High-Performance and Multifunctional Cement-Based Composite Material

Victor C. Li

Engineering ›› 2019, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (2) : 250 -260.

PDF (3464KB)
Engineering ›› 2019, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (2) :250 -260. DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2018.11.031
Research
Research High Performance Structures: Building Structures and Materials—Article

High-Performance and Multifunctional Cement-Based Composite Material

Author information +
History +
PDF (3464KB)

Abstract

Concrete is a continuously evolving material, and even the definition of high-performance concrete has changed over time. In this paper, high-performance characteristics of concrete material are considered to be those that support the desirable durability, resilience, and sustainability of civil infrastructure that directly impact our quality of life. It is proposed that high-performance material characteristics include tensile ductility, autogenous crack-width control, and material 'greenness.' Furthermore, smart functionalities should be aimed at enhancing infrastructure durability, resilience, and sustainability by responding to changes in the surrounding environment of the structure in order to perform desirable functions, thus causing the material to behave in a manner more akin to certain biological materials. Based on recent advances in engineered cementitious composites (ECC), this paper suggests that concrete embodying such high-performance characteristics and smart multifunctionalities can be designed, and holds the potential to fulfill the expected civil infrastructure needs of the 21st century. Highlights of relevant properties of ECC are provided, and directions for necessary future research are indicated.

Keywords

High-performance concrete / Multifunction / Smart / Cement-based composite / Durability / Resilience / Sustainability / Infrastructure

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Victor C. Li. High-Performance and Multifunctional Cement-Based Composite Material. Engineering, 2019, 5(2): 250-260 DOI:10.1016/j.eng.2018.11.031

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

1. Introduction

In the 21st century, humanity faces increasing concerns about climate change, which brings about extreme conditions such as high winds, flooding, and unusual heat waves. Infrastructure designers must consider adapting infrastructure to extreme loading so as to maintain community resilience. At the same time, the mitigation of climate change caused by the rise of the earth’s average surface temperature is becoming increasingly urgent. Reducing the release of greenhouse gases associated with civil infrastructure construction and use must be a high priority of infrastructure designers. Because of the large size and long life-cycle of infrastructure, enhancing the “greenness” of construction materials—and especially their durability—can contribute significantly to the mitigation of climate change. Adaptation of civil infrastructure to climate change and the mitigation of climate change are grand challenges for current and future civil engineers.

The middle panel of Fig. 1 shows the characteristics of civil infrastructure that are necessary to support human habitation for current and future generations. Durability extends the service life of a structure without repeated repairs or the associated economic and environmental costs. It also requires that structures not be weakened by degradation in a way that limits their resilience. A structure cannot be sustainable without being both durable and resilient. Lack of resilience implies repeated reconstructions, particularly in the face of climate-change-induced hazards. According to the World Commission on Environment and Development [1], “sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.” Sustainable infrastructure engineering can be defined as an integrated system of material development, structural design and construction, and infrastructure management that is consistent with the principles of sustainable development.

The desirable characteristics of concrete infrastructure imply several high-performance requirements for modern concrete material. First and foremost, this material must be green, with low embodied energy and low carbon intensity. This is necessary in order to directly support infrastructure sustainability. Second, high-performance concrete must be ductile in order to prevent catastrophic failure induced by brittle fracture of the material. This is critical in order to directly support infrastructure resilience. Ductility also contributes to infrastructure durability, such as by the suppression of concrete cover spalling, a common phenomenon in concrete structure deterioration. But the most direct means of enhancing infrastructure durability should be the ability of the high-performance concrete to autogenously control its crack width, in order to limit the ingress of water and aggressive agents through the cover, and thus eliminate many common infrastructure deterioration mechanisms such as the corrosion of reinforcing steel. Thus, a truly high-performance concrete must simultaneously possess the characteristics of material greenness, tensile ductility, and autogenous crack-width control, as indicated in the left panel of Fig. 1.

