Biocompatibility Pathways in Tissue-Engineering Templates

David F. Williams

Engineering ›› 2018, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (2) : 286-290.

PDF(431 KB)
PDF(431 KB)
Engineering ›› 2018, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (2) : 286-290. DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2018.03.007
Research
Research

Biocompatibility Pathways in Tissue-Engineering Templates

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Tissue engineering, which involves the creation of new tissue by the deliberate and controlled stimulation of selected target cells through a systematic combination of molecular and mechanical signals, usually involves the assistance of biomaterials-based structures to deliver these signals and to give shape to the resulting tissue mass. The specifications for these structures, which used to be described as scaffolds but are now more correctly termed templates, have rarely been defined, mainly because this is difficult to do. Primarily, however, these specifications must relate to the need to develop the right microenvironment for the cells to create new tissue and to the need for the interactions between the cells and the template material to be consistent with the demands of the new viable tissues. These features are encompassed by the phenomena that are collectively called biocompatibility. However, the theories and putative mechanisms of conventional biocompatibility (mostly conceived through experiences with implantable medical devices) are inadequate to describe phenomena in tissue-engineering processes. The present author has recently redefined biocompatibility in terms of specific materials- and biology-based pathways; this opinion paper places tissue-engineering biocompatibility mechanisms in the context of these pathways.

Keywords

Biomaterials / Scaffolds / Mechanotransduction / Inflammation / Topography

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
David F. Williams. Biocompatibility Pathways in Tissue-Engineering Templates. Engineering, 2018, 4(2): 286‒290 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2018.03.007

