Molecular Characteristics, Functions, and Related Pathogenicity of MERS-CoV Proteins

Yan-Hua Li , Chen-Yu Hu , Nan-Ping Wu , Hang-Ping Yao , Lan-Juan Li

Engineering ›› 2019, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (5) : 940 -947.

PDF (441KB)
Engineering ›› 2019, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (5) :940 -947. DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2018.11.035
Research
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Molecular Characteristics, Functions, and Related Pathogenicity of MERS-CoV Proteins
Author information +
History +
PDF (441KB)

Abstract

Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) is a viral respiratory disease caused by a de novo coronavirus—Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV)—that is associated with high mortality. However, the mechanism by which MERS-CoV infects humans remains unclear. To date, there is no effective vaccine or antibody for human immunity and treatment, other than the safety and tolerability of the fully human polyclonal Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody (SAB-301) as a putative therapeutic agent specific for MERS. Although rapid diagnostic and public health measures are currently being implemented, new cases of MERS-CoV infection are still being reported. Therefore, various effective measures should be taken to prevent the serious impact of similar epidemics in the future. Further investigation of the epidemiology and pathogenesis of the virus, as well as the development of effective therapeutic and prophylactic anti-MERS-CoV infections, is necessary. For this purpose, detailed information on MERS-CoV proteins is needed. In this review, we describe the major structural and nonstructural proteins of MERS-CoV and summarize different potential strategies for limiting the outbreak of MERS-CoV. The combination
of computational biology and virology can accelerate the advanced design and development of effective peptide therapeutics against MERS-CoV. In summary, this review provides important information about the progress of the elimination of MERS, from prevention to treatment.

Keywords

MERS-CoV / Spike protein / Structural protein / Accessory protein / Nonstructural protein

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yan-Hua Li, Chen-Yu Hu, Nan-Ping Wu, Hang-Ping Yao, Lan-Juan Li. Molecular Characteristics, Functions, and Related Pathogenicity of MERS-CoV Proteins. Engineering, 2019, 5 (5) : 940-947 DOI:10.1016/j.eng.2018.11.035

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

1. Introduction

Coronavirus (CoV) is an enveloped, positive, single-stranded RNA virus that causes mild upper respiratory infections in humans. Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) is a viral respiratory disease caused by a de novo coronavirus—MERS-CoV. MERS-CoV was originally isolated from an Arab patient who died of respiratory failure and renal failure in 2012, and was classified as a member of the CoV family, which is lineage C of the genus Betacoronavirus. From April 2012 to 22 May 2019, the total global number of laboratory-confirmed MERS cases reported to the World Health Organization (WHO) was 2428, with 838 associated deaths, or a fatality of about 35% (40.43% in Saudi Arabia) [1]. Aside from MERS-CoV, only a few other CoVs are known to infect humans; these include human coronavirus (HCoV)-229E, HCoV-NL63, HKU1, and OC43, which usually result in relatively mild respiratory disease[2–3]. However, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)- CoV and MERS-CoV are highly pathogenic and lead to high mortality, especially in the elderly and in immunocompromised patients[4–5]. MERS has broken out in 27 countries around the world, with major outbreaks occurring in Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Korea. The dromedary camel is the largest intermediate host for MERS-CoV, and bats are considered to be animal sources of MERS-CoV. However, the specific role of dromedaries in the transmission of the virus is not yet clear. To date, in addition to the safety and tolerability of the fully human polyclonal Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody (SAB-301), which is described as a putative therapeutic agent specific for MERS, no effective vaccines or antibodies have been reported for human immunization and therapy [6]. Therefore, different intervention methods are need to treat MERS patients, including control of transmission. In this review, we describe the structure and potential functions of the reported MERS-CoV proteins, and discuss how their respective intervention strategies prevent virus transmission.

2. Structural proteins

Many CoVs, including MERS-CoV, have a very large RNA genome of about 30 kb with at least ten predicted open reading frames (ORFs)[3–7]. The ORFs for the structural proteins are arranged as 5' -ORF1a/b-S-E-M-N-poly(A)-3' , which is a similar arrangement to that of other CoVs in lineage C of the genus Betacoronavirus [8]. Research has targeted these genes and their encoded proteins for use as vaccines, or for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes (Table 1)[9,10].

Table 1 Structural proteins, genes, and their potential functions in MERS-CoV.

Like other CoVs, MERS-CoV carries genes encoding accessory proteins (APs; 3, 4a, 4b, and 5), which antagonize host antiviral responses—typically type I interferon (IFN) responses—and contribute to virulence and pathogenesis. When expressed alone, CoV APs appear to interfere with the innate antiviral signaling pathway [11].

2.1. Spike protein

The spike (S) protein of MERS-CoV is a type I transmembrane glycoprotein that is expressed on the surface of the envelope of the virus and forms spikes from the virus body. The S protein comprises 1353 amino acids, is heavily glycosylated, and has a large extracellular domain and a short cytoplasmic terminal. S protein can be subdivided into S1 and S2, which have important effects in virus binding, fusion, and entry.

2.1.1. Binding

The S1 subunit has an N-terminal domain (NTD) and a receptorbinding domain (RBD), and comprises about 240 residues. MERS– RBD contains internal and external subdomains. The internal subdomains are relatively conserved among CoVs [12], whereas the structure of the external subdomains in CoVs varies greatly; the external subdomains mainly participate in receptor binding, resulting in the use of different receptors between CoVs. The RBD is responsible for the binding of dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP4, also known as human CD26). Interestingly, MERS-RBD can induce strong production of antibodies in vivo, which indicates that the S protein has a good immunogenicity for the induction of neutralizing antibodies (nAbs)[13–16]. The immunogenicity and protective potential of the NTD have been studied, and the recombinant N-terminal domain (rNTD) is a candidate vaccine against MERS [17].