A smart material is defined as a material that has the ability to respond to stimulus of an external environment, and that provides a useful function without human intervention. For example, self-healing material responds to water and air and conducts damage repair in order to restore its intrinsic mechanical and transport properties. It therefore supports both infrastructure durability and resilience. Self-sensing material responds to external loading, and identifies the location and extent of damage it suffers. It supports infrastructure durability by informing decision-makers when and where repair is needed, and supports infrastructure resilience by providing information on whether a structure may be put back in service, thus allowing an earlier return to use of the structure after a major load event. If self-sensing and self-healing were combined, the material would be able to communicate the level of healing recovery without external intervention. The self-thermal auto-adaptive function allows the material to alter its heat storage capacity by responding to a rise in air temperature, thus limiting the temperature increase in the interior of a building and minimizing the need for energy-intensive air conditioning. This function directly addresses the sustainability of a building in the use phase of its life-cycle. Photocatalytic material responds to ultraviolet (UV) irradiation from sunlight by creating electron-hole pair and generating highly active hydroxyl radicals that minimize the need for water- and energy-intensive washing, and enhances the surrounding air quality of urban structures via pollutant removal. This function also directly addresses infrastructure sustainability. These examples of smart material functions, as shown in the right panel of Fig. 1, add significant value to high-performance concrete, through their contributions to infrastructure durability, resilience, and sustainability.

To advance civil infrastructure durability, resilience, and sustainability in the 21st century, it is highly desirable to develop high-performance concrete with multi-smart functions. Although a significant amount of research has gone into high-performance characteristics and smart functions, much more work is needed to fully develop an industrially scalable concrete material that embodies these desirable characteristics and smart functions. It may be extremely challenging to develop concrete that simultaneously possesses both high performance and smartness, but this should be our goal, for the sake of our planet—Mother Earth and her inhabitants.

Engineered cementitious composite (ECC) is a concrete material that attempts to embody the above aspirations. This material has been undergoing extensive research and development by an increasingly global community of researchers and industrial early adopters. Some highlights of the characteristics and functionalities of ECC are described below. Examples of applications of ECC in transportation, building, and water infrastructures can be found in Ref. [2]. This material is also known as strain-hardening cementitious composite (SHCC)—a name that emphasizes the unique tensile stress–strain behavior of this material.

2. Contribution of ECC to infrastructure durability

The durability of civil infrastructure is influenced by the structural design and by the use and exposure environments. However, the durability of concrete material in the structure also plays a critical role. The durability of concrete in a structure is different from that of concrete in the laboratory, in that the material is expected to be under load in the field. The loading may be due to dead or live loads. It may also be induced loading due to imposed deformation such as thermal cycles or foundation settlements, and the restraint of the concrete members. Whatever the cause, loading may lead to cracking of the concrete material. Although the textbooks teach that concrete structures are designed to crack, the reality is that cracks accelerate structural deterioration and shortens service life.

Fig. 2 plots various forms of deterioration, including the increase in transport phenomena such as water permeation, chloride ion diffusion, and corrosion of reinforcing steels, as a function of crack width. These plots are normalized by the corresponding degradation level at a crack width of 0.1 mm, based on data collected from published literature [39]. What is striking in these plots is the common elbow shape of the degradation curves. Below a 0.1 mm crack width, and especially below 0.05 mm, the degradation level is minimal. Above a 0.1 mm crack width, however, the degradation level accelerates nonlinearly. These plots suggest that crack width plays a critical role in the service life of civil infrastructures.

In laboratory durability tests, concrete specimens are subjected to various exposure environments. These are important tests to understand the influence of environmental exposures on material integrity, governed by material chemistry and microstructure. The data in Fig. 2 suggest, however, that true structural durability requires the control of crack width in the field, beyond having the proper material chemistry and microstructure.