References

[1]
D.F. Williams. To engineer is to create: the link between engineering and regeneration. Trends Biotechnol, 24 (1) (2006), pp. 4-8
[2]
D.F. Williams. The biomaterials conundrum in tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part A, 20 (7-8) (2014), pp. 1129-1131. DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2013.0769
[3]
D.F. Williams. Essential biomaterials science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2014)
[4]
D.F. Williams. Biocompatibility pathways: biomaterials-induced sterile inflammation, mechanotransduction, and principles of biocompatibility control. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 3 (1) (2017), pp. 2-35. DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00607
[5]
Williams DF, editor. Definitions in biomaterials:proceedings of a consensus conference of the European Society for Biomaterials; 1986 Mar 3-5; Chester, UK. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Ltd.; 1987.
[6]
D.F. Williams. On the mechanisms of biocompatibility. Biomaterials, 29 (20) (2008), pp. 2941-2953
[7]
D.F. Williams. There is no such thing as a biocompatible material. Biomaterials, 35 (38) (2014), pp. 10009-10014
[8]
P.A. Mouthuy, S.J.B. Snelling, S.G. Dakin, L. Milković, A.C. Gašparović, A.J. Carr, et al.. Biocompatibility of implantable materials: an oxidative stress viewpoint. Biomaterials, 109 (2016), pp. 55-68
[9]
K. Ren, Y. Chen, H. Wu. New materials for microfluidics in biology. Curr Opin Biotechnol, 25 (2014), pp. 78-85
[10]
K.N. Ekdahl, J.D. Lambris, H. Elwing, D. Ricklin, P.H. Nilsson, Y. Teramura, et al.. Innate immunity activation on biomaterial surfaces: a mechanistic model and coping strategies. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 63 (12) (2011), pp. 1042-1050
[11]
A. Ambesi, P.J. McKeown-Longo. Conformational remodeling of the fibronectin matrix selectively regulates VEGF signaling. J Cell Sci, 127 (Pt 17) (2014), pp. 3805-3816
[12]
S. Tenzer, D. Docter, J. Kuharev, A. Musyanovych, V. Fetz, R. Hecht, et al.. Rapid formation of plasma protein corona critically affects nanoparticle pathophysiology. Nat Nanotechnol, 8 (10) (2013), pp. 772-781. DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2013.181
[13]
T. Iskratsch, H. Wolfenson, M.P. Sheetz. Appreciating force and shape—the rise of mechanotransduction in cell biology. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 15 (12) (2014), pp. 825-833. DOI: 10.1038/nrm3903
[14]
K.C. Koskinas, Y.S. Chatzizisis, A.P. Antoniadis, G.D. Giannoglou. Role of endothelial shear stress in stent restenosis and thrombosis: pathophysiologic mechanisms and implications for clinical translation. J Am Coll Cardiol, 59 (15) (2012), pp. 1337-1349
[15]
N. Huebsch, P.R. Arany, A.S. Mao, D. Shvartsman, O.A. Ali, S.A. Bencherif, et al.. Harnessing traction-mediated manipulation of the cell/matrix interface to control stem-cell fate. Nat Mater, 9 (6) (2010), pp. 518-526. DOI: 10.1038/nmat2732
[16]
Y. Li, X. Zhang, D. Cao. Nanoparticle hardness controls the internalization pathway for drug delivery. Nanoscale, 7 (6) (2015), pp. 2758-2769
[17]
G.Y. Chen, G. Nuñez. Sterile inflammation: sensing and reacting to damage. Nat Rev Immunol, 10 (12) (2010), pp. 826-837. DOI: 10.1038/nri2873
[18]
M.J.P. Biggs, R.G. Richards, M.J. Dalby. Nanotopographical modification: a regulator of cellular function through focal adhesions. Nanomedicine, 6 (5) (2010), pp. 619-633
[19]
E.K.F. Yim, M.P. Sheetz.Force-dependent cell signaling in stem cell differentiation. Stem Cell Res Ther, 3 (5) (2012), p. 41
[20]
A.J. Keung, E.M. de Juan-Pardo, D.V. Schaffer, S. Kumar. Rho GTPases mediate the mechanosensitive lineage commitment of neural stem cells. Stem Cells, 29 (11) (2011), pp. 1886-1897. DOI: 10.1002/stem.746
[21]
A.B. Yeatts, D.T. Choquette, J.P. Fisher. Bioreactors to influence stem cell fate: augmentation of mesenchymal stem cell signaling pathways via dynamic culture systems. Biochim Biophys Acta, 1830 (2) (2013), pp. 2470-2480
[22]
A.B. Castillo, C.R. Jacobs. Mesenchymal stem cell mechanobiology. Curr Osteoporos Rep, 8 (2) (2010), pp. 98-104. DOI: 10.1007/s11914-010-0015-2
[23]
L.A. Reis, L.L.Y. Chiu, N. Feric, L. Fu, M. Radisic. Biomaterials in myocardial tissue engineering. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 10 (1) (2016), pp. 11-28. DOI: 10.1002/term.1944
[24]
T. Jacobs, R. Morent, N. De Geyter, P. Dubruel, C. Leys. Plasma surface modification of biomedical polymers: influence on cell-material interaction. Plasma Chem Plasma Process, 32 (5) (2012), pp. 1039-1073. DOI: 10.1007/s11090-012-9394-8
[25]
A. Leal-Egaña, T. Scheibel. Interactions of cell with silk surfaces. J Mater Chem, 22 (29) (2012), pp. 14330-14336. DOI: 10.1039/c2jm31174g
[26]
S.P. Zustiak, Y. Wei, J.B. Leach. Protein-hydrogel interactions in tissue engineering: mechanisms and applications. Tissue Eng Part B Rev, 19 (2) (2013), pp. 160-171. DOI: 10.1089/ten.teb.2012.0458
[27]
M. Gonen-Wadmany, L. Oss-Ronen, D. Seliktar. Protein-polymer conjugates for forming photopolymerizable biomimetic hydrogels for tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 28 (26) (2007), pp. 3876-3886
[28]
G. Wick, C. Grundtman, C. Mayerl, T.F. Wimpissinger, J. Feichtinger, B. Zelger, et al.. The immunology of fibrosis. Annu Rev Immunol, 31 (2013), pp. 107-135. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032712-095937
[29]
H. Guo, J.B. Callaway, J.P.Y. Ting. Inflammasomes: mechanism of action, role in disease, and therapeutics. Nat Med, 21 (7) (2015), pp. 677-687. DOI: 10.1038/nm.3893
[30]
T.A. Wynn, K.M. Vannella. Macrophages in tissue repair, regeneration, and fibrosis. Immunity, 44 (3) (2016), pp. 450-462
[31]
E. Martínez, A. Lagunas, C.A. Mills, S. Rodríguez-Seguí, M. Estévez, S. Oberhansl, et al.. Stem cell differentiation by functionalized micro- and nanostructured surfaces. Nanomedicine (Lond), 4 (1) (2009), pp. 65-82. DOI: 10.2217/17435889.4.1.65
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(431 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/