2.1.2. Viral fusion

There are two regions in the S2 subunit that participate in viral fusion—namely, heptapeptide repeats 1 and 2 (HR1 and HR2), which assemble into a typical six-helix bundle (also called the fusion core). Three HR2 chains in the HR1 side groove core emit three HR1 spirals, forming a central coiled spiral core that is a key membrane fusion structure[18,19]. Upon binding of S1 and DPP4, HR1 binds HR2 to form a temporary intermediate structure, causing the viral and cell membranes to move in close proximity to fuse the membranes.

2.1.3. Virus entry

The S protein plays a key role in CoV tropism and morbidity, with proteolysis between S1 and S2 [20]. There are many kinds of proteases (reviewed in Ref. [21]) in hosts that can digest the S protein of MERS-CoV. For example, furin can be used in two steps by MERS-CoV in the activation process of cleavage during infection. First, furin recognizes the R751/S752 position and cleaves the S protein during biosynthesis. Next, S2 is further digested to S2' at position R887/S888, which is adjacent to the fusion peptide after viral entry [20].

2.2. Envelope protein

The envelope (E) protein is an inner membrane protein that is also a small structural protein of MERS-CoV; it is 82 amino acids in length and is predicted to contain at least one transmembrane helix [22]. The E protein of CoVs plays an important role in intracellular trafficking, host recognition, viral assembly, and virus budding [22]. However, the exact function of the CoV E protein during infection remains unclear.

2.2.1. Virion assembly

Researchers have used infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) infection to prove that the E protein is required for virion assembly, and that its other role is disturbing the secretory pathway [23]. The MERS-CoV E protein has a single hydrophobic domain (HD) that targets the Golgi composite membrane and has cationic channel activity in vitro. The purified MERS-CoV E proteins form pentameric ion channels in the lipid bilayer. Lack of the E protein may lead to elimination of channel activity. Based on the proposed channel activity as a virulence factor, the MERS-CoV E protein is a potential antiviral therapeutic target [22].

2.2.2. B cell epitopes

Researchers have used software or programs such as LaserGene (DNASTAR, Inc., USA), PHYRE 2 (Structural Bioinformatics Group, Imperial College London, UK), and PyMOL (Schrödinger, LLC, USA) to identify a potential B epitope with high antigenicity at positions 58–82 of the E protein [24].

2.3. Membrane protein

The membrane (M) protein is important in viral assembly, the formation of the viral envelope, and the formation of the viral core by interacting with the nucleocapsid (N) protein[25,26]. Therefore, the development of fusion peptides and IFN antagonists may be an important treatment option.

2.4. Nucleocapsid protein

The N protein of MERS-CoV is a phosphorylated basic protein and is the second largest structural protein, containing 413 amino acid residues. The N protein binds to the RNA genome to form a nucleocapsid, which is important in virus replication and assembly [27].

2.4.1. Virion replication and assembly

The N-terminus of the N protein (residues 39–165) may be the RNA-binding region, and the C-terminus may be a self-binding oligomer-forming region [28]. A comparison of homology between MERS-CoV and other CoVs shows that although the N protein has low homology over the entire amino acid sequence, certain local amino acid sequences—especially the N-terminal amino acid sequence—are highly conserved. The SARS-CoV N protein can increase replication by overexpression [29]. The nucleocapsid structure not only requires the recognition of the characteristic sequences of the viral RNA, but also must recognize binding to other structural viral proteins. After the N protein forms a complex with the viral genomic RNA, the RNA is protected from destruction by nucleases in the host cell [30]. X-ray diffraction measurement at very high resolution (2.4 Å) was used to discover an intrinsically disordered region (IDR) and an NTD at the N-terminus of the N protein. This model shows that the NTDs in CoVs are relatively conserved [31].

2.4.2. Post-translational modification

The N proteins of SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV are ADP-ribosylated, which is a common post-translational modification; however, it is unclear how this regulates RNA virus infection. In a study that screened for ADP-ribosylating proteins after infection with CoV, researchers identified an ADP-ribosylated protein of about 55 kDa in vivo, which was subsequently verified as a CoV N protein. Therefore, CoV N proteins may modulate the post-translational modification of certain important proteins [30].

2.4.3. Modulation of the innate immune response

The N protein of CoV may inhibit type I IFN production by interfering with the interaction between the triple motif protein 25 (TRIM25) and retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I), and by binding to the E3 ubiquitin ligase of TRIM25. Thus, inhibiting the ubiquitination and activation of RIG-I mediated by TRIM25 ultimately leads to the inhibition of IFN production, suggesting that the N protein of a CoV regulates the host’s immune response against the virus [29].

The MERS-CoV N protein is thought to interact with mannoseassociated serine protease 2 (MASP2) [32] and translation elongation factor 1 (EF-1A) [33] in the host. Once the mannose-binding lectin recognizes the mannan on the surface of the virus-infected cell, it recruits MASP2 and then activates its enzymatic activity, eventually causing a local or systemic inflammatory response. EF-1A acts as a translation elongation factor, and catalyzes the aminoacyl-tRNA to the A site in the ribosome. EF-1A can play a regulatory role in the assembly of the cytoskeleton, microfilaments, and cytokinesis rings. The interaction between the MERS-CoV N protein and EF-1A disrupts the formation of cytokinesis loops and inhibits lymphocyte proliferation, which may explain the reduction in the number of lymphocytes in patients with MERS.

3. Accessory proteins

MERS-CoV has a large number of genomes encoding a variety of APs (dORF: ORF3, ORF4a, ORF4b, ORF5). Even among closely related CoVs, their number and sequence are different, and lead to host shift and HCoV emergence [34].

3.1. Viral replication

The MERS-CoV AP ORF is important for the replication of the virus in vivo and in vitro, which allows these ORFs to be used as targets of vaccine production, and emphasizes that MERS-CoV APs are potential targets for monitoring and therapeutic treatment. In addition, parallel disruption of the AP ORF provides a rapid response platform for new mutations of SARS or MERS-CoV AP ORFs [35].