In the past, crack control in structures was intended to be taken care of by steel reinforcement. Experience reveals that this has not been a reliable approach. A more reliable approach would be to build autogenous crack-width control directly into the material itself. That is, the crack width would be designed to be an intrinsic property of the concrete, regardless of loading, reinforcement details, structural dimensions, or the exposure environment.

Fig. 3 shows a tensile stress–strain curve of an ECC [10]. Beyond the elastic limit, the ECC exhibits a strain-hardening response. That is, the load-carrying capacity continues to rise as damage is developed in the uniaxially tensioned specimen. An increasing number of microcracks form, but their width remains limited to less than 0.06 mm. This specimen does not contain any steel reinforcement.

Fig. 4 [11] shows the development of crack width in normal concrete and ECC specimens of various sizes. The cracks were generated by restrained shrinkage under drying. For normal concrete, the crack width increases linearly with specimen dimension, and increases indefinitely. For ECC, the crack width is limited to below 0.05 mm and is independent of specimen dimension.

These two experiments confirm that crack width in ECC is essentially independent of loading and specimen size. Crack width in ECC is also independent of steel reinforcement.

The durability performance of ECC has been extensively documented [4,5,1214]. To illustrate this durability, Fig. 5 [5] shows the effective chloride ion diffusivity of specimens taken from beams subjected to different levels of bending deflection. Although an increase in effective chloride ion diffusivity is observed in the ECC, this increase is linear, which reflects the rising number of cracks in the beam at higher imposed deformation. In contrast, the mortar shows an effective chloride ion diffusivity that increases exponentially, as a result of the increasing crack width of a single crack. This experimental data suggest that crack width is more critical to structural durability than crack number. The intrinsically tight crack width in ECC slows the ingress of chloride ion into the concrete cover of a structural element. The correlation between crack width and chloride ion diffusion coefficient is consistent with the elbow shape degradation curve shown in Fig. 2(b).

The importance of crack width to structural durability is highlighted by experimental evidence of the corrosion rate of steel reinforcements in beams subjected to an accelerated corrosion exposure regime. A pair of beams was preloaded and kept in flexure in the configuration shown in Fig. 6 [12]. The accelerated corrosion regime involved 28-day exposures to wet (saltwater shower 90% relative humidity (RH), 2 days) and dry (60% RH, 5 days) cycles. The control reinforced concrete (R/C) beam had a single crack, whereas the reinforced ECC (R/ECC) beam had multiple cracks with a crack width below 0.01 mm. The corrosion rates of the R/C and R/ECC beams showed distinctively different deterioration modes and magnitude. In the R/C beam, the steel reinforcement revealed severe corrosion where the concrete cracks, while the rest of the steel reinforcement remained in an uncorroded condition (Fig. 7(a)) [13]. In the R/ECC beam, the steel reinforcement revealed corrosion along multiple points associated with the multiple cracks in the ECC, but the corrosion rate was substantially lower (Fig. 7(b)). This contrast in the corrosion deterioration rate and damage pattern is a direct reflection of the crack control behavior of ECC. The autogenously controlled tight crack width in the ECC limits the chloride ion penetration through the ECC cover and the subsequent corrosion of the rebar. This test result is consistent with the elbow-shaped degradation curve shown in Figs. 2(c) and (d).

Although the above discussions used an average crack width to describe the level of damage and its effect on a variety of deterioration mechanisms, it should be noted that the crack-width distribution in ECC typically shows a log-normal form, and that the large cracks may dominate the transport and deterioration mechanism [6,15,16]. A comprehensive review of the durability of ECC materials can be found in Ref. [15].

3. Contribution of ECC to infrastructure sustainability

The enhanced durability of R/ECC structures implies reduced repair events during the use phase of a structure. In turn, the energy consumption and pollutant emissions associated with repair or replacement events can be substantially curtailed. This contribution to infrastructure sustainability by ECC was quantified for a bridge deck located in Southern Michigan. The bridge deck was retrofitted with an ECC link-slab developed for conventional joint replacement (Fig. 8 [17]). The link-slab implementation was carried out in 2005, motivated by the frequent maintenance needs that are typical of expansion joints on bridge decks.

