Mechanized Tunneling in Soft Soils: Choice of Excavation Mode and Application of Soil-Conditioning Additives in Glacial Deposits

Rolf Zumsteg, Lars Langmaack

Engineering ›› 2017, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (6) : 863-870.

PDF(2232 KB)
PDF(2232 KB)
Engineering ›› 2017, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (6) : 863-870. DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2017.11.006
Research
Research

Mechanized Tunneling in Soft Soils: Choice of Excavation Mode and Application of Soil-Conditioning Additives in Glacial Deposits

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The history of the formation of the alpine region is affected by the activities of the glaciers, which have a strong influence on underground works in this area. Mechanized tunneling must adapt to the presence of sound and altered rock, as well as to inhomogeneous soil layers that range from permeable gravel to soft clay sediments along the same tunnel. This article focuses on past experiences with tunnel-boring machines (TBMs) in Switzerland, and specifically on the aspects of soil conditioning during a passage through inhomogeneous soft soils. Most tunnels in the past were drilled using the slurry mode (SM), in which the application of different additives was mainly limited to difficult zones of high permeability and stoppages for tool change and modification. For drillings with the less common earth pressure balanced mode (EPBM), continuous foam conditioning and the additional use of polymer and bentonite have proven to be successful. The use of conditioning additives led to new challenges during separation of the slurries (for SM) and disposal of the excavated soil (for EPBM). If the disposal of chemically treated soft soil material from the earth pressure balanced (EPB) drive in a manner that is compliant with environmental legislation is considered early on in the design and evaluation of the excavation mode, the EPBM can be beneficial for tunnels bored in glacial deposits.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Soil conditioning / Earth pressure balanced shield / Slurry shield / Mechanized tunneling

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Rolf Zumsteg, Lars Langmaack. Mechanized Tunneling in Soft Soils: Choice of Excavation Mode and Application of Soil-Conditioning Additives in Glacial Deposits. Engineering, 2017, 3(6): 863‒870 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2017.11.006