3.2. Dysregulating host responses

The APs of MERS-CoV may invoke a hostile response through different modes, including IFN antagonism and the protein kinase R (PKR) and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-) pathways.

3.2.1. IFN antagonism

The attenuated function of dORF3-5 mutants is mainly caused by host-response disorders, including disrupted cellular processes and strong inflammation. ORF4-5 proteins increase IFN pathway activation and are potent IFN antagonists. They can inhibit IFN production (e.g., IRF-3/7) and interferon stimulated response element (ISRE) signaling pathways. The MERS-CoV ORF4a protein most likely interferes with the anti-antiviral effects of IFNs [36].

IFN antagonism is a key element of viral pathogenesis. The IFNinducible oligoadenylate synthase (OAS)-RNase L pathway is activated after the sensing of viral double-stranded RNA (dsRNA); thus, the virus and single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) of the host are cleaved, which hinders the replication and spread of the virus. ORF4b, which is mainly located in the nucleus (while all the other proteins are located in the cytoplasm), has phosphodiesterase (PDE) activity and activates RNase L. Treatment with NS4b interferes with the pathogenesis of MERS-CoV in in vivo models [37].

3.2.2. PKR antagonism

The p4a of MERS-CoV is essential for PKR antagonistic activity. To establish infection and spread, MERS-CoV must regulate a complex antiviral host-response network (type I IFN (IFN-) responses). Phosphorylation of eIF2 by PKR leads to inhibition of the translation of cells and viruses, and the formation of stress granules (SGs), which provide platforms for antiviral signaling pathways [38].

3.2.3. NF- inhibition

MERS-CoV 4b needs to prevent a strong host-dependent reaction during infection. During viral infection, 4b acts to interfere with NF--mediated innate immune responses by binding NF- to nuclear transcription factor-4 (KPNA4) and translocating it to the nucleus to play a competitive role [20]. ORF5 also has some effect on the regulation of NF--mediated inflammation [35].

4. Nonstructural proteins

ORF1a and ORF1b at the 5' -terminus of the CoV genome encode polyprotein 1a and polyprotein 1b, which may cleaved into 16 nonstructural proteins (nsps). These proteins are essential for viral replication and transcription [39].

4.1. Proteolysis

MERS-CoV 3C-like protease (3CLpro) and papain-like protease (PLpro) are affected by the different genetic and evolutionary effects of protein sequence formation, codon usage patterns, and codon usage bias. The cleavage points of PLpro are positions 1–3, which produces three nsps, while 3CLpro cleavage occur at the remaining positions 4–16. Nsp3 (~200 kDa) is a multifunctional protein that contains up to 16 different domains and regions, and is associated with viral RNA, nucleocapsid proteins, and other viral proteins involved in polyprotein processing. The PLpro activity of nsp3 is the established target of new antiviral drugs [40]. PLpro is controlled by a wide range of components, mutations, and other effects. Antiviral drugs, such as PLpro inhibitors and 3CLpro inhibitors (Table 2), have been studied for their innate immunosuppression profiles[41,42]. Nsp5 is widely involved in virus-encoded polyproteins (ppla, pplab) and 16 nsps processing; therefore, nsp5 is essential and indispensable for virus survival. In addition, the lack of cell homologs of human nsp5 makes it an ideal target for antiviral drug design [43]. The adaptive evolution of nsp3 in MERS-CoV strains is ongoing. CoV nsp3 can be used as a primary screening target, and nsp3 sequencing should be considered for monitoring and site-specific investigations [44].

Table 2 Summary of potential products targeting MERS-CoV proteins.

4.2. Viral replication

CoV RNA synthesis is associated with replication organelles (ROs) composed of a modified endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane. These are converted to double-membrane vesicles (DMVs) containing viral dsRNA and then converted to other crimped membranes, which together form a reticulovesicular network. Nsp3, 4, and 6 of SARS-CoV contain transmembrane domains and are all responsible for the formation of DMVs [45]. In addition, the cisacting element at the 5' end of the nsp1 coding region facilitates the specific recognition of viral RNA, which is necessary for efficient virus replication [46].

MERS-CoV helicase (nsp13) is one of the most important viral replication enzymes and can profoundly affect tropism and virulence [47]. Nsp13 unfolds DNA and RNA in the 5' to 3' direction and is a kinematic protein that catalyzes the progressive separation of double-stranded nucleic acids into two single-stranded nucleic acids, using energy generated by ATP hydrolysis. Therefore, the nsp13 helicase can be used as a therapeutic target to inhibit the replication of MERS-CoV [48]. In addition, nsp8 has major activity in viral replication; nsp12 (RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp)) plays a role in virus replication and transcription and can be used as a diagnostic (RdRpSeq assay) and as an antiviral target (polymerase inhibitor); nsp14 has exoribonuclease activity; and nsp15 has endoribonuclease activity, and can effectively prevent the activation of dsRNA sensor (including melanoma differentiation-related protein 5 (Mda5), OAS, and PKR) in host cells[9,49,50].

4.3. Methyltransferase inhibition

Nsp16 is an S-adenosine-L-methionine (SAM)-dependent 2' -O-methyltransferase (2' -O-MTase), and nsp10 plays an important role in regulating 2' -O-MTase activity. SAM binding can promote the assembly of the nsp10/nsp16 complex, which enzymatically converts 7mGpppG (cap-0) to 7mGpppG2' Om (cap-1) RNA in a SAM-dependent manner through 2' -OH methylation of SAM. Alanine mutagenesis has been used to identify the nsp16 residues that affect RNA recognition. The balance of SAM/S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine (SAH) can regulate 2' -O-methyltransferase activity, which increases SAH hydrolase inhibition and can interfere with CoV replication cycles [51].