A life-cycle assessment model [18] was developed to compute the sustainability metrics, considering the durability characteristics of R/ECC, as highlighted above. The difference in repair schedules for the deck with a conventional expansion joint and the one with an ECC link-slab is illustrated in Fig. 9 [18]. The model accounts for changes in traffic patterns due to repair events.

Fig. 10 [18] shows a comparison between the total primary energy and carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalent for the ECC retrofitted deck and those for the deck with a conventional expansion joint. Savings of 40% in total primary energy and 33% in CO2 equivalent were found for the more durable bridge deck with the ECC link-slab retrofit. A significant amount of savings was derived from the reduction in traffic pattern alteration due to the reduced number of repair events (Δtraffic) during the service life of the deck (60 years). Savings were also achieved by the reduced volume of material needed for repair or joint replacement. This study highlights the value of the tensile ductility and tight crack width of ECC for enhanced infrastructure durability and sustainability. While material greenness is important in reducing the embodied energy and carbon of construction material, structural durability plays an even more important role in attaining infrastructure sustainability.

Greening of ECC has received much attention. The cementitious binder can be partially or fully replaced by supplementary cementitious materials (e.g., high-volume fly ash [19] or granulated blast-furnace slags [20]), by filler such as iron ore tailing powder [21], or by Portland-cement-free binder such as fly ash geopolymer [22]. The manufactured silica sand that is typically used in ECC can be substituted by limestone powder [20] or by industrial waste-stream materials such as foundry calcinator baghouse sand [23], foundry green sand [23], or iron ore tailings [24]. The polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) fiber commonly used in ECC can be substituted by lower energy-intensive polypropylene fiber or using renewable plant fiber such as curaua [25]. Lepech et al. [23] have suggested a systematic approach to the greening of ECC, in order to ensure fresh property suitable for casting and retain the unique tensile ductility of ECC.

4. Contribution of ECC to infrastructure resilience

A resilient structure can be described as one that delays failure for a given load event, limits the degradation of function due to failure, and recovers at less time and lower cost. This concept is illustrated in Fig. 11, which compares the quality of a conventional structure with that of a more resilient one.

The tensile ductility of ECC offers R/ECC structures significant advantages in terms of structural resilience. This is illustrated by the contrast in the hysteretic behavior of an R/ECC beam versus that of an R/C beam under reversed cyclic loading (Fig. 12) [26]. The contrast in damage between the two beams is illustrated in Fig. 13 [26]. Even without shear stirrups, the R/ECC beam was able to limit the damage via the ductility of ECC in tension and shear [26].

Numerous experimental studies on beams, columns, frames, and walls have arrived at the same conclusion: The tensile ductility of ECC contributes to structural resilience [2732]. This advantage has been exploited in several new buildings in which R/ECC coupling beams were used to enhance seismic safety, construction ease, and usable floor space, with savings in building cost [33]. Recently, over a thousand R/ECC precast dampers were deployed to retrofit a viaduct along the eastern shoreline of Japan.

5. Multifunctional ECC

5.1. Self-thermal auto-adaptive ECC

Following the pioneering work of Alkan [34], self-thermal auto-adaptive ECC has been developed [35] to support energy conservation in buildings. Phase change materials (PCMs) can temporarily store energy by absorbing heat by switching from a solid to a liquid phase, and can then release heat by switching back from a liquid phase to a solid phase. Paraffin wax, which undergoes such a phase change at 22.8 °C, is a suitable PCM for such applications, as the transition temperature coincides with changes in human comfort level. Fig. 14 [35] shows 5 μm micro-encapsulated PCM embedded inside ECC. The resulting PCM-ECC reveals a distinct rise in thermal capacitance at the expected transition temperature (Fig. 15 [35]). Compared with the ECC without PCM, the PCM-ECC with 3% PCM has a thermal capacitance about 35% greater. The thermal capacitance curve is reversible when the temperature returns below the transition temperature, so this functionality is repeatable indefinitely.