References

[1]
M. Herrenknecht, M. Thewes, C. Budach.Entwicklung der Erddruckschilde: Von den Anfängen bis zur Gegenwart. Geomech Tunnelling, 4 (1) (2011), pp. 11-35.[German]. DOI: 10.1002/geot.201100003
[2]
B. Maidl, M. Herrenknecht, U. Maidl, G. Wehrmeyer. Mechanised shield tunneling. (2nd ed.), Ernst & Sohn, Berlin (2012)
[3]
D. Willis. Nächste Generation Hybrid-TBM für wechselnden Baugrund. Tunnel, 3 (32) (2013), pp. 20-26.[German]
[4]
Bäppler K, Burger W.Innovation track of multi-mode machines for complex ground conditions. In: Proceedings of the Swiss Tunnel Congress 2016; 2016 Jun 15-16; Luzern, Switzerland; 2016. p.122-129.
[5]
C. Budach, M. Thewes. Application ranges of EPB shields in coarse ground based on laboratory research. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech, 50 (2015), pp. 296-304
[6]
Häfliger P.Choice of driving methods in soft ground. In:Proceedings of the Swiss Tunnel Congress 2013; Luzern, Switzerland. 2013. p. 178-201.
[7]
T. Krause. Schildvortrieb mit flüssigkeits- und erddruckgestützter Ortsbrust. [dissertation]. Technische Univesität Braunschweig, Braunschweig (1987). [German]
[8]
V. Guglielmetti, P. Grasso, A. Mathab, S. Xu. Mechanized tunnelling in urban areas: design methodology and construction control. Taylor and Francis, London (2007)
[9]
Fritz P. Slurry shield tunneling in highly permeable ground. In: Proceedings of the 12th panamerican conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering and the 39th US rock mechanics symposium; 2003 Jun 22-25; Cambridge, MA, USA. Essen: Verlag Gluckauf GMBH; 2003.
[10]
Langmaack L.Chemische Additive für den maschinellen Tunnelvortrieb. In:Proceedings of the Swiss Tunnel Congress 2009; 2009 Jun 17- 18; Luzern, Switzerland; 2009. German.
[11]
R. Zumsteg, A.M. Puzrin, G. Anangnostou. Effects of slurry on stickiness of excavated clays and clogging of equipment in fluid supported excavations. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech, 58 (2016), pp. 197-208
[12]
R. Zumsteg, M. Plötze, A.M. Puzrin. Reduction of clogging potential of clays: new chemical applications and novel quantification approaches. Géotechnique, 63 (4) (2013), pp. 276-286
[13]
G.W.E. Milligan. Lubrication and soil conditioning in tunnelling, pipe jacking and microtunnelling: a state-of-the-art review. Report. Geotechnical Consulting Group, London (2000)
[14]
D. Peila, C. Oggeri, R. Vinai. Screw conveyor device for laboratory tests on conditioned soil for EPB tunneling operations. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, 133 (12) (2007), pp. 1622-1625
[15]
A.S. Merritt, R.J. Mair. Mechanics of tunnelling machine screw conveyors: model tests. Géotechnique, 56 (9) (2006), pp. 605-615. DOI: 10.1680/geot.2006.56.9.605
[16]
R. Vinai, C. Oggeri, D. Peila. Soil conditioning of sand for EPB applications: a laboratory research. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech, 23 (3) (2008), pp. 308-317
[17]
Peila D, Oggeri C, Borio L.Influence of granulometry, time and temperature on soil conditioning for EPBS applications. In: Proceedings World Tunnel Congress 2008; 2008 Sep 22-24; Agra, India. New Dehli: Aravali Printers & Publishers; 2008. p.881-91.
[18]
M. Thewes, F. Hollmann. Assessment of clay soils and clay-rich rock for clogging of TBMs. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech, 57 (2016), pp. 122-128
[19]
S.A. Jefferis, A.S. Merritt. Exploiting physic-chemical modification of soils in closed face tunneling. M. Manassero, A. Dominijanni, S. Foti, G. Musso (Eds.), Coupled phenomena in environmental geotechnics, CRC Press/Balkema, London (2013)
[20]
M. Galli, M. Thewes. Investigations for the application of EPB shields in difficult grounds. Geomech Tunn, 7 (1) (2014), pp. 31-44. DOI: 10.1002/geot.201310030
[21]
Yu H, Mooney MA, Bezuijen A. A simplified chamber pressure model for EPB TBM tunneling in granular soil. In: Proceedingsof 9th international symposium on geotechnical aspects of underground construction in soft ground; Apr 4-5 2017 ; Sao Paulo, Brazil; 2017.
[22]
A.S. Merritt, R.J. Mair. Mechanics of tunnelling machine screw conveyors: a theoretical model. Géotechnique, 58 (2) (2008), pp. 79-94. DOI: 10.1680/geot.2008.58.2.79
[23]
H. Egli, L. Langmaack. Erddruckgestützter Schildvortrieb-Chancen und Risiken. Felsbau Magazin, 3 (2008), pp. 149-154 [German]
[24]
Jancsecz S, Steiner W. Face support for a large mix-shield in heterogeneous ground conditions. In: Proceedings of tunnelling 1994; 1994 Jul 5-7; London, UK. Boston: Springer; 1994. p. 531-50.
[25]
Steiner W. Slurry penetration into coarse grained soils and settlements from large slurry shield tunnel. In: Geotechnical aspects of underground construction in soft ground. Rotterdam: Balkema; 1996. p. 329-333. [German]
[27]
Sennhauser U.Lockergesteinsstrecke des Längholztunnels—Wahl des Vortriebverfahrens. Kolloquium Maschinelle Tunnelvortriebe im Lockergestein. Report. Bern: Bächtold & Moor AG; 2008 May 5. German.
[28]
M. Bosshard, J. Bolliger, R. Kobel. Zurich cross rail, Weinberg tunnel—the challenges of the loose ground section and passing under the river. Geomech Tunn, 4 (6) (2011), pp. 651-664. DOI: 10.1002/geot.201100047
[29]
EFNARC. Specification and guidelines for the use of specialist products for mechanised tunnelling (TBM) in soft ground and hard rock. Surry: European Federation for Specialist Construction Chemicals and Concrete Systems; 2005 Apr.
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(2232 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/