4.4. Membrane proliferation

Working together, nsp3 and nsp4 exert their effects in pairing membranes. Nsp6 can promote membrane proliferation by forming perinuclear vesicles, which is thought to require full-length nsp3, because no DMVs are seen in cells co-expressing Cterminally truncated nsp3 with nsp4 and nsp6 [52].

4.5. Interaction with the host

4.5.1. IFN antagonism

Most adaptive events occur through nsp3, which inhibits the IFN response via its deubiquitination and de-esterification activity [41]. Nsp3 is currently undergoing selection, based on MERS-CoV that has been isolated from humans and camels [44]. Positive selection changes in nsp3 (R911C) were observed in human-only viruses, suggesting that virus adaptation in humans represents a potential selective pressure [44]. Nsp16 helps the virus to escape from cellular innate immunity and uses IFN-induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats 1 (IFIT-1) protein to inhibit viral translation [34]. Using reverse genetics, dnsp16-mutated MERS-CoV showed attenuation based on type I IFN; the mutation was partially recovered in the absence of IFIT-1 [53].

4.5.2. Deubiquitination

PLpro’s ubiquitin-like domain (Ubl) becomes fully flexible after binding to ubiquitin, and its increased flexibility is important for its interaction with other downstream proteins and for inhibition of innate immunity [54]. The four major residues involved in deubiquitination-L106, R168, P163, and F265 are conserved in all MERS-CoVs, but differ from other betacoronaviruses. Thus, downregulation of the deubiquitination of nsp3 may lead to a weakened interaction between MERS-CoV and the host immune system[54,55].

4.5.3. Inhibition of the expression and translation of host mRNA

Nsp1 inhibits the host innate immune response by binding to dsRNA and cell double-stranded DNA; therefore, it is considered to be the best checkpoint of viral invasion [56]. At the same time, the C-terminus of nsp1 targets TNF receptor-associated factor 3 (TRAF-3) to inhibit the production of IFN-β [57]. In addition, activation of interferon-regulated transcription factor 3 (IRF3) [58] and PKR can be inhibited by other nsp1 domains [59]. Nsp1 of CoV may also interact with cyclophilin, and is considered to be a major virulence factor because it degrades host mRNA. The mRNA degradation activity of MERS-CoV nsp1 is separate from its translational inhibitory function. Furthermore, certain residues of MERS-CoV nsp1 are crucial for evading translational shutdown [46]. The escape of MERS-CoV mRNAs from inhibition by MERS-CoV nsp1 is promoted by their cytoplasmic origin [60].

5. Potential strategies to treat MERS

There is no completely effective treatment for MERS-CoV. Current treatment methods mainly imitate the treatment of SARS-CoV, and comprise the following: symptomatic treatment, including biological therapy such as monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), blockers, protease inhibitors, corticosteroids, and IFN; chemical drugs, such as Acyclovir [61], chlorpromazine hydrochloride [62], loperamide, and lopinavir [63]; broad-spectrum antibiotics, such as ribavirin, lopinavir-ritonavir, or mycophenolate mofetil [64]; and nanoparticle vaccines [65]. However, wellorganized clinical trials have not yet been carried out. Therefore, we analyzed potential prevention and treatment methods from the perspective of their molecular characteristics, which provides a reference for the development of effective and targeted prevention and treatment, and especially of biological strategies.

5.1. Strategies related to the S protein

5.1.1. Antibodies toward S protein

The mAbs are regarded as a potential intervention method and have been used to diagnose many diseases. The main products are shown in Table 2. LCA60 is the only antibody isolated from recovered MERS patients. Preclinical development of this product has been completed, and good manufacturing practices (GMP)- approved cell lines that express high concentrations of purified and highly efficient antibodies have been established [66]. Studies of human nAbs [67] and mAbs[68,69] have been performed. These antibody-based drugs are specific and effective inhibitors of RBD, and show strong resistance to MERS-CoV-neutralizing activity. Table 2 describes other studies on potential antibodies and mAbs. Potential antibodies REGN3051 and REGN3048 have demonstrated effective prophylaxis in MERS-CoV-infected animal models[70,71], as have the following treatments: Mersmab [72]; 1E9, IF8, 3A1, 2F9, 1F7, and YS110 [73]; hMs-1 [74]; 4C2 [75]; and RBD s377- 588-Fc IgG fusion [76]. G4 recognizes the variable glycosylation loops in CoVs that define the four conformational states of the trimer. These studies may contribute to our understanding of fusion initiation and provide a basis for the design of structure-based CoV vaccines[5,77].

5.1.2. Inhibitors

MERS-CoV SP is essential for the virus to enter cells; therefore, other therapeutic agents that blockade viral cell membrane fusion should be exploited, such as feline protein inhibitors [78], TMPRSS2 inhibitors [79], PLpro inhibitors [41], furin inhibitors [80], kinase inhibitors [81], and IFN-induced transmembrane (IFITM) proteins [82].

5.1.3. Peptides

HR1P at position 998–1038 and HR2P at positions 1251–1286 have been identified by Lu et al. [19] and Liu et al. [83] as being responsible for the formation of the fusion core. The HR2P peptide can inhibit viral replication of MERS-CoV in cell lines, such as Calu3 and HFL [19]. HR2P plays a role in the inhibition of the replication of MERS-CoV and its stimulatory fusion. Although there is little knowledge concerning assembly and release, inhibiting these viral processes may be an important goal in the future[64,84]

5.1.4. Potential therapeutic components

Low-temperature electron microscopy recently revealed a global pre-fusional structure of the full-length S-exodomain, indicating that the NTD and C terminal domain (CTD) form a “V” shape that helps the overall S trimer’s triangular appearance[85–87]. The S2 subunit is linked to the viral membrane and is characterized by the presence of a long alpha helix. This structural information could form the basis for the structure-based immunogen design of vaccines against betacoronaviruses. The combination of computational biology and virology could accelerate advanced designs of agents acting against MERS-CoV, resulting in higher efficacy [64].

