. Available from: http://www.controlglobal.com/articles/2013/real-time-optimization-with-mpc/.
|
[11] |
He X, Hayya JC. The Impact of just-in-time production on food quality. Total Qual Manage 2002;13(5):651–70.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Cao C, Gu X,Xin Z. A data-driven rolling-horizon online scheduling model for diesel production of a real-world refinery. AIChE J 2013;59(4):1160–74.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Grossmann IE, Sargent RWH. Optimum design of chemical plants with uncertain parameters. AIChE J 1978;24(6):1021–8.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[14] |
Halemane KP, Grossmann IE. Optimal process design under uncertainty. AIChE J. 1983;29(3):425–33.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Steimel J, Harrmann M, Schembecker G, Engell S. A framework for the modeling and optimization of process superstructures under uncertainty. Chem Eng Sci 2014;115:225–37.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Steimel J, Engell S. Optimization-based support for process design under uncertainty: A case study. AIChE J 2016;62(9):3404–19.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Mohideen MJ, Perkins JD, Pistikopoulos EN. Optimal design of dynamic systems under uncertainty. AIChE J 1996;42(8):2251–72.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Washington ID, Swartz CLE.Design under uncertainty using parallel multiperiod dynamic optimization. AIChE J 2014;60(9):3151–68.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Wang S, Baldea M. Identification-based optimization of dynamical systems under uncertainty. Comput Chem Eng 2014;64:138–52.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Sahinidis NV. Optimization under uncertainty: State-of-the-art and opportunities. Comput Chem Eng 2004;28(6–7):971–83.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[21] |
Yuan Z, Chen B, Zhao J. An overview on controllability analysis of chemical processes. AIChE J 2011;57(5):1185–201.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[22] |
Sharifzadeh M. Integration of process design and control: A review. Chem Eng Res Des 2013;91(12):2515–49.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[23] |
Ellis M, Durand H, Christofides PD. A tutorial review of economic model predictive control methods. J Process Contr 2014;24(8):1156–78.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[24] |
Youssef MA, Youssef EM. The synergistic impact of time-based technologies on manufacturing competitive priorities. Int J Technol Manage 2015;67(2–4):245–68.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[25] |
Sousa RT, Shah N, Papageorgiou LG. Supply chains of high-value low-volume products. In: Pistikopoulos EN, Georgiadis MC, Dua V, Papageorgiou LG, editors Process systems engineering: Supply chain optimization, volume 4. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA; 2008. p. 1–27.
|
[26] |
Li J, Xiao X, Boukouvala F, Floudas CA, Zhao B, Du G, et al.Data-driven mathematical modeling and global optimization framework for entire petrochemical planning operation. AIChE J 2016;62(9):3020–40.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[27] |
Sahay N, Ierapetritou M. Multienterprise supply chain: Simulation and optimization. AIChE J 2016;62(9):3392–403.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[28] |
Venkatasubramanian V, Rengaswamy R, Yin K, Kavuri SN. A review of process fault detection and diagnosis: Part I: Quantitative model-based methods. Comput Chem Eng 2003;27(3):293–311.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[29] |
Zhang L, Babi DK, Gani R. New vistas in chemical product and process design. Annu Rev Chem Biomol 2016;7:557–82.
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[30] |
Jonuzaj S, Akula PT, Kleniati PM, Adjiman CS. The formulation of optimal mixtures with generalized disjunctive programming: A solvent design case study. AIChE J 2016;62(5):1616–33.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[31] |
Bogle IDL. Recent developments in process systems engineering as applied to medicine. Curr Opin Chem Eng 2012;1(4):453–8.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[32] |
Ashworth W, Perez-Galvan C, Davies N, Bogle IDL. Liver function as an engineering system. AIChE J 2016;62(9):3285–97.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[33] |
Duran MA, Grossmann IE. An outer-approximation algorithm for a class of mixed-integer nonlinear programs. Math Program 1986;36(3):307–39.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[34] |
Ruiz JP, Grossmann IE. Global optimization of non-convex generalized disjunctive programs: A review on reformulations and relaxation techniques. J Global Optim 2017;67(1–2):43–58.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[35] |
Floudas CA, Pardalos PM. State of the art in global optimization: Computational methods and applications. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2012.
|
[36] |
Brandt SC, Morbach J, Miatidis M, Theißen M, Jarke M, Marquardt W.An ontology-based approach to knowledge management in design processes. Comput Chem Eng 2008;32(1–2):320–42.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[37] |
Zhao Y, Jiang C, Yang A. Towards computer-aided multiscale modelling: An overarching methodology and support of conceptual modelling. Comput Chem Eng 2012;36:10–21.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[38] |
Lopez Flores R, Belaud JP, Negny S, Le Lann JM. Open computer aided innovation to promote innovation in process engineering. Chem Eng Res Des 2015;103:90–107.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |