A Geodesign Method of Human-Energy-Water Interactive Systems for Urban Infrastructure Design: 10KM2 Near-Zero District Project in Shanghai

Perry Pei-Ju Yang, Cheryl Shu-Fang Chi, Yihan Wu, Steven Jige Quan

Engineering ›› 2018, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (2) : 182-189.

PDF(1538 KB)
PDF(1538 KB)
Engineering ›› 2018, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (2) : 182-189. DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2018.03.014
Research
Research

A Geodesign Method of Human-Energy-Water Interactive Systems for Urban Infrastructure Design: 10KM2 Near-Zero District Project in Shanghai

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The grand challenges of climate change demand a new paradigm of urban design that takes the performance of urban systems into account, such as energy and water efficiency. Traditional urban design methods focus on the form-making process and lack performance dimensions. Geodesign is an emerging approach that emphasizes the links between systems thinking, digital technology, and geographic context. This paper presents the research results of the first phase of a larger research collaboration and proposes an extended geodesign method for a district-scale urban design to integrate systems of renewable energy production, energy consumption, and storm water management, as well as a measurement of human experiences in cities. The method incorporates geographic information system (GIS), parametric modeling techniques, and multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) tools that enable collaborative design decision-making. The method is tested and refined in a test case with the objective of designing a near-zero-energy urban district. Our final method has three characteristics. ① Integrated geodesign and parametric design: It uses a parametric design approach to generate focal-scale district prototypes by means of a custom procedural algorithm, and applies geodesign to evaluate the performances of design proposals. ② A focus on design flow: It elaborates how to define problems, what information is selected, and what criteria are used in making design decisions. ③ Multi-objective optimization: The test case produces indicators from performance modeling and derives principles through a multi-objective computational experiment to inform how the design can be improved. This paper concludes with issues and next steps in modeling urban design and infrastructure systems based on MDO tools.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Geodesign / Urban design / Urban infrastructure / Energy performance / Iterative process / Multi-objective optimization

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Perry Pei-Ju Yang, Cheryl Shu-Fang Chi, Yihan Wu, Steven Jige Quan. A Geodesign Method of Human-Energy-Water Interactive Systems for Urban Infrastructure Design: 10KM2 Near-Zero District Project in Shanghai. Engineering, 2018, 4(2): 182‒189 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2018.03.014

References

[1]
C. Steinitz. A framework for geodesign:changing geography by design. Esri Press, Redlands (2012)
[2]
T.W. Simpson, J.R.R.A. Martins. Multidisciplinary design optimization for complex engineered systems: report from a National Science Foundation workshop. J Mech Des, 133 (10) (2011), p. 101002.
[3]
C.D. Jilla. A multiobjective, multidisciplinary design optimization methodology for the conceptual design of distributed satellite systems [dissertation]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge (2002)
[4]
N.J. Habraken. The control of complexity. Places, 4 (2) (1987), pp. 3-15
[5]
K. Lynch, L. Rodwin. A theory of urban form. J Am Inst Plan, 24 (4) (1958), pp. 201-214. DOI: 10.1080/01944365808978281
[6]
P.P.J. Yang. Complexity question in urban systems design. J Archit Eng Technol, 1 (2) (2012), p. e107
[7]
K. Lynch. Good city form. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1984)
[8]
S.J. Quan, Q. Li, G. Augenbroe, J. Brown, P.P.J. Yang. A GIS-based energy balance modeling system for urban solar buildings. Energy Procedia, 75 (2015), pp. 2946-2952.
[9]
D.B. Crawley, L.K. Lawrie, F.C. Winkelmann, W.F. Buhl, Y.J. Huang, C.O. Pedersen, et al.. EnergyPlus: creating a new-generation building energy simulation program. Energy Build, 33 (4) (2001), pp. 319-331.
[10]
H. Chen. Simulating the hydrologic impacts of land cover and climate changes under a semi-arid environment.[dissertation]. University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati (2013)
[11]
C.W. Thornthwaite, J.R. Mather. Instructions and tables for computing potential evapotranspiration and the water balance. Publ Climatol, 10 (3) (1957), pp. 185-311
[12]
J. Jacobs. The death and life of great American cities. Random House, New York (1961)
[13]
A. Sevtsuk, M. Mekonnen. Urban network analysis: a new toolbox for ArcGIS. Revue Int Géomat, 22 (2) (2012), pp. 287-305. DOI: 10.3166/rig.22.287-305
[14]
M. Batty. Defining geodesign (= GIS + design?). Environ Plann B Plann Design, 40 (1) (2013), pp. 1-2. DOI: 10.1068/b4001ed
[15]
C. Steinitz. E. Dias, H.J. Scholten (Which way of designing?. D. Lee, Eds.), Geodesign by integrating design and geospatial sciences, Springer, Cham (2014), pp. 11-40. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-08299-8_2
PDF(1538 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/