5.2. Strategies related to the N protein

The N protein of MERS-CoV is abundantly produced during infection and shows strong immunogenicity, indicating that it is an ideal antigen for virus antibody detection. Anti-N IgG can be used as an indicator of susceptibility to human CoV infection [88]. Reports have described new methods to generate mAbs directed against N proteins. Using the wheat germ cell protein synthesis system, a large number of MERS-CoV N protein antigens were successfully prepared in a highly soluble and intact immune state [89].

5.3. Potential strategies to treat MERS-CoV based on its characteristics

Given the biological characteristics of MERS-CoV, infection prevention and control measures are critical to prevent the possible spread of this virus. For patients with MERS, effective early diagnosis and early treatment are difficult to achieve, mainly because of atypical early symptoms, the limitations of detection methods, and airborne transmission. Therefore, regardless of the diagnosis, healthcare providers should always take consistent standard precautions for all patients. IgM-type antibodies against MERS-CoV proteins need to be detected more effectively, necessitating the development of more effective antibodies.

6. Conclusion

Explosive epidemics of MERS-CoV pose a serious threat to global public health and emphasize the need to further investigate the epidemiology and pathogenesis of this virus, in addition to developing effective therapeutic and preventive drugs against MERS-CoV infection. Despite rapid advances in diagnostics and public health measures, new MERS-CoV cases are still being reported. This suggests that multiple interventions targeting different affected populations may be necessary to stop these outbreaks. As described herein, the structural information associated with the MERS-CoV proteins may be used to develop different potential interventions to limit the outbreak of MERS-CoV. There is a need to better understand the pathogenesis of MERS-CoV in order to identify viral and host factors that play an important role in the development of MERS in humans; this may provide potentially novel therapeutic and intervention options.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Science and Technology Major Project for the Control and Prevention of Major Infectious Diseases in China (2018ZX10711001 and 2018ZX10102001).

Compliance with ethics guidelines

Yan-Hua Li, Chen-Yu Hu, Nan-Ping Wu, Hang-Ping Yao, and Lan-Juan Li declare that they have no conflict of interest or financial conflicts to disclose.

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within
[1]

Hui DS, Azhar EI, Kim YJ, Memish ZA, Oh MD, Zumla A. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: risk factors and determinants of primary, household, and nosocomial transmission. Lancet Infect Dis 2018;18(8):e217–27.
[2]

Lee H, Lei H, Santarsiero BD, Gatuz JL, Cao S, Rice AJ, et al. Inhibitor recognition specificity of MERS-CoV papain-like protease may differ from that of SARSCoV. ACS Chem Biol 2015;10(6):1456–65.
[3]

Choi J, Kim MG, Oh YK, Kim YB. Progress of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus vaccines: a patent review. Expert Opin Ther Pat 2017;27 (6):721–31.
[4]

Zaki AM, Van Boheemen S, Bestebroer TM, Osterhaus AD, Fouchier RA. Isolation of a novel coronavirus from a man with pneumonia in Saudi Arabia. N Engl J Med 2012;367(19):1814–20.
[5]

Pallesen J, Wang N, Corbett KS, Wrapp D, Kirchdoerfer RN, Turner HL, et al. Immunogenicity and structures of a rationally designed prefusion MERS-CoV spike antigen. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2017;114(35):E7348–57.
[6]

Beigel JH, Voell J, Kumar P, Raviprakash K, Wu H, Jiao JA, et al. Safety and tolerability of a novel, polyclonal human anti-MERS coronavirus antibody produced from transchromosomic cattle: a phase 1 randomised, double-blind, single-dose-escalation study. Lancet Infect Dis 2018;18(4):410–8.
[7]

Van Boheemen S, De Graaf M, Lauber C, Bestebroer TM, Raj VS, Zaki AM, et al. Genomic characterization of a newly discovered coronavirus associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome in humans. MBio 2012;3(6):e00473–512.
[8]

Frey KG, Redden CL, Bishop-Lilly KA, Johnson R, Hensley LE, Raviprakash K, et al. Full-genome sequence of human betacoronavirus 2c Jordan-N3/2012 after serial passage in mammalian cells. Genome Announc 2014;2(3): e00324–414.
[9]

Chan JF, Lau SK, To KK, Cheng VC, Woo PC, Yuen KY. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: another zoonotic betacoronavirus causing SARS-like disease. Clin Microbiol Rev 2015;28(2):465–522.
[10]

Cotten M, Lam TT, Watson SJ, Palser AL, Petrova V, Grant P, et al. Full-genome deep sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of novel human betacoronavirus. Emerg Infect Dis 2013;19(5):736–42.
[11]

Widagdo W, Okba NMA, Stalin Raj V, Haagmans BL. MERS-coronavirus: from discovery to intervention. One Health 2016;3:11–6.
[12]

Li F, Li W, Farzan M, Harrison SC. Structure of SARS coronavirus spike receptorbinding domain complexed with receptor. Science 2005;309(5742):1864–8.
[13]

Du L, Kou Z, Ma C, Tao X, Wang L, Zhao G, et al. A truncated receptor-binding domain of MERS-CoV spike protein potently inhibits MERS-CoV infection and induces strong neutralizing antibody responses: implication for developing therapeutics and vaccines. PLoS One 2013;8(12):e81587.
[14]

Lu G, Hu Y, Wang Q, Qi J, Gao F, Li Y, et al. Molecular basis of binding between novel human coronavirus MERS-CoV and its receptor CD26. Nature 2013;500 (7461):227–31.
[15]

Ma C, Li Y, Wang L, Zhao G, Tao X, Tseng CT, et al. Intranasal vaccination with recombinant receptor-binding domain of MERS-CoV spike protein induces much stronger local mucosal immune responses than subcutaneous immunization: implication for designing novel mucosal MERS vaccines. Vaccine 2014;32(18):2100–8.
[16]