In a study using PCM-ECC for a solar chimney in a home in Ann Arbor, MI, the peak temperature in the interior of this building was found to be maintained at below 23 °C without air conditioning, and with a peak temperature decreased by 5 °C and delayed by 2 h compared with an equivalent situation using conventional concrete with no phase change functionality.

The inclusion of 3% PCM microcapsules is synergistic with the tensile properties of ECC, which has a tensile strain capacity reaching 4% and a crack width of 10 μm. However, the compressive strength is negatively affected, and drops to about 28 MPa.

5.2. Self-healing ECC

A comprehensive review of the self-healing phenomena of cement-based materials can be found in Ref. [37].

ECC possesses the unique self-healing capability of its microcrack damage. Self-healing in ECC combines both the sealing function and the binding function of the crack faces. The self-sealing function restores transport properties such as water permeation and chloride diffusion, whereas the binding function restores mechanical properties such as tensile strength, stiffness, and ductility. It was found [36] that the self-healing functions of ECC are most effective when the crack width is below 50 μm, and when the damaged material is exposed to cycles of wetting and drying. Fig. 16 [36] shows the resonant frequency (RF) ratio as a function of crack width. A drop in RF ratio is observed after microcrack introduction. Full recovery of the RF ratio (to 100%) is evident after exposure to wet–dry cycles. Apart from RF recovery, evidence of healing has also been investigated using three-dimensional (3D) X-ray computed micro-tomography [38] and scanning electron microscopy/energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM/EDS) [39], confirming that a tighter crack width heals better.

The mechanism of self-healing is a combination of continued hydration and pozzolanic reactions when unhydrated cement grains and pozzolans come into contact with water. The resulting calcium silicate hydrates (CSHs) fill the microcrack and bind the crack faces. In addition to CSH, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) confirmed the formation of calcium carbonate (CaCO3) crystals inside the crack (Fig. 17), likely a result of reactions between the calcium hydroxide (CaOH) phase and carbonic acid from water-dissolved CO2 in the surrounding air [39]. These rehealing products were found to form on both the crack walls as well as on the surfaces of the bridging fibers.

The self-healing function of ECC is likely to last, since the shelf-life of unhydrated cement grains is known to be long. Yıldırım et al. [40] demonstrated experimentally that self-healing remained effective with one-year-aged ECC specimens after exposure to water, especially water rich in CO2 (Fig. 18).

The self-healing function of ECC was found to be repeatable [36,41]. Specimens damaged by preloading were found to recover stiffness and strength after exposure to 10 wet–dry cycles (Fig. 19).

5.3. Self-cleaning and air-purifying ECC

ECC can also be made to have self-cleaning and air-purifying functionalities, following the seminal work of Cassar et al. [42,43].

By including 10% TiO2 nanoparticles in ECC, the reflectance loss that occurred when the ECC was dyed by rhodamine B (RhB) was shown to be recoverable when the dyed ECC was exposed to UV irradiation [44] (Fig. 20). Similarly, the concentration of NO and NOx in a reaction chamber was shown to dramatically decrease with exposure of TiO2-ECC to UV irradiation (Fig. 21).

5.4. Self-sensing ECC

Self-sensing concrete material was pioneered by Chung [45], among others. Self-sensing ECC was developed to automatically detect and report damage [46]. This functionality is built on the principle that ECC is a semi-conducting material with electrical resistivity that is sensitive to changes in the material microstructure due to loading. To be specific, microcracks induced by loading alter the electrical conducting pathways. Because cracks are by definition anisotropic, the pathways that are most affected are those that pass perpendicular to the crack lines. This concept allows the use of electrical impedance tomography (EIT) to map crack damage in ECC. EIT is based on stimulating a specimen with regulated sinusoidal alternating current (AC) and determining the amplitude and phase of the voltage, from which impedance can be computed as a function of AC frequency. When an array of electrodes for voltage monitoring on the perimeter of the specimen is utilized, the data collected can be inverted for electrical conductivity for each point in the medium. Fig. 22 [46] shows this principle in action. The detected microcrack damage at different stages of loading based on electric conductivity maps corresponds well to the visual images of the microcracks, although the resolution could be further improved.

