Core Outcome Set for Clinical Trials on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COS-COVID)

Xinyao Jin, Bo Pang, Junhua Zhang, Qingquan Liu, Zhongqi Yang, Jihong Feng, Xuezheng Liu, Lei Zhang, Baohe Wang, Yuhong Huang, Alice Josephine Fauci, Yuling Ma, Myeong Soo Lee, Wei’an Yuan, Yanming Xie, Jianyuan Tang, Rui Gao, Liang Du, Shuo Zhang, Hanmei Qi, Yu Sun, Wenke Zheng, Fengwen Yang, Huizi Chua, Keyi Wang, Yi Ou, Ming Huang, Yan Zhu, Jiajie Yu, Jinhui Tian, Min Zhao, Jingqing Hu, Chen Yao, Youping Li, Boli Zhang

Engineering ›› 2020, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (10) : 1147-1152.

PDF(316 KB)
PDF(316 KB)
Engineering ›› 2020, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (10) : 1147-1152. DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2020.03.002
Research
Article

Core Outcome Set for Clinical Trials on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COS-COVID)

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Since its outbreak in December 2019, a series of clinical trials on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been registered or carried out. However, the significant heterogeneity and less critical outcomes of such trials may be leading to a waste of research resources. This study aimed to develop a core outcome set (COS) for clinical trials on COVID-19 in order to tackle the outcome issues. The study was conducted according to the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) Handbook: Version 1.0, a guideline for COS development. A research group was set up that included experts in respiratory and critical medicine, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), evidence-based medicine, clinical pharmacology, and statistics, in addition to medical journal editors. Clinical trial registry websites (www.chictr.org.cn and clinicaltrials.gov) were searched to retrieve clinical trial protocols and outcomes in order to form an outcome pool. A total of 78 clinical trial protocols on COVID-19 were included and 259 outcomes were collected. After standardization, 132 outcomes were identified within seven different categories, of which 58 were selected to develop a preliminary outcome list for further consensus. After two rounds of Delphi survey and one consensus meeting, the most important outcomes for the different clinical classifications of COVID-19 were identified and determined to constitute the COS for clinical trials on COVID-19 (COS-COVID). The COS-COVID includes one outcome for the mild type (time to 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) negativity), four outcomes for the ordinary type (length of hospital stay, composite events, score of clinical symptoms, and time to 2019-nCoV RT-PCR negativity), five outcomes for the severe type (composite events, length of hospital stay, arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), duration of mechanical ventilation, and time to 2019-nCoV RT-PCR negativity), one outcome for critical type (all-cause mortality), and one outcome for rehabilitation period (pulmonary function). The COS-COVID is currently the most valuable and practical clinical outcome set for the evaluation of intervention effect, and is useful for evidence assessment and decision-making. With a deepening understanding of COVID-19 and application feedback, the COS-COVID should be continuously updated.

Keywords

Novel coronavirus pneumonia / Core outcome set / COVID-19 / 2019-nCoV / Coronavirus disease / Clinical trials

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xinyao Jin, Bo Pang, Junhua Zhang, Qingquan Liu, Zhongqi Yang, Jihong Feng, Xuezheng Liu, Lei Zhang, Baohe Wang, Yuhong Huang, Alice Josephine Fauci, Yuling Ma, Myeong Soo Lee, Wei’an Yuan, Yanming Xie, Jianyuan Tang, Rui Gao, Liang Du, Shuo Zhang, Hanmei Qi, Yu Sun, Wenke Zheng, Fengwen Yang, Huizi Chua, Keyi Wang, Yi Ou, Ming Huang, Yan Zhu, Jiajie Yu, Jinhui Tian, Min Zhao, Jingqing Hu, Chen Yao, Youping Li, Boli Zhang. Core Outcome Set for Clinical Trials on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COS-COVID). Engineering, 2020, 6(10): 1147‒1152 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2020.03.002

References

[1]
Sinha IP, Gallagher R, Williamson PR, Smyth RL. Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials in childhood asthma: a survey of clinicians, parents, and young people. Trials 2012;13(1):103.
[2]
Williamson PR, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M, Gargon E. Driving up the quality and relevance of research through the use of agreed core outcomes. J Health Serv Res Policy 2012;17(1):1–2.
[3]
Xing DM, Zhang JH, Zhang BL. Approach to developing core outcome sets for clinical trials of traditional Chinese medicine. Chin J Tradit Chin Med Pharm 2014;29(5):1352–5.
[4]
Williamson PR, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M, Devane D, Gargon E, et al. Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider. Trials 2012;13(1):132.
[5]
Williamson PR, Altman DG, Bagley H, Barnes KL, Blazeby JM, Brookes ST, et al. The COMET handbook: version 1.0. Trials 2017;18(Suppl 3):280.
[6]
Kirkham JJ, Davis K, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M, Tunis S, et al. Core outcome set-standards for development: the COS-STAD recommendations. PLoS Med 2017;14(11):e1002447.
[7]
Kirkham JJ, Gorst S, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M, Devane D, et al. Core outcome set-standards for reporting: the COS-STAR statement. PLoS Med 2016;13(10):e1002148.
[8]
Kirkham JJ, Gorst S, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M, Tunis S, et al. Core outcome set-standardised protocol items: the COS-STAP statement. Trials 2019;20(1):116.
[9]
National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China, National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Diagnosis and treatment protocol for novel coronavirus pneumonia (trial version 5). Beijing: The State Council of the People’s Republic of China; 2020 Feb 18 [cited 2020 Mar 1]. Available from: http://www.nhc.gov.cn/yzygj/s7653p/202002/ 8334a8326dd94d329df351d7da8aefc2/files/b218cfeb1bc54639af227f922bf6b 817.pdf. Chinese.
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(316 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/