Mou H, Raj VS, Van Kuppeveld FJ, Rottier PJ, Haagmans BL, Bosch BJ. The receptor binding domain of the new Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus maps to a 231-residue region in the spike protein that efficiently elicits neutralizing antibodies. J Virol 2013;87(16):9379–83.
[17]

Lan J, Yao Y, Deng Y, Hu Y, Bao L, Huang B, et al. The recombinant N-terminal domain of spike proteins is a potential vaccine against Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) infection. Vaccine 2017;35(1):10–8.
[18]

Zumla A, Hui DS, Perlman S. Middle East respiratory syndrome. Lancet 2015;386(9997):995–1007.
[19]

Lu L, Liu Q, Zhu Y, Chan KH, Qin L, Li Y, et al. Structure-based discovery of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus fusion inhibitor. Nat Commun 2014;5:3067.
[20]

Millet JK, Whittaker GR. Host cell proteases: critical determinants of coronavirus tropism and pathogenesis. Virus Res 2015;202:120–34.
[21]

Lu G, Wang Q, Gao GF. Bat-to-human: spike features determining ‘‘host jump” of coronaviruses SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and beyond. Trends Microbiol 2015;23 (8):468–78.
[22]

Surya W, Li Y, Verdià-Bàguena C, Aguilella VM, Torres J. MERS coronavirus envelope protein has a single transmembrane domain that forms pentameric ion channels. Virus Res 2015;201:61–6.
[23]

Westerbeck JW, Machamer CE. A coronavirus E protein is present in two distinct pools with different effects on assembly and the secretory pathway. J Virol 2015;89(18):9313–23.
[24]

Xie Q, He X, Yang F, Liu X, Li Y, Liu Y, et al. Analysis of the genome sequence and prediction of B-cell epitopes of the envelope protein of Middle East respiratory syndrome-coronavirus. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform 2018;15(4):1344–50.
[25]

Liu J, Sun Y, Qi J, Chu F, Wu H, Gao F, et al. The membrane protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus acts as a dominant immunogen revealed by a clustering region of novel functionally and structurally defined cytotoxic T-lymphocyte epitopes. J Infect Dis 2010;202(8):1171–80.
[26]

De Haan CA, Rottier PJ. Molecular interactions in the assembly of coronaviruses. Adv Virus Res 2005;64:165–230.
[27]

Lin SC, Ho CT, Chuo WH, Li S, Wang TT, Lin CC. Effective inhibition of MERSCoV infection by resveratrol. BMC Infect Dis 2017;17(1):144.
[28]

Szelazek B, Kabala W, Kus K, Zdzalik M, Twarda-Clapa A, Golik P, et al. Structural characterization of human coronavirus NL63 N protein. J Virol 2017;91(11):e02503–16.
[29]

Hu Y, Li W, Gao T, Cui Y, Jin Y, Li P, et al. The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus nucleocapsid inhibits type I interferon production by interfering with TRIM25-mediated RIG-I ubiquitination. J Virol 2017;91(8): e02143–16.
[30]

Grunewald ME, Fehr AR, Athmer J, Perlman S. The coronavirus nucleocapsid protein is ADP-ribosylated. Virology 2018;517:62–8.
[31]

Papageorgiou N, Lichière J, Baklouti A, Ferron F, Sévajol M, Canard B, et al. Structural characterization of the N-terminal part of the MERS-CoV nucleocapsid by X-ray diffraction and small-angle X-ray scattering. Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol 2016;72(Pt 2):192–202.
[32]

Banda NK, Acharya S, Scheinman RI, Mehta G, Takahashi M, Endo Y, et al. Deconstructing the lectin pathway in the pathogenesis of experimental inflammatory arthritis: essential role of the lectin ficolin B and mannosebinding protein-associated serine protease 2. J Immunol 2017;199 (5):1835–45.
[33]

Bolwig GM, Bruder JT, Hearing P. Different binding site requirements for binding and activation for the bipartite enhancer factor EF-1A. Nucleic Acids Res 1992;20(24):6555–64.
[34]

Forni D, Cagliani R, Clerici M, Sironi M. Molecular evolution of human coronavirus genomes. Trends Microbiol 2017;25(1):35–48.
[35]

Menachery VD, Mitchell HD, Cockrell AS, Gralinski LE, Yount BL Jr, Graham RL, et al. MERS-CoV accessory ORFs play key role for infection and pathogenesis. MBio 2017;8(4):e00665–717.
[36]

Yang Y, Zhang L, Geng H, Deng Y, Huang B, Guo Y, et al. The structural and accessory proteins M, ORF 4a, ORF 4b, and ORF 5 of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) are potent interferon antagonists. Protein Cell 2013;4(12):951–61.
[37]

Thornbrough JM, Jha BK, Yount B, Goldstein SA, Li Y, Elliott R, et al. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus NS4b protein inhibits host RNase L activation. MBio 2016;7(2):e00258.
[38]

Rabouw HH, Langereis MA, Knaap RC, Dalebout TJ, Canton J, Sola I, et al. Middle East respiratory coronavirus accessory protein 4a inhibits PKR-mediated antiviral stress responses. PLoS Pathog 2016;12(10):e1005982.
[39]

Zumla A, Chan JF, Azhar EI, Hui DS, Yuen KY. Coronaviruses—drug discovery and therapeutic options. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2016;15(5):327–47.
[40]

Lei J, Kusov Y, Hilgenfeld R. Nsp3 of coronaviruses: structures and functions of a large multi-domain protein. Antiviral Res 2018;149:58–74.
[41]

Báez-Santos YM, St John SE, Mesecar AD. The SARS-coronavirus papain-like protease: structure, function and inhibition by designed antiviral compounds. Antiviral Res 2015;115:21–38.
[42]