The self-sensing functionality of ECC can be utilized to self-report the structural condition after a major loading event. This information may feasibly support decision-making regarding continuing operation, repairing structures, or replacing structures, with improved efficiency and with less danger to first responders in a major load event.

6. Conclusions

This paper describes the need to integrate the high-performance characteristics of concrete material with smart functionalities in order to maximize the durability, resilience, and sustainability of civil infrastructure. Tensile ductility and autogenously controlled tight crack width lend themselves to attaining these desired infrastructure performances. Using ECC as an illustration, this paper shows that functionalities such as self-healing, self-sensing, self-thermal auto-adapting, self-cleaning, and air purifying can be built into high-performance concrete, thus achieving a modern construction material with high performance and multifunctionalities. Further improvement and material refinements can be made to enhance the wider adoption of these materials in practice. It is hoped that the current state of technology points to a viable direction for the creation of civil infrastructures that support the ambitions of truly smart cities of the future.

While major advances have been made over the last decade in high-performance multifunctional concrete, additional research is needed in order to dramatically green such materials, ideally driving them to become carbon negative. The utilization of CO2 as a resource for this purpose should be given serious consideration. Such a process would combine the engineering of material composition with that of the curing process. There are also opportunities to integrate materials development with construction methods, including modern methods such as architectural-scale 3D printing. Industrial implementation of materials with extreme durability, such as those with autogenous tight crack-width control, will benefit from data from pilot projects in the field. Although compressive strength remains a useful gold standard for the quality of concrete, as has been the case in most structural design codes, there is also a need to update codes to reflect high-performance concrete characteristics that are desirable for the modern demands of infrastructure durability, resilience, and sustainability. Such changes may include minimum tensile ductility and maximum autogenously controlled crack width, for example. Finally, high-performance concrete with multifunctionalities mimicking certain biological materials is fast becoming a reality, and should be exploited to support climate change adaptation and mitigation. This should be a high priority in the civil engineering community and in decision-making bodies for the 21st century.

References

[1]

Brundtland G.H.. Our common future: report of the World Commission on Environment and Development.

[2]

Rokugo K., Kanda T., Yokota H., Sakata N.. Applications and recommendations of high performance fiber reinforced cement composites with multiple fine cracking (HPFRCC) in Japan. Mater Struct. 2009; 42(9): 1197-1208.

[3]

Wang K., Jansen D.C., Shah S.P., Karr A.F.. Permeability study of cracked concrete. Cement Concr Res. 1997; 27(3): 381-393.

[4]

Lepech M.D., Li V.C.. Water permeability of engineered cementitious composites. Cement Concr Compos. 2009; 31(10): 744-753.

[5]

Sahmaran M., Li M., Li V.C.. Transport properties of engineered cementitious composites under chloride exposure. ACI Mater J. 2007; 104(6): 604-611.

[6]

Liu H., Zhang Q., Gu C., Su H., Li V.C.. Influence of micro-cracking on the permeability of engineered cementitious composites. Cement Concr Compos. 2016; 72: 104-113.

[7]

Djerbi A., Bonnet S., Khelidj A., Baroghel-bouny V.. Influence of traversing crack on chloride diffusion into concrete. Cement Concr Res. 2008; 38(6): 877-883.

[8]

Şahmaran M., Yaman İ.Ö.. Influence of transverse crack width on reinforcement corrosion initiation and propagation in mortar beams. Can J Civ Eng. 2008; 35(3): 236-245.

[9]

Blagojevic A.. The influence of cracks on the durability and service life of reinforced concrete structures in relation to chloride-induced corrosion. [dissertation]

[10]

Wang S., Li V.C.. Engineered cementitious composites with high-volume fly ash. ACI Mater J. 2007; 104(3): 233-241.

[11]

Li VC, Stang H. Elevating FRC material ductility to infrastructure durability. In: Proceedings of the 6th RILEM Symposium Fiber-Reinforced Concretes; 2004 Sep 20–22; Varenna, Italy; 2004. p. 171–86.

[12]

Miyazato S, Hiraishi Y. Transport properties and steel corrosion in ductile fiber reinforced cement composites. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Fracture; 2005 Mar 20–25; Turin, Italy; 2005. p. 1500–5.

[13]

Sahmaran M., Li V.C., Andrade C.. Corrosion resistance performance of steel-reinforced engineered cementitious composite beams. ACI Mater J. 2008; 105(3): 243-250.

[14]

Şahmaran M., Lachemi M., Li V.C.. Assessing the durability of engineered cementitious composites under freezing and thawing cycles. J ASTM Int. 2009; 6(7): JAI102406.

[15]

Van Zijl G.P.A.G., Wittmann F.H., Oh B.H., Kabele P., Toledo Filho R.D., Fairbairn E.M.R., . Durability of strain-hardening cement-based composites (SHCC). Mater Struct. 2012; 45(10): 1447-1463.

[16]

Ranade R., Zhang J., Lynch J.P., Li V.C.. Influence of micro-cracking on the composite resistivity of engineered cementitious composites. Cement Concr Res. 2014; 58: 1-12.

[17]

Lepech M.D., Li V.C.. Application of ECC for bridge deck link slabs. Mater Struct. 2009; 42(9): 1185-1195.

[18]

Keoleian G.A., Kendall A., Dettling J.E., Smith V.M., Chandler R.F., Lepech M.D., . Life cycle modeling of concrete bridge design: comparison of engineered cementitious composite link slabs and conventional steel expansion joints. J Infrastruct Syst. 2005; 11(1): 51-60.

[19]

Yang E.H., Yang Y., Li V.C.. Use of high volumes of fly ash to improve ECC mechanical properties and material greenness. ACI Mater J. 2007; 104(6): 620-628.

[20]

Zhou J., Qian S., Sierra Beltran M.G., Ye G., van Breugel K., Li V.C.. Development of engineered cementitious composites with limestone powder and blast furnace slag. Mater Struct. 2010; 43(6): 803-814.

[21]

Huang X., Ranade R., Li V.C.. Feasibility study of developing green ECC using iron ore tailings powder as cement replacement. J Mater Civ Eng. 2013; 25(7): 923-931.

[22]

Ohno M., Li V.C.. A feasibility study of strain hardening fiber reinforced fly ash-based geopolymer composites. Constr Build Mater. 2014; 57: 163-168.

[23]

Lepech M.D., Li V.C., Robertson R.E., Keoleian G.A.. Design of green engineered cementitious composites for improved sustainability. ACI Mater J. 2008; 105(6): 567-575.

[24]

Huang X., Ranade R., Ni W., Li V.C.. Development of green engineered cementitious composites using iron ore tailings as aggregates. Constr Build Mater. 2013; 44: 757-764.

[25]

Soltan D.G., das Neves P., Olvera A., Savastano Junior H., Li V.C.. Introducing a curauá fiber reinforced cement-based composite with strain-hardening behavior. Ind Crops Prod. 2017; 103: 1-12.

[26]

Fischer G., Li V.C.. Effect of matrix ductility on deformation behavior of steel-reinforced ECC flexural members under reversed cyclic loading conditions. ACI Struct J. 2002; 99(6): 781-790.

[27]

Fukuyama H, Sato Y, Li VC, Matsuzaki Y, Mihashi H. Ductile engineered cementitious composite elements for seismic structural application. In: Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering; 2000 Jan 30–Feb 4; Auckland, New Zealand; 2000.