Kankanamalage ACG, Kim Y, Damalanka VC, Rathnayake AD, Fehr AR, Mehzabeen N, et al. Structure-guided design of potent and permeable inhibitors of MERS coronavirus 3CL protease that utilize a piperidine moiety as a novel design element. Eur J Med Chem 2018;150:334–46.
[43]

Kandeel M, Altaher A. Synonymous and biased codon usage by MERS CoV papain-like and 3CL-proteases. Biol Pharm Bull 2017;40(7):1086–91.
[44]

Forni D, Cagliani R, Mozzi A, Pozzoli U, Al-Daghri N, Clerici M, et al. Extensive positive selection drives the evolution of nonstructural proteins in lineage C betacoronaviruses. J Virol 2016;90(7):3627–39.
[45]

Oudshoorn D, Rijs K, Limpens RWAL, Groen K, Koster AJ, Snijder EJ, et al. Expression and cleavage of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus nsp3-4 polyprotein induce the formation of double-membrane vesicles that mimic those associated with coronaviral RNA replication. MBio 2017;8(6): e01658–717.
[46]

Terada Y, Kawachi K, Matsuura Y, Kamitani W. MERS coronavirus nsp1 participates in an efficient propagation through a specific interaction with viral RNA. Virology 2017;511:95–105.
[47]

Zhang R, Li Y, Cowley TJ, Steinbrenner AD, Phillips JM, Yount BL, et al. The nsp1, nsp13, and M proteins contribute to the hepatotropism of murine coronavirus JHM.WU. J Virol 2015;89(7):3598–609.
[48]

Adedeji AO, Lazarus H. Biochemical characterization of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus helicase. mSphere 2016;1(5):e00235–316.
[49]

Kindler E, Gil-Cruz C, Spanier J, Li Y, Wilhelm J, Rabouw HH, et al. Early endonuclease-mediated evasion of RNA sensing ensures efficient coronavirus replication. PLoS Pathog 2017;13(2):e1006195.
[50]

Deng X, HackbartM,Mettelman RC, O’Brien A,Mielech AM, Yi G, et al. Coronavirus nonstructural protein 15 mediates evasion of dsRNA sensors and limits apoptosis in macrophages. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2017;114(21):E4251–60.
[51]

Aouadi W, Blanjoie A, Vasseur JJ, Debart F, Canard B, Decroly E. Binding of the methyl donor S-adenosyl-I-methionine to Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus 20 -O-methyltransferase nsp16 promotes recruitment of the allosteric activator nsp10. J Virol 2017;91(5):e02217–316.
[52]

Angelini MM, Akhlaghpour M, Neuman BW, Buchmeier MJ. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus nonstructural proteins 3, 4, and 6 induce double-membrane vesicles. MBio 2013;4(4):e00524–613.
[53]

Menachery VD, Gralinski LE, Mitchell HD, Dinnon KH 3rd, Leist SR, Yount BL Jr, et al. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus nonstructural protein 16 is necessary for interferon resistance and viral pathogenesis. mSphere 2017;2 (6):e00346–417.
[54]

Alfuwaires M, Altaher A, Kandeel M. Molecular dynamic studies of interferon and innate immunity resistance in MERS CoV Non-Structural Protein 3. Biol Pharm Bull 2017;40(3):345–51.
[55]

Huang YP, Cho CC, Chang CF, Hsu CH. NMR assignments of the macro domain from Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV). Biomol NMR Assign 2016;10(2):245–8.
[56]

Phua KKL, Liu Y, Sim SH. Non-linear enhancement of mRNA delivery efficiencies by influenza A derived NS1 protein engendering host gene inhibition property. Biomaterials 2017;133:29–36.
[57]

Qian W, Wei X, Guo K, Li Y, Lin X, Zou Z, et al. The C-terminal effector domain of non-structural protein 1 of influenza A virus blocks IFN-b production by targeting TNF receptor-associated factor 3. Front Immunol 2017;8:779.
[58]

Kuo RL, Li LH, Lin SJ, Li ZH, Chen GW, Chang CK, et al. Role of N terminustruncated NS1 proteins of influenza A virus in inhibiting IRF3 activation. J Virol 2016;90(9):4696–705.
[59]

Schierhorn KL, Jolmes F, Bespalowa J, Saenger S, Peteranderl C, Dzieciolowski J, et al. Influenza a virus virulence depends on two amino acids in the N-terminal domain of its NS1 protein to facilitate inhibition of the RNA-dependent protein kinase PKR. J Virol 2017;91(10):e00198–217.
[60]

Lokugamage KG, Narayanan K, Nakagawa K, Terasaki K, Ramirez SI, Tseng CT, et al. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus nsp1 inhibits host gene expression by selectively targeting mRNAs transcribed in the nucleus while sparing mRNAs of cytoplasmic origin. J Virol 2015;89(21):10970–81.
[61]

Peters HL, Jochmans D, de Wilde AH, Posthuma CC, Snijder EJ, Neyts J, et al. Design, synthesis and evaluation of a series of acyclic fleximer nucleoside analogues with anti-coronavirus activity. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2015;25 (15):2923–6.
[62]

Dyall J, Coleman CM, Hart BJ, Venkataraman T, Holbrook MR, Kindrachuk J, et al. Repurposing of clinically developed drugs for treatment of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014;58(8):4885–93.
[63]

De Wilde AH, Raj VS, Oudshoorn D, Bestebroer TM, Van Nieuwkoop S, Limpens RW, et al. MERS-coronavirus replication induces severe in vitro cytopathology and is strongly inhibited by cyclosporin A or interferon-a treatment. J Gen Virol 2013;94(Pt 8):1749–60.
[64]

Mustafa S, Balkhy H, Gabere MN. Current treatment options and the role of peptides as potential therapeutic components for Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS): a review. J Infect Public Health 2018;11(1):9–17.
[65]

Kim YS, Son A, Kim J, Kwon SB, Kim MH, Kim P, et al. Chaperna-mediated assembly of ferritin-based Middle East respiratory syndrome-coronavirus nanoparticles. Front Immunol 2018;9:1093.
[66]

Corti D, Passini N, Lanzavecchia A, Zambon M. Rapid generation of a human monoclonal antibody to combat Middle East respiratory syndrome. J Infect Public Health 2016;9(3):231–5.
[67]

Tang XC, Agnihothram SS, Jiao Y, Stanhope J, Graham RL, Peterson EC, et al. Identification of human neutralizing antibodies against MERS-CoV and their role in virus adaptive evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014;111(19): E2018–26.
[68]

Jiang L, Wang N, Zuo T, Shi X, Poon KM, Wu Y, et al. Potent neutralization of MERS-CoV by human neutralizing monoclonal antibodies to the viral spike glycoprotein. Sci Transl Med 2014;6(234):234ra59.
[69]

Niu P, Zhang S, Zhou P, Huang B, Deng Y, Qin K, et al. Ultrapotent human neutralizing antibody repertoires against Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus from a recovered patient. J Infect Dis 2018;218(8):1249–60.
[70]

Pascal KE, Coleman CM, Mujica AO, Kamat V, Badithe A, Fairhurst J, et al. Preand postexposure efficacy of fully human antibodies against Spike protein in a novel humanized mouse model of MERS-CoV infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2015;112(28):8738–43.
[71]

De Wit E, Feldmann F, Okumura A, Horne E, Haddock E, Saturday G, et al. Prophylactic and therapeutic efficacy of mAb treatment against MERS-CoV in common marmosets. Antiviral Res 2018;156:64–71.
[72]

Du L, Zhao G, Yang Y, Qiu H, Wang L, Kou Z, et al. A conformation-dependent neutralizing monoclonal antibody specifically targeting receptor-binding domain in Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein. J Virol 2014;88(12):7045–53.
[73]

Rabaan AA, Alahmed SH, Bazzi AM, Alhani HM. A review of candidate therapies for Middle East respiratory syndrome from a molecular perspective. J Med Microbiol 2017;66(9):1261–74.
[74]

Qiu H, Sun S, Xiao H, Feng J, Guo Y, Tai W, et al. Single-dose treatment with a humanized neutralizing antibody affords full protection of a human transgenic mouse model from lethal Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS)- coronavirus infection. Antiviral Res 2016;132:141–8.
[75]

Li Y, Wan Y, Liu P, Zhao J, Lu G, Qi J, et al. A humanized neutralizing antibody against MERS-CoV targeting the receptor-binding domain of the spike protein. Cell Res 2015;25(11):1237–49.
[76]

Zhang N, Channappanavar R, Ma C, Wang L, Tang J, Garron T, et al. Identification of an ideal adjuvant for receptor-binding domain-based subunit vaccines against Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Cell Mol Immunol 2016;13(2):180–90.
[77]

Wang L, Shi W, Joyce MG, Modjarrad K, Zhang Y, Leung K, et al. Evaluation of candidate vaccine approaches for MERS-CoV. Nat Commun 2015;6:7712.
[78]

Shirato K, Kawase M, Matsuyama S. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection mediated by the transmembrane serine protease TMPRSS2. J Virol 2013;87(23):12552–61.
[79]

Gierer S, Bertram S, Kaup F, Wrensch F, Heurich A, Krämer-Kühl A, et al. The spike protein of the emerging betacoronavirus EMC uses a novel coronavirus receptor for entry, can be activated by TMPRSS2, and is targeted by neutralizing antibodies. J Virol 2013;87(10):5502–11.
[80]

Millet JK, Whittaker GR. Host cell entry of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus after two-step, furin-mediated activation of the spike protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014;111(42):15214–9.
[81]

Coleman CM, Sisk JM, Mingo RM, Nelson EA, White JM, Frieman MB. Abelson kinase inhibitors are potent inhibitors of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus fusion. J Virol 2016;90(19):8924–33.
[82]

Wrensch F, Winkler M, Pöhlmann S. IFITM proteins inhibit entry driven by the MERS-coronavirus spike protein: evidence for cholesterol-independent mechanisms. Viruses 2014;6(9):3683–98.
[83]

Liu S, Wu S, Jiang S. HIV entry inhibitors targeting gp41: from polypeptides to small-molecule compounds. Curr Pharm Des 2007;13 (2):143–62.
[84]

Fehr AR, Perlman S. Coronaviruses: an overview of their replication and pathogenesis. Methods Mol Biol 2015;1282:1–23.
[85]

Kirchdoerfer RN, Cottrell CA, Wang N, Pallesen J, Yassine HM, Turner HL, et al. Pre-fusion structure of a human coronavirus spike protein. Nature 2016;531 (7592):118–21.
[86]

Walls AC, Tortorici MA, Frenz B, Snijder J, Li W, Rey FA, et al. Glycan shield and epitope masking of a coronavirus spike protein observed by cryo-electron microscopy. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2016;23(10): 899–905.
[87]

Walls A, Tortorici MA, Bosch BJ, Frenz B, Rottier PJ, DiMaio F, et al. Crucial steps in the structure determination of a coronavirus spike glycoprotein using cryoelectron microscopy. Protein Sci 2017;26(1):113–21.
[88]

Gao X, Zhou H, Wu C, Xiao Y, Ren L, Paranhos-Baccalà G, et al. Antibody against nucleocapsid protein predicts susceptibility to human coronavirus infection. J Infect 2015;71(5):599–602.
[89]

Yamaoka Y, Matsuyama S, Fukushi S, Matsunaga S, Matsushima Y, Kuroyama H, et al. Development of monoclonal antibody and diagnostic test for Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus using cell-free synthesized nucleocapsid antigen. Front Microbiol 2016;7:50.

Funding

()

PDF (441KB)

7576

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail
Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