[28]

Fischer G, Fukuyama H, Li VC. Effect of matrix ductility on the performance of reinforced ECC column members under reversed cyclic loading conditions. In: Proceedings of the JCI International Workshop on Ductile Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites: Application and Evaluation; 2002 Oct 21–22; Takayama, Japan; 2002. p. 269–78.

[29]

Parra-Montesinos G., Wight J.K.. Seismic response of exterior RC column-to-steel beam connections. J Struct Eng. 2000; 126(10): 1113-1121.

[30]

Fischer G., Li V.C.. Intrinsic response control of moment-resisting frames utilizing advanced composite materials and structural elements. ACI Struct J. 2003; 100(2): 166-176.

[31]

Kesner K., Billington S.L.. Investigation of infill panels made from engineered cementitious composites for seismic strengthening and retrofit. J Struct Eng. 2005; 131(11): 1712-1720.

[32]

Dehghani A., Nateghi-Alahi F., Fischer G.. Engineered cementitious composites for strengthening masonry infilled reinforced concrete frames. Eng Struct. 2015; 105: 197-208.

[33]

Kanda T, Nagai S, Maruta M, Yamamoto Y. New high-rise R/C structure using ECC coupling beams. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International RILEM Conference on Strain Hardening Cementitious Composites; 2011 Dec 12–14; Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; 2011. p. 289–96.

[34]

Alkan C.. Enthalpy of melting and solidification of sulfonated paraffins as phase change materials for thermal energy storage. Thermochim Acta. 2006; 451(1–2): 126-130.

[35]

Desai D., Miller M., Lynch J.P., Li V.C.. Development of thermally adaptive engineered cementitious composite for passive heat storage. Constr Build Mater. 2014; 67(Pt C): 366-372.

[36]

Yang Y., Lepech M.D., Yang E.H., Li V.C.. Autogenous healing of engineered cementitious composites under wet–dry cycles. Cement Concr Res. 2009; 39(5): 382-390.

[37]

De Rooij M., van Tittelboom K., de Belie N., Schlangen E.. Self-healing phenomena in cement-based materials.

[38]

Fan S., Li M.. X-ray computed microtomography of three-dimensional microcracks and self-healing in engineered cementitious composites. Smart Mater Struct. 2015; 24(1): 015021.

[39]

Kan L.L., Shi H.S., Sakulich A.R., Li V.C.. Self-healing characterization of engineered cementitious composite materials. ACI Mater J. 2010; 107(6): 617-624.

[40]

Yıldırım G., Khiavi A.H., Yeşilmen S., Şahmaran M.. Self-healing performance of aged cementitious composites. Cement Concr Compos. 2018; 87: 172-186.

[41]

Yamamoto A., Watanabe K., Li V.C., Niwa J.. Effect of wet–dry condition on self-healing property of early-age ECC. Jap Concr Inst. 2010; 32(1): 251-256.

[42]

Cassar L., Beeldens A., Pimpinelli N., Guerrini G.L.. Photocatalysis of cementitious materials. In: Proceedings of the International RILEM Symposium on Photocatalysis, Environment and Construction Materials; 2007 Oct 8–9. Florence, Italy. Paris: RILEM Publications SARL; 2007. p. 131-145.

[43]

Cassar L.. Photocatalysis of cementitious materials: clean buildings and clean air. MRS Bull. 2004; 29(5): 328-331.

[44]

Zhao A., Yang J., Yang E.H.. Self-cleaning engineered cementitious composites. Cement Concr Compos. 2015; 64: 74-83.

[45]

Chung D.D.L.. Self-monitoring structural materials. Mater Sci Eng Rep. 1998; 22(2): 57-78.

[46]

Hou T, Lynch JP. Tomographic imaging of crack damage in cementitious structural components. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Earthquake Engineering; 2006 Oct 12–13; Taipei, China; 2006.

Funding

()

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

THE AUTHORS

PDF (3464KB)

4